libs can't prove he won't get off on Brandenberg. hear them crickets?
Libs can't answer
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI
— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
frfr
[email protected]
When LULZ worked right, all new threads showes up on page 1 for at leasr some users (typically)
poop on the libs they are gay and eat poop
Is this about his Minecraft post? You know he tried swatting the sheriff right?
Yes, the post, I have no info on that.
Go ahead hunny. try an argument.
spoiler. seems she couldn't.
We all know women and troons are retarded. That's why they have to use the retard toilet.
LIBERAL women are all retarded
I was thinking about this. I don't see how it was imminent.
Has a sheriff ever been killed this way?
The rule is because you are assumwd to be rational.But, if you were presaured you might make a rash decision.
He never swatted anybody shill
It's a known fact that if you shoot sheriff shitwood in the head that he wouldn't be a problem anymore.
It's a simple fact
Everyone knows this only works if the courts were constrained by the law.
However, here in clownworld, the only thing that matters is the political ideology of the Judge.
It always comes down to a crapshoot.
yeah, law is retarded
It's not even a crap shoot. Judge will be selected specifically for political affiliation. It's not going to be random.
Did Charlottesville, the Jogger and Flyod teach you nothing? It's a miracle Zimmerman and Rittenhouse got off as is.
checked
lib women literally are retarded
>the Jogger
that one was truly insane.
a man got life in prison simply for filming the altercation.
sweet mother of nagger moses homosexual israelite did this
That one was insane to me. Proof that there's no point even dealing with police. They'll put you away for anything.
I Trump will pardon them I’d vote for him again
if trump promised to do something, it's 100% with the bookies
He deserved it. They were off scot-free, then he decided to post the video online and got everyone sentenced to life.
Also, wasn't the district attorney (or whatever lawyerfag is responsible for that shit) who originally said it was self defense get charged?
>he won't get off
The 'process' is the 'penalty'.
Our government is 'amoral evil'.
True. the cops are the confederates of the browncoats. His Twitter is full of unprofessional antagonizing. He can dish it, but does so with color of law.
If the legal/court system in this country were fair, this never would have been an issue to begin with.
>1) Intent to cause harm
This one is subjective but they can likely argue the context was such that he intended to cause harm.
>2) Express advocacy of harm
This one is easy. He said multiple times that someone should be murdered.
>3) Harm caused must be illegal
This one is easy as well. Shooting someone in the head is illegal.
>4) Harm caused must be imminent
This one probably the hardest to prove out of all of them. There is probably precident for written/spoken comments and but imminentcy is a fuzzy concept and prosecutors could use it to their advantage
>Advocacy must be likely to cause harm
This is going to be somewhat hard to prove. They will reference shooters who posted on LULZ and try to argue using this website and writing such comments is enough to constitute likelihood.
So it isn't clean cut but given the US's free speech laws he has a shot at getting off. The guy's life is likely ruined no matter what though (not that he had much going on but still).
intent seems to be whatever the judge wants.
3 is a slam dunk, but it shouldn't be. moral codes are not subject ti change at law, eternally do they derive, homosexuality from aeons back is a crime like murder.
so, if 2 is strong, 3 falls. 3 strong, 2 falls.
>This one is easy. He said multiple times that someone should be murdered.
In a video game. So not as easy as you might think.
>In a video game.
You know saying "in Minecraft" is as real as asking someone whether or not they're a cop, right?
We're about to find out. But I suspect this is a sticking point.
Wanting to kill someone's minecraft character is not a crime.
>We're about to find out.
It's not a real defense.
Cite case law or rake yourself, leaf
>SOURCE?!?!?!
You're the one making the claim so I think that's your job.
The reason it doesn't work is that it's easy to argue the statement is still sincere (especially since he's using a well known meme and didn't say something like "if I were paying Counterstrike I'd shoot him in the head..."). Do you remember when Sam Hyde said he wanted to kill that Hassan guy "IN REAL LIFE!" The literal interpretation is that he wanted to kill him. However, given the context of the statement it's still defensible as a joke.
Minecraft is a popular hobby, your honor. Exhibit 911:
>in which you don't shoot people in the head
It's not a defense. Again, it's a well known meme that retards think is true (like cops having to tell you they're cops). It's not.
>I didn't make the claim
The claim is that saying "in Minecraft" is a legal defense that allows you to make illegal speech. It's not. The legality of such is in Brandenburg v. Ohio and the defense will not be basing its case off of a "Minecraft" defense you absolute retard.
Your honor, this is an oriental cartoons and gaming fansite. Nothing is very literal here. Let me show you /d/
Seriously, you guys are like that retarded kid in class who thought he could tell the teacher to "puck off" and get away with it because he changed a letter.
See the tentacles? Here a user account "Anonymous" says, "I just want to put my tentaclea in all her holes" and it continues from ther. Your honor, tentacle monsters are fantasy creatures.
Nobody thinks it's true. Morons who don't understand sarcasm think others aren't using it ironically because they're morons
I didn't make any claim you stupid nagger. An anon said "we're about to find out" and you chimped out. Get a fucking grip LMAO
In minecraft itself is a statement of insincerity. It's saying "I know you really shouldn't talk like this because some people will think you're serious and I'm just joking." It's a fucking meme.
Yes.
No.
ChatGPT pointed out the minecracaft defense could literally hapoen. please lmao
>ChatGPT pointed out
Kek.
chatgpt could pass the bar
lmfao, if what he said must meet all these points to be in violation of the law, then he’s def getting off.
checked for masonic elements
It seems like he has a pretty good defense but it depends on a jury. Another thing that retards don't understand is that convictions can be based on circumstantial evidence.
Totality of the circumstance. He had almost no capacity to harm the sheriff and the sheriff is an intelligent, armed man. If this case had any merit, everytime someone said "i hope you die" or "kill yourself" would be prosecutable. There's no manifested intent or planning so we can assume it's just talk. This will probably end shitwood's career because of how bonkers stupid it is. It's not your employer seeing a facebook post and terminating you, it's a sheriff going beyond state lines with a vendetta.
I hope shitwood get's ass cancer and bleeds out.
You're overstating (1). Merely saying something of a harmful nature isn't "intent to cause harm"
itent is at the judge's discretion.
It literally isn't. The prosecution would have to prove that
it's subjective, the subparts of intent are.
Prove he typed it and no someone else on his computer.
4,5 fail
Oh, and (2) of the main is questionable.
whatever chud we're still winning the GOP is cucked and fucked. You got fucked by Trump and u deserve it. Remember: Trump will ruin every election for the GOP until he gets his 2nd term. Joke is it will never happen XD
Golden’s post hits points 2 and 3, they’d have to prove 1, I think it fails points 4 and 5.
Your honor, you can do anything in minecraft. Let me show you the netherworld.
Your honor, you could model Ivanka's feet in glorious detail in Minecraft, for example.
Oh yes. And there's more.
if that was me id get my entire post history as evidence so i could read it all to the court (for contextual reasons of course)