>you can’t judge another culture or civilisation as being inferior just because they never invented the wheel or written language!
>mud huts are equally impressive as the ancient ruins of majestic stone structures that were built by Rome, Mesopotamia and China!
When did this become a historical consensus?
Beware Cat Shirt $21.68 |
Beware Cat Shirt $21.68 |
>they never invented the wheel or written language!
Are you talking about Europe? They borrowed those from the Mid-east, same as Africa.
why would you make a kangaroo vehicle.
they are slow and can't even into plough because they would stomp on all your crops
the wheel and the oldest evidence of animal use for plough are from the funnelbeaker culture in europe.
the horse and chariot are from the Sintasha culture.
the oldest evidence of symbols also apparently came from -paleolithic- europe
Kangaroos aren't slow.
They have the most efficient locomotion of any terrestrial animal.
They dont fart
I saw a single dingo chasing a full grown roo the other day. It was easily twice his size. Don't know if he caught it but it made me think about how savage nature is.
>the oldest evidence of symbols also apparently came from -paleolithic- europe
if symbols are writing then writing is invented in Africa.
Writing is invented in Sumer and this info can not be changed no matter how much you try to focus on Europe.
>if symbols are writing then writing is invented in Africa.
pretty sure hieroglyphics and chinese symbols are considered writing
>pretty sure hieroglyphics and chinese symbols are considered writing
because they contain sounds, words and they can conduct a communication of sentences. Random symbols marking something doesnt form sentences.
the oldest writing is 100% from vinca culture in europe.
sumer probably asimilated the concept from vinca through trade
i couldnt find any source that cuneiform is related to Vinca symbols. And also, whether if Vinca symbols are writing or not is still debated.
Ubaid Sumer, Cycladic Greece and Protodynastic Egypt all have identical material cultures to the Danube Civilization of the Balkans, which also predates them all. Furthermore, the Indus Valley Civilation do not exist at this point, and only appear after the Yamnaya diffused across the steppes and only attain any semblance of advancement after the diffusion of the Yamnaya's successors, the Sintashta, neither of which existed before coming into contact with the Danubian cultures themselves. The chronological sequence of the earliest civilations is obvious unless you're a seething swarthoid.
The Indus Valley Civilization and Longshan Culture*
If we count vinca as writing, then Asians and Africans invented that shit a long time ago too
>the wheel and the oldest evidence of animal use for plough are from the funnelbeaker culture in europe.
>the horse and chariot are from the Sintasha culture.
>the oldest evidence of symbols also apparently came from -paleolithic- europe
WE
WUZ
I mean the horse was domesticated in europe as suggested by some fairly recent genetic papers. (librado et al for example)
As an aside, it really is crazy what one can conclude out of random ass bullshit+genetics.
All of that is very literally confirmed, the first depiction of a wheeled vehicle is from funnelbeakers, on the same settlement you can observe the oldest evidence of use of ploughs (aurochs that evidence their horse being tied to a plough)
The horse is very clearly from the pontic caspian steppe, most specifically descended from the sintasha horse, and the chariot too.
Never
>HEH, STUPID TRIBESPEOPLE NEVER INVENTED A FRICKING HAMMER
do you realize how fricking moronic you are?, why would they fricking need a wheel if the land is not workable and it already provides sustenance in other forms?
youre just trying to claim that """technology""" makes man better even though it serves no purpose other than making him lazier when destroying the ecosystem
Imagine trying to aim with a fricking kangaroo pulling your chariot, lol.
How come europe didn’t invent the wheel, math, science, writing, or philosophy? All of it came from the near east.
And even in the classical or medieval eras, you had the Arab world, india, and China exporting a shit ton of stuff into Europe. I can’t think of a single major invention made by Europeans in actual isolation.
Even Bantus were able to develop iron working and farming in their garbage shithole environment with drought and disease and pests. Europeans in their temperate climate and fertile river valleys hardly did anything themselves.
>wheel
not true
>writing
not true
>science
not true
>philosophy
not true
india has never produced anything of value, in fact dravidians never invented the wheel, a writing system, innovated technologicaly or developed anything in isolation
in fact their domestic animals and agriculture started after the anatolian farmers most relative to sardinians domesticated crops and animals then gave it to the iranian ancestors of indians
they barely did anything with extremely high population, density, proficient rivers and a long existence
i literlaly can't name anythinng of value or real complexity ever produced by india or the middle east
not in the past, nor in the future, let alone africa.
why is this? low iq explains it? other explainations don't seem to account for the lack of civilization among indians until the anatolian agricultural practices spreaded into them
yes, indians are a slave race without genetic capacity, that's why a population of over 60 million brahmins have never produced anything comparable to the industrial revolution, to the unification of electromagnetism, a capacitor, a self-propeled vehicle or a computer like british people.
there is more brahmins than british, an elite the size of a country
yet no achievements comparable, there is no indian newton, there is no indian industrial revolution, there is no indian fridges nor any indian electromagnetic induction.
they have been exposed to major civilizations immediatly for thousands of years nonstop, yet barely moved past the iron age. is a clear case of genetic lack of capacity
now that you mention it i correct myself, indians have never had somehting like a civilizations.
it is but a primitive showdown of big mudhuts created as vanity monuments for classist overlords.
what baffles me the most is how not even the middle east, north africa, india and china combined hold a candle against europe, that people, over billions really, has barely developed anything other than big mudwalls.
is simply hard to believe
a single indian kingdom may have accounted for a bigger population than half of western europe in the middle ages, and they had direct contact with arabs, chinese, southeast asians and in the past even with greeks.
yet with all this adventages in size, and this lack of isolation, they did basically nothing.
the fact they had so many resources at their hand yet did so few is... i don't know, dissapointing even.
i can't explain it other way than by them being african in their intelect
Who is this pajeet-obsessed kid? And why does he keep crying about india?
Why is trying to degrade and put down other people so important to you?
>When did this become a historical consensus?
never?
i didnt read any paper that said "Tribal civilisations were as devrloped as Roman Empire at peak"
saying
>yeah during certain historical times one region was richer than other
does not mean
>whites are superior
>darkwitch be like: you obsessed with india!!!
>also darkwitch:
Wait are you the Irish kid who keeps talking about Darkwitch? Nobody knows or cares who that is. Sorry that pajeets own half your country, but we don’t give a frick about that. Stop shitting up the thread with your seething, homosexual ass b***h lol
>irish
>that grammar
he's obviously a spic
dark witch thread
when npcs became mainstream.
This narrative is pushed for very specific reasons. If you don't know why at this point, you're the target
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Boas