Posted on: September 21, 2018 Posted by: LULZ Comments: 631

Update (September 24): new response from Richard M. Stallman, and Eric S. Raymond (ESR) says the license revocation “threat has teeth.”

Linux powers the internet, the Android in your pocket, and perhaps even some of your household appliances. A controversy over politics is now seeing some of its developers threatening to withdraw the license to all of their code, potentially destroying or making the whole Linux kernel unusable for a very long time.

An open letter posted to the Linux Kernel Mailing List explains:

Date	Thu, 20 Sep 2018 09:28:14 +0000
From	[email protected] ...
Subject	Re: A Plea to Unfuck our Codes of Conduct

Regarding those who are ejected from the Linux Kernel Community after 
this CoC:

Contributors can, at any time, rescind the license grant regarding their 
property via written notice to those whom they are rescinding the grant 
from (regarding their property (code)) .

The GPL version 2 lacks a no-rescission clause (the GPL version 3 has 
such a clause: to attempt furnish defendants with an estoppel defense, 
the Linux Kernel is licensed under version 2, however, as are the past 
contributions).

When the defendants ignore the rescission and continue using the 
plaintiff's code, the plaintiff can sue under the copyright statute.

Banned contributors _should_ do this (note: plaintiff is to register 
their copyright prior to filing suit, the copyright does not have to be 
registered at the time of the violation however)

Additionally when said banned contributors joined the Linux team, they 
were under the impression that it was a meritocracy: in-fact this belief 
was stated or ratified by those within the governing body regarding 
Linux when the contributors began their work (whatever that body was at 
that time, it could have been simply Linus, or Linus and a few 
associates).

The remuneration for the work was implied to be, or perhaps stated, to 
be fame as-well as a potential increase in the contributors stature, in 
addition to membership in the Linux Kernel club or association, or 
whatever it is that the Linux Kernel Community actually is (which a 
court may determine... it is something, suffice to say).

Thusly for work, consideration was promised by (Linus? Others? There are 
years of mailing list archives with which to determine).

And now that consideration has been clawed-back and the contributors 
image has been tarnished.

Thus the worker did work, however the other side of the implied, or 
perhaps written (email memorandums), understanding has been violated 
(once the contributor has been banned under the new non-meritocratic 
"CoC").

Damages could be recovered under: breach of contract, quazi-contract, 
libel, false-light. (services rendered for the contractual claims, 
future lost income for the libel claims)

In addition to copyright claims. (statutory damages, profits)

For greatest effect, all rescission should be done at once in a bloc. 
(With other banned contributors).

Contributors: You were promised something, you laboured for that 
promise, and now the promise has become a lie. You have remedies 
available to you now, as-well as in the close future .

Additionally, regarding those who promoted the Code of Conduct to be 
used against the linux kernel contributors, knowing full well the effect 
it would have and desiring those effects; recovery for the ejected 
contributors via a tortious interference claim may be possible.

“PLEASE DON’T”

An anonymous commenter clarifies:

The Linux kernel is licensed under GPL Version 2. Under normal circumstances what this license entails is that the code can be freely copied and distributed (and also that the code must be made available with binary distributions but thats not important here). The thing that becomes confusing is that whoever authored the code still owns the actual copyright for the code they contributed. Some projects under the GPL like Emacs have a smart policy where the maintainers will not accept your code unless you also turn over complete control of the copyright. Since you own the copyright and are merely licensing it under the GPL you can technically remove that license at any time.

The GPL Ver 3 has a clause that Ver 2 lacks which dictates though that you may not rescind your license over your code. In a court, a lawyer would make the argument that since the Free Software Foundation(the license’s publisher) saw the need to add the clause, that the Ver 2 allows for rescinding of the GPL license.

If the threat is put into action, ramifications could include large parts of the internet being left vulnerable to exploits, and companies around the world might even inherit bundles of unwanted legal liabilities.

As promised, LULZ reached out to a variety of experts and some results are in. Richard M. Stallman said over email that he thinks the licence revocation plan is “misguided.”

Eric S. Raymond (often referred to simply as ESR) on the other hand told the Linux Kernel Mailing List that he thinks the plan is viable: “I’m writing now, from all of that experience and with all that perspective, about the recent flap over the new CoC and the attempt to organize a mass withdrawal of creator permissions from the kernel.

He continues: “First, let me confirm that this threat has teeth. I researched the relevant law when I was founding the Open Source Initiative. In the U.S. there is case law confirming that reputational losses relating to conversion of the rights of a contributor to a GPLed project are judicable in law. I do not know the case law outside the U.S., but in countries observing the Berne Convention without the U.S.’s opt-out of the “moral rights” clause, that clause probably gives the objectors an even stronger case.

The controversy

Activists from the feminist and LGBTQIA+ communities have been trying to force the Linux project to join the Contributor Covenant since at least 2015. The Contributor Covenant is an agreement to implement a special Code of Conduct (frequently CoC from now on) aimed at changing the predominantly white, straight, and male face of programming. CC’s Code of Conduct is controversial particularly because it allows anyone to be banned from contributing code for any reason, usually with no mechanism for oversight or accountability.

On September 16 the pro-CoC side got their wish (how this happened is a very strange story of its own, read recent news about Linus Torvalds’ departure if you want to know more) — Linux had officially committed to implementing and obeying the CC Code of Conduct — and they immediately set about using it to remove top Linux coders. Sage Sharp, who describes theyself as a “diversity & inclusion consultant, hufflepuff, non-binary agender trans masculine” and has 7k followers, cites GeekFeminismWiki and targets Google’s Theo Ts’o with accusations of being a rape apologist:

Many twitter users pointed out the apparent irony.

Several users on 4chan’s technology board speculate that Theo is targeted first because he famously resisted an Intel backdoor.

CC’s Code of Conduct replaces Linux’ earlier Code of Conflict (not to be confused with current use of “CoC”), which asked for civility without having political implications. The change is widely condemned by developers, and opposition has generated thousands upon thousands of posts on 4chan’s technology board alone. Here is a summary of their arguments:

1. Insertion of the CoC into other projects has heralded witch hunts where good contributors are removed over trivial matters or even events that happened a long time ago.
2. The lack of proper definitions for punishments, time frames, and even what constitutes abuse or harassment leaves the Code of Conduct wide open for abuse (see 1).
3. It gives the people charged with enforcement omnipotent and unaccountable power.
4. It could force acceptance of contributions that wouldn’t make the cut if made by cis white males.
5. CC’s Code of Conduct is purely about power.
6. “‘In all that time I never had to know or care whether my fellow contributors were white, black, male, female, straight, gay, or from the planet Mars, only whether their code was good’; namely, in a project that receives contributions from volunteers who are anonymous beyond a chosen handle, specious claims of exclusion and harassment crumble beneath the most haphazard scrutiny. Contributors reveal as much about their race, sex, and orientation as they want because no one cares about that tangential shit at the end of the day. If there really was some “straight white males only” mentality, the community would insist on determining whether a new contributor is “one of us” before accepting their code, but they don’t do that in the slightest. Thus, it’s patently clear there is no culture of exclusion, but rather a culture of total indifference to individual differences beyond coding ability. The rhetoric of diversity and inclusiveness is just a weapon being used to attack a community that is inherently opposed to identity politics, which is why they’re seen as such a threat to these SJW gestapo.

On the other side of the aisle, arguments FOR CC’s Code of Conduct include:

1. Fostering an inclusive and safe space for women, LGBTQIA+, and People of Color, who in the absence of the CoC are excluded, harassed, and sometimes even raped by cis white males.
2. CC’s CoC will remove meritocracy, a “white supremacist” concept which “has consistently shown itself to mainly benefit those with privilege, to the exclusion of underrepresented people in technology.”
3. The vast majority of Linux contributors are cis white males. CC’s Code of Conduct would enable the building of a more diverse overall demographic as people who aren’t cis white males feel welcome to join and white males are weeded out over time.
4. Being against the CoC means you want women, LGBTQIA+, and People of Color to be harassed.

Conclusion? Keep an eye on Linux.

P.S. Are you using Brave yet? Delay the skynet by using the browser that automatically strips all tracking and ads. Brendan Eich (of JavaScript fame) is its CEO.

avatar
230 Comment threads
401 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
  Subscribe  
newest oldest
Notify of
trackback

[…] = “Linux Developers Threaten Kill Switch” · [Links: 1, 2, 3, […]

aicra
Guest
aicra

Fixed it!

Marcia Wilbur
Guest

The CC is a boil on the ass of our community!

It’s all pullpoopy and I agree this is about power. As a developer, I will never work on projects using CC. Free speech bitches… or bros… or whatever… 😀

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

This makes me ashamed to be part of the lgbt community..

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Within a few years, these SJW’s and LGBTQIA+ instigators will wonder why they have been beaten back into the closet, cowering in fear for their lives… it will be their own party doing it.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Simple explanation of the law, recorded in American:

Video: https://openload.co/f/mT_AH3xmIUM/TruthAboutLinuxandGPLv2__.mp4
Audio: https://ufile.io/sdhpl

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

All the more reason I support Version 3 of the GNU General Public License!

trackback

[…] Linux developers threaten to pull “kill switch” […]

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Linux has been dying for years. Every gently caressing autist that is a code monkey defiles any code they touch.

The single biggest reason for why Linux will never go mainstream is because it is a meeting place for people with mental illness.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

More like a meeting place for SJWs fighting the useless causes for now, this is how SJWs typically act, not really people with mental illnesses.

Thomas
Guest

I love how everyone ignores the actual reason why it’s predominantly males. Men are psychologically wired differently. It’s been proven that men excel at certain tasks, than women do. Programming is one of them, but most of IT is mostly men, most mechanics are men, anyone b****ing about that? Nope. The other problem is how women react around men in the environment. If anyone in IT hasn’t her a sexist/racist/vulgar joke or comment, I’d be damn surprised by that. In the past 5 years, I’ve worked around maybe 4 women in total, and 3 of the 4 wanted to be treated like they were special, and deserved attention and praise for every god damn little thing. Congrats, you swapped a blade on a C7000 Chassis, big f***ing whoop. It’s the same idea behind the gun grab bull****. Guns aren’t the problem, people are. Society is THE problem, society says everyone has to be equal. Sorry, hate to break it to you but equality is the biggest load of bull**** ever served. Bosses get fired because of women, if they treat them harshly they start crying and then HR complaints come rolling out like the U.S. Government prints money.

Long Story Short: Stop forcing your political bull**** on others. Take it, and directly shove it up your ***. We don’t want it, we don’t need it and we certainly won’t tolerate it.

Damascus
Guest
Damascus

Yup. I hang around with a lot of male friends, and we joke around. I can take a joke- and that means we get along swimmingly. They get to tease me, I get to tease them, life is good. Other than that, someone could be a pink haired platypus with a rainbow tail and worship the flying spaghetti monster for all I care, as long as it’s a halfway decent person.

All those snowflake types out there who couldn’t see a joke if it smacked them in the face are a cancer for any community.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Slowly the world actually is going mad, full-retard… Thanks, I could not have been more disappointed.

trackback

[…] Linux developers threaten to pull “kill switch” […]

anon
Guest
anon

https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/15/10

Date Sun, 14 Oct 2018 21:56:10 +0000
From [email protected]
Subject Re: A Plea to Ungently caress our Codes of Conduct

The GPLv2 is not a contract, it is a revocable license.

Here is a paper explaining what the GPL is and is not:
http://illinoisjltp.com/journal/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/kumar.pdf

Page 12 starts the relevant discussion.
Page 16 begins the explanation of all the ways the GPL is not a
contract.

Later there is a short gloss of state law promissory estopple doctrines.
Remember: in the case of the linux kernel it, unlike other projects,
omitted the “or any later version” codicil, and is only under version 2
of the GPL, which makes no promise of irrevocability by grantor.

(Note: The SFConservancy recently chose to publish a “correction” that
conflates clauses, within version 2 of the GPL, [that clarify that if a
licensee’s license is revoked by operation of the license for a
violation of the terms, that sub-licensees licenses are not-in-turn
automatically revoked] – [with an inexistent irrevocability doctrine
within the text of the GPLv2])
(Additionally: Clause 0 of GPLv2 specifically defines the “you” in said
clauses as referring to the licensee (not the grantor); the
SFConservancy’s conflation is shown to be ever more disingenuous)

The Linux Kernel License grant:
Is Not: a contract. [No breach of contract damages vs grantor if
rescinded]
Is: a bare license akin to a property license.
And: There is no “irrevocable by grantor” promise in v2. [No promissory
estopple defense]
.: Can be rescinded at will.

Dave
Guest
Dave

“The vast majority of Linux contributors are cis white males. ”
Nobody cared when the stereotype of a ‘nix dev was a spotty, glasses wearing, lives in his parents’ basement, single white guy doing it because he was socially awkward in real life but revered in his online community back in the days when only nerds used computers.
Now that you can make big money being a developer, white-hat hacker or developer everyone wants a piece of the pie and some people are willing to fight dirty for it.

My own workplace is pushing for 50/50 gender balance but that can only be achieved by either waiting till the older generation of guys have retired or by discriminating when they bring young ones on-board. For example, in the UK about 24% of CS graduates are female, down from 25% in previous years.
https://www.stemwomen.co.uk/blog/2018/03/useful-statistics-women-in-stem

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

So people are pissed they cannot steal the code people contribute to the kernel? Sweet tears!

Sap
Guest
Sap

This is manipulation and orchestration to undermine Linux because Linux is freedom.
It isn’t a gender issue, it’s an insiduous ploy to invoke an ideological faction.

It’s like someone saying that religion is an issue or the colour of your socks.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Well, that might be Microsoft agents trying to kill Linux and push through their Windows.

Gregory
Guest
Gregory

Microsoft is very PC, no pun intended.

Демократ
Guest
Демократ

Ёбанные пидарасы. Они хуже гитлера, затыкают рот всем кто имеет альтернативное мнение. Не думал что ограничение на свободу слова и мировоззрения придёт и в IT-сообщество. Если хочешь жарить своего бойфренда в задницу, делайте это молча дома, не надо об этом орать в обществе где 99% людей не подвержены этому девиантному поведению. Хочу напомнить всем пидорам, что демократия это власть большинства, с уважительным отношением к меньшинству. Так вот, уважительное отношение – это возможность вам пороться как вы хотите без вероятности забивания вас камнями и не более, какие-либо особенные права у вас тут отсутствуют. Мир захватывают фрики.

Note from editor: English only, please.
>”gently caressing pidarasy. They are worse than Hitler, gagging everyone who has an alternative opinion. I did not think that the restriction on freedom of speech and worldview will come to the IT community. If you want to fry your boyfriend in the ass, do it silently at home, do not yell about it in a society where 99% of people are not subject to this deviant behavior. I want to remind all the fagots that democracy is the power of the majority, with respect for the minority. So, respectful attitude is an opportunity for you to rip off as you want without the likelihood of stoning you and no more, you have no special rights here. The world is captured by freaks.”

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

First two words “Ёбанные пидарасы” was translated incorrectly. It’s not “gently caressing pidarasy”. Correct translation is “gently caressing faggots”. And I must completely agree those SJW indeed are gently caressing faggots.

P.S. Not meant to insult any sane, reasonable homosexuals 🙂 Insulting only mad freaky sjw.

trackback

[…] The whole controversy over the Linux Code of Conduct is complex, but FastGadgets has a great video on YouTube detailing what’s going on.  You should also read the full post over at Lulz.com.  […]

Wyrd
Guest
Wyrd

I’m starting to feel like maybe this WHOL E GPL thing was kind of a Bad Idea ™.

So, like–yeah you contributed code to this project– but now as a result you can just yank the plug on **the world** if you are upset?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

>So, like–

Why did you feel the need to share your sexuality on an article about linux?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Could we know the name of the SJW-free kernel fork so we can forget about these pests and move on?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

that ain’t gonna save you. * reuploads the Linux kernel sources on torrents *

Robert M. Stockmann
Guest
Robert M. Stockmann

Torvalds should lawyer up. The problems are the large IT Tech firms who platinum donated all over the place in Open Source land. When IBM donated with 1 billion USD to Linux in 2000 https://itsfoss.com/ibm-invest-1-billion-linux/ a friend who vehemently was against the GPL and what Torvalds was doing, told me that in due time OSS would simply just go away.
These Community Organizers, not Coders per se, are on a mission to overtake and control the Linux Foundation, and if they can’t, will search and destroy all of it, even if it destroys themselves. Coraline is merely a expendable pion here. Torvalds is now facing unjust confrontations and charges resembling the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh. Looking at the CoC document it even might have been written by a Google executive, who themselves currently are facing serious charges and lawsuits from their own Code of Conduct. See theintercept.com, their leaked video the day after the election of 2016. They will do anything to pursue this. However to pursue a personal bias or agenda furnishing enactments or acts such as to, omit contradicting facts (code), commit perjury, attend riots and harassments, cleanse Internet archives and search engines of exculpatory evidence and ultimately hire hit-men to exterminate witnesses of truth (developers), in an attempt to elevate bias as fabricated fact (code) are crimes and should be prosecuted accordingly.

rocketride
Guest
rocketride

And this $#|+ is why we can’t have nice things (OSs).

trackback

[…] nicht auszudenken, wie viel von den kirre kreischenden einhornarmeen der SJWs kaputtgemacht wurde, wenn jetzt wirklich etliche linux-mitentwickler ihre GPL zurückziehen (sie haben ja weiterhin das u…. [Link geht auf einen englischsprachigen […]

Blackie Malone
Guest
Blackie Malone

Ridiculous. Just make it anonymous submission. Any reference to yourself or any others’ race, religion, sexuality, or any other identity politics gets you kicked off the team ASAP without the right to rescind your contribution. If they don’t like it, the FORK OFF! Bloody SJWs want to ruin everything good in the world with their me-me-me attitudes.

rocketride
Guest
rocketride

Exactly. I really don’t care (or want to need to care) about the details of your pigmentation, plumbing, or your preferred way(s) of using that plumbing. And if you (obviously not YOU in particular, Blackie) feel a need to tell people who are likely at a great distance, whom you likely will never meet in the flesh, whose common interest is something neutral and technical like coding, all about those details, that says more about you than anything else. Namely the same thing that those LGBTQWERTY types who get in peoples’ faces leading with their orientation are saying– that they don’t actually have anything more interesting to lead with in introducing themselves.

The best way to avoid any possibility of being harassed by other people in an online work (or work-oid) collaboration for being XYZ is to be a “black box”– don’t let them know who or what you are. There was an old joke to the effect of “On the internet, nobody knows you’re a cocker spaniel”.

Bob the Attack Helicopter
Guest
Bob the Attack Helicopter

If you don’t tell them that you’re a dragonkin or a pansexual flufflepuff, then you’re a cis white male scum. No way to avoid them.

Damascus
Guest
Damascus

Sigh. Yeah, it’s straight off the bat assumed (no pun intended).

I happen not to be a cis male, and the SJW crowd is a bunch of raging hypocrites…

Joey
Guest
Joey

#ForkOff ?
#GoForkYourselves ?

Richard Steven Hack
Guest
Richard Steven Hack

One would hope that if you have any intellectual integrity or believe that your contribution to the Linux kernel was done in the hopes of improving it as a benefit to everyone that you will NOT use your legal right to revoke your contribution regardless of whether you are banned from the kernel development by the actions of a bunch of SJW buttheads.

Let’s be rational here, even when the opponents are not.

Now, one might be an effective approach is to cease all further kernel development work until this nonsense is retracted, or until some other strategy might be developed whereby the kernel contributions so far are transferred to another OS development team which is not so subject to the CoC – in other words, forking the kernel, a time-honored method of dealing with buttheads on open source projects.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

> Let’s be rational here, even when the opponents are not.

No, that’s how you lose.

trackback

[…] Chcem tým povedať, že internetová infraštruktúra de facto beží na Linuxovom kerneli, a kvôli novému kódu chovania, ktoré umožní usporiadať hony na čarodejnice, celý svet je […]

trackback

[…] el desarrollador que lo mantiene a partir de ese momento. Como explicaba un comentarista en el artículo de Lulz que explica el desarrollo de los […]

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

I will just say one thing: With garden gnomes, you lose.

trackback

[…] Linux developers threaten to pull “kill switch” […]

Anonymoose
Guest
Anonymoose

Can the CoC be repealled at this time ?

trackback

[…] This is not only an educational fear: we’ve got noticed codes of behavior time and again abused via activists (a just right background of this kind of factor is right here), and so there is a lot to concern about right here.  Well, the linux kernel hackers are pushing again, announcing that if they’re disciplined beneath the code of behavior that they’re going to revoke the best to use their code within the kernel: […]

Some are so dense to even see how stupid they are. See: SJWs
Guest
Some are so dense to even see how stupid they are. See: SJWs

Cant wait for the time when everyone would get operated in Hospitals but people with morphed knowledge, if not little or no knowledge.

I am already sick of their poopy.

W. O. Frobozz
Guest
W. O. Frobozz

Reading this, and the comments, gives me a great big fk u c ing headache. If I wanted an American liberal/marxist take-over of something formerly good, I would just hang around the campus commons or go visit Democrat Underground.

So now the purple-haired retards are gunning for the Linux kernel too? I guess there isn’t one part of the world that will be left without toxic femininity (and hair dye) infesting it. Hey maybe Anita Skeezian will give her oh-so-informed opinion on Linux Kernel patches…that should be good for a laugh. Maybe Pantifa will pay Linus a visit at home next.

Barack Obama
Guest

The purple-haired retards are useful idiots doing the bidding of a higher power. THAT is what needs to be in the crosshairs. Chop off the heads of the hydra.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

“It’s about muh eeeethics in linux programming!”

No, it’s not. It’s about racism and misandry and harassing men. Look at the social media profiles of the people pushing this. Full of the typical “kill all white men” posts.

If you’re for CC CoC you’re racist filth and a monster. #basta

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

http://archive.fo/DNfh3

>A senior scientist has given what has been described as a “highly offensive” presentation about the role of women in physics, the BBC has learned. At a workshop organised by Cern, Prof Alessandro Strumia of Pisa University said that “physics was invented and built by men, it’s not by invitation”. He said male scientists were being discriminated against because of ideology rather than merit.

>CERN, the European nuclear research centre, described Prof Strumia’s presentation as “highly offensive”. The centre, which discovered the Higgs Boson in 2012, has removed slides used in the talk from its website “in line with a code of conduct that does not tolerate personal attacks and insults”.

>He produced a series of graphs which, he claimed, showed that women were hired over men whose research was cited more by other scientists in their publications, which is an indication of higher quality.

>He also presented data that he claimed showed that male and female researchers were equally cited at the start of their careers but men scored progressively better as their careers progressed.

>Prof Strumia pointed to behavioural research which he suggested may account for the disparity.

CERN has a similar Code of Conduct and it’s being used to define facts someone doesn’t like as “harassment” so they can be censored.

Sherlock
Guest
Sherlock

Pure Racism. Counting the colors is racist. If they want more blacks coding teach them to code.
Should EVERYBODY have to wear blindfolds because some people are blind?

Robert Hoffmann
Guest
Robert Hoffmann

Why don’t they just create their own “politically correct” os from scratch instead of destroying something that works.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

You are now implying that they actually are capable of doing something productive instead of trying to show off how ‘special’ they are.

Robert Hoffmann
Guest
Robert Hoffmann

You are right, I am sorry I wasn’t thinking properly …

Come to think of all this nonsense, it is very clear to me now that a swath of the population, usually the unproductive ones, are so bored with life, and with getting everything for free, that it’s time a large world war shows them the truth about life and death.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

> it’s time a large world war shows them the truth about life and death

War kills the strongest in a society, those who are capable of being soldiers. It wouldn’t kill these parasites.

David D
Guest
David D

Every single person that demands a “safe space” is an idiot. Whether they be feminist, gay, trans gender or have any form of mental illness whatsoever they have no right to a veto over other people’s views or speech. I have been insulted, mentally abused and driven almost insane by a female and nobody has ever suggested that I get a “safe space” yet here I am, older and wiser. If other’s are so weak minded that even mild criticism or actual facts burst their bubble too bad. Toughen up and grow up.

Fucking Irate.
Guest
Fucking Irate.

Yeah the gently caressing SJW IDIOTS – the gently caressing feminists and their cunt licking acolytes.

Jesus gently caress I have been standing up to this crap in forums all around the world, and gently caressing IDIOT moderators etc., “Oh your gently caressing suspended, blocked, banned etc.” and it’s almost always because I stand up to stupid cunts.

People who give bullpoopy advice, they say use code, that they have no idea of what it does, or they pop out comments like, “Oh why do you want to do that for?”, or “You should never need access to the root directory, so therefore you should not need to find out how to access it..”

And the cunts of moderators and the IDIOTS who hang out in the forums of Ubuntu… Bugzilla, and lots of other sites… They DO really stupid block you out and lock you out poopy and the IQ of the forums keeps on dropping and dropping and dropping and only the dumbest of the dumb cunts – with all their politically correct bullpoopy exist in there…

And these feminist pieces of poopy and the “Oh my god” the sexist, racist, bullpoopy artists, in the CODE OF CONDUCT”…….

All the dumbest of cunts, will rally to the cause celebre, and the very best, smartest, and most capable people will just pull the plug on these scum….

And that could gently caress it for everyone…..

They have pulled this poopy on Reddit…

“On a platform as open and diverse as Reddit, there will sometimes be communities that, while not prohibited by the Content Policy, average redditors may nevertheless find highly offensive or upsetting,”

I pulled out of that about a week or two ago… “The crazies on that with their “Your banned, your banned, your banned” – bullpoopy……

And in terms of Linux and these cunts, and their code of conduct – well people for the most part do like to argue, fight and make arseholes of themselves… and that is fine… and these idiots are saying we should all interact and police the lives and minds of others to make sure they are following OUR RULE BOOK, and if they don’t they will be gently caressing banned.

We need an active campaign to erase their systems, and cripple their net access…

Just to wipe them off the internet.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

since everything spoken nowadays must accepted as truth all these guys have to do is say they are gay, black, disabled or Asian job done now piss off

Lizardicus Saurian
Guest
Lizardicus Saurian

I’ve been banned even in liberal New Zealand, the Netherlands, and Belgium.
Try using Tor, and VPN; they won’t even accept anything from such sites!

Michael
Guest
Michael

Funny the technology that enabled the SJWs is going to be killed by the SJWs. Well the 80’s was not a bad time.

Also I was playing around with NetBSD before as I did not like how RH was pushing the new startup system they were making, and trying to ram it down the thoughts of the rest of the Linux systems. So for me, as I have worked with NetBSD (heck I have worked with a lot of Real unix systems, Irix, Ultrex, Solaris, BSD, SunOS, etc) all I have to do is back up my data and jump to a place that is friendly to cis white males, and will accept things based on “the content of some ones heart and not the color of their skin”

coudenhove-kalergi
Guest
coudenhove-kalergi

years ago when I was strictly using UNIX on military computers and saw this LINUX rising up up and away from MicroDong’s poorly written expensive crap, I knew that the days would come when the coders would be infiltrated by money’d interests using some canard to float it. so it has now come.

sadly, this is not the only assault on white hetero’s and straight people going on, a particular
‘group’ following the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan to cause rifts and divisions in society, seem to have effectively utterly destroyed Europe with that garbage under the false premise of ‘humanitarianism’ now.

Goetz (Gates) will not stop till he has his way. very sad day for us all. his tribe is the root of this.

1/4horse
Guest
1/4horse

. . . Goetz . . . is merely yet another ∯ront:..

ʬHICH /\ll/\
u do know
4the lie
\/\/HICH’s
[hic et ubique] /\/\ i s s i n g..:

0N0MASTICS.
0N0!!n a m e s

.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

. . . Goetz . . . is merely yet another ∯ront:..

ʬHICH /\ll/\
u do know
4the lie
\/\/HICH’s
[hic et ubique] /\/\ i s s i n g..:

0N0MASTICS.
0N0!!n a m e s

.

trackback

[…] Linux developers threaten to pull “kill switch” […]

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

The Linux developers should amend the policy and the implementation of this code of conduct to make it a meritocracy thus satisfying the non-discrimination parts of the COC

trackback

[…] Foundation новые правила не подтвердил только Theo Ts’o, что привело к еготравле активистами движения за равноправие. Т.е. […]

trackback

[…] Linux developers threaten to pull “kill switch” […]

rashomon
Guest
rashomon

So, will Ubuntu name their next Version “Vociferous Vodoo”, then? Good luck, and good night, GNU/Linux! In German, there’s a saying: “Wer die Schlechten schützt, verletzt die Guten!”, meaning: “Who protects the bad ones, hurts the good ones!”

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Execute programming code 66