>preach that the election was stolen 24/7
>every single anchor did NOT believe it
>lure your viewers into a federal sting operation
lmfao, how will magats spin this one? Faux News lied for profit, and a couple hundred viewers are going to spend a decade behind bars because of it
https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/news/sean-hannity-maria-bartiromo-jeanine-pirro-top-tv-stars-tipped-to-be-fired-in-rupert-murdoch-blood-sacrifice-over-fox-news-election-lies-scandal/ar-AA188wAk?ocid=msedgntp&cvid
>preach that the election was stolen 24/7
When did Fox News make this claim?
from about August '20 (when mail in voting began) up until '22 when AZ went blue
Can you cite a specific example? Or share a video link?
This is a major story and this lawsuit has been around for a while, so it should be fairly easy to provide a clear example of a Fox News agent stating that the election was stolen.
do you think I am lying?
not only did Murdock admit to it, he said they only went along with it (stolen election narrative) because they didn't want to lose viewership to NewsMax
cope and seethe all you want
>do you think I am lying?
I think you are mistaken. I don't know whether or not you are lying.
If Fox News was claiming (24/7 as you say) that the election was stolen, then it should be very easy to provide an example of that.
how easy exactly? I don't have 365 daily episodes of Tucker Carlson Tonight or Hanity archived. if you read up on the law suit, the whole thing is centered around Fox pushing the stolen election narrative.
it's rather sad in all honesty
>how easy exactly? I don't have 365 daily episodes of Tucker Carlson Tonight or Hanity archived.
If it was being pushed 24/7 as OP claims, then you should be able to just pick an episode at random and skim through until they start talking about the election.
>if you read up on the law suit, the whole thing is centered around Fox pushing the stolen election narrative.
It's centered around Fox News "platforming" people who allegedly made false statements, or not airing fact checks that Dominion sent them, or implying that there were questionable aspects to how the election was conducted, and other nebulous bullshit.
Not that Fox News or its agents stated that the election was stolen.
>it's rather sad in all honesty
Indeed.
>do you think I am lying?
>not only did Murdock admit to it, he said they only went along with it (stolen election narrative) because they didn't want to lose viewership to NewsMax
>cope and seethe all you want
If you make the claim and can't site a single example, I think you're lying your ass off. Put up or shut up, bitch.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2023/03/03/fox-punished-journalists-dominion-lawsuit/
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/03/02/media/rupert-murdoch-fox-news-reliable-sources/index.html
>washintonpost: internal documents show
paywalled, irrelevant
>cnn:reliable sources
lmao, so literally nothing
almost had me, homosexual
>fox news isn't reporting on the fact that fox news is being sued for millions
shocker
WaPo is paywalled.
The CNN article details how Murdoch supposedly instructed Fox employees to "help" Republicans in various ways. But none of those involved stating that the election was stolen.
> do you think I am lying?
Yes of course lol
Still waiting on your proof of a FOX cyron stating the election was stolen
>lure your viewers into a federal sting operation
it was a rigged election. i don't care what msm says
This. I don't watch Fox News and didn't even bother to vote in 2020, but the election was obviously stolen. We aren't voting our way out of this shit, and people are beginning to figure that out.
whatever, resist reality all you want. when Hannity gets pulled maybe then you'll wake up, but at this rate, I'm unsure.
>whatever, resist reality all you want.
Reaality that you can't demonstrate with anything other than broad, unsupported assertions.
>when Hannity gets pulled maybe then you'll wake up, but at this rate, I'm unsure.
If they get rid of some 20+ year neocon with fading appeal in the light of newer, younger, more popular figures like Carlson or Gutfeld, that won't prove anything other than they are getting rid of dead weight.
Reject the establishment and their 2 party partisan politics. Reunite Church with state. Join the Jesus revolution. Christ is king
Its funny that you use the term magat... akin to maggot.
Maggots eat the flesh of the dead and basically make room for new growth. ITs fucking gross of course, but its also a natural thing. Typical liberal that you are, you think its gross and therefore should be a sign of disgust.
However that doesn't stop the rotten meat from stinking up the place. You can't eat the rotten meat. The ebst you can do is bury it and use it as fertilizer for the next bit of planting you attempt to feed the animals you husband during the next winter.
But you won't even do that. Instead you'll villify the maggots. Or magats as you call them, and try and chase them off your useless rotten corpse in order to hold that rotten, stinking think up as some sort of triumph against God and Nature.
More and more people are realizing that you're spinning putrid moldy shit around and aren't going to be able to stand being around you and rather then bury it you'll call them magats, because its obviously their fault that the meat is rotten. And while you struggle through bite after bite of that inedible, vvomit inducing garbage, to the disgust of those watching, they're going to find better ways to survive while you perish in a sickness of your own creation.
for your sake, I hope that's a copypasta
Imagine thinking a pedophile money laundering out of Ukraine and China who is suffering from dementia or Alzheimer's and is so unpopular he has to call people names for not clapping at his shit speeches actually 'won'.
Imagine.
>YOU CAN'T DENY THE ELECTION YOU JUST CAN'T CHUDS JOE IS THE MOST POPULAR PRESIDENT IN HISTORY AND YOU SHOULD ALL GO TO JAIL WHO DENY IT! LOVE TRUMPS HATE!
The election was stolen so your premise is wrong.
Next week Tucker will start releasing the Jan 6th footage.
Funny timing these posts are increasing here isn't it?
This is a perfect example of how liberals refuse to accept that conservative movements have grass roots. They genuinely believe that everyone believe is something that was handed out to us from a central source.
They genuine cannot comprehend that conservative organizations, politicians, and media represent the opinions and desires of millions of Americans.
the election was rigged and i don't even like zognald.
if you think government agencies, MSM and social media companies colluding together to change the results of an election isn't interference I would shoot you in the face.
>will will shoot you
>t.amerikaaner
>inb4 "muh cities aren't murica!"