Years of tea staining teeth, a lack of interest in the orthodontics industry, high-sugar diets, and a fetish by their women for men that look like Churchill
This is not true in the slightest. After a few generations of the mixing pot Americans today only remember the most exotic, distinct or socially advantageous distant foreign family members. This is why all Americans are 1/76 native, but also Irish, Italian, German or whatever one off distant relation with a nationality other than "English" or "American." There are a few areas where specific nationalities moved in to areas in higher numbers but they were almost always outnumbered by the Anglos already there.
Yes but because American ancestry is all self reported, Anglo Americans name a single foreign ancestor and assume their entire ancestry is all from that same ethnic group. Irish-Americans, Italian-Americans, etc, etc. There people are 80% English and 20% something else thrown in. When they fill in a survey they name the 20% because it is more exotic than saying Anglo or they’re ignorant of their actual ancestry.
Anonymous says:
can you substantiate any of that? it seems to me that it’s more likely for most burgers to be descended from the late 19th-early 20th century immigrant laborer wave than from the original settlers, a comparably small group of people. and how do you account for the fact that most americans don’t have anglo last names?
Anonymous says:
>1980, 21% of Americans claim English ancestry, nearly 50 million people >1990, 13% of Americans claim English ancestry (15% claimed Irish ancestry this year too lmao) > 2000, 8.7% of Americans claim English ancestry >2010, 9% of Americans claim English ancestry >2015, 7.8% of Americans claim English ancestry >2020, 7.7% of Americans claim English ancestry, only 25 million people.
Americans have been forgetting English heritage since 1776 despite being the single largest ethnic group at the time of independence. Being the dominant culture/ethnic group made English culturally invisible in the same way people today can’t see their own culture. At the same time the foundation mythos of the USA is anti-English, this made the adoption of foreign ethnicities like Irish and Scottish appealing. This is how you get absurd situations like how the majority of Irish-Americans aren’t even Catholic. Or even something as obvious as the lack of linguistic impact. If the majority of Americans couldn’t speak English, why don’t more Americans speak German or Italian? Could it be that these massive waves of immigrants were forced to live alongside even larger numbers of English speakers and adopt their language? Where is the Germano-Italian creole? Why doesn’t American English have more words of German or Italian origin?
It’s all a little absurd if you think about it. The apparent overwhelming German immigration resulted in… parts of the USA having funny accents?!?!
Anonymous says:
even the highest figure is still a minority of american whites so what’s your point? i already acknowledged the fact that anglos are the largest single ethnic group in the US, that doesn’t change the fact that the MAJORITY of US whites aren’t anglos
Anonymous says:
My point is that the majority of Americans are Anglos LARPing as something else. No one seriously believes 25 million people just… didn’t reproduce and died in 40 years. It is ridiculous. Even if we accepted that 25 million Anglo-Americans discovered ancestry outside of England such knowledge doesn’t change the fact that they are still majority or at least partially Anglo yes? This confirms that Americans prefer to state or claim non-English heritage. All this is only in a 40 year period at the tail end of decades of positive UK-US relations. The fact is Americans have been trying to differentiate themselves from the English ever since 1776 and claiming to be part of a non-English ethnic group has been the easiest method to do this.
Again I ask you, why have none of the foreign languages that came with all these people impacted American English? If Anglos were not a majority of people why did everyone adopt their language? The answer is because Anglos were always the majority, a few million Germans or Italians migrating to an area aren’t going to seriously change the demographics of the 15 million Anglos already living there. The reason why they adopted English so quickly was because 9/10 people around them were speaking it. Each yeah the number of Anglo-Americans got lower and the number of German-Americans got higher because they were assimilated and intermarried with the Anglos. Instead of just being "American" they became "German-American."
This isn’t rocket science.
Anonymous says:
>No one seriously believes 25 million people just… didn’t reproduce and died in 40 years
anon the US is a country of 330 million people. even if you take out the non whites, 25 million is still a minority. hell, 50 million is still a minority.
>Again I ask you, why have none of the foreign languages that came with all these people impacted American English?
they have. you ever been to the US? there’s like a dozen dialects of american english, and even in its most "neutral" form we still use loan words from all over europe in our daily speech
Anonymous says:
You’re missing my point. If 50 million Americans claim they have English ancestry in 1980, why do only 25 million claim the same in 2020? This is just the end result of hundreds of years of selecting "X"-American over English-American or just plain old American.
>dialects of American English
Not significant enough to account for a hypothetical migration of people in numbers greater than the local Anglo inhabitants.
Anonymous says:
man i keep telling you i’m not disputing that it’s a large ethnic group here but the fact remains that all of the non-anglos put together outnumber the anglos. average joe-blow american isn’t english
>Not significant enough to account for a hypothetical migration of people in numbers greater than the local Anglo inhabitants.
historically speaking european immigrants assimilated very well into american culture. the wave of immigrant laborers i referred to earlier readily abandoned their languages and customs and even accepted changes to their last names to anglicize them. there was a big cultural push in the early 1900s, largely motivated by the necessities of WW1, to form a unified american identity in which one’s ethnic heritage was of secondary importance
Anonymous says:
You must not be very clever. If Anglo-American is being constantly subsumed and mixed with other ethnic groups that doesn’t actually make the Anglo-American heritage disappear. It just means you have Anglo-Americans with a small percentage of Irish or Italian mixture. That they call themselves Italian/Irish/German-Americans does not make it so. They’re still predominantly Anglo. Every time an Anglo-American (or anyone calling themselves American as they’re likely Anglo-American) intermarried with an X-American, the number of Anglo-Americans on these self reported censuses goes down and the reverse is true for X-Americans. The fact is Anglo-Americans were always the predominant ethnic group and regardless of what X-Americans call themselves, they’re still mostly Anglos with a mixture of whatever.
Europeans intergrated well because there was no other option but to intergrate. The incoming migrants were still heavily outnumbered by Anglo-Americans. If the number of incoming people was as high as to completely outnumber the Americans already living there they wouldn’t have adopted English regardless of how much pressure Anglo-Americans put on them because they wouldn’t need English to get by. They could just use their native languages with all the other immigrants who you believe outnumbered the local people completely. You’d have seen what we see today in areas where migrants don’t need to adopt the local language to survive because the enclave of their countrymen is large enough to survive for generations.
Anonymous says:
>If the number of incoming people was as high as to completely outnumber the Americans already living there they wouldn’t have adopted English regardless of how much pressure Anglo-Americans put on them
you underestimate how powerful the WASP used to be in this country. a minority can easily retain control over a much larger group so long as they have a wildly disproportionate amount of money and property. you either assimilated or you didn’t work.
latin american migrants don’t assimilate these days because power is no longer centralized along ethnic lines and the powers that be don’t care whether or not they assimilate so long as they work for low wages
Anonymous says:
>no you see the minority population that was outnumbered by this huge margin was actually puppet masters able to coerce 80% of the population to adopt their culture…
Anonymous says:
yeah? it’s a pretty common thing. apartheid, sunni rule in iraq, shia rule in syria. i dunno why you say it like it’s implausible when it’s a well documented phenomenon that happens all the time all over the world
Anonymous says:
Take a second to think about your answer. Particularly the state of the countries you’ve given as your counter argument. Even Islamic conquest Arabization was a process that took centuries, required countless revolts and massacres and to this day has still failed to completely remove all the native languages of the subjugated people.
Anonymous says:
anglos didn’t have to conquer the european migrants because they came of their own volition, often to escape extreme hardship that made life as a second class citizen in the states seem desirable. and it’s not like they gave up EVERY vestige of their cultures. most american families retain a few old-world traditions, however bastardized
Anonymous says:
I’m Welsh mixed with Indian feather-not-dot. The eternal Anglo, I am not.
Anonymous says:
Germans were the biggest ethnic group to ever immigrate here, most of the country is definitely not anglo, even though most of the cultural influence is anglo
>american >le white germanic anchestors
Saw a documentary about Brazil and Bolsonaro shills there, claiming to be white.
Laughed because even Bolsonaro would be a turk or gypsy in central europe.
I guess pic related is true for north and south America.
the only americans who care about eurofags are commies. regular people do not think of you at all.
Anonymous says:
Americans have become obsessed with the "melting pot" idea (created by hebrews btw). The idea that you can be a proud American doesn’t not exist to these creatures. Even the idea of being a singlular ethnicity is anathema to them. They aren’t Americans but Irish-Americans with a dash of Cherokee and a sprinkle of Scottish, German, Italian or Greek! If they’re feeling particularly open minded they might even be part African-American, through a distant cousin twice removed side of the family. Ask any American about their family and you will see them jump at the opportunity to explain how their family is blessed with a mixture of people from all over the world. Americans collect ancestry like an zoomer collects funko pops, each one meaningless beyond the dopamine rush of acquiring it.
How is any of their ancestry relevant? It isn’t because despite being able to name all the flags their bloodline has collected over the years, they are still predominantly English. Tell an American that the majority of their ancestors are English and watch as it recoils in pain. The horror of being something as mundane as an English man causes great pain and distress. >b-but my great-great aunties son married a girl whose great grandmother was German…
The American might say in a desperate attempt to recover some semblance of dignity. Little does he know that the grandmother in question married an American of English stock and whose children did the same.
They sent both most of their crazy religious nuts and genetically attractive population abroad. Leaving behind only those too poor or powerfully vested in it. The ugly bongs are the descendants of the former.
>Let’s not change the subject, please
let’s not mutilate penises please. then maybe you’d have a "leg" to stand on haha. ha. property of the hebrew should shut up
cheese
(Wensleydale)
Years of tea staining teeth, a lack of interest in the orthodontics industry, high-sugar diets, and a fetish by their women for men that look like Churchill
I’d rather Churchill than a mutilated cock done by a hebrew
>Why are you obsessed with male genitals, circumcision and hebrews?
>allows another person to touch your weewee
HOMOSEXUAL
I find it funny how americans always pretend they aren’t anglos for whatever reason.
most of us aren’t
This is not true in the slightest. After a few generations of the mixing pot Americans today only remember the most exotic, distinct or socially advantageous distant foreign family members. This is why all Americans are 1/76 native, but also Irish, Italian, German or whatever one off distant relation with a nationality other than "English" or "American." There are a few areas where specific nationalities moved in to areas in higher numbers but they were almost always outnumbered by the Anglos already there.
anglos are the largest single ethnic group among white americans, but the majority of white americans aren’t anglos.
Yes but because American ancestry is all self reported, Anglo Americans name a single foreign ancestor and assume their entire ancestry is all from that same ethnic group. Irish-Americans, Italian-Americans, etc, etc. There people are 80% English and 20% something else thrown in. When they fill in a survey they name the 20% because it is more exotic than saying Anglo or they’re ignorant of their actual ancestry.
can you substantiate any of that? it seems to me that it’s more likely for most burgers to be descended from the late 19th-early 20th century immigrant laborer wave than from the original settlers, a comparably small group of people. and how do you account for the fact that most americans don’t have anglo last names?
>1980, 21% of Americans claim English ancestry, nearly 50 million people
>1990, 13% of Americans claim English ancestry (15% claimed Irish ancestry this year too lmao)
> 2000, 8.7% of Americans claim English ancestry
>2010, 9% of Americans claim English ancestry
>2015, 7.8% of Americans claim English ancestry
>2020, 7.7% of Americans claim English ancestry, only 25 million people.
Americans have been forgetting English heritage since 1776 despite being the single largest ethnic group at the time of independence. Being the dominant culture/ethnic group made English culturally invisible in the same way people today can’t see their own culture. At the same time the foundation mythos of the USA is anti-English, this made the adoption of foreign ethnicities like Irish and Scottish appealing. This is how you get absurd situations like how the majority of Irish-Americans aren’t even Catholic. Or even something as obvious as the lack of linguistic impact. If the majority of Americans couldn’t speak English, why don’t more Americans speak German or Italian? Could it be that these massive waves of immigrants were forced to live alongside even larger numbers of English speakers and adopt their language? Where is the Germano-Italian creole? Why doesn’t American English have more words of German or Italian origin?
It’s all a little absurd if you think about it. The apparent overwhelming German immigration resulted in… parts of the USA having funny accents?!?!
even the highest figure is still a minority of american whites so what’s your point? i already acknowledged the fact that anglos are the largest single ethnic group in the US, that doesn’t change the fact that the MAJORITY of US whites aren’t anglos
My point is that the majority of Americans are Anglos LARPing as something else. No one seriously believes 25 million people just… didn’t reproduce and died in 40 years. It is ridiculous. Even if we accepted that 25 million Anglo-Americans discovered ancestry outside of England such knowledge doesn’t change the fact that they are still majority or at least partially Anglo yes? This confirms that Americans prefer to state or claim non-English heritage. All this is only in a 40 year period at the tail end of decades of positive UK-US relations. The fact is Americans have been trying to differentiate themselves from the English ever since 1776 and claiming to be part of a non-English ethnic group has been the easiest method to do this.
Again I ask you, why have none of the foreign languages that came with all these people impacted American English? If Anglos were not a majority of people why did everyone adopt their language? The answer is because Anglos were always the majority, a few million Germans or Italians migrating to an area aren’t going to seriously change the demographics of the 15 million Anglos already living there. The reason why they adopted English so quickly was because 9/10 people around them were speaking it. Each yeah the number of Anglo-Americans got lower and the number of German-Americans got higher because they were assimilated and intermarried with the Anglos. Instead of just being "American" they became "German-American."
This isn’t rocket science.
>No one seriously believes 25 million people just… didn’t reproduce and died in 40 years
anon the US is a country of 330 million people. even if you take out the non whites, 25 million is still a minority. hell, 50 million is still a minority.
>Again I ask you, why have none of the foreign languages that came with all these people impacted American English?
they have. you ever been to the US? there’s like a dozen dialects of american english, and even in its most "neutral" form we still use loan words from all over europe in our daily speech
You’re missing my point. If 50 million Americans claim they have English ancestry in 1980, why do only 25 million claim the same in 2020? This is just the end result of hundreds of years of selecting "X"-American over English-American or just plain old American.
>dialects of American English
Not significant enough to account for a hypothetical migration of people in numbers greater than the local Anglo inhabitants.
man i keep telling you i’m not disputing that it’s a large ethnic group here but the fact remains that all of the non-anglos put together outnumber the anglos. average joe-blow american isn’t english
>Not significant enough to account for a hypothetical migration of people in numbers greater than the local Anglo inhabitants.
historically speaking european immigrants assimilated very well into american culture. the wave of immigrant laborers i referred to earlier readily abandoned their languages and customs and even accepted changes to their last names to anglicize them. there was a big cultural push in the early 1900s, largely motivated by the necessities of WW1, to form a unified american identity in which one’s ethnic heritage was of secondary importance
You must not be very clever. If Anglo-American is being constantly subsumed and mixed with other ethnic groups that doesn’t actually make the Anglo-American heritage disappear. It just means you have Anglo-Americans with a small percentage of Irish or Italian mixture. That they call themselves Italian/Irish/German-Americans does not make it so. They’re still predominantly Anglo. Every time an Anglo-American (or anyone calling themselves American as they’re likely Anglo-American) intermarried with an X-American, the number of Anglo-Americans on these self reported censuses goes down and the reverse is true for X-Americans. The fact is Anglo-Americans were always the predominant ethnic group and regardless of what X-Americans call themselves, they’re still mostly Anglos with a mixture of whatever.
Europeans intergrated well because there was no other option but to intergrate. The incoming migrants were still heavily outnumbered by Anglo-Americans. If the number of incoming people was as high as to completely outnumber the Americans already living there they wouldn’t have adopted English regardless of how much pressure Anglo-Americans put on them because they wouldn’t need English to get by. They could just use their native languages with all the other immigrants who you believe outnumbered the local people completely. You’d have seen what we see today in areas where migrants don’t need to adopt the local language to survive because the enclave of their countrymen is large enough to survive for generations.
>If the number of incoming people was as high as to completely outnumber the Americans already living there they wouldn’t have adopted English regardless of how much pressure Anglo-Americans put on them
you underestimate how powerful the WASP used to be in this country. a minority can easily retain control over a much larger group so long as they have a wildly disproportionate amount of money and property. you either assimilated or you didn’t work.
latin american migrants don’t assimilate these days because power is no longer centralized along ethnic lines and the powers that be don’t care whether or not they assimilate so long as they work for low wages
>no you see the minority population that was outnumbered by this huge margin was actually puppet masters able to coerce 80% of the population to adopt their culture…
yeah? it’s a pretty common thing. apartheid, sunni rule in iraq, shia rule in syria. i dunno why you say it like it’s implausible when it’s a well documented phenomenon that happens all the time all over the world
Take a second to think about your answer. Particularly the state of the countries you’ve given as your counter argument. Even Islamic conquest Arabization was a process that took centuries, required countless revolts and massacres and to this day has still failed to completely remove all the native languages of the subjugated people.
anglos didn’t have to conquer the european migrants because they came of their own volition, often to escape extreme hardship that made life as a second class citizen in the states seem desirable. and it’s not like they gave up EVERY vestige of their cultures. most american families retain a few old-world traditions, however bastardized
I’m Welsh mixed with Indian feather-not-dot. The eternal Anglo, I am not.
Germans were the biggest ethnic group to ever immigrate here, most of the country is definitely not anglo, even though most of the cultural influence is anglo
I’m mainland Euro lmao
>american
>le white germanic anchestors
Saw a documentary about Brazil and Bolsonaro shills there, claiming to be white.
Laughed because even Bolsonaro would be a turk or gypsy in central europe.
I guess pic related is true for north and south America.
why are you so obsessed with america, eurofag? we dont think about you at all but you cant our cock out of your mouth
But americans are obsessed with europeans
the only americans who care about eurofags are commies. regular people do not think of you at all.
Americans have become obsessed with the "melting pot" idea (created by hebrews btw). The idea that you can be a proud American doesn’t not exist to these creatures. Even the idea of being a singlular ethnicity is anathema to them. They aren’t Americans but Irish-Americans with a dash of Cherokee and a sprinkle of Scottish, German, Italian or Greek! If they’re feeling particularly open minded they might even be part African-American, through a distant cousin twice removed side of the family. Ask any American about their family and you will see them jump at the opportunity to explain how their family is blessed with a mixture of people from all over the world. Americans collect ancestry like an zoomer collects funko pops, each one meaningless beyond the dopamine rush of acquiring it.
How is any of their ancestry relevant? It isn’t because despite being able to name all the flags their bloodline has collected over the years, they are still predominantly English. Tell an American that the majority of their ancestors are English and watch as it recoils in pain. The horror of being something as mundane as an English man causes great pain and distress.
>b-but my great-great aunties son married a girl whose great grandmother was German…
The American might say in a desperate attempt to recover some semblance of dignity. Little does he know that the grandmother in question married an American of English stock and whose children did the same.
They sent both most of their crazy religious nuts and genetically attractive population abroad. Leaving behind only those too poor or powerfully vested in it. The ugly bongs are the descendants of the former.
have you SEEN the average American lmao?
They’re in denial
That’s nice. Let’s not change the subject, please
>Let’s not change the subject, please
let’s not mutilate penises please. then maybe you’d have a "leg" to stand on haha. ha. property of the hebrew should shut up
Ok schizo
good boy.
Inbreeding
>anglo anglo anglo anglo anglo anglo anglo anglo anglo anglo anglo anglo anglo anglo
ENGLISH
heck
shut up you filthy anglo