Why do some people keep being obsessed about supposed draft if war were to escalate?
NATO has 5 to 1 numerical advantage over russia with just professional soldiers.
With every piece of equipment being decades ahead of anything russia has.
No draft would ever be necessary.
How are they gonna kill native europeans without a draft?
When was the last time poland ever actually fought in a war?
80 years ago. And the outcome was amazing.
they sucked your mutilated cocks in afghan and iraq
They're probably stupid. They're not even in a war. And we in Russia in war and still drafted less than 1% of males
>armies of homosexuals, naggers, and women.
Do those technically count as people when they're counting muster potential?
Army of naggers, homosexuals and women crushed 500,000 "warriors of Allach" within a month, with minimal casualties. Across the ocean.
Russian army of illiterate, starving and drunk slaves struggles to take once small city 50km from its border.
Who controls Afghanistan, again?
>Russian army of illiterate, starving and drunk slaves struggles to take once small city 50km from its border.
kek, and yet a real army supported by NATO for almost a decade to the tune of 100 billion dollars cannot push those illiterate retards out of their lands. here's me hoping they really draft you and you get your chance to fight those silly russians and I get some funny webms of you getting rekt
>100 billion worth of materiel in exchange for countless dead russians
best money spent by the US army in the past 50 years
>best money spent by the US army in the past 50 years
results are pretty underwhelming
Ukraine lost
NATO vs Russia sure; NATO vs Russia and allies? Definitely not 5-1. Burgers are also fixated with the draft because they suspect it is the only way the armed forces can get the numbers after 10 yes of woke propaganda. I think they will deploy the ‘enlist for pussy’ psyop first
Russia has no allies.
Russians think China is a military ally and would back them in any war against NATO.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA oh thats COPE
The idea that China would involve themselves in a war against NATO on the behalf of Russia is the real cope.
China will be next if Russia falls. Helping Russia in the war against nato is the China's high priority.
no one will die for poland except baltics lol, germans will watch poland fall
Just imagine the US Army stomping through that herd, the russians call an army today
it would be decades of PTSD riddled Vatnigfags telling us about the tactical feints back to the Urals
I don't think you understand that the war would be against Russia, China, and their allies. China has more fighting age men than the entire US population.
NATO lost pretty much every war it fought. Iraq is 9 years and was a loss, afghan is 20 and yet again, a loss. And it doesnt even come close to ukies on a life support by collective west. These were countries with fucking nothing, some leftover stocks from SU.
Holy fuck thats cope only true vatnik is capable of.
Russia has consequently one of the worst military record in human history. You lost almost every war in last 250 years.
To Japan, to Germany, to Poland, to Afghanistan, to France, to UK, to Finland and even Chechnya. Now its time for Ukraine to roll you over.
Only war you won is WW2 and thats only thanks to US.
Calling Iraq which was by every metric, most flawlessly executed military operation in human history anything but total victory is just pure vatnik delusion.
>You lost almost every war in last 250 years.
Not true. Wont even bother arguing on that, wikipedia is open for everyone. i mentioned modern conflicts, where we lost once in first chechen war.
>Calling Iraq which was by every metric, most flawlessly executed military operation in human history anything but total victory
Total victory after 9 years of ISIS beheading videoes of mutts and total retreat from Iraq and it ending up having closer connection to coalition enemy is really flawless kek. Sure it looked nice in the first year or two.
Forgot pic
American veteran suicides count as casualties since PTSD is a battlefield injury.
Therefore america lost 130k men to iraq and afghanistan losing a measly 10-20k
ah that graph video? does 10-20k inclued the civies?
NATO does not have the requisite military industry to supply an army that large. Not even close. Russia produces 4+ million shells a year, all of NATO combined doesn't even produce 300k. The difference is astronomical. In a real slugfest meat grinder type war, not some quick in and out conflict like iraq, the US army would run out of ammo and eat massive shit and take ludicrous casualties.
>b-b-but we could beat ruzzzzzzzia in 3 days
amerishart neocoon cope. russian air defense guarantees that we couldn't replicate an iraq style blitzkrieg and the sheer size and decentralized nature of russian population and industry makes it untenable. It's literally impossible to conquer european russia in 3 days, armies physically cannot fucking move that fast. Even if they wouldn't get bogged down by shitty russian infrastructure-
Could you imagine 70 ton US tanks trying to drive down some shitty dirt road that got turned into mud? Or some dingy little bridge from the 1920s in some shitty russian village?
what a fucking nightmare. fortunately most mutt generals realize a NATO invasion of russia would be a total bloodbath meat grinder
The only people who unironically think NATO could beat ruzzia in days or weeks are lockheed martin paid shills like adam kinzinger, libtards living in candy land, and 13 year old American military simps
NATO doesn't produces shells because it doesn't rellies on WW1 tactics. Every russian artillery piece would be evaporated within hours in case of real hostilities.
>russian air defense guarantees
Israeli F-35 are slaughtering syrians "protected" by S-400 as we speak. Russia has NOTHING to counter or even mitigate NATO airpower. They are COMPLETLY defenseless.
There is not a single aspect of making war in which russia isn't outmatched by thousands of orders of magnitude.
What about with supersonic missiles they have already deployed that we're still working on and are incapable of producing?
Whole 15 of them?
Yeah what about them?
Even finest russian systems have accuracy measured in kilometers. They are gimic.
nigga what fucking planet are you living on?
the f35 is a flying shitheap and US stealth wunderwaffe has long since been proven to be worthless against russian anti air
america has NEVER fought an enemy with actual developed anti aircraft infrastructure in place.
https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/aviation/a42912833/f-35-availability-problems/
MUH STEALTH WUNDER WAFFLES THAT GOT 200 QUINTILLION DOLLARS HAVE NEVER FAILED AGAINST GOAT HERDERS
Only takes 1 lucky hit on rammstein to knock out like half of the USAF's air power in continental europe.
forgot image
holy christ the copium readings are going off the charts
This is the problem. You think WW3 is the world versus Russia.
It's increasingly looking like China, Russia, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, India, and Iran are getting cozier and cozier. If we went to war with those countries our entire economy would be utterly devastated overnight, because they run all of our businesses in the name of diversity.
Eventually we sold the rope that they're hanging us with.
>China
Naval Blockade
>Brazil
Naval Blockade
>Saudi Arabia
They are literally losing entire armored divisions to Yemeni partisans lmao
>India
You are delusional if you think they are going to pick thier shity alliance of poverty over the west.
>Iran
Naval blockade
*Edgy Solo Intro Begins
>NATO
>russia
forgets that its NATO vs BRICS, nigs+chinks+jeets outnumber us by the gorillions with bodies to throw at us until we're all dead
Europe and US have total control over oceans and worlds food supply.
For climate change. There's too many humans and the best way to dispose of them is a pointless war.