>you cant judge another culture or civilisation as being inferior just because they never invented the wheel or written language!

>you can’t judge another culture or civilisation as being inferior just because they never invented the wheel or written language!
>mud huts are equally impressive as the ancient ruins of majestic stone structures that were built by Rome, Mesopotamia and China!

When did this become a historical consensus?

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >they never invented the wheel or written language!
    Are you talking about Europe? They borrowed those from the Mid-east, same as Africa.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      why would you make a kangaroo vehicle.
      they are slow and can't even into plough because they would stomp on all your crops

      the wheel and the oldest evidence of animal use for plough are from the funnelbeaker culture in europe.
      the horse and chariot are from the Sintasha culture.
      the oldest evidence of symbols also apparently came from -paleolithic- europe

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Kangaroos aren't slow.
        They have the most efficient locomotion of any terrestrial animal.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          They dont fart

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I saw a single dingo chasing a full grown roo the other day. It was easily twice his size. Don't know if he caught it but it made me think about how savage nature is.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >the oldest evidence of symbols also apparently came from -paleolithic- europe
        if symbols are writing then writing is invented in Africa.
        Writing is invented in Sumer and this info can not be changed no matter how much you try to focus on Europe.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >if symbols are writing then writing is invented in Africa.
          pretty sure hieroglyphics and chinese symbols are considered writing

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >pretty sure hieroglyphics and chinese symbols are considered writing
            because they contain sounds, words and they can conduct a communication of sentences. Random symbols marking something doesnt form sentences.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          the oldest writing is 100% from vinca culture in europe.
          sumer probably asimilated the concept from vinca through trade

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            i couldnt find any source that cuneiform is related to Vinca symbols. And also, whether if Vinca symbols are writing or not is still debated.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            If we count vinca as writing, then Asians and Africans invented that shit a long time ago too

            Ubaid Sumer, Cycladic Greece and Protodynastic Egypt all have identical material cultures to the Danube Civilization of the Balkans, which also predates them all. Furthermore, the Indus Valley Civilation do not exist at this point, and only appear after the Yamnaya diffused across the steppes and only attain any semblance of advancement after the diffusion of the Yamnaya's successors, the Sintashta, neither of which existed before coming into contact with the Danubian cultures themselves. The chronological sequence of the earliest civilations is obvious unless you're a seething swarthoid.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            The Indus Valley Civilization and Longshan Culture*

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            If we count vinca as writing, then Asians and Africans invented that shit a long time ago too

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >the wheel and the oldest evidence of animal use for plough are from the funnelbeaker culture in europe.
        >the horse and chariot are from the Sintasha culture.
        >the oldest evidence of symbols also apparently came from -paleolithic- europe
        WE
        WUZ

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I mean the horse was domesticated in europe as suggested by some fairly recent genetic papers. (librado et al for example)
          As an aside, it really is crazy what one can conclude out of random ass bullshit+genetics.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          All of that is very literally confirmed, the first depiction of a wheeled vehicle is from funnelbeakers, on the same settlement you can observe the oldest evidence of use of ploughs (aurochs that evidence their horse being tied to a plough)

          The horse is very clearly from the pontic caspian steppe, most specifically descended from the sintasha horse, and the chariot too.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Never

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >HEH, STUPID TRIBESPEOPLE NEVER INVENTED A FRICKING HAMMER
    do you realize how fricking moronic you are?, why would they fricking need a wheel if the land is not workable and it already provides sustenance in other forms?

    youre just trying to claim that """technology""" makes man better even though it serves no purpose other than making him lazier when destroying the ecosystem

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine trying to aim with a fricking kangaroo pulling your chariot, lol.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How come europe didn’t invent the wheel, math, science, writing, or philosophy? All of it came from the near east.

    And even in the classical or medieval eras, you had the Arab world, india, and China exporting a shit ton of stuff into Europe. I can’t think of a single major invention made by Europeans in actual isolation.

    Even Bantus were able to develop iron working and farming in their garbage shithole environment with drought and disease and pests. Europeans in their temperate climate and fertile river valleys hardly did anything themselves.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >wheel
      not true
      >writing
      not true
      >science
      not true
      >philosophy
      not true

      india has never produced anything of value, in fact dravidians never invented the wheel, a writing system, innovated technologicaly or developed anything in isolation
      in fact their domestic animals and agriculture started after the anatolian farmers most relative to sardinians domesticated crops and animals then gave it to the iranian ancestors of indians

      they barely did anything with extremely high population, density, proficient rivers and a long existence

      i literlaly can't name anythinng of value or real complexity ever produced by india or the middle east

      not in the past, nor in the future, let alone africa.

      why is this? low iq explains it? other explainations don't seem to account for the lack of civilization among indians until the anatolian agricultural practices spreaded into them

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        yes, indians are a slave race without genetic capacity, that's why a population of over 60 million brahmins have never produced anything comparable to the industrial revolution, to the unification of electromagnetism, a capacitor, a self-propeled vehicle or a computer like british people.
        there is more brahmins than british, an elite the size of a country
        yet no achievements comparable, there is no indian newton, there is no indian industrial revolution, there is no indian fridges nor any indian electromagnetic induction.

        they have been exposed to major civilizations immediatly for thousands of years nonstop, yet barely moved past the iron age. is a clear case of genetic lack of capacity

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          now that you mention it i correct myself, indians have never had somehting like a civilizations.
          it is but a primitive showdown of big mudhuts created as vanity monuments for classist overlords.
          what baffles me the most is how not even the middle east, north africa, india and china combined hold a candle against europe, that people, over billions really, has barely developed anything other than big mudwalls.
          is simply hard to believe

          a single indian kingdom may have accounted for a bigger population than half of western europe in the middle ages, and they had direct contact with arabs, chinese, southeast asians and in the past even with greeks.
          yet with all this adventages in size, and this lack of isolation, they did basically nothing.
          the fact they had so many resources at their hand yet did so few is... i don't know, dissapointing even.

          i can't explain it other way than by them being african in their intelect

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            yes, indians are a slave race without genetic capacity, that's why a population of over 60 million brahmins have never produced anything comparable to the industrial revolution, to the unification of electromagnetism, a capacitor, a self-propeled vehicle or a computer like british people.
            there is more brahmins than british, an elite the size of a country
            yet no achievements comparable, there is no indian newton, there is no indian industrial revolution, there is no indian fridges nor any indian electromagnetic induction.

            they have been exposed to major civilizations immediatly for thousands of years nonstop, yet barely moved past the iron age. is a clear case of genetic lack of capacity

            >wheel
            not true
            >writing
            not true
            >science
            not true
            >philosophy
            not true

            india has never produced anything of value, in fact dravidians never invented the wheel, a writing system, innovated technologicaly or developed anything in isolation
            in fact their domestic animals and agriculture started after the anatolian farmers most relative to sardinians domesticated crops and animals then gave it to the iranian ancestors of indians

            they barely did anything with extremely high population, density, proficient rivers and a long existence

            i literlaly can't name anythinng of value or real complexity ever produced by india or the middle east

            not in the past, nor in the future, let alone africa.

            why is this? low iq explains it? other explainations don't seem to account for the lack of civilization among indians until the anatolian agricultural practices spreaded into them

            Who is this pajeet-obsessed kid? And why does he keep crying about india?

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why is trying to degrade and put down other people so important to you?

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >When did this become a historical consensus?
    never?
    i didnt read any paper that said "Tribal civilisations were as devrloped as Roman Empire at peak"
    saying
    >yeah during certain historical times one region was richer than other
    does not mean
    >whites are superior

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >darkwitch be like: you obsessed with india!!!
    >also darkwitch:

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Wait are you the Irish kid who keeps talking about Darkwitch? Nobody knows or cares who that is. Sorry that pajeets own half your country, but we don’t give a frick about that. Stop shitting up the thread with your seething, homosexual ass b***h lol

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >irish
        >that grammar
        he's obviously a spic

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    dark witch thread

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    when npcs became mainstream.

    This narrative is pushed for very specific reasons. If you don't know why at this point, you're the target

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Boas

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *