Imagine being this poor guy. No male over the age of 20 with a healthy mind takes you serious yet your whole deal is presenting this "masculinity" persona and whoring for attention. Its actually pretty sad.
He’s become a thought leader in hebrew neocon circles, is against an ethnostate, has no belief in any particular god, he’s a drug addict, with mental health issues, and he has a questionable history with his daughter. The only people aligned with him are 15-29 year old ‘white’ guys with weak fathers, no brains, and no guidance.
Anonymous says:
>The only people aligned with him are 15-29 year old ‘white’ guys with weak fathers, no brains, and no guidance.
So /pol/’s userbase?
Anonymous says:
Yes, but somehow even gayer and more stupid, as impossible as that may seem. Peterson is the posterboy of ‘reject post-modernity, embrace modernity’. His beliefs are based on nothing more than what he thinks is practical. He has no soul. He neither believes that there is transcendental meaning or value, nor does he believe in social progress, and bring humanity forward in any way. His approach to life is pretty much saying what he thinks, without any basis in a concrete philosophical system and hoping he sounds smart enough to reel in midwits by quoting Hegel and Jung every now and again.
>is against an ethnostate
That’s because that’s an archaic fossilized concept nobody really takes seriously
I agree completely. I’m not a /pol/tard, but i know what kind of ideas they float, and this drugged-up grandpa Kermit-impersonator ain’t the type of person they see as being on their side. Everyone i know that likes him are the type to watch ‘libs get owned compilation #13’ on Youtube in hecking 2023. They all believe in God as some sort of symbol. They all have weak chins. They all get no b***hes. It’s funny to meet these people in person, and it goes to show how easy it is for stupids with advanced degrees to grow cults of personality around themselves.
Anonymous says:
>Peterson is the posterboy of ‘reject post-modernity, embrace modernity’. His beliefs are based on nothing more than what he thinks is practical. He has no soul. He neither believes that there is transcendental meaning or value, nor does he believe in social progress, and bring humanity forward in any way. His approach to life is pretty much saying what he thinks, without any basis in a concrete philosophical system and hoping he sounds smart enough to reel in midwits by quoting Hegel and Jung every now and again.
But that’s absolute bullshit lmao. Most of his lectures consist of him referencing the bible as a set of moral guidelines. He has nothing to believe in because he studies human nature and knows all beliefs stem from it. Thi sis such an incredibly stupid take, and I’m not a fan of the guy particularly. I find him very knowledgeable however. Also most of pol hates the guy.
Anonymous says:
>But that’s absolute bullshit lmao. Most of his lectures consist of him referencing the bible as a set of moral guidelines. He has nothing to believe in because he studies human nature and knows all beliefs stem from it. Thi sis such an incredibly stupid take, and I’m not a fan of the guy particularly. I find him very knowledgeable however. Also most of pol hates the guy.
Yet everytime he’s asked what god believes in he either gives a vague answer or admits that he doesn’t believe in any god in particular. He’s a pragmatist and a materialist. His view of Darwinian anthropology presupposes any religious ontology. He believes in ‘following human nature’, but never goes into justifying why his belief in nature matters or how that belief has any bearing on morality. His unsubstantiated epistemological realism got called out by that gay atheist he’s always spending time with. Dude really needs to read Hume and Quine and realize you cannot derive an ought from an is. He’s a stupid that doesn’t give any justification for his beliefs, but apparently it doesn’t take make much to have a mass of the uneducated, band behind your grift so you can feed your destructive drug addiction.
Anonymous says:
seethe
Anonymous says:
The pocket response of a dumb moron
Anonymous says:
u r ultra mad
Anonymous says:
Anonymous says:
Not believing in a higher diety surely doesn’t make you outright materialistic.
>His view of Darwinian anthropology presupposes any religious ontology
If you’re refering to his view on lobsters then yeah, it’s completely stupid I must admit, and his blind faith in antidepressants is bothering to say the least.
Anonymous says:
But otherwise his view on interpersonal attraction is spot on and can be noticed by anyone with a foot in the real world. The only reason I follow him on some stuff he says is because I experienced it.
>He believes in ‘following human nature’, but never goes into justifying why his belief in nature matters or how that belief has any bearing on morality.
I don’t really get your point. Man is a natural being that must follow a moral, be it religious or a categorical imperative to not crumble under guilt or be chastised by his fellow men. Try and be as mean and egocentric as you can for a week, see how far that gets you towards other people and how shitty you’ll feel after a while.
Anonymous says:
>Not believing in a higher diety surely doesn’t make you outright materialistic.
I never said that was the case.
But otherwise his view on interpersonal attraction is spot on and can be noticed by anyone with a foot in the real world. The only reason I follow him on some stuff he says is because I experienced it.
>He believes in ‘following human nature’, but never goes into justifying why his belief in nature matters or how that belief has any bearing on morality.
I don’t really get your point. Man is a natural being that must follow a moral, be it religious or a categorical imperative to not crumble under guilt or be chastised by his fellow men. Try and be as mean and egocentric as you can for a week, see how far that gets you towards other people and how shitty you’ll feel after a while.
>I don’t really get your point. Man is a natural being that must follow a moral, be it religious or a categorical imperative to not crumble under guilt or be chastised by his fellow men. Try and be as mean and egocentric as you can for a week, see how far that gets you towards other people and how shitty you’ll feel after a while.
This is an unsubstantiated pragmatic view of morality. Of course if you’re an asshole people may not treat you well. Maybe the autists that follow him don’t understand that, but for normal people, that isn’t a grand revelation. Morality cannot be grounded in the material, it’s either subjective, and meaningless, or grounded in a higher objective being; same goes for nature and being. Peterson is neither smart enough to be an ontological nihilist nor embrace a transcendental ontology. His a priori grounding in the material and inability to engage with metaphysics makes his blabbing about morality and nature senseless. He’s not a philosopher, and very much admits that, but then he proceeds to give unqualified opinions on matters of philosophy and spirituality. That’s why he’s sought after by men with weak fathers and no spiritual guidance; any good father could teach you a lot more about life, and any good spiritual father could teach you a lot about our nature and being.
Anonymous says:
>is against an ethnostate
That’s because that’s an archaic fossilized concept nobody really takes seriously
Anonymous says:
>is against an ethnostate
Except Israel of course
Anonymous says:
>he’s a drug addict, with mental health issues
Just like majority of shrinks.
Anonymous says:
Is that why so many younger black men (20-mid30s) love his videos now?
Anonymous says:
Young back men are getting more into the manosphere and starting to talk about things disaffected white men were talking about 10 years ago. It doesn’t help that so many black men are being raised in fatherless homes.
Jordan Petersen is incredibly based simply due to the fact that he makes effeminate libtard males and mentally ill they/them non-binary radical feminist cunts INCREDIBLY angry. Seethingly so. It’s insane the hate he inspires. I don’t follow the guy, I only know what I’ve seen from his Joe Rogan interview. Ooh, he tells gaygy men to take charge of their lives instead of staying indoors wallowing in their own self pity? He tells beta cucks to not let women wear the pants, and instead work for an equal 50/50 relationship? No wonder liberals despise him, since their main goal is to turn all men into sissy boys, because when men are more like women, women can control them far easier, and so can hebrews and the government.
Seethe harder trannies. Pic related, it’s yfw you hear about Jordan Petersen, and also after reading my post rn.
/thread. The big picture of what JP says is common sense traditional knowledge that you can’t even argue with. Mentally ill non binary tranny gays of course hate him
I’m not denying that the shoes are insane. Hell, even the socks are a bit problematic because they’re roughly the same color as grubby white gym socks.
They’ve got terrible job security because most right-wing grifters have a short shelf life. They also make themselves unemployable most of the time. How many right-wing grifters end up in a good place long-term after all?
what do you call that typing style?
to answer your question, i would call that style of clothes; vintage american icecream seller. defo 1950’s vibes. you must admit it is a SOLID fit. more cohesive than almost everything I’ve seen here.
>i would call that style of clothes; vintage american icecream seller. defo 1950’s vibes. you must admit it is a SOLID fit. more cohesive than almost everything I’ve seen here.
stupid take. If he was going for the old ice cream man vibe, then he should be wearing dressier shoes. If he went all in and wore appropriate footwear and added an ice cream man hat, I might actually respect the fit if he wasn’t always posing and contorting like he’s trying to speak sign language to a autistic alien.
Humiliation ritual
toddler suit
benzo bozo
coke’d up presenter in a tv quiz show
hebrew Owned Cuckservative
He’s dressed like an NBA player.
Imagine being this poor guy. No male over the age of 20 with a healthy mind takes you serious yet your whole deal is presenting this "masculinity" persona and whoring for attention. Its actually pretty sad.
>pol still threatened by weak old men telling you to be responsible
are you stuck in 2019?
nowadays peterson gives his qualified opinions on the ukraine war, the economy and trannies
Yep poltard crying
Im pretty sure he is completely aligned with pol on everything: pro russia, anti tranny, obsessed with the WEF and Klaus Schwab..
He’s become a thought leader in hebrew neocon circles, is against an ethnostate, has no belief in any particular god, he’s a drug addict, with mental health issues, and he has a questionable history with his daughter. The only people aligned with him are 15-29 year old ‘white’ guys with weak fathers, no brains, and no guidance.
>The only people aligned with him are 15-29 year old ‘white’ guys with weak fathers, no brains, and no guidance.
So /pol/’s userbase?
Yes, but somehow even gayer and more stupid, as impossible as that may seem. Peterson is the posterboy of ‘reject post-modernity, embrace modernity’. His beliefs are based on nothing more than what he thinks is practical. He has no soul. He neither believes that there is transcendental meaning or value, nor does he believe in social progress, and bring humanity forward in any way. His approach to life is pretty much saying what he thinks, without any basis in a concrete philosophical system and hoping he sounds smart enough to reel in midwits by quoting Hegel and Jung every now and again.
I agree completely. I’m not a /pol/tard, but i know what kind of ideas they float, and this drugged-up grandpa Kermit-impersonator ain’t the type of person they see as being on their side. Everyone i know that likes him are the type to watch ‘libs get owned compilation #13’ on Youtube in hecking 2023. They all believe in God as some sort of symbol. They all have weak chins. They all get no b***hes. It’s funny to meet these people in person, and it goes to show how easy it is for stupids with advanced degrees to grow cults of personality around themselves.
>Peterson is the posterboy of ‘reject post-modernity, embrace modernity’. His beliefs are based on nothing more than what he thinks is practical. He has no soul. He neither believes that there is transcendental meaning or value, nor does he believe in social progress, and bring humanity forward in any way. His approach to life is pretty much saying what he thinks, without any basis in a concrete philosophical system and hoping he sounds smart enough to reel in midwits by quoting Hegel and Jung every now and again.
But that’s absolute bullshit lmao. Most of his lectures consist of him referencing the bible as a set of moral guidelines. He has nothing to believe in because he studies human nature and knows all beliefs stem from it. Thi sis such an incredibly stupid take, and I’m not a fan of the guy particularly. I find him very knowledgeable however. Also most of pol hates the guy.
>But that’s absolute bullshit lmao. Most of his lectures consist of him referencing the bible as a set of moral guidelines. He has nothing to believe in because he studies human nature and knows all beliefs stem from it. Thi sis such an incredibly stupid take, and I’m not a fan of the guy particularly. I find him very knowledgeable however. Also most of pol hates the guy.
Yet everytime he’s asked what god believes in he either gives a vague answer or admits that he doesn’t believe in any god in particular. He’s a pragmatist and a materialist. His view of Darwinian anthropology presupposes any religious ontology. He believes in ‘following human nature’, but never goes into justifying why his belief in nature matters or how that belief has any bearing on morality. His unsubstantiated epistemological realism got called out by that gay atheist he’s always spending time with. Dude really needs to read Hume and Quine and realize you cannot derive an ought from an is. He’s a stupid that doesn’t give any justification for his beliefs, but apparently it doesn’t take make much to have a mass of the uneducated, band behind your grift so you can feed your destructive drug addiction.
seethe
The pocket response of a dumb moron
u r ultra mad
Not believing in a higher diety surely doesn’t make you outright materialistic.
>His view of Darwinian anthropology presupposes any religious ontology
If you’re refering to his view on lobsters then yeah, it’s completely stupid I must admit, and his blind faith in antidepressants is bothering to say the least.
But otherwise his view on interpersonal attraction is spot on and can be noticed by anyone with a foot in the real world. The only reason I follow him on some stuff he says is because I experienced it.
>He believes in ‘following human nature’, but never goes into justifying why his belief in nature matters or how that belief has any bearing on morality.
I don’t really get your point. Man is a natural being that must follow a moral, be it religious or a categorical imperative to not crumble under guilt or be chastised by his fellow men. Try and be as mean and egocentric as you can for a week, see how far that gets you towards other people and how shitty you’ll feel after a while.
>Not believing in a higher diety surely doesn’t make you outright materialistic.
I never said that was the case.
>I don’t really get your point. Man is a natural being that must follow a moral, be it religious or a categorical imperative to not crumble under guilt or be chastised by his fellow men. Try and be as mean and egocentric as you can for a week, see how far that gets you towards other people and how shitty you’ll feel after a while.
This is an unsubstantiated pragmatic view of morality. Of course if you’re an asshole people may not treat you well. Maybe the autists that follow him don’t understand that, but for normal people, that isn’t a grand revelation. Morality cannot be grounded in the material, it’s either subjective, and meaningless, or grounded in a higher objective being; same goes for nature and being. Peterson is neither smart enough to be an ontological nihilist nor embrace a transcendental ontology. His a priori grounding in the material and inability to engage with metaphysics makes his blabbing about morality and nature senseless. He’s not a philosopher, and very much admits that, but then he proceeds to give unqualified opinions on matters of philosophy and spirituality. That’s why he’s sought after by men with weak fathers and no spiritual guidance; any good father could teach you a lot more about life, and any good spiritual father could teach you a lot about our nature and being.
>is against an ethnostate
That’s because that’s an archaic fossilized concept nobody really takes seriously
>is against an ethnostate
Except Israel of course
>he’s a drug addict, with mental health issues
Just like majority of shrinks.
Is that why so many younger black men (20-mid30s) love his videos now?
Young back men are getting more into the manosphere and starting to talk about things disaffected white men were talking about 10 years ago. It doesn’t help that so many black men are being raised in fatherless homes.
I miss that powerpoint theme
To think these two are the same man…
what if they’re not… before deep fakes were cia dopples
Less of a dress, more of a humiliation ritual.
Gotta spend your millions on something
Boss baby
Jordan Petersen is incredibly based simply due to the fact that he makes effeminate libtard males and mentally ill they/them non-binary radical feminist cunts INCREDIBLY angry. Seethingly so. It’s insane the hate he inspires. I don’t follow the guy, I only know what I’ve seen from his Joe Rogan interview. Ooh, he tells gaygy men to take charge of their lives instead of staying indoors wallowing in their own self pity? He tells beta cucks to not let women wear the pants, and instead work for an equal 50/50 relationship? No wonder liberals despise him, since their main goal is to turn all men into sissy boys, because when men are more like women, women can control them far easier, and so can hebrews and the government.
Seethe harder trannies. Pic related, it’s yfw you hear about Jordan Petersen, and also after reading my post rn.
I can’t tell if this is irony or not anon, but this post is golden.
/thread. The big picture of what JP says is common sense traditional knowledge that you can’t even argue with. Mentally ill non binary tranny gays of course hate him
>pill-popping
>being mentally ill
>not believing in God
>traditional
Based stupid
>this dude listens to what another man tells him to do in life instead of forming his own path
what’s it like being a cuck gay that can’t think for himself
No need to reinvent the wheel.
hecking golden post. I hope this becomes a pasta.
>inane polcel garbage
seethe more libtard
Nobody is seething at this shit anymore, it’s not 2016
Quality bait
ITS VERY
MARKIST, BECAUSE MARK SOUNDS LIKE A GAY NAME HAHA AND IT SOUNDS LIKE MARXIST.
Fugly. Obvi with a capital F
losing it
"It’s a boy!"
Why didn’t he just wear some actual shoes? The sneakers make the already ridiculous suit look 4x worse.
Even without the shoes the suit looks like a pimp outfit but with the color scheme of a pack of diapers.
Yeah but the shoes make it look even more mismatched.
I’m not denying that the shoes are insane. Hell, even the socks are a bit problematic because they’re roughly the same color as grubby white gym socks.
Is being a right wing grifter the easiest job in the world?
Just say trannies le bad and theyll deep throat you and shower you with money
Yeah you can even be a tranny while doing it
They’ve got terrible job security because most right-wing grifters have a short shelf life. They also make themselves unemployable most of the time. How many right-wing grifters end up in a good place long-term after all?
His book is great. I actually really like his goofy style but the man himself has gone insane.
NBA draftcore
unironically good
idk but he is very nice in person. I met him at a show (VIP lvl 2) in Austin, took a picture and talked for a sec.
what do you call that typing style?
to answer your question, i would call that style of clothes; vintage american icecream seller. defo 1950’s vibes. you must admit it is a SOLID fit. more cohesive than almost everything I’ve seen here.
>i would call that style of clothes; vintage american icecream seller. defo 1950’s vibes. you must admit it is a SOLID fit. more cohesive than almost everything I’ve seen here.
stupid take. If he was going for the old ice cream man vibe, then he should be wearing dressier shoes. If he went all in and wore appropriate footwear and added an ice cream man hat, I might actually respect the fit if he wasn’t always posing and contorting like he’s trying to speak sign language to a autistic alien.
he’s just dressing like bing crosby
ontologically transcendent core
He wouldn’t understand what that means
he’s the one who says it all the time