your future wife fell in love with chad and was his momentary cumsock. she felt deep love for him, the kind that you feel for your oneitis, but she had her dreams come true and actually got her man
and when she's an old used up roastie hag, she will marry you, out of financial necessity and out of accepting that once chad dumps her, she cant find a man as good as he is
you looking forward to your future, mr. sigma grindset?
I would rather kill myself than marry a roastie tbh
bold of you to assume that i will have a wife
My gf was a KHHV before me doe.
Marry and impregnate her ASAP you moron. You found the needle in the haystack, act fast before it's gone forever.
She is also mentally ill, which kinda explains the fact she was a KHHV.
you're on here, you're also mentally ill. perfect match.
Ikr dude.
>your future wife fell in love with chad and was his momentary cumsock. she felt deep love for him, the kind that you feel for your oneitis, but she had her dreams come true and actually got her man
I don't think i've ever seen a woman with a Chad and I do go out to bars, clubs, parties etc somewhat often.
They're always with skinnyfat, boneless normies.
because chad doesnt take them to phoney dates, dummy. he takes them right to the bedroom
And you know this, how? You know any Chads? I doubt you see many, let alone are friends with even one.
And like I said, i'm talking about nightclubs and college parties. I've seen plenty of people hooking up.
Not once I saw a Chad. A few high-tier normie but more often than not it's some bland mid-tier normie.
they have this weird fantasy of some omnipotent chad
Yeah, it's hilarious honestly. I remember the first time I left my basement and went to a nightclub after reading Lookism posts for years. I expected there to be 6'5 Gigachads dancing with their harems. Instead two of my borderline fat friends ended up bringing girls home.
Your friends were probably tall and the girls trash tier whores
nah, somewhere between 5'10 and 6'0. The girls were 5-6/10, decent looking club sluts, nothing amazing but could easily get better looking guys.
So they were tall and all they could get is some average looking sluts
>but could easily get better looking guys.
Better looking guys have options. A man with options doesn't go for average looking whores when he's looking for a relationship.
They weren't tall. They were in the average range. And they were chubby boneless normies. The girls could've easily gotten better looking guys, even guys with "options".
You are delusional because you think every man is as cucked and low test as you. Good men don't settle for average whores.
Good men aren't single, dumbass.
Lots of them are because they'd rather have a harem than settling for one girl
It wasn't settling, it was a hookup.
And most men will fuck anything. Having "high standards" generally means you're low test.
I wonder which chad would visit clubs now when he can get a woman to deliver herself to his house for fucking.
Believe it or not, it's mainly autistic incels who think that the whole world revolves around dating apps. Normal people use them as an extra source of dick/ pussy if they find something they like, but normal young people in highschool and college prefer going out and socializing and meeting people that way.
And goalpost was shifted. Good job.
>women are just objects
Most irrelevant shit to women there is. Unless it is an ugly guy doing it then you can beat him over the head with it and pretend it is because of that and not because he is ugly.
You should stop wasting your time and nerves arguing with brainlets, it's pointless
you have hemorrhoids .... gay sex retarded homosexual.
>Unless it is an ugly guy doing it
Ugly guys have sex. Most of these sigma grindset MLM retards are average looking or barely below average. It's ironic as fuck that you think being treated like an object would be irrelevant to women while posting this stupid lookism meme shit. You're not special for thinking that superficiality is unfair, dumb fuck.
>It's ironic as fuck that you think being treated like an object would be irrelevant to women
Well they seem to care more about the height and face of their partner than being treated like a person
Most people have height and face. Try again.
>It's ironic as fuck that you think being treated like an object would be irrelevant to women while posting this stupid lookism meme shit. You're not special for thinking that superficiality is unfair, dumb fuck.
It is irrelevant cause they will ask daddy to objectify them harder if daddy is good looking. And I never thought about myself as special. Chad is real. He gets best looking women for free while rest have to settle for scraps and they have to work their ass off for those scraps. And that reality somehow gets on your nerves to the point you are melting down.
>Stacy gets the best looking men for free
>settle for scraps
You're agreeing with me. I hope you are single.
All women get men for free. Some just decide not to cause they think they deserve even more for free.
Exactly, Stacy gets the best looking men for free while almost all women are suffering with the potential of getting a scrap one day maybe.
She could have not chased chad knowing it wouldn't work and settled for the scrap earlier so that they could both build this scrap up. Now both scrap and non-stacies are damaged beyond repair. But hey I actually don't mind it anymore ever since I learned to be alone.
Why should she settle for a scrap? She wants to be a sigma female.
I don't care. Let her eat cake.
>bunch of bot responses
>Makes you screech autistically
kek
>Believe it or not, it's mainly autistic incels who think that the whole world revolves around dating app
you know, im really thankful for the blackpill, because it really show just how endless the lies and gaslighting from shameless normies like you. its actually unreal how much lies and gaslighting comes from normies when exposed to the truth
seriously, we'd be lost without the scientific blackpill
your opinion is worthless, as you have no evidence to back up any of your shit claims. online dating is real life, and its the standard for everyone
The scientific blackpill shows less than 2% of relationships start through dating apps.
https://web.stanford.edu/~mrosenfe/Rosenfeld_Tinder_and_dating_apps.pdf
>https://web.stanford.edu/~mrosenfe/Rosenfeld_Tinder_and_dating_apps.pdf
>Draft date: December 8, 2017
yeah, old people didnt have tinder or dating apps or insta
but now they do. 2023 is a lot different than even 2013
and all social media is a dating app, because if you're a girl, instagram is no different than tinder. its all just being picky until chad comes along. hypergamy on steroids
fucking retard
>instagram is no different than tinder
the level of retardation you just expressed tells me that you deserve to be alone for life, and it doesn't matter what you look like. i hope you suffer, and i hope no one is ever going to be a victim to your retardation in person.
>I can't read data
the post.
Those charts only "prove" one thing
>Men think female attractiveness is very important but women don't think male attractiveness is very important
Which is what "hypergamy" *actually* means, BTW.
And you left off the IMPORTANT OKCupid chart that proves women do NOT care about a man's appearance very much
Your charts prove the *opposite* of what you think, you're just too dumb to know that
I will bite and address this seriously. Are the graphs adjusted for male attractiveness curves? If 90% of men are average or below on attractiveness scale then of course women will message most attractive less since they just can't get more than a few most attractive guys - according to their measure of attractiveness.
They aren't, the graphs use the female ratings of how attractive men are, and vice versa. So it's going to be scuffed because women believe nearly every man bar Chad is ugly.
>Are the graphs adjusted for male attractiveness curves?
Translation
>"I do not understand how graphs work"
Not everything is a Normal Deviation, you innumerate fool.
>If 90% of men are average or below on attractiveness scale
That is NOT how 'rating attractiveness" WORKS, you innumerate asshole.
Because women view male attractiveness differently than how men view female attractiveness it is not a Normal Distribution.
As a matter of fact the Normal Distribution of Males rating Females means the OKCupid data is almost certainly total shit because it is found nowhere else!
The entire
>huuuuurrrr wimmenz rate most menz BELOW AVERAGE duuuuurrrrrr!"
is just an admission you don't know how statistics work.
The blunt fact - over 10% of all female messaging to men is for men with the LOWEST rating for appearance compared to effectively ZERO ffrom men to least attractive women.
IF women "only want Chad" and "any woman can get a BF" that would be REVERSED.
You're trying to *teach incels*?
Dude, all you are going to do is make them cry!
You sound awfully mad for someone who knows the actual truth.
You are mistaking
>laughing like a hyena at morons
with
>being mad
You are wrong and dumb while thinking you are right and smart and you are laughing like a hyena. I can't imagine a more sad existence. We all pity you anon.
A KHHV loser feeling sorry for me because I took a statistics class is HILARIOUS!
Thanks
>Because women view male attractiveness differently than how men view female attractiveness it is not a Normal Distribution.
Absolutely they view it as most men being unattractive. The exact opposite of your point that women don't care about a man's appearance very much.
>"I refuse to learn how to read a graph"
FTFY
Look at you!
>the median average falls in the "ugly" side of ratings.
You're proving yourself wrong but don't know it.
Think of it this way, stupid fuck.
Human appearance is not objective. You are ANNOUNCING the average women have. a 1.8 is "average" *TO WOMEN*. That's the fucking point.
And once again
the data is trash
'you not being able to read a graph' doesn't mean the graph has to be real, moron.
That graph has been posted AND proven wrong
>posted AND proven wrong
In your own personal reality based on your autistic savant interpretation of statistics that has nothing to do with objective reality or how actual statistics work.
Posted
and proven wrong
Anything else you want to be stupid about today?
>the bars clearly represent a scale, with seven options ranging from "very unattractive" to "very attractive", with "okay" being the middle bar
>if they didn't represent a fixed scale, a bar graph would not make sense, and a scatter graph/line graph would've be used instead like pic rel
>this means that women consider most men to be in the "unattractive" set of options, and very few to be on the "attractive" side, while as men rate about the same number of women as being "attractive" and "unattractive"
>Because women view male attractiveness differently than how men view female attractiveness it is not a Normal Distribution.
So women view the majority of men to be "ugly", to the point where the median average falls in the "ugly" side of ratings. So essentially, you've admitted to the thing that you're vehemently trying to deny doesn't exist.
If we track the point where the graph goes from "percentage of messages<percentage of people" to "percentage of messages>percentage of people", this occurs at roughly the 65th percentile of female attractiveness for men messaging women, while as it occurs at roughly the 75th percentile of male attractiveness for women messaging men. Which proves the exact opposite of your point.
Your chart is the opposite of reality. You cant rate personality off of a photograph, but people will often make fake photographs if they have a certain personality.
Are you a woman or just pretending to be one?
Only a woman would think that chart has any value. If you rate both personality and looks off of a photograph of someone, then there obviously will be a correlation, retarded whore. But in the real world people rate personality off of personality because you become accustomed to how people look and you can't photoshop your real world appearance. You actually have to dress properly and not smell like shit.
>women consider more than 80% of men to be ugly
>men consider less than 50% of women to be ugly
>"oh wow look women message ugly men more than men message ugly women"
Online "women" aren't even talking to anyone. most people meet at social events. ugliness barely even matters anymore since everyone is overweight.
By that logic, the people that aren't overweight/ugly should be swimming in pussy.
Yet I'm neither and I haven't had any skin-to-skin contact with a woman for over a decade.
>top 20% guy hasn't had "skin-to-skin" autism contact
You're proving my point. Ugliness doesn't make any difference in most cases. I bet you spend a lot of time alone. You are the definition of a retard. Most incels have normal looking faces.
see
That is NOT how survey work, dumbfuck. You're just announcing your stupidity.
The BEST part?
The OKCupid charts are total trash
>No controls, no sample size analysis, no criteria, no standards, no universal ratings, no discussion of what is being rated, no filtering of fake accounts
>The OKCupid charts are total trash
Which you then use to make a thesis because if you are making a point then data isn't trash.
Lol I love the autistic balkan voice of that retard. It's how I imagine every incel to be like: some eastern European or brown lanky sperg reading some half-assed studies and calling it a LE SCIENTIFIC BLACKPILLZ.
You immediately know someone is a basement dweller when they can't write a sentence without bringing up Tinder.
Touch grass and go to a bar or club.
inceltvs voice is the worst thing ever
>online dating is real life
>global Tinder userbase: 75 million (0.1% of the real world)
oof. Autistic incels really are the dumbest creatures on earth.
>Global
Most of the world is irrelevant when talking about dating in the west
>it's not 0.1%...it's 2%!
>real life!
Trust me I just think this is funny and you retards will never learn. You automatically cut off like 95% of relevant women if you are using a dating app, and I bet you will never think that you have high standards either lol.
Pew proved that
>Meeting online is FOURTH most common, not first
>The research showed that less than 10% of "met online" involved dating apps
>Thus, as mentioned, less than 2% of relationships come from dating apps
You retards are so ignorant that YOUR OWN BLACKPILL STUFF REFUTES YOU and you don't know it!
>Ugly nigga cope
The majority of couples in 2023 meet through online dating services and apps.
>l-l-l-look AT MUH GRAPH. IT HAS LOTZ OF COLORZ AND LINES!!!
So, which is it. Tinder is Chad only or most couples meet off Tinder?
Because the average couple sure as shit doesn't have a Chad.
Tinder is Chad only, women in their prime get railed by Chads who they hope will settle down with them. What they eventually realize after the 10th Chad fuckboy to play her and string her in is that those guys are out of her league and won't commit, and she doesn't want to die alone so she will settle for some average loser like you or the reddit guy when she's 27
then give him starfish sex once a month.
>10th Chad fuckboy to play her and string her in is that those guys are out of her league and won't commit
You wish. That happens when they don't even want to string her along anymore cause she got old enough.
I'm talking about the young high school and college couples I see everyday. The guy is usually a 4 - 6/10 normie. If they met on Tinder, then Tinder is not Chad only because these guys are average looking. Or did they not meet on Tinder? Which is it? I'm confused.
That's why you never date women older than 22, no matter your age.
this happens not just in online dating anymore, because even people who dont date online get affected by the sexual market caused by dating. people simping for girls, and causing hypergamy simply results in hoe-flation. a girl who was once a 5/10 and only limited by her social connections is now able to access rich tall chads from the entier city, if not from anywhere in the world, by a simple swipe of the finger
and most normies are so cucked and bluepilled, they dont get know about telegony
Reality
>Guy FOUR fake profiles on dating app, one male and 3 female
>Creates *all* of the dialog in the image
>Retards fall for it
Kid, less than 3% of women are on dating apps
Reality is I tried it myself after I had zero luck with a regular profile. It is wild how different women were to me. I could have actually scored this way since when I admitted to one of them she was still nice because her brain didn't adjust to the reality that it is not me. She still had her preconceived perception of my personality based on fake photos.
Most likely those were fake accounts. It's popular to do this shit now. I created a lot of these tinder experiment memes on /misc/
You are an absolute retard cause I did it a few years back when chadfishing was new and I got zero fake accounts with my regular profile. It was real. You can't even chadfish properly now that they implemented security against it. You would need a burner phone each time and get shadowbanned quickly. You are so dumb and obtuse that you just outed yourself as ragebaiter. Be more subtle next time.
It wasn't real lol. The way to make these memes is through text generators.
>the thing you tried out yourself and it worked wasn't real
Sure anon sure. You will definitely convince me I didn't experience firsthand what I experienced firsthand.
>"When I joined a meme app that is 70%-80% fake profiles, scambots, and fakes where less than 2% of women aged 19-29 go yo ANY of these meme apps nothing hapened until I also made a scam profile.
No shit, really?!?!
Next thing you'll tell that those phone apps that claim you can earn money playing bingo are scams!
What are you even doing now? I mean I do get that you are an incel larping as a normie trying to rile other people up for fun. But what is the game here? Confuse the other person or just post something/anything to keep it going to find something to hook into next?
I am making fun of a retard that thinks Tinder is real, fuckwit
If you are serious then may god have mercy on your soul cause you are seriously an embarrassment and a certified retard.
The differences between me and you include
-I can do math
-I can read a graph
-I have had sex with XX women
-I can talk to strangers
How KHHV robots are born
>ages 12-14 they daydream about being tall, handsome, athletic, charming men who can fuck any woman at will
>Age 15 - 17 no woman runs up to them, rips off her clothes, and demands to be fucked and they realize they are not the demi-god of their dreams
>They imagine SOMEONE must be, so it becomes a mythical figure responsible for the fact women aren't begging them for sex
There it is
>They imagine SOMEONE must be, so it becomes a mythical figure responsible for the fact women aren't begging them for sex
While that is real for some and would be nice I would honestly settle for a girl who keeps playing with her hair and not so subtly rubs against me with her body from the moment she sees me. And she laughs at the jokes I didn't even make yet. I could probably take it from there since I would really have to put in conscious effort into fucking it up.
>And you know this, how? You know any Chads?
Yes. I know a few.
They're absolute assholes to every single person they meet, have egos so high that jumping from them to their IQ would count as a suicide attempt, and are extremely misogynist.
They'll openly admit that they'll fuck women they find "ugly" or "revolting" purely because they're "easy", and then ghost them immediately afterwards. And they have no interest in having a long-term relationship; why get one when you can have dozens of friends-with-benefits/fuckbuddies at any given time? One of them literally admitted he has no interest in getting a gf because he can get sex from women so easily without one.
And despite these "misogynistic behaviours" and "toxic personalities", they're absolutely swimming in pussy. Why? Because they're tall, muscular, and handsome.
All of the women your age that have partners of 1 or less are already married by the time you're 20. Once you get past that, the only women available for you are the women that've been run through by multiple other men, and had their ability to partner-bond permanently broken.
>They're absolute assholes to every single person they meet,
that alone probably means you don't know any. Attractive people being assholes is a Hollywood thing. Actual Chads don't give a shit about incels, they don't even know you exist.
Your idea of a Chad is probably some 6'1 white guy with blue eyes or something.
>your idea of a chad is probably some chad
Why yes. It is.
Yeah, like I thought. Your idea of a top-tier man is only some decent looking guy.
You don't know any Chads.
I never said it's impossible. I'm just saying that most bullies and assholes are average - a little above average looking. Good looking people generally don't waste their time bullying autistic Indians. They don't care about you enough.
>literally arguing it's impossible for attractive people to be bad people
I literally KNOW this guy, he is a real person that exists, and he's an absolute egotistical cunt to everyone, he thinks he's God's fucking gift to mankind.
Also:
>6'1
>"Chad"
Get with the times grandpa, if he was a strawman that'd still be too short, most women want 6'2" minimum now, ideally 6'4"+
I knew a 6'4 jacked guy with a pretty handsome face when I worked at my part time lifeguard job last summer. Every girl at work was obsessed with him, and he showed me his tinder one time while we were chilling in the break room and he had over 800 matches. In the convos he would barely put effort and and just tell them to come over and they would do it, Chad lives in a different reality to you, he orders girls like pizza.
every incel has a chad friend who had a gajillion matches on tinder or some shit
every bluepiller has a subhuman friend who cleans up
who to believe?
>attractive guy is attractive
holy shit....
Btw I can assure you that the guy wasn't on it 24/7 autistically swiping. It's something he did on the toilet. He went out to meet people the normal way.
I do self-improvement for the sake of my mental discipline to become a greek god with mastery of his mind and body. There is not a shred of consideration for my dating options whenever I force myself to work out.
sigma grindset MLM guys are the exact same people who think that "Chad" is a real thing and that women are just objects. It's cringe when some ugly antisocial kid posts "Women *coffee emoji*" on instagram and thinks he is to smart to get married, but you're insulting your own community lol.
>tfw I've done this with 2 girls
sorry lads
*VERY smug pepe .jpeg
>25% of all women married between the ages of 18 and 29 have only ever had sex with their husband (although few waited for the wedding night).
>Mean lifetime sexual partner count in 2002 was 3.3, and lifetime partner count has been dropping for 20 years, now down to 2.7
>over 1 in 3 women aged 44 or less has a lifetime partner count of 1 *or less*.
Why do you have such a retarded cuckold fetish, OP?
Not OP but realistically that is the only type of woman you can get if you self improove. The ship for 25% of women who had sex with only one partner has already sailed.
>me real dumb, me not know women
FTFY
Dumbass, RIGHT NOW over 60% of unmarried 20 year olds are virgins.
What ship has sailed, again?
>All of the women your age that have partners of 1 or less are already married by the time you're 20
See
Per the Pew analysis of CDC, GSS, and epidemiology data of UNMARRIED 20 year olds 60% are still virgins.
IS being as wrong as you are painful?
>your future wife
My what?
LULZ is just cuck porn... endless fantasies about women getting fucked. Why does everyone keep doing this?
>why do pornbrained people think about sex and parasocial relationships more frequently than normal?
Really a challenging question...lol
I can tell you guys are pretty young by your responses. When you're fucking old and lonely you'll lower your standards. Some of you maybe are content being alone. But a lot of you will start to realize the way you have been doing things isn't getting you the results you want. Life didn't turn out how you hoped it would and you wasted your youth acting in ways that didn't get you those results. The less time you have the more likely you'll be to switch up your strategy. I have news for you, women don't like older guys unless they are fucking rich. This idea that women age and men are just attractive forever isn't true. You might do ok in your teens and 20s by virtue of being young. If that's all you had going for you, and you are still single by 30 holy shit are you every in for a rude awakening. Obviously I don't want a roastie. Obviously my preference is not a girl who is so immoral and has been with lots of dudes. But the older you get the less options you have. Do you want a 38 year old who just realized now that her eggs are dried up that she wants to give you a chance? Or do you want a 25 year old who was young and stupid and got swept up by social pressure into falling for propaganda and doing something really bad? I think it depends how she talks about it. If she is mature and remorseful about it, then you have to give people a chance. If she cheats on you obviously dump her but if you just wrote her off as tainted goods you will probably be alone forever or marry a baron old lady.
Best option is knock up a nerd while you're young. Fine since 22 year old 6/10 when you're in your 20s and just never use condoms. As long as she's not a pink haired psycho who's going to turn your son trans, that's your best option is you're young. If you're old like me, I would give the roastie a chance but be careful about STDs. Get her tested. Honestly, be manipulative and condescending to her. That's what she needs is a leader like a dog that wasn't trained.
Nah bro, I'd rather kill myself then end up in some dead bedroom with a bitch who settled for me at 27 after she spent her youth fucking guys out of her league that she met on tinder. Death is preferable to reddit cuckoldry.
I'll never stop dating girls below 20 and I'll get away with it more and more as mentally ill girls with BPD and daddy issues get more prevalent and I get older.
Most guys have at least 5 girlfriends below the age of 20.
>future wife
>wife
>implying I'd marry
AHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA
"Do not worry nice guys! You will win in the end!"
I'm on the left lol. Weds night I was grabbing her throat while I fucked her prone bone. Also stuck my thumb up her ass while hitting it from behind. Unbelievably hot
10 other guys before you did that to her too.
I thought the same thing but I don't care cause now it's me doing that. She lets me hit it raw since I was a virgin
I'm p happy with the situation. She's a nympho
Jokes on you I hate women and only will do casual stuff with them.
Reading threads like this really makes me wonder if most incels are incels simply because they're so unbelievably fucking stupid.
This shit makes it sound like you're parodying incels.
Unreal.
unless she bleeds I will never propose to her. Im not taking any sloppy seconds
fuck off tourist
>Reading threads like this really makes me wonder if most incels are incels simply because they're so unbelievably fucking stupid.
That's about 95% of it. The rest is just LDAR syndrome
What is the stupidity exactly? Getting baited by other incels pretending to be normies?
posting shitty half-assed studies and calling it le scientific blackpill, not actually knowing what a Chad is and thinking it's some 6'1 normie, thinking that normal people spend their lives swiping on shitty dating apps instead of going out and socializing, not touching grass and still trying to tell people how the real world works. List goes on.
There's a reason why everyone outside your little scientific blackpillosphere thinks you're dumbfucks.
Fuck off roastoid retard.
I'm only willing to settle for a virgin so it's not my problem. Failing that I'd rather be single. Don't see the point in settling for used goods.
This is not as bad as you think. Yes, women are whores... but so what? Even if you're an attractive chad, women will still be looking for mega attractive and rich chad and fantasize about that. The answer is to marry a girl when she is 16/17. For that, you must be in a close-knit religious community. Literally, the only way to go.
>"...and then the UFO dropped off bigfoot so he could build a mind-control ray!"
same energy
>says something reasonable and easily achievable if you can lay of and stop playing vidya
hurrr durr but but muh blackpill. im a retarded zooomer nagger who just feels bad for myself.
You
>Yes, women are whores... but so what? Even if you're an attractive chad, women will still be looking for mega attractive and rich chad and fantasize about that. The answer is to marry a girl when she is 16/17. For that, you must be in a close-knit religious community. Literally, the only way to go.
Also you
>says something reasonable and easily achievable if you can lay of and stop playing vidya
>you looking forward to your future, mr. sigma grindset?
Yes, her daughter will be a good cumsock.
But what if my true love mr chad never did anything degrading to me.
We only had cute romantic stuff, and he ate my pussy for hours but never let me near his bepis. I loved him a lot...