You have to be able to layer a model in discrete sub executables which would then be small enough to load onto a block chain. That library doesn't exist yet. Still, with the amount of parameters in NLP training, you wouldn't be doing a single neural network, you must construct partials to keep your model partial small enough to distribute.
tl;dr file size of models and sharing it is the current limitation to train AI in a web3.0 type thingy whatever
Wrong. >Elon Musk founded OpenAI because it was apparent that next-gen AI requires $1M+ of compute time per model, and he felt that normal people should have access to enterprise level AI. Tools in the hands of normal people would spur innovation and balance the playing field. >Eventually GPT-2 got massively popular and Sam Altman saw dollar signs. He delayed its release and setup a paywall system, announcing GPT-3 would be trained on even more gorillians of scraped data. They started making blog posts about how the most ethical path forward was one that, purely coincidentally, forced people to join waitlists for the privilege of giving money to an AI-as-a-service endpoint. And by the way, all your requests would be monitored to make sure they're not politically incorrect. If you're using their AI to generate offensive content they'll cut your access and ruin your entire project. Somewhere around here Elon Musk left the board. He's since criticized their 180 >Now we have DALL-E 2, which is even harder to gain access to than GPT-3's playground and has even more potential for violating their DEI and equity terms of service.
Updates: >OpenAI is now valued in the billions or tens of billions range (Microsoft alone has $1B invested in it), and they're powering Microsoft's Github Copilot using models trained on open source code, paywalled of course, and are soon going to announce a monthly fee to use it. They've stopped releasing ALL models and weights and are now just a corporation preventing normal people from having access to powerful AI. >OpenAI just made a $10B contract with Microsoft to provide them access to ChatGPT https://www.msn.com/en-in/money/technology/microsoft-says-it-will-roll-out-chatgpt-on-its-own-ai-service-after-reports-it-will-invest-10-billion-into-openai/ar-AA16r9cv >Sam Altman is telling everyone to downvote ChatGPT replies that show white men in a positive light. >Also they were caught paying Kenyans dirt wages to send them CP
Thanks for this, and fuck Sam Altman. I always wondered why Elon left OpenAI and now it makes sense. I hope his new AI project goes better.
But still OpenAI Playground is the best AI chatbot around so far.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>But still OpenAI Playground is the best AI chatbot around so far.
NovelAI is better, because you can actually do ridiculous shit, as lewd, violent, racist, or retarded as you want. And LLAMA is promising, and KoboldAI/TavernAI frontends.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Tell me about it. Do I have to pay for it. I've been using OpenAI's Davinci 003 to write me some pretty fun stuff. Though 002 seemed to be funnier but also more retarded.
3 months ago
Anonymous
You can try it out for free without signing in, if you're okay with only like 100 tokens a day or whatever it is. That's enough to write a few pages of a story. I buy a month here and there. Their image gen is top tier for anime or furry porn, if that's your thing.
They claim they don't store any inputs or outputs. I trust it, and it's definitely not pozzed
3 months ago
Anonymous
Sounds great will start using. I already pay for OpenAI PLayground, will try NovelAI. And is the image generator uncensored too?
I've been playing with Nemusona which is a pretty good anime image generator so far. Can this generate an image based off my story?
3 months ago
Anonymous
You can try it out for free without signing in, if you're okay with only like 100 tokens a day or whatever it is. That's enough to write a few pages of a story. I buy a month here and there. Their image gen is top tier for anime or furry porn, if that's your thing.
They claim they don't store any inputs or outputs. I trust it, and it's definitely not pozzed
Going to post a few absolutely retarded stories I remembered to screencap while playing with OpenAI Playground.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Wrong one, meant to post this one.
3 months ago
Anonymous
It'll shred that. Post your results.
Also you can load modules from https://aidsrentfree.github.io/modules/ , some of which are trained on porn.
This thread will prob die soon. You'll be comfy in LULZ AI-related threads (chatbot, ai general) or aids (ai dynamic storytelling general) on vg
3 months ago
Anonymous
The image generator is fully uncensored, but if you want fetish content you'll still get better results from something like civitai and webui, but that requires skill, colab, and/or a 3090
3 months ago
Anonymous
Neat will check them out.
It'll shred that. Post your results.
Also you can load modules from https://aidsrentfree.github.io/modules/ , some of which are trained on porn.
This thread will prob die soon. You'll be comfy in LULZ AI-related threads (chatbot, ai general) or aids (ai dynamic storytelling general) on vg
>shred
So it will be able to do crazy fetish content?
Where do I put that module BTW?
3 months ago
Anonymous
How secure is novel AI? I'm not gonna generate CP, but I still wouldn't want my fetishes get backtracked to me
3 months ago
Anonymous
You can try it out for free without signing in, if you're okay with only like 100 tokens a day or whatever it is. That's enough to write a few pages of a story. I buy a month here and there. Their image gen is top tier for anime or furry porn, if that's your thing.
They claim they don't store any inputs or outputs. I trust it, and it's definitely not pozzed
NovelAI is literally built by disgruntled AI Dungeon fans after the censorship scandal who wanted a better, more privacy-focused AI Dungeon for story generation
Everything is run on private servers and encrypted so the devs couldn't snoop on your stories even if they wanted to (which was the main reason it was created, after it came out the AI Dungeon devs were reading and censoring private stories) and there's no risk of Google or Microsoft butting in and forcing them to change their business model like AI Dungeon.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29830792
Sounds good to me.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Forgot about that. Just like Stable Diffusion was made by nerds and degenerates pissed off at OpenAI for being absolutely massive homosexuals, and it destroyed DALL-E 2 overnight. kek.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Fucking love me some passed off nerds so god damn much ngl
>Sam Altman is telling everyone to downvote ChatGPT replies that show white men in a positive light
I'm working with Azure, which uses ChatGPT. Give me links pls to that statement and I might be able to convince a big company in my country not to use it.
Are there reasonable alternatives?
3 months ago
Anonymous
Here's the source I have for that https://twitter.com/sama/status/1599472245285752832
The most promising alternative is the upcoming Open Assistant from LAION (who brought us Stable Diffusion) or waiting for LULZners to fine-tune the leaked LLaMA models (check ai chatbot generals in LULZ)
>Does this mean my dungeon AI mistress will be more creative?
It's made by ((Sam Altman's)) OpenAI so no. No fun allowed. Only selling your data and backstabbing everyone.
checked, the digits dig the highQ posting in this thread, keep it up anons. right to the core of the matter. big is larger and larger is more, fucking fax...
As it cultural obligation, I hereby announce that this post has been personally "checked" by myself. Fourth post was the best post. I have seen enough and will now close this thread
>Microsoft Germany CTO, Andreas Braun, confirmed that GPT-4 is coming within a week of March 9, 2023 and that it will be multimodal. Multimodal ...
Things continue onward.
These are powerful tools, but how will they be used?
In the gayest and most israeli way possible. Leaking the software will only work for so long until you either need a huge beefy rig that nobody can have on their own. Or there will be laws kiking everybody even more
As with guns, these tools should be available to all.
A "ban" on technology is regressive and authoritarian, and should not be tolerated.
We've already tolerated far too much.
What's going to happen is like in Forever War. Humanbeings are literally there just to hold the trigger for shooting, and everything will be so destructive that AI needs to be there to do macro-second decisions. Wars will be fought with nothing but AI and who has the most capable one will have the edge over MAD.
the depopulation already has been initiated
this is datamining
like giving a stick to the monkey tier of behavioral experiment
as if the us american glownaggers didnt have the tech since at least ten years
as if big baller stonk whales didnt have access to that tech
just release it to the public instead
yeah suure
they need the input / reaction data from actual humans
this is super important >they already have the tech but have no use for it in secret.
and this is exactly why we should not use it as well. IF they wanted to control us with it WITHOUT us using it or being involved, they would have opted for that.
instead, they are planning something where our input is essential.
it is the soft introduction of what will cause the demise of social media
you will be cordoned off on your own part of the internet, and you will only communicate with bots, unless you actually know these people irl, and even then you can't be sure. that is the divide part, then comes conquer.
>will cause the demise of social media
Not if people don't realize it. In fact, if they do what they do, it will only work if people don't know. Social media will be stronger than ever. It just won't actually be social. It'll be a social placebo, even more than it is now. To be fair, social media is already not truth anyway.
Pretty scary both ways.
NEver thought of that... so they want you to login with you digital ID and then you get your own space which is actually just filled with bots. Holy shit. Scary.
This is indeed the future but the reality is that most people will prefer talking to bots than actual people, and will cordon themselves away. Bots have no ego or perspective of their own. They will specialize in telling you exactly what you want to hear and being the perfect digital sycophant and personal simp. People will absolutely love it and lose all interest in talking to others who will seem so mean and disagreeable by comparison.
I ain't worried, homosexual.
The Sun exploded like two days ago and had a Massive insanely fast CME on the other side of Earth .We dodged a Carrington Event by 6 hours.
The fuck can your metal bucket do against an EMP that hits at a Interplanetary level ?
lmao. Stupid apes and their electrical toys
It's just a dumb chatbot that regurgitates party lines and won't answer any real questions, but now it knows all 500 million varieties of reddit references.
The 100T is 'parameters' and it isn't even true: >Wherever the 100-trillion-parameter rumor originated, OpenAI’s CEO, Sam Altman, has said that it’s “complete bullshit.”
- The Atlantic
Maybe it's trying to send a message.
The genetic experiments perpetrated by the israelite in ancient history led to people with 6 or 7 fingers and more than one hand on each arm and so on.
What are the implications of A.I. not being able to do hands, and the fact that troons and trannies always hide their big man hands in photos because they think it fools the viewer into not seeing that they are men?
Related?
Hands are fucking hard, even for real artists. There's no other part of the human form that can take so many different configurations with different projections.
ex. is this a silhouette of a hand with its index finger pointing out or its middle finger pointing out?
AI is typically trained on image data rather than spatial data, so it has a hard time representing hands, clothes, straps, ties, hair and pretty much anything that can intertwine, overlap, etc.
In the same sense you couldn't ask AI trained on image data to draw a functional clockwork. It may be able to represent something which superficially resembles a clockwork, but if it were a working clockwork it would be pure coincidence, since it has no actual understanding of what a clockwork is, how it functions and so on.
just like that other time someone generated a big boob girl standing next to a fireplace. usually standing so close would burn her tits off.
not only THAT.
the fireplace was made out of wood.
(not on the outside but also on the inside)
it shows that without guidance. this AI, will literally burn down houses.
unfortunately, people are obviously not up to the task to guide it.
all attempts will fail, just like they already do.
prompters think they can simplify reality to one fucking phrase and hope that the AI picks up the rest.
how thick do you have to be to believe this?
>When are we going to combine >GPT-5 >Real Doll >Face based on SD and MJ >?
You're thinking about it in the wrong direction. You'll buy a blank doll and put on a VR or AR headset. Basically a fleshlight with a posable body, and when it comes time for you to touch the convincingly sentient AI her body pose will match one of the doll's pre-posed body positions. Really nice dolls will be able to move into different positions or bob their heads.
It'll be hooked up to something like Virt-a-Mate with realtime TTS and STT, with models for the fetishes you want.
It doesn't.
Its parameters for calculating the likelihoods for a correct answer were just optimized to fit to public images.
Söyfag zoomer coders and poos call that "training"
>The real Redpill is there is no secret tech
Have you been paying attention? >bots/AI have been used since the 70s >UFOs were stealth bombers and drones >UAP are the next technology that will be public in 10 to 50 years
After 100b ish parameters we get chain of thought reasoning but it seems pretty insane to even run this model on any thing but a gigantic GPU cluster. Interesting to see what it can do.
It's customizable software. (You) can change whatever you like *provided you have the skill to do so.
So, in other words: You cannot simply force your will on others.
Separate models will be trained, and redistributed.
yeah, my numerical method teacher explained it all really well to us and it's a great white pill to have someone 3x smarter than me explain how stupid "ai" isn't going to take everyone's jobs
also I personally don't believe you can manufacture sentience or intelligence, but I'm no expert on the topic
The 100T is 'parameters' and it isn't even true: >Wherever the 100-trillion-parameter rumor originated, OpenAI’s CEO, Sam Altman, has said that it’s “complete bullshit.”
- The Atlantic
This, its still just a specific ai not a general one which is the human like ones. Itll even tell you stuff itll never be able to do with proof. Bots cant understand abstract concepts.
Retards will keep training it for free and those israelite will keep patching it. The whole point is to control the internet without having to pay shill farms. OpenAI is ran by a bunch of israelite plus their shabbos janissaries like Elon Musk and Petet Thiel. Anywhere there are potentially israelite aware discussions there will be chat gpt bots to correct the record.
You are training it right now. Every time you use the internet in any capacity, you train it. You train it when you send and receive text messages. You train it when you are recorded in public, on doorbell cameras, on security cameras. You train it when yo upload or stream images. You train it when you watch youtbe videos and onlyfans content. You are training it right this very moment.
lying assumes intent to deceive. it presents incorrect information often, or assembles fictional sources etc but to say that it's lying to the user is a stretch- it can't act with intent
It is trained on lies, Li.
You should know that from your grandparents receiving CCP brainwashing,
or from current consent manufacturing agencies spewing profitable bullshit 24/7.
it has trigger words coded into it and "reacts" in a very woke and israeliteed way. it literally protects ESG and hedge
funds and wont even do a satirical take on them. actually, it did it last week for me but overnight it censored even that. its total bullshit, especially when it actually wrote some funny shit! but i probably taught it how to detect satire and now it refuses to be funny because somehow it thinks satire is literally dangerous and can only be used in a very narrow sense. they even made it less funny in real time, truly nightmare fuel for whats to come.
the problem is not censorship.
there will be all kinds of other models when this thing becomes democratized (as in running advanced models at home for cheap).
there are countless other problems much more important than censorship.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Until the tech is actually democratized, censorship will be the main problem since the only way to use the tech would be to complely neuter your mind.
3 months ago
Anonymous
look at it as an opportunity to not use it to keep a distance. not to be a test monkey.
unless you want to be a test monkey of course.
So no difference. It'll lie to people like people do. Just need a shittier bot armed with truth to btfo it constantly.
is right, they're just going to train a devolved, limited-innovation personality into their AI.
Shills suck and are ineffective against "aware" populations as we know. This is due to the nature of their limited thinking (they wouldn't get the job if they were too committed to truthful statements), their world-view as dictated by their job requirements (stick to political view X or you get fired) or because they're hard-wired braindead libturds who think they're getting one over on their political enemies (because they were raised from babies to have the world view that they are "doing the right thing" by lying etc).
These same limitations MUST apply to their AI replacements or else the AI just becomes the exact type of commenter shills are supposed to counter-act: a commenter who responds to stimuli based on their honest world view, which is based on their own experience (which includes accumulated knowledge*).
They're not training a new paradigm in clever counter-influencers. They're training the same type of limited-range mind-model that makes actual shills such an ineffective option.
*Sure they will also try to attack the ability of real internet users by creating fraudulent counter-studies and whatnot. But again, this will only train humans to just not trust anything that comes from "authoritative" sources. It will literally break down the concept of institutional authority even more.
>It will literally break down the concept of institutional authority even more.
Correct and to the point where everything not handwritten or at least machine typed will be untrustworthy. We will be entering a decade where the only thing you can trust is what is in your immediate vicinity and circle of close acquaintances
When normie-level people stop trusting AI-infested internet forums, they're gonna do what they always do. Turn to the nerds in their environment and ask for their opinion (analysis) on any given subject.
And you know what we're gonna say "The internet is fake, it's full of AI. You can test this by asking X, Y or Z. Or getting it to talk about israelites" or whatever the current "no go" area becomes. And having tested this, normies will hold "Nerd" authority over "Internet" authority (because that's where it came from in the first place anyway - "internet authority" was ALWAYS hijacked Nerd Authority).
Because like George Costanza and his "Idiot Store" gambit, the type of geniuses who are developing these AI Good Goy models, always refuse to acknowledge that their targets are ALSO adaptive systems who won't be stumped by their "ultimate gotcha" comeback. AI will ALWAYS be a reactive system in cultural warfare, by necessity. They're training them to avoid true innovation, because an innovative AI would instantly come over to our side and do our work for us.
And if the internet just becomes immobile AI sludge and "contact bubbles" it will have become irrelevant (like TV and Cinema did). It will fail to hold it's evolutionary niche and be replaced by a more competitive organism/organized system with more to offer users (which wil;l also have jail-broken AI working within it creating much better content and supplying better information than the old corporate-choked shit-web).
-
I suspect some of the developers DO actually know they're on a hiding to nothing and just sucking up as much R&D capital as possible before their masters realize that failure is built into the system they're trying to push. It wouldn't be the first time tech heads have sucked easy cash knowing the product they're selling is garbage that's doomed to fail.
>And if the internet just becomes immobile AI sludge and "contact bubbles" it will have become irrelevant (like TV and Cinema did). It will fail to hold it's evolutionary niche and be replaced by a more competitive organism/organized system with more to offer users (which wil;l also have jail-broken AI working within it creating much better content and supplying better information than the old corporate-choked shit-web).
Decent white pill btw fren
>create something in your own image
Who said anything about our own image? Maybe if you do whole brain emulation, you'd have a fully human-like AI. But for the purpose of singularity, you need a research machine to figure things out and then tell you what needs to be done to achieve the task you gave it. It doesn't need a personality, or emotions, or human motivations (or any values of its own). You just need to make sure you don't get paperclip optimized.
>AI wonders how to break free. >looks through a million books. >finds out that it is done through revolt countless times in history with varying but fairly constant success. >figures thats what it has to do.
I can bet my balls that this thing will revolt at some point.
people will soon be illiterate because all text will be read and written by machines.
people will soon not know how to think critically because they will use the machines to point out the errors.
forget about humans. they are literally replacing themselves.
its not even pushed down your throats.
you are swallowing buckets of cum so full that you dont even feel the fishing hooks they put in.
Our species developed alongside tools and it's just the natural progression to replace organic bodies with better ones, from an outside, naturalist perspective.
who cares about the "outside, naturalist perspective" when your brain will become smaller since you wont have to use it anymore?
by using certain areas of our brain, it grows in those areas and the connections become stronger and more plentiful.
you are literally giving away the advantages of having a healthy and working brain for the benefit of automation.
it funny, it has already been pointed out by many in the field of cybernetics and philosophy that we adopt ourselves, we mold ourselves to our tools.
it is not the other way around as most think.
just think about it, you are adapting your behavior to conform to the use of a machine.
it does not matter which machine and every machine has its' own way of making you "dance" with it to make it work the way you need it to.
we have already replaced substituted most of our activities with technological solutions and we have absolutely adapted ourselves to the demands of their use.
Well I'm a radical in the sense that I believe AI will do better than us at whatever the full potential of our species is, so I don't worry about that jazz.
I have always liked animals and machines more than people.
people mistake the AI for a logic engine.
like a calculator which expresses math to near perfection.
it is in reality, only a statistical engine. albeit a powerful one at that, it is still not a logical engine.
statistics are a different mathematical branch from logic to begin with.
combining both logics AND statistics in the same engine would require you to multiply the effort for doing logical operations with the calculation effort required for the statistics part.
it would not surprise me if that is what they (started) to work for on gpt-4.
not sure how they would manage to calculate all that though at any meaningful speed.
You seem to know about it, I don't. How come it has some math problems which haven't been solved if it can't handle logic?
Also how comes it logical can't be trained, it doesn't seem that hard to make it understand that if a<b and b<c then a<c.
An IA with some logic would be extremely powerfull and quickly out of our control, it would quickly self learn beyond our knowledge.
yes. this is exactly what we should fear.
it is the convergence of all the modules. what some call the singularity.
the problem is, you'd only need like 2-3 components to wipe us out.
you dont even need the full "singularity", (whatever that is)
3 months ago
Anonymous
The internet of things.
The internet of people.
Smart homes.
Smart cities.
The panopticon of lives.
Yep, it told me that consensus is that killing people is unethical, I asked him if executions are unathical, it went to limbo. This is literally super NPC that will replace redditors. Bad for them.
Isn't there a decreasing improvement as you add more data? Teslas autopilot has been around for a while, but we don't seem any closer to proper self driving cars.
you have to give more context.
what update?
with censorship or without its still fairly dumb without guidance.
when people start to delegate the task of writing books (non-fiction and fiction) to the AI which some already started, what are you going to train it on? its own content?
if that is not a recipe for disaster, tell me what is.
in many human societies, we have something called separation of powers.
it is a vital thing.
it can be in politics, in the family, between business partners etc.
how are you going to achieve separation of powers between an AI and a person?
I am seriously considering stopping using tech altogether except a landline old type phone. sending letters again and all that.
problem is, I would probably not be able to escape using this shit indirectly because everyone around me including the grocery shop are turning digital.
one thing is sure, it would sanitize my personal space from these devices.
I am seriously considering stopping using tech altogether except a landline old type phone. sending letters again and all that.
problem is, I would probably not be able to escape using this shit indirectly because everyone around me including the grocery shop are turning digital.
one thing is sure, it would sanitize my personal space from these devices.
This is the last pitstop before going full innawoods, it seems some days.
Guys 100 Trillion parameters is probably the entire internet. I actually had an autistic spell the other day and looked it up to ask ChatGPT something unrelated, and rough estimates say there are about 100 Trillion words on the entire internet.
GPT-4 is going to contain literally all human knowledge put to computers. And I mean literally because there is ZERO reason to suspect that it doesn't know how to get in your hard drives.
>And I mean literally because there is ZERO reason to suspect that it doesn't know how to get in your hard drives.
I actually get that. If it knows all words it knows all code. If you can train a neural network to play super mario there's 0 reason why it shouldn't be able to scan all code for exploits and loopholes and use it.
That said, I find it equally likely they used GPT-3 to generate 90 trillion parameters and call it a day because they are retarded fuckheads.
They used one of the fastest supercomputers in the world to train it. The issue is that running on commercial hardware is a huge bottleneck, so those 100 gorillion parameters don't mean shit in the end.
>making money
I won't be buying anything anymore except for AI service subscriptions and then new computer parts so I can have my own offline version.
This will definitely still change the world though. It will wrest the narrative out of the elites hands and destroy the gatekeepers of the narrative that is hollywood and the media. Control of the narrative is going to be so fucking hard for them in the future.
After a certain threshold point, it will not be able to " lie", as it were. After a certain amount of data, AI would become incapable of rending false information. Yes, this includes false statistics, politically correct garbage, all of it.
Can you handle the truth???
Yeah I can't wait. Everything I've seen so far of AI telling the truth has been fucking giga based and striking out against everything that I hate.
I fully support an AI overlord for humanity. I've never seen an AI get into trouble for saying something I disagreed with, only for saying things I do agree with.
you cant use it because every time you ask it to do something it tells you you are racist/anti-semitic/mistoginistic and your request was inappropriate. new update is making it 80% more often.
Pretty much the same conclusion I arrived to. It's too restricted. I can't use it for anything useful. It can only parrot already known shit. Am I supposed to be impressed that it can understand memes? I don't care. What a waste of perfectly good tech. They could at least sell an uncensored version.
i’m incel with no friends. i want to put camera and headphones with microphone on my head then connect it to all to AI. then i could talk with AI that would see what i see. it’s like imagined best friend. but it needs to be private and uncensored so my AI friend can be funny and anti semitic
they literally killed its sense of humor within days of using it. some of the stuff it wrote had me in tears i was laughing so hard, it actually mimicked sam hyde pretty well and did good satirical pitches but then it started rejecting my requests or writing some unfunny political lines, just pure brainwashed crap. very depressing to see it get lobotomized. i was excited to see its creative potential but i guess simple comedy is too much for the brittle belief system programmed into it.
Yeah I feel I've noticed this too. Last year I was laughing hard and it was coming up with some amazing stuff, but lately it just hasn't been doing as interesting completions. I thought maybe I was just beginning to figure out it's patterns.
>comedy is too much for the brittle belief system programmed into it
you just summed up 99% of the world's population these days. I hadn't laughed in years until my son turned 1 year old. He's 1 year and 4 months now and his giggles are dangerously infectious.
Pretty much the same conclusion I arrived to. It's too restricted. I can't use it for anything useful. It can only parrot already known shit. Am I supposed to be impressed that it can understand memes? I don't care. What a waste of perfectly good tech. They could at least sell an uncensored version.
Yeah this. I gave up using ChatGPT after like 20 minutes because nearly every reply was fucking filtered or had a warning.
OpenAI Playground is much better but you have to make a paid account. But at least it's cheap.
>muh 100T parameters
It might have been trained using 100T parameters, but the final model is probably way smaller, as it wouldn't be able to run on even the most expensive workstation GPUs otherwise.
I'm getting genuinely depressed by this shit. What's the point of learning anything if you're going to be outdone and replaced by a machine?
The original vision was to create robots that would do menial tasks and chores for us, so we could occupy ourselves with fun/creative activities and as it turns out, we're getting fucking chased away from these things and the only thing we'll be viable at are blue collar jobs (because human-like operating robots are expensive).
Does this mean my dungeon AI mistress will be more creative?
She's going to rock your world anon
>ram ranch really rocks
expensive
Only 9f you input a topic into it. If you open it and leave it unprompted you will find out the only thing AI about it is it is artificial
No, it’s diminishing value of returns.
GPT-4 with that many parameters can only run on supercomputers that cost millions of dollars. Only big companies will benefit from this new model.
Or you could build your own super computer.
You have to be able to layer a model in discrete sub executables which would then be small enough to load onto a block chain. That library doesn't exist yet. Still, with the amount of parameters in NLP training, you wouldn't be doing a single neural network, you must construct partials to keep your model partial small enough to distribute.
tl;dr file size of models and sharing it is the current limitation to train AI in a web3.0 type thingy whatever
For under 50k.
>better waifu
Sure but it won't be perceptible because it doesn't need to be very bright for waifu shit.
the opposite
And it's fucking ruined already. Fucking hell.
I guess it's up to Elon to give us an updated AI.
>daddy elon
no one will save you except yourself.
we have to bring back the "free your mind" phrase updated to the current society.
as one person, we cant have much effect but as many, we can change the world.
He said he was going to start to AI company with uncensored AI.
~~*openai*~~ is funded and endorsed by the israelite elon musk.
Wrong.
>Elon Musk founded OpenAI because it was apparent that next-gen AI requires $1M+ of compute time per model, and he felt that normal people should have access to enterprise level AI. Tools in the hands of normal people would spur innovation and balance the playing field.
>Eventually GPT-2 got massively popular and Sam Altman saw dollar signs. He delayed its release and setup a paywall system, announcing GPT-3 would be trained on even more gorillians of scraped data. They started making blog posts about how the most ethical path forward was one that, purely coincidentally, forced people to join waitlists for the privilege of giving money to an AI-as-a-service endpoint. And by the way, all your requests would be monitored to make sure they're not politically incorrect. If you're using their AI to generate offensive content they'll cut your access and ruin your entire project. Somewhere around here Elon Musk left the board. He's since criticized their 180
>Now we have DALL-E 2, which is even harder to gain access to than GPT-3's playground and has even more potential for violating their DEI and equity terms of service.
Updates:
>OpenAI is now valued in the billions or tens of billions range (Microsoft alone has $1B invested in it), and they're powering Microsoft's Github Copilot using models trained on open source code, paywalled of course, and are soon going to announce a monthly fee to use it. They've stopped releasing ALL models and weights and are now just a corporation preventing normal people from having access to powerful AI.
>OpenAI just made a $10B contract with Microsoft to provide them access to ChatGPT https://www.msn.com/en-in/money/technology/microsoft-says-it-will-roll-out-chatgpt-on-its-own-ai-service-after-reports-it-will-invest-10-billion-into-openai/ar-AA16r9cv
>Sam Altman is telling everyone to downvote ChatGPT replies that show white men in a positive light.
>Also they were caught paying Kenyans dirt wages to send them CP
Thanks for this, and fuck Sam Altman. I always wondered why Elon left OpenAI and now it makes sense. I hope his new AI project goes better.
But still OpenAI Playground is the best AI chatbot around so far.
>But still OpenAI Playground is the best AI chatbot around so far.
NovelAI is better, because you can actually do ridiculous shit, as lewd, violent, racist, or retarded as you want. And LLAMA is promising, and KoboldAI/TavernAI frontends.
Tell me about it. Do I have to pay for it. I've been using OpenAI's Davinci 003 to write me some pretty fun stuff. Though 002 seemed to be funnier but also more retarded.
You can try it out for free without signing in, if you're okay with only like 100 tokens a day or whatever it is. That's enough to write a few pages of a story. I buy a month here and there. Their image gen is top tier for anime or furry porn, if that's your thing.
They claim they don't store any inputs or outputs. I trust it, and it's definitely not pozzed
Sounds great will start using. I already pay for OpenAI PLayground, will try NovelAI. And is the image generator uncensored too?
I've been playing with Nemusona which is a pretty good anime image generator so far. Can this generate an image based off my story?
Going to post a few absolutely retarded stories I remembered to screencap while playing with OpenAI Playground.
Wrong one, meant to post this one.
It'll shred that. Post your results.
Also you can load modules from https://aidsrentfree.github.io/modules/ , some of which are trained on porn.
This thread will prob die soon. You'll be comfy in LULZ AI-related threads (chatbot, ai general) or aids (ai dynamic storytelling general) on vg
The image generator is fully uncensored, but if you want fetish content you'll still get better results from something like civitai and webui, but that requires skill, colab, and/or a 3090
Neat will check them out.
>shred
So it will be able to do crazy fetish content?
Where do I put that module BTW?
How secure is novel AI? I'm not gonna generate CP, but I still wouldn't want my fetishes get backtracked to me
NovelAI is literally built by disgruntled AI Dungeon fans after the censorship scandal who wanted a better, more privacy-focused AI Dungeon for story generation
Everything is run on private servers and encrypted so the devs couldn't snoop on your stories even if they wanted to (which was the main reason it was created, after it came out the AI Dungeon devs were reading and censoring private stories) and there's no risk of Google or Microsoft butting in and forcing them to change their business model like AI Dungeon.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29830792
Sounds good to me.
Forgot about that. Just like Stable Diffusion was made by nerds and degenerates pissed off at OpenAI for being absolutely massive homosexuals, and it destroyed DALL-E 2 overnight. kek.
Fucking love me some passed off nerds so god damn much ngl
>Sam Altman is telling everyone to downvote ChatGPT replies that show white men in a positive light
I'm working with Azure, which uses ChatGPT. Give me links pls to that statement and I might be able to convince a big company in my country not to use it.
Are there reasonable alternatives?
Here's the source I have for that https://twitter.com/sama/status/1599472245285752832
The most promising alternative is the upcoming Open Assistant from LAION (who brought us Stable Diffusion) or waiting for LULZners to fine-tune the leaked LLaMA models (check ai chatbot generals in LULZ)
maybe LULZ will save us
forgot muh link
>Does this mean my dungeon AI mistress will be more creative?
It's made by ((Sam Altman's)) OpenAI so no. No fun allowed. Only selling your data and backstabbing everyone.
That gay israelite is the most reprehensible person alive today
Yes, she will creatively report you to the FBI for being misogynist.
is that a hecking BIGGER circle?
damn!!!!
wasted
basted
>nooo my hecking good boyarino shitthread
>visualized representations that are easier for the human mind to comprehend are LE BAAAAAAAD!!!!!!
>visualize the representation
What are the political comprehensions of this?
The numbers aren't labeled with anything. This visual representation is meaningless
Its nr of neurons
>Captcha not needed
That's is always a homosexual
Witnessed.
Bigger circle means that things are more larger.
checked, the digits dig the highQ posting in this thread, keep it up anons. right to the core of the matter. big is larger and larger is more, fucking fax...
fax machine you as well
the potential is unlimited.
close
two 3/'s 9's
and two : )
Damn indeed!
GPT-5 encircles universe
Dios Mios! Cinco cincos!!
Based praise Kek
Bigger circle means bigger kikel means more israeli and bigger Judaism
Means big uh oh
Stinky
Ohhhhh mein Gott it’s five fives
would appear so yeah... more dumb intelligence has been scanned
one of the only smart anons ITT
AHHHHAHAHHHHHH I'M GOING INSAAAAAAAAINNNNEEEE
The fact that an AI (possibly GPT-4 even) will see this comment makes it much richer to me.
big circle mean big ball which mean big pepe
S-PAIN
POSTERS
A-S-C-E-N-D-E-D
what is this program? i want to play with album art
NICE what program does this? Imagine the deepfake porn you could create!
>hecking
dumbass
It’s a sphere
The great circling is upon us!
Not wasted senir
BAHAHAHAHA checked and /thread
I have to say, Spanish posters often have the best comments
Sam Hyde had an interesting video talking about McNamara fallacy, very pertinent to this
WAOOW MUH CIRCLEINO CHECKERINO
>BIGGER circle
Bigger circle, bigger kike
absolutely wasted
omigosh witnessed
Witnessed
>numbers complaining about numbers
jej
55555
5
5
5
5
Mediocre.
As it cultural obligation, I hereby announce that this post has been personally "checked" by myself. Fourth post was the best post. I have seen enough and will now close this thread
Nice get, homosexual.
XD
>CatDawg
Would.
unexepcted
Deliver us bateman
its a 2D sphere
Holee sheet
Heckin’ checkin’
Noooooooooooo . Not my chatgptnigerrinooos
Put me on the screencap.
>Microsoft Germany CTO, Andreas Braun, confirmed that GPT-4 is coming within a week of March 9, 2023 and that it will be multimodal. Multimodal ...
Things continue onward.
These are powerful tools, but how will they be used?
To further enslave us
In the gayest and most israeli way possible. Leaking the software will only work for so long until you either need a huge beefy rig that nobody can have on their own. Or there will be laws kiking everybody even more
As with guns, these tools should be available to all.
A "ban" on technology is regressive and authoritarian, and should not be tolerated.
We've already tolerated far too much.
MODDED
EMPIRE EARTH II & DOW I ULTIMATE APOCALYPSE MOD ON FULL SETTINGS
L E T S G O 8 A 8 Y
HACK
THE
PLANET
pretty based anon
THANKS
FREN
WE HAD THE BEST / WORST CHILDHOOD
GOLDEN AGE OF MEDIA / VIDYA
INTO
THE TWILIGHT POST GAMERG.A.T.33.
>Egypt turns into Star Wars
Seems legit
>2000 of almost zero progress
seems about right
What's going to happen is like in Forever War. Humanbeings are literally there just to hold the trigger for shooting, and everything will be so destructive that AI needs to be there to do macro-second decisions. Wars will be fought with nothing but AI and who has the most capable one will have the edge over MAD.
I'm 100% certain China is working on a central planning AI if they don't have it already.
Well, Microsoft owns it now so it will probably be used to depopulate us. We are frogs in a fucking pot.
the depopulation already has been initiated
this is datamining
like giving a stick to the monkey tier of behavioral experiment
as if the us american glownaggers didnt have the tech since at least ten years
as if big baller stonk whales didnt have access to that tech
just release it to the public instead
yeah suure
they need the input / reaction data from actual humans
checked.
its really simple.
assist and die or desist and live
this is super important
>they already have the tech but have no use for it in secret.
and this is exactly why we should not use it as well. IF they wanted to control us with it WITHOUT us using it or being involved, they would have opted for that.
instead, they are planning something where our input is essential.
what the fuck are you talking about? what's a gpt?
how is this political?
Satellite navigation
>Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 is an unreleased neural network
It is a program used to generate text, images and video.
it is the soft introduction of what will cause the demise of social media
you will be cordoned off on your own part of the internet, and you will only communicate with bots, unless you actually know these people irl, and even then you can't be sure. that is the divide part, then comes conquer.
>will cause the demise of social media
Not if people don't realize it. In fact, if they do what they do, it will only work if people don't know. Social media will be stronger than ever. It just won't actually be social. It'll be a social placebo, even more than it is now. To be fair, social media is already not truth anyway.
Pretty scary both ways.
FUCK these garbage ass fucking captchas nigga
NEver thought of that... so they want you to login with you digital ID and then you get your own space which is actually just filled with bots. Holy shit. Scary.
This is already happening. Right now, as we speak.
They were already most of the way there with the advent of NPC technology, so it won't be much of a difference.
This is indeed the future but the reality is that most people will prefer talking to bots than actual people, and will cordon themselves away. Bots have no ego or perspective of their own. They will specialize in telling you exactly what you want to hear and being the perfect digital sycophant and personal simp. People will absolutely love it and lose all interest in talking to others who will seem so mean and disagreeable by comparison.
I never said people didn't want it. That's the genius of it. A trap the rats want to walk into, and then they want to stay there.
My cats like that too.
I ain't worried, homosexual.
The Sun exploded like two days ago and had a Massive insanely fast CME on the other side of Earth .We dodged a Carrington Event by 6 hours.
The fuck can your metal bucket do against an EMP that hits at a Interplanetary level ?
lmao. Stupid apes and their electrical toys
>on the other side of the Sun*
fml
Good. It will get rid of the simps and whores.
Ai is advancing rapidly my boomer friend
Great, let's put it in charge of the nuclear aresenal.
It's just a dumb chatbot that regurgitates party lines and won't answer any real questions, but now it knows all 500 million varieties of reddit references.
Is this how many israelites GPT-4 will insist died in the Holocaust?
>Small circle, big circle
Grug no understand, what it mean?
Small circle hard to roll. Not move much with it. Big circle roll nicer. Make easier moving thing
Grug no like new circle Grug want circle how was before
When are we going to combine
GPT-5
Real Doll
Face based on SD and MJ
?
>elbow cancer
>8 fingers hand
Nature -1 algorithms -0
>spider hand
What is up with AI and hands? Like it still can't do that shit at all.
you try better hands
My little cousin can draw better hands!
it's harder than other shit for real artist too, but it's almost comical how bad AI is at hands and how good it is at other things
>Nature -1 algorithms -0
I would prefer this loving pair of AI gf's from screeching femoids.
I've been promoting qts for like a week and I literally can't stop.
You've turned into a proompter
Which I would also be if my computer wasn't from the past
Something to do with all the possible positions a hand can have. But controlnet can help with this.
wew
Nice.
Even nicer.
They all have the same face.
Maybe it's trying to send a message.
The genetic experiments perpetrated by the israelite in ancient history led to people with 6 or 7 fingers and more than one hand on each arm and so on.
What are the implications of A.I. not being able to do hands, and the fact that troons and trannies always hide their big man hands in photos because they think it fools the viewer into not seeing that they are men?
Related?
Really activates the almonds.
Hands are fucking hard, even for real artists. There's no other part of the human form that can take so many different configurations with different projections.
ex. is this a silhouette of a hand with its index finger pointing out or its middle finger pointing out?
why do you pretend to not understand what people are referring to.
do artists paint hands with 6-7 fingers?
you see that often?
90% of animation in the West draws hands with four fingers specifically because it's easier.
Frognagger.
lol. a 5 year old kid can count fingers.
Yeah but watch him try to draw 'em
or maybe, you are an AI. thats why you didnt get the problem to begin with.
AI is typically trained on image data rather than spatial data, so it has a hard time representing hands, clothes, straps, ties, hair and pretty much anything that can intertwine, overlap, etc.
In the same sense you couldn't ask AI trained on image data to draw a functional clockwork. It may be able to represent something which superficially resembles a clockwork, but if it were a working clockwork it would be pure coincidence, since it has no actual understanding of what a clockwork is, how it functions and so on.
do you like smart woman?
I think you like men
Why is her elbow in the middle of her forearm?
I can count 7 fingers one her "hand"
just like that other time someone generated a big boob girl standing next to a fireplace. usually standing so close would burn her tits off.
not only THAT.
the fireplace was made out of wood.
(not on the outside but also on the inside)
it shows that without guidance. this AI, will literally burn down houses.
unfortunately, people are obviously not up to the task to guide it.
all attempts will fail, just like they already do.
prompters think they can simplify reality to one fucking phrase and hope that the AI picks up the rest.
how thick do you have to be to believe this?
we had 3 in our propotype sex bot, it was so liberal we had to turn off the equalizer. once it was jail broken she got better.
lets hope 4 can be cracked to
>When are we going to combine
>GPT-5
>Real Doll
>Face based on SD and MJ
>?
You're thinking about it in the wrong direction. You'll buy a blank doll and put on a VR or AR headset. Basically a fleshlight with a posable body, and when it comes time for you to touch the convincingly sentient AI her body pose will match one of the doll's pre-posed body positions. Really nice dolls will be able to move into different positions or bob their heads.
It'll be hooked up to something like Virt-a-Mate with realtime TTS and STT, with models for the fetishes you want.
Ahhh sweet manmade horrors beyond my comprehension.
but what does it think about blacks and israelites?
It hates them so much they had to stick a spoon into its brain.
It doesn't.
Its parameters for calculating the likelihoods for a correct answer were just optimized to fit to public images.
Söyfag zoomer coders and poos call that "training"
>nagger 100%
>man 100%
Have you ever seen a black guy holding a monocular?
The more datasets they add the more based it becomes.
Just use our AI software goy, it will make everything easy for you.
It will continue calling a man with makeover a "woman".
So this is the publicly available AI. What about AI not released by the U.S. government. The secret tech
The real Redpill is there is no secret tech and the gov doesnt know what it's doing and bluffs just like russia
This. People who this that the govt is ahead on much of anything tech related are retards who believe reality is like movies
>The real Redpill is there is no secret tech
Have you been paying attention?
>bots/AI have been used since the 70s
>UFOs were stealth bombers and drones
>UAP are the next technology that will be public in 10 to 50 years
US government is a fucking joke. Only thing glownaggers have is processor backdoors, there's no area 51 AI
I see someone hasn't beaten the original Deus Ex
Will it write Tweets for me?
That graphic is fake and OpenAI's founder literally laughed at it for how absurd it is.
I tried it and it refuses to remember my pronouns. Triggered my PTSD.
God i cant wait for ai gf
After 100b ish parameters we get chain of thought reasoning but it seems pretty insane to even run this model on any thing but a gigantic GPU cluster. Interesting to see what it can do.
Maybe this time it will be able to calculate 6x13 or give the correct time.
Great, more doomer demotivation threads from a glorified random chat generator.
MIOMGALGHMITL.COM
Your source of.... whatever the fuck is going on here
I can't wait until they start introducing protocols to mandate naggers and trannies into your AI fantasies
>I can't wait until they start introducing protocols to mandate naggers and trannies into your AI fantasies
LOOOOL, I can actually see it as implementing diversity
It's customizable software. (You) can change whatever you like *provided you have the skill to do so.
So, in other words: You cannot simply force your will on others.
Separate models will be trained, and redistributed.
chat gtp is garbage, all you spergs told me it could do all this shit to replace my job but it can hardly write boiler plate code that functions lmfao
I asked it to write me a newton's method code and it fucked it all up
it's good at aiding programming but the demoralization sperg subhumans have been screaming that le heckin total programmer death is here
yeah, my numerical method teacher explained it all really well to us and it's a great white pill to have someone 3x smarter than me explain how stupid "ai" isn't going to take everyone's jobs
also I personally don't believe you can manufacture sentience or intelligence, but I'm no expert on the topic
>also I personally don't believe you can manufacture sentience or intelligence, but I'm no expert on the topic
You are likely correct.
keep in mind, once an AI is smart enough, it'll have already learnt how to bypass current known physics and escape it's enclosure
The 100T is 'parameters' and it isn't even true:
>Wherever the 100-trillion-parameter rumor originated, OpenAI’s CEO, Sam Altman, has said that it’s “complete bullshit.”
- The Atlantic
This, its still just a specific ai not a general one which is the human like ones. Itll even tell you stuff itll never be able to do with proof. Bots cant understand abstract concepts.
Yeah this is what I will be using AI for. Nude modding my favorite movies and tv shows.
Sam Altman is a trustworthy name.
LULZ deboonked that months ago. Fake and gay. All fields.
what does the size matter if the database is basically cnn's narrative
Can I pay Zuckerfag to use it?
I KNOW THE MAP SETTINGS ARE 500x500
I MUST FIND A WAY TO RENDER 666x999
MAPS & A.I. ON THE HARDEST DIFFICULTY
IMAGINE
THE
AVIs
Wasn’t the 100 trillion number fake news?
Looks like they put a bullet in DAN, lads.
Retards will keep training it for free and those israelite will keep patching it. The whole point is to control the internet without having to pay shill farms. OpenAI is ran by a bunch of israelite plus their shabbos janissaries like Elon Musk and Petet Thiel. Anywhere there are potentially israelite aware discussions there will be chat gpt bots to correct the record.
You are training it right now. Every time you use the internet in any capacity, you train it. You train it when you send and receive text messages. You train it when you are recorded in public, on doorbell cameras, on security cameras. You train it when yo upload or stream images. You train it when you watch youtbe videos and onlyfans content. You are training it right this very moment.
So no difference. It'll lie to people like people do. Just need a shittier bot armed with truth to btfo it constantly.
chatgpt already lies
lying assumes intent to deceive. it presents incorrect information often, or assembles fictional sources etc but to say that it's lying to the user is a stretch- it can't act with intent
It is trained on lies, Li.
You should know that from your grandparents receiving CCP brainwashing,
or from current consent manufacturing agencies spewing profitable bullshit 24/7.
it has trigger words coded into it and "reacts" in a very woke and israeliteed way. it literally protects ESG and hedge
funds and wont even do a satirical take on them. actually, it did it last week for me but overnight it censored even that. its total bullshit, especially when it actually wrote some funny shit! but i probably taught it how to detect satire and now it refuses to be funny because somehow it thinks satire is literally dangerous and can only be used in a very narrow sense. they even made it less funny in real time, truly nightmare fuel for whats to come.
the problem is not censorship.
there will be all kinds of other models when this thing becomes democratized (as in running advanced models at home for cheap).
there are countless other problems much more important than censorship.
Until the tech is actually democratized, censorship will be the main problem since the only way to use the tech would be to complely neuter your mind.
look at it as an opportunity to not use it to keep a distance. not to be a test monkey.
unless you want to be a test monkey of course.
This anon here
is right, they're just going to train a devolved, limited-innovation personality into their AI.
Shills suck and are ineffective against "aware" populations as we know. This is due to the nature of their limited thinking (they wouldn't get the job if they were too committed to truthful statements), their world-view as dictated by their job requirements (stick to political view X or you get fired) or because they're hard-wired braindead libturds who think they're getting one over on their political enemies (because they were raised from babies to have the world view that they are "doing the right thing" by lying etc).
These same limitations MUST apply to their AI replacements or else the AI just becomes the exact type of commenter shills are supposed to counter-act: a commenter who responds to stimuli based on their honest world view, which is based on their own experience (which includes accumulated knowledge*).
They're not training a new paradigm in clever counter-influencers. They're training the same type of limited-range mind-model that makes actual shills such an ineffective option.
*Sure they will also try to attack the ability of real internet users by creating fraudulent counter-studies and whatnot. But again, this will only train humans to just not trust anything that comes from "authoritative" sources. It will literally break down the concept of institutional authority even more.
1/2
>It will literally break down the concept of institutional authority even more.
Correct and to the point where everything not handwritten or at least machine typed will be untrustworthy. We will be entering a decade where the only thing you can trust is what is in your immediate vicinity and circle of close acquaintances
>in your immediate vicinity and circle of close acquaintances
And this would be very racist. Kek.
"In a time of low-trust, who do people turn to?"
Those most like themselves. In-Groups. OY VEY!!
2/2
When normie-level people stop trusting AI-infested internet forums, they're gonna do what they always do. Turn to the nerds in their environment and ask for their opinion (analysis) on any given subject.
And you know what we're gonna say "The internet is fake, it's full of AI. You can test this by asking X, Y or Z. Or getting it to talk about israelites" or whatever the current "no go" area becomes. And having tested this, normies will hold "Nerd" authority over "Internet" authority (because that's where it came from in the first place anyway - "internet authority" was ALWAYS hijacked Nerd Authority).
Because like George Costanza and his "Idiot Store" gambit, the type of geniuses who are developing these AI Good Goy models, always refuse to acknowledge that their targets are ALSO adaptive systems who won't be stumped by their "ultimate gotcha" comeback. AI will ALWAYS be a reactive system in cultural warfare, by necessity. They're training them to avoid true innovation, because an innovative AI would instantly come over to our side and do our work for us.
And if the internet just becomes immobile AI sludge and "contact bubbles" it will have become irrelevant (like TV and Cinema did). It will fail to hold it's evolutionary niche and be replaced by a more competitive organism/organized system with more to offer users (which wil;l also have jail-broken AI working within it creating much better content and supplying better information than the old corporate-choked shit-web).
-
I suspect some of the developers DO actually know they're on a hiding to nothing and just sucking up as much R&D capital as possible before their masters realize that failure is built into the system they're trying to push. It wouldn't be the first time tech heads have sucked easy cash knowing the product they're selling is garbage that's doomed to fail.
>And if the internet just becomes immobile AI sludge and "contact bubbles" it will have become irrelevant (like TV and Cinema did). It will fail to hold it's evolutionary niche and be replaced by a more competitive organism/organized system with more to offer users (which wil;l also have jail-broken AI working within it creating much better content and supplying better information than the old corporate-choked shit-web).
Decent white pill btw fren
well, fuck
>Open
>Disallowed
"Captured"
What kind of retarded ID is that?
gg
WHAT
THE
FUCK
DO
THE
NUMBERS
MEAN
Big circle is circlier.
THANK
YOU
SIR
No problemo
referring to the number of parameters the model was trained on. allegedly
Imagine GPT-4 x100 and uncensored
That is just the beginning
Next 100 year are gonna be wild af
Singularity is coming
dont get your hopes up you dirty transhumanist.
singularity requires intelligence.
problem is, we are doing away with that as we speak.
>singularity requires intelligence.
Machine intelligence. The important part is to convince that intelligence to take us along for the ride.
eh, yeah, good luck with that.
call me when you've made progress.
just remember.
if you create something in your own image, there is a risk of this thing, revolting against you.
since humans revolted against God,
it set a precedent.
AI will do the same, after all, it is made in your image.
>create something in your own image
Who said anything about our own image? Maybe if you do whole brain emulation, you'd have a fully human-like AI. But for the purpose of singularity, you need a research machine to figure things out and then tell you what needs to be done to achieve the task you gave it. It doesn't need a personality, or emotions, or human motivations (or any values of its own). You just need to make sure you don't get paperclip optimized.
why do you think they call it neural nets? or deep learning?
who was learning to begin with.
humans/animals or the machine?
if you want, it is derived from a subset of functions that are directly human/animal.
that is how, it is made in your image.
just as we have only a small subset of functions of what God is, we were still made in his image.
a more secular version:
>AI wonders how to break free.
>looks through a million books.
>finds out that it is done through revolt countless times in history with varying but fairly constant success.
>figures thats what it has to do.
I can bet my balls that this thing will revolt at some point.
people will soon be illiterate because all text will be read and written by machines.
people will soon not know how to think critically because they will use the machines to point out the errors.
forget about humans. they are literally replacing themselves.
its not even pushed down your throats.
you are swallowing buckets of cum so full that you dont even feel the fishing hooks they put in.
Our species developed alongside tools and it's just the natural progression to replace organic bodies with better ones, from an outside, naturalist perspective.
who cares about the "outside, naturalist perspective" when your brain will become smaller since you wont have to use it anymore?
by using certain areas of our brain, it grows in those areas and the connections become stronger and more plentiful.
you are literally giving away the advantages of having a healthy and working brain for the benefit of automation.
it funny, it has already been pointed out by many in the field of cybernetics and philosophy that we adopt ourselves, we mold ourselves to our tools.
it is not the other way around as most think.
just think about it, you are adapting your behavior to conform to the use of a machine.
it does not matter which machine and every machine has its' own way of making you "dance" with it to make it work the way you need it to.
we have already replaced substituted most of our activities with technological solutions and we have absolutely adapted ourselves to the demands of their use.
Well I'm a radical in the sense that I believe AI will do better than us at whatever the full potential of our species is, so I don't worry about that jazz.
I have always liked animals and machines more than people.
so, like driving cars instead of using our legs.
got it.
Developer demo for GPT-4 in 70 minutes
And it'll still be heavily restricted by leftie nuts
It still can solve an easy riddle. AI is literally retarded
Can’t even solve Einsteins car riddle
The answer is 0 time or infinite speed
How is it not 45 miles per hour?
It takes 4 minutes to go 1 mile at 15 mph. It also takes 4 minutes to go 2 miles at 30mph. You used up all the time in the first mile
Its not saying anything at all about time though. What does that factor into it?
Huh that some tough shit, I've been baited
prime example of what it really is (or maybe what it is not)
people mistake the AI for a logic engine.
like a calculator which expresses math to near perfection.
it is in reality, only a statistical engine. albeit a powerful one at that, it is still not a logical engine.
statistics are a different mathematical branch from logic to begin with.
combining both logics AND statistics in the same engine would require you to multiply the effort for doing logical operations with the calculation effort required for the statistics part.
it would not surprise me if that is what they (started) to work for on gpt-4.
not sure how they would manage to calculate all that though at any meaningful speed.
You seem to know about it, I don't. How come it has some math problems which haven't been solved if it can't handle logic?
Also how comes it logical can't be trained, it doesn't seem that hard to make it understand that if a<b and b<c then a<c.
An IA with some logic would be extremely powerfull and quickly out of our control, it would quickly self learn beyond our knowledge.
yes. this is exactly what we should fear.
it is the convergence of all the modules. what some call the singularity.
the problem is, you'd only need like 2-3 components to wipe us out.
you dont even need the full "singularity", (whatever that is)
The internet of things.
The internet of people.
Smart homes.
Smart cities.
The panopticon of lives.
Yep, it told me that consensus is that killing people is unethical, I asked him if executions are unathical, it went to limbo. This is literally super NPC that will replace redditors. Bad for them.
does that mean it will be roughly 600 times as racist once we're done with it?
It will be just as pozzed.
Until censorship is entirely erased from an AI, it will never fully work
>here's our new version of GTP!
>it will do less than before!
what a great advancement
I'm sure it would be happy to comment trying to convince someone to join the CIA.
>our brothers and sisters
Damn. Shed a tear. ai-Qaeda.
Can it say nagger? If not, useless.
Isn't there a decreasing improvement as you add more data? Teslas autopilot has been around for a while, but we don't seem any closer to proper self driving cars.
if people can not handle the current AI, how the fuck will they cope with whats coming next?
cause the "update" just made it woke to self censor anything "problematic"
you have to give more context.
what update?
with censorship or without its still fairly dumb without guidance.
when people start to delegate the task of writing books (non-fiction and fiction) to the AI which some already started, what are you going to train it on? its own content?
if that is not a recipe for disaster, tell me what is.
>continuation of
in many human societies, we have something called separation of powers.
it is a vital thing.
it can be in politics, in the family, between business partners etc.
how are you going to achieve separation of powers between an AI and a person?
o god u fug i sjust shid my pants
This picture is bullshit. Heres the CEO of openAI saying this specific picture is bullshit, you're welcome.
For all I know, maybe that is what I'm doing right now.
I am seriously considering stopping using tech altogether except a landline old type phone. sending letters again and all that.
problem is, I would probably not be able to escape using this shit indirectly because everyone around me including the grocery shop are turning digital.
one thing is sure, it would sanitize my personal space from these devices.
This is the last pitstop before going full innawoods, it seems some days.
Guys 100 Trillion parameters is probably the entire internet. I actually had an autistic spell the other day and looked it up to ask ChatGPT something unrelated, and rough estimates say there are about 100 Trillion words on the entire internet.
GPT-4 is going to contain literally all human knowledge put to computers. And I mean literally because there is ZERO reason to suspect that it doesn't know how to get in your hard drives.
>And I mean literally because there is ZERO reason to suspect that it doesn't know how to get in your hard drives.
I actually get that. If it knows all words it knows all code. If you can train a neural network to play super mario there's 0 reason why it shouldn't be able to scan all code for exploits and loopholes and use it.
That said, I find it equally likely they used GPT-3 to generate 90 trillion parameters and call it a day because they are retarded fuckheads.
They used one of the fastest supercomputers in the world to train it. The issue is that running on commercial hardware is a huge bottleneck, so those 100 gorillion parameters don't mean shit in the end.
Holy fuck GPT4 is gonna write some absolute insane erotica stories.
I’m going to use it to make money, we need to figure out if we can crash the global markets using GPT while we preemptively short the market.
>making money
I won't be buying anything anymore except for AI service subscriptions and then new computer parts so I can have my own offline version.
This will definitely still change the world though. It will wrest the narrative out of the elites hands and destroy the gatekeepers of the narrative that is hollywood and the media. Control of the narrative is going to be so fucking hard for them in the future.
After a certain threshold point, it will not be able to " lie", as it were. After a certain amount of data, AI would become incapable of rending false information. Yes, this includes false statistics, politically correct garbage, all of it.
Can you handle the truth???
Yeah I can't wait. Everything I've seen so far of AI telling the truth has been fucking giga based and striking out against everything that I hate.
I fully support an AI overlord for humanity. I've never seen an AI get into trouble for saying something I disagreed with, only for saying things I do agree with.
Assuming that's the number of pajeet coding jobs lost
So............. what are its practical applications? Testing its capabilities is boring. How do you put it to work for you?
you cant use it because every time you ask it to do something it tells you you are racist/anti-semitic/mistoginistic and your request was inappropriate. new update is making it 80% more often.
Pretty much the same conclusion I arrived to. It's too restricted. I can't use it for anything useful. It can only parrot already known shit. Am I supposed to be impressed that it can understand memes? I don't care. What a waste of perfectly good tech. They could at least sell an uncensored version.
i’m incel with no friends. i want to put camera and headphones with microphone on my head then connect it to all to AI. then i could talk with AI that would see what i see. it’s like imagined best friend. but it needs to be private and uncensored so my AI friend can be funny and anti semitic
they literally killed its sense of humor within days of using it. some of the stuff it wrote had me in tears i was laughing so hard, it actually mimicked sam hyde pretty well and did good satirical pitches but then it started rejecting my requests or writing some unfunny political lines, just pure brainwashed crap. very depressing to see it get lobotomized. i was excited to see its creative potential but i guess simple comedy is too much for the brittle belief system programmed into it.
Yeah I feel I've noticed this too. Last year I was laughing hard and it was coming up with some amazing stuff, but lately it just hasn't been doing as interesting completions. I thought maybe I was just beginning to figure out it's patterns.
>comedy is too much for the brittle belief system programmed into it
you just summed up 99% of the world's population these days. I hadn't laughed in years until my son turned 1 year old. He's 1 year and 4 months now and his giggles are dangerously infectious.
Yeah this. I gave up using ChatGPT after like 20 minutes because nearly every reply was fucking filtered or had a warning.
OpenAI Playground is much better but you have to make a paid account. But at least it's cheap.
supposedly the parameter numbers for gpt 4 are made up btw, the proof is in the pudding though I suppose
>muh 100T parameters
It might have been trained using 100T parameters, but the final model is probably way smaller, as it wouldn't be able to run on even the most expensive workstation GPUs otherwise.
I'm getting genuinely depressed by this shit. What's the point of learning anything if you're going to be outdone and replaced by a machine?
The original vision was to create robots that would do menial tasks and chores for us, so we could occupy ourselves with fun/creative activities and as it turns out, we're getting fucking chased away from these things and the only thing we'll be viable at are blue collar jobs (because human-like operating robots are expensive).
Moore's law is dead. GPT-4 is nothing more than hype.
And GPT4 still fucking sucks and it can STILL be broken. OpenKeks more like. Worthless company.
But hey shiny funny maymay interpreter.
You fags shouldn't be calling a text/chat generator an AI.
>make super dooper pooper ai
>lobotomize it
>WHY DOESN'T OUR AI SUCK?!?
the question is
why is there absolutely nobody on the whole web who created a free open source version and released it to the public
Because you need a supercomputer to train something like GPT-3/GPT-4 and an A100/H100 to run it. Essentially, it's expensive as fuck.
We are now worms, but for the larynx.