They’re ok. I love tac boots, and it’s nice to see a more subtle "watered-down" version that doesn’t make you look like an active shooter in public. Still though, I’d prefer something actually service-worthy. The soles look like they would not work for serious terrain that’s jagged or sharp/thorny.
I’m a footgay and these don’t arouse me much for some reason.
I think they seem too lightweight.
Like they’re nylon and foam or something.
I need some heft and weight and mass in my male feet I guess.
I just clicked the site and it’s a dead link, no longer available. How long ago was this and why is /fashion/ committed to only talking about shit after it sells out?
Civilian >Avoid all mil boots, gaygy larper core
Air Force/Other branches but with office worker/lazy gay MOS >Garmonts
Actual soldier >Issued boot, summer only(even in winter)
They are these choinase pair https://www.aliexpress.com/item/3256802592197711.html?spm=a2g0o.productlist.0.0.7aef1f808ZNoRt&algo_pvid=49fe064f-29ef-433b-8d21-680db67b41d4&algo_exp_id=49fe064f-29ef-433b-8d21-680db67b41d4-47&pdp_ext_f=%7B%22sku_id%22%3A%2212000022147050358%22%7D&pdp_npi=2%40dis%21USD%21%2118.73%2118.73%21%21%21%21%402103399116562479195588729e599a%2112000022147050358%21sea
China should rate their people like Brave New World. >lmao your shoes are shit, made by epsilon minus chinks!
heck you these are heritage beta plus manufacturing – guaranteed.
I got the jungle boots because they were a lightweight midpoint between a sneaker and leather combat boot and and i wanted something taller than a hiking boot.
I got some tactical research ones but when i tighten them they make the leather on the top of the toe cap bubble up above the foot, which looks like the same problem the Vietnam boots would have. The Nike version leaves less room above the foot near the toes so not only does it not bubble up but it can be worn unlaced which is often seen.
I prefer the original Gen 1s, but these are neat. too bad they only come in coyote tho, the USAF phased out sage green, absolutely tragic imo
They’re ok. I love tac boots, and it’s nice to see a more subtle "watered-down" version that doesn’t make you look like an active shooter in public. Still though, I’d prefer something actually service-worthy. The soles look like they would not work for serious terrain that’s jagged or sharp/thorny.
Too expensive, probably. Plus, these dont fail after 7 years
jammies and sfbs, intresting style
They ain’t sfbs’s. They’re Bellevilles, and I wear them all the time
I’m a footgay and these don’t arouse me much for some reason.
I think they seem too lightweight.
Like they’re nylon and foam or something.
I need some heft and weight and mass in my male feet I guess.
Based and I agree
whats the cheaper, more durable, & non-this corporation version
for me? its still the field 2s
>just
I just clicked the site and it’s a dead link, no longer available. How long ago was this and why is /fashion/ committed to only talking about shit after it sells out?
those shoe lace eyelets look really vulnerable for a military boot
Civilian
>Avoid all mil boots, gaygy larper core
Air Force/Other branches but with office worker/lazy gay MOS
>Garmonts
Actual soldier
>Issued boot, summer only(even in winter)
im just gonna keep wearing them you freak
do you think cargo pants and bomber jackets are "faggy larper core" too stupid?
>muh stolen valor
get over yourself, enlisting doesn’t make you special.
you can enlist for free, anon
in many countries, you would have enlisted already
What happened too the base? It looks like its pressing into shit and the shits caking up the sides.
that’s how their machine glues it
it is cheaper to stick them together like that
look super goob. all of the "modern" little design flourishes on it are gonna look so stupid in a few years
they went from looking nice to looking shit
good job nike
They look like dog shit, the OGs are unbeatable
why the heck is it so hard just to get basic leather or sneakerboots that don’t have goretex and bullshit in them?
They really don’t look good compared to the v2
yeah they suck.
Jungle V1 > Jungle V2 > Gen 2 > Field 2 > G1
can anyone identify these?
Damn that looks crazy similar to the new G1s
They are these choinase pair https://www.aliexpress.com/item/3256802592197711.html?spm=a2g0o.productlist.0.0.7aef1f808ZNoRt&algo_pvid=49fe064f-29ef-433b-8d21-680db67b41d4&algo_exp_id=49fe064f-29ef-433b-8d21-680db67b41d4-47&pdp_ext_f=%7B%22sku_id%22%3A%2212000022147050358%22%7D&pdp_npi=2%40dis%21USD%21%2118.73%2118.73%21%21%21%21%402103399116562479195588729e599a%2112000022147050358%21sea
Thanks pard, makes sense, those join lines (don’t know the technical term) look sloppy as hell
ya you can literally see the heckin glue
I will defend this look until I die
it’s a good look
Lace up the boots ffs
Looks like shit lol
heck nike. Cheaply made overpriced garbage
prefer picrel, look less larpy and autistic
Palladium are made in china tier uncomfortable pieces of shit though. Nike comfy.
implying nikes are not also made in china
China should rate their people like Brave New World.
>lmao your shoes are shit, made by epsilon minus chinks!
heck you these are heritage beta plus manufacturing – guaranteed.
these look awful
I got these recently…
the patterned paneling on that boot suffers from the same gaudy bs as the G1.
I got the jungle boots because they were a lightweight midpoint between a sneaker and leather combat boot and and i wanted something taller than a hiking boot.
I got some tactical research ones but when i tighten them they make the leather on the top of the toe cap bubble up above the foot, which looks like the same problem the Vietnam boots would have. The Nike version leaves less room above the foot near the toes so not only does it not bubble up but it can be worn unlaced which is often seen.
You can even see it in the profile of the boots