>pedophilia is valid
Literally the only pro pedo people are also anti-LGBT.
Anonymous says:
how is homosexuality harmful ? to whom ? dont say children lmao
Anonymous says:
>how is homosexuality harmful ?
To the parents. Wasted resources etc.
Anonymous says:
It does massive harm to your own spirit
Anonymous says:
teaching kids about sex in school is normal in europe and kids dont have more sex
treating sex like some secret shit that no one talks about created the hypersexual american culture where the only place to learn about sex is porn
europe definitely does have looser sexual morals (i’m thinking swingers, sex clubs, etc.) but i think the repression in american culture leads to perversion. when you don’t air out latent sexual desires and only feed them in isolation through porn they’ll get more extreme. i’d be willing to bet furry giantess foot fetishists are overwhelmingly american.
Anonymous says:
also nudity is not as sexual in europe, in the us you cant be naked without offending people
Anonymous says:
Americans are more religious. There’s groups of people that don’t just follow whatever socially-engineered morals they’re told to follow in the current year.
Anonymous says:
depends where.loads more degenerates in france germany and UK than italy poland and portugal, though they’ve invaded everywhere by now
Anonymous says:
>loads more degenerates in france germany and UK than italy poland and portugal
source: dude just trust me
Anonymous says:
Ban porn
Anonymous says:
amen
Anonymous says:
>teaching kids about sex in school is normal in europe and kids dont have more sex
Being european, i’ve had a "sex education" class when i was 14.
It was two gays (litteral homosexuals) teaching us teens how to put a condom on a banana and talking about AIDS.
The whole thing was just them probably creaming their pants thinking about us havibg sex. The other way around was also disgusting to imagine.
The whole thing had pervert undertones as they were propagating their own view about sex, a view that was both empty of sense, nihilistic and sad.
Anonymous says:
that’s not any different than in america, except i had it in middle school and the person doing it was my math teacher who later got fired for saying he was gonna kill a kid
Anonymous says:
>no! there’s some gays on a commercial! they are literally teaching toddlers how to jack off and having sex with children nooo!!
kwab
https://i.imgur.com/VAk1njh.jpg
Which brand is the most pozzed, and why is it Calvin Klein?
adidas because vatnigs wear it and they’ve got the highest AIDs infection rate outside of africa
Bras should push the breast up against your body. His nipples are drooping, which means the fabric is not supportive enough. That could mean one of two things; either the fabric is not tight enough, or the fabric is snug but it’s too cheap/thin to give the correct amount of support for the girth it needs to hold up/against the chest wall. I think it’s the latter, also the band needs to be wider, and a bit looser; it’s buckling under the strain of his underbust measurement, so it’s too small and too tight. Literally he’s wearing exactly the wrong size and cut for his body to fit/rest correctly in it. So it’s basically an anti-advertisement because it’s telling both men and plus size women "this brand isn’t made for your physical mass".
In the second photo everything fits correctly, which is funny because it shows how Calvin Klein is literally just virtue signaling; their bras are cut and sized to work with thin models and then clearly don’t work for fat people. It almost confirms; "don’t buy if you are fat".
The trans element to the ads is something I barely notice mostly because the failure to market the wearability of their product is so high.
https://i.imgur.com/qxkivyD.jpg
adidas
this design could be seen as anti-LGBTQ+
That’s how I read it. Looks like you’ve crib-stomped the rainbow. Also, some cities charge hate crimes for people stepping on the rainbow crosswalks in the "wrong" way. Or leaving tire marks. So It’s basically an alt-right sneaker.
>it’s intentionally equally off.
Why would CK do that? They want to sell bras.
It can boost their sales up 25% if all their customers born in a male body wear bras.
Because mass produced fashion doesn’t fit hardly anyone, ever since we moved from the age of personally tailored clothes and every household owning and knowing how to use a sewing machine. Nobody feels good in their store bought clothes. CK is just trying to normalize that feeling with this ad and convince you that it’s cool to not fit in shit that’s too tight so you’ll buy more
I, for one, am glad that trannys and corporate shills now see the traditional rainbow as obsolete and bigoted and got their new pride flag. Traditional six color rainbow can be used by normies again.
Beautiful people are expected to just exist in the background now and not promote their natural beauty. That’s why a lot of actually pretty people get tattoos and nose rings and color their hair; they know they are pretty, but they can’t market themselves on their natural traits anymore so they have to mask their appeal as having a unique/good sense of style. That way when they beat out the ugly ones in popularity, they can claim it’s just because they are more creative/talented and not get burned at the steak for being just naturally more attractive.
there’s definitely a push towards not caring about natural beauty, which sucks, but ugly people dye their hair, get intrusive piercings, etc. at the same rate as good looking people. in fact that’s probably part of why they do it, with a face full of piercings and dyed hair you don’t focus so much on their weak facial genetics.
Because ugly people threatened to cancel and lead boycotts against the fashion industry for staying elitist.
Terrified of losing profits due to damaged reputation, they did what any spineless enterprise would do and damaged their reputation. Now fashion is for everyone, except you, pretentious chud.
i remember spending a lot of time on /pol/ from around 2014-2016 but some of y’all never left the place and it hasn’t done your brains any good.
if you disagree with the pandering to unhealthy life choices, good. start a family. teach your values, pass them along. be a shining example to your family and friends, lead by example, built a great foundation. boycott calvin klein for all i care.
but this weird american/pol/ way of thinking everything has to be made into a discussion and everytime a brand chooses to do something you disagree with it is your duty to shit up a board with it is unhealthy, annyoing and has never lead to anything.
if you teach your children right and surround yourself with like-minded people, calvin klein putting sports bras on men is not going to impact your life or the lives of the ones you love in the slightest.
stop giving a shit about brands doing whatever fits the cultural zeitgeist simply to make more money.
It doesn’t impact my life in particular, it impacts society.
And these brand don’t follow the "cultural zeitgeist", they create it.
The rest of your post is just projection.
Also, what makes you think it was a critic of these brands. Pozzed is good. It’s ok to be HIV positive, it’s as good as not having HIV, or even better, because it’s positive.
>And these brand don’t follow the "cultural zeitgeist", they create it.
You’re overselling their influence. No one who’s anyone actually gives a damn about all this ugly shit, I assure you
Redpilled post. These companies do this to market themselves to people you’ll never even meet, people need to stop thinking every single random online-only identity politics topic is the most important thing in the hecking universe.
Pozzed is derived from HIV Positive and refers to when someone has been infected with it, which by way of queer associations is associated with progressive leftist globalism.
To be pozzed is to be supportive of SJW initiatives, which are backed by the shadow cabal establishment for the purpose of destabilizing and undermining society.
>Be me >Wear CK underwear cause of hot models and celebs wearing them >Thinking I can look the same so it gives confidence >Nowadays all fat gays and landwhales and degenerates wear them >Never buy any again >Buy Tommy Hilfiger cause of athletes on ads that look hot and ripped
Way to hecking go CK marketing team.
Wanna point out how this person is hot and could be LGBTQ+ and it would be a non-issue.
Woke/Poz marketing is anti-beauty.
Anyone can choose to be beautiful… It has nothing to do with gender identity or sexuality. These weirdos keep creating ugly marketing strategies and then associate it with being gay or trans or whatever. I’m tired of it and it re-enforces negative connotations.
(also doesn’t re-enforcing ugliness bring up feelings of dysphoria? isn’t the goal to reduce dysphoric triggers?)
>Wear CK underwear cause of hot models and celebs wearing them >Buy Tommy Hilfiger cause of athletes on ads that look hot and ripped
so there’s "people" out there who’s really this stupid… what a time to be alive
Only Japanese girls between the ages of 17-24 can wear crazy platform shoes and look good. I see girls with shoes like this all the time in Osaka and Nagoya.
the problem isnt black people existing, the problem is that corporations can afford and will pay highly to plaster this shit everywhere, for all we know it was a white guys idea
why do you guys care so much what an advertisement shows? i mean at the end of the day an advertisement is just what a group of professionals thinks will maximise profits in some way. theres no thought behind it besides what might potentially lead more people to buy these products
Ad agencies don’t have complete control, they work to the specs they’re given like how an engineer does with an architect’s vision. So how an engineer will make a suspension bridge when he knows a span bridge would be objectively better for the application, so ad agencies use the diverse models they are told to because they want to keep the contract.
it’s all so fake anyway, in the 80s they didnt mind putting Brooke Shields on their advertisements for controversy and attention, now that pedophilia doesnt sell they go for obese trannies instead
It doesn’t even fit him.
Why would you put a model in the wrong size, when you’re trying to tell people you sell in plus-sizes?
Is this one better?
How do you wear your bras, anon? It’s supposed to be snug.
Absolutely hecking revolting.
bestiality is objectively less harmful than pedophilia and homosexuality
Or you know, eating animals.
>pedophilia is valid
Literally the only pro pedo people are also anti-LGBT.
how is homosexuality harmful ? to whom ? dont say children lmao
>how is homosexuality harmful ?
To the parents. Wasted resources etc.
It does massive harm to your own spirit
teaching kids about sex in school is normal in europe and kids dont have more sex
treating sex like some secret shit that no one talks about created the hypersexual american culture where the only place to learn about sex is porn
europe definitely does have looser sexual morals (i’m thinking swingers, sex clubs, etc.) but i think the repression in american culture leads to perversion. when you don’t air out latent sexual desires and only feed them in isolation through porn they’ll get more extreme. i’d be willing to bet furry giantess foot fetishists are overwhelmingly american.
also nudity is not as sexual in europe, in the us you cant be naked without offending people
Americans are more religious. There’s groups of people that don’t just follow whatever socially-engineered morals they’re told to follow in the current year.
depends where.loads more degenerates in france germany and UK than italy poland and portugal, though they’ve invaded everywhere by now
>loads more degenerates in france germany and UK than italy poland and portugal
source: dude just trust me
Ban porn
amen
>teaching kids about sex in school is normal in europe and kids dont have more sex
Being european, i’ve had a "sex education" class when i was 14.
It was two gays (litteral homosexuals) teaching us teens how to put a condom on a banana and talking about AIDS.
The whole thing was just them probably creaming their pants thinking about us havibg sex. The other way around was also disgusting to imagine.
The whole thing had pervert undertones as they were propagating their own view about sex, a view that was both empty of sense, nihilistic and sad.
that’s not any different than in america, except i had it in middle school and the person doing it was my math teacher who later got fired for saying he was gonna kill a kid
>no! there’s some gays on a commercial! they are literally teaching toddlers how to jack off and having sex with children nooo!!
kwab
adidas because vatnigs wear it and they’ve got the highest AIDs infection rate outside of africa
Bras should push the breast up against your body. His nipples are drooping, which means the fabric is not supportive enough. That could mean one of two things; either the fabric is not tight enough, or the fabric is snug but it’s too cheap/thin to give the correct amount of support for the girth it needs to hold up/against the chest wall. I think it’s the latter, also the band needs to be wider, and a bit looser; it’s buckling under the strain of his underbust measurement, so it’s too small and too tight. Literally he’s wearing exactly the wrong size and cut for his body to fit/rest correctly in it. So it’s basically an anti-advertisement because it’s telling both men and plus size women "this brand isn’t made for your physical mass".
In the second photo everything fits correctly, which is funny because it shows how Calvin Klein is literally just virtue signaling; their bras are cut and sized to work with thin models and then clearly don’t work for fat people. It almost confirms; "don’t buy if you are fat".
The trans element to the ads is something I barely notice mostly because the failure to market the wearability of their product is so high.
That’s how I read it. Looks like you’ve crib-stomped the rainbow. Also, some cities charge hate crimes for people stepping on the rainbow crosswalks in the "wrong" way. Or leaving tire marks. So It’s basically an alt-right sneaker.
It’s always the stupids that write the most about something has the least amount of knowledge about the subject.
There’s only one answer to this question.
No, it’s not, it’s intentionally equally off.
>and why is it Calvin Klein?
Obviously, not CK.
>it’s intentionally equally off.
Why would CK do that? They want to sell bras.
It can boost their sales up 25% if all their customers born in a male body wear bras.
Because mass produced fashion doesn’t fit hardly anyone, ever since we moved from the age of personally tailored clothes and every household owning and knowing how to use a sewing machine. Nobody feels good in their store bought clothes. CK is just trying to normalize that feeling with this ad and convince you that it’s cool to not fit in shit that’s too tight so you’ll buy more
>Nobody feels good in their store bought clothes.
I’m literally a woman and okay with it wtf is wrong you insecure virgin??
adidas
this design could be seen as anti-LGBTQ+
The infamous Adidas SmashThem
looks like they’ve been stomping the flag, bit of an odd choice.
I, for one, am glad that trannys and corporate shills now see the traditional rainbow as obsolete and bigoted and got their new pride flag. Traditional six color rainbow can be used by normies again.
i like the person on the lefts tattoo, any more pics?
WHY THE heck IS EVERYONE UGLY NOW, JUST 30 YEARS AGO MODELS LOOKED LIKE THIS, UGLY PEOPLE NEED TO GO TO THE BACK YOURE UGLY NOT A MODEL heck
Beautiful people are expected to just exist in the background now and not promote their natural beauty. That’s why a lot of actually pretty people get tattoos and nose rings and color their hair; they know they are pretty, but they can’t market themselves on their natural traits anymore so they have to mask their appeal as having a unique/good sense of style. That way when they beat out the ugly ones in popularity, they can claim it’s just because they are more creative/talented and not get burned at the steak for being just naturally more attractive.
there’s definitely a push towards not caring about natural beauty, which sucks, but ugly people dye their hair, get intrusive piercings, etc. at the same rate as good looking people. in fact that’s probably part of why they do it, with a face full of piercings and dyed hair you don’t focus so much on their weak facial genetics.
No, it’s about sending a message. They’re trying to demoralize you.
>That’s why a lot of actually pretty people get tattoos and nose rings and color their hair
Bullshit.
Main reason is low self-esteem due to childhood trauma.
Which does not exclude beautiful or rich people.
>Main reason is low self-esteem due to childhood trauma.
this is true
she looks better than 90% of models today
That’s Stephanie Seymour stupid. Great hair and teeth.
>Minus18 youth advocate
The end of western civilization can’t come soon enough.
>if you only knew how bad things really are
the majority of people are ugly and normies loathe self-improvement
wait a minute…
there’s a black model in this picture.
and she’s not fat and ugly…
Holy heck, I didn’t even notice, I just saw 3 attractive women.
90s models mogged so hard, they still do
She’s mogging the other two. Gorgeous
Because ugly people threatened to cancel and lead boycotts against the fashion industry for staying elitist.
Terrified of losing profits due to damaged reputation, they did what any spineless enterprise would do and damaged their reputation. Now fashion is for everyone, except you, pretentious chud.
they shouldn’t pander to Black folk and feature non-white models on general principle
This.
Exceptions are objective 9/10 / 10/10s like Idris Elba.
it’s all pozzed corporate trash
i remember spending a lot of time on /pol/ from around 2014-2016 but some of y’all never left the place and it hasn’t done your brains any good.
if you disagree with the pandering to unhealthy life choices, good. start a family. teach your values, pass them along. be a shining example to your family and friends, lead by example, built a great foundation. boycott calvin klein for all i care.
but this weird american/pol/ way of thinking everything has to be made into a discussion and everytime a brand chooses to do something you disagree with it is your duty to shit up a board with it is unhealthy, annyoing and has never lead to anything.
if you teach your children right and surround yourself with like-minded people, calvin klein putting sports bras on men is not going to impact your life or the lives of the ones you love in the slightest.
stop giving a shit about brands doing whatever fits the cultural zeitgeist simply to make more money.
It doesn’t impact my life in particular, it impacts society.
And these brand don’t follow the "cultural zeitgeist", they create it.
The rest of your post is just projection.
Also, what makes you think it was a critic of these brands. Pozzed is good. It’s ok to be HIV positive, it’s as good as not having HIV, or even better, because it’s positive.
>And these brand don’t follow the "cultural zeitgeist", they create it.
You’re overselling their influence. No one who’s anyone actually gives a damn about all this ugly shit, I assure you
>It doesn’t impact my life in particular, it impacts society.
This
Redpilled post. These companies do this to market themselves to people you’ll never even meet, people need to stop thinking every single random online-only identity politics topic is the most important thing in the hecking universe.
Chuds seething
I’m ETL (English turd lang) and what is pozd?
Pozzed is derived from HIV Positive and refers to when someone has been infected with it, which by way of queer associations is associated with progressive leftist globalism.
To be pozzed is to be supportive of SJW initiatives, which are backed by the shadow cabal establishment for the purpose of destabilizing and undermining society.
Bonds is turbo pozzed
>LGBTQIA+
There’s a new letter? Wtf is the I?
Also, i’m surprised they didn’t include a P yet.
probably intersex?
>gender less shopping experience
So they’re going to change the Men and Women categories to Dick and No Dick.
I wanna drop a cinderblock onto his neck
>Be me
>Wear CK underwear cause of hot models and celebs wearing them
>Thinking I can look the same so it gives confidence
>Nowadays all fat gays and landwhales and degenerates wear them
>Never buy any again
>Buy Tommy Hilfiger cause of athletes on ads that look hot and ripped
Way to hecking go CK marketing team.
hecking disgusting. That chick has a revolting body and thinks the underwear will do the heavy lifting. b***h please
Wanna point out how this person is hot and could be LGBTQ+ and it would be a non-issue.
Woke/Poz marketing is anti-beauty.
Anyone can choose to be beautiful… It has nothing to do with gender identity or sexuality. These weirdos keep creating ugly marketing strategies and then associate it with being gay or trans or whatever. I’m tired of it and it re-enforces negative connotations.
(also doesn’t re-enforcing ugliness bring up feelings of dysphoria? isn’t the goal to reduce dysphoric triggers?)
>Wear CK underwear cause of hot models and celebs wearing them
>Buy Tommy Hilfiger cause of athletes on ads that look hot and ripped
so there’s "people" out there who’s really this stupid… what a time to be alive
I’m super weak for marketing, what do you want me to say..
this, I hecking hate seeing landwhales polluting my eyes when I was shopping for panties on Calvin Klein or Victoria’s Secret online shops
any un pozzed brands?
the most important question and not a single answer
we’re all doomed, aren’t we?
start your own thread
this one is for pozzed brands, non-conformist
Only Japanese girls between the ages of 17-24 can wear crazy platform shoes and look good. I see girls with shoes like this all the time in Osaka and Nagoya.
Making your own
Definitely nike
those buildings were built by wealthy meds, albinosan
anglos have no culture to speak of other than sister-hecking and velveeta
that’s france you stupid
the french aren’t meds
thats not black but american culture
go to africa they dont have billboards like these
the problem isnt black people existing, the problem is that corporations can afford and will pay highly to plaster this shit everywhere, for all we know it was a white guys idea
Yeah.
>white
hmmm
why do you guys care so much what an advertisement shows? i mean at the end of the day an advertisement is just what a group of professionals thinks will maximise profits in some way. theres no thought behind it besides what might potentially lead more people to buy these products
Ad agencies don’t have complete control, they work to the specs they’re given like how an engineer does with an architect’s vision. So how an engineer will make a suspension bridge when he knows a span bridge would be objectively better for the application, so ad agencies use the diverse models they are told to because they want to keep the contract.
Nigga
It is WAY easier to list which brands are NOT pozzed.
And let me tell you, I can’t think of a single one.
>ITT people who think advertising is culture
Jesus Christ
>uneducated anon doesn’t understand what culture encompasses
Advertising isn’t culture, but there is consumer culture, which might be want he meant.
People who use culture don’t even know what they mean the majority of the time.
>whites seething about dumb shit again
God is good
>dumb shit again
letting fat ugly people be accepted and normalized is a bad thing, especially on fashion. Its disgusting. youre bait is 2/10
worst thing we did was stop public shaming
it’s all so fake anyway, in the 80s they didnt mind putting Brooke Shields on their advertisements for controversy and attention, now that pedophilia doesnt sell they go for obese trannies instead