My history professor keeps including questions like these on the homework, for now been skirting the issue as much as I can, any violent woman leaders I can name drop?
Women are inherently less violent, cause feminism says so CHUD!
My history professor keeps including questions like these on the homework, for now been skirting the issue as much as I can, any violent woman leaders I can name drop?
What were the materials you read over the past rwo weeks?
About ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt, nothing regarding women in the chapters besides they were seen as lessers.
Every three years women kill more of their own children than the total number of men who have died in all war.
75 million unborn children per year are dashed upon the rocks by their mothers for inconveniencing them. In what way is this any different than burning your children alive as an offering to Satan for wealth? Is the mother's end goal not to have more money?
Liberals don't see abortion as murder
This, women are more bloodthirsty than men by far. A child is literally never in more dangers than when he is with his own mother. SIDS is also made up, 95% of the time it’s just psychotic foids smothering their children.
we have the most women ever in power and are on the brink of WW3
women are less calm and more violent. survey of ER room doctors found most instances of domestic violence were perpetrated by the female
women are governed by their hormones and are coddled instead of taught to control themselves like men are.
women are greedy.
spiteful.
vicious.
deceitful.
irresponsible.
Rather not work dead end jobs all my life, soon i'll become neet but not yet.
>any violent woman leaders I can name drop?
Women in US abort 1 million unborn babies each year.
That's a pretty violent group , if you ask me.
For what it's worth, queen Isabella I of Spain launched the bloodiest inquisition known in history against israelites. Also read up on statistics about which gender started the most wars between kings and queens.
I knew there were a handful of violent woman queens but damn.
>For what it's worth, queen Isabella I of Spain launched the bloodiest inquisition known in history against israelites.
wtf, i love al espani habibis now?
>women use the trifecta of manipulation, gossip, shaming
>men use violence
two sides of the same coin. except we have completely abolished violence and that's why everything is ultra-feminised now
We havent abolished violence. Any time you say no to a woman, a simp comes to fight you. Every time you beat that simp, she summons another. The fighting jever ends until you are defeated or until you surrender.
I try to give violence away to people for free all the time and no one wants any. Society is gay and you're not real
Margaret Thatcher
Joan of Arc
Queen Victoria
Queen Elizabeth
Queen Mary
Catherine the Great
that lady who threw all the White people off the bus in the 50s
Matriarchies don't exist because women aren't competent enough to take power and run a society or they would have done so. It's self evident.
just play along don't be a chud. none of this matters. you're not accomplish anything
This would be the safest option and what ive been doing mostly, or ignoring that part of the question
but if it doesn't matter may as well say fuck it
She's rigging any debate by sophistry.
>Black's Law 11ed Violence ~ Over whelming use of force
Women are not capable of overwhelming force, w/o a man doing it for them.
>Automation breeds complacency Ergo women don't suffer the consequences of violence
Women are TWICE AS MALICIOUS
In order to convict a predator, you must prove MALICE in a court of record,
Malicious is a LEGAL term required for conviction, violence is not.
Women maliciously kill more children than men.
Men attack pedophiles, women encourage such behavior in Tales from the Brother's Grimm.
TURN THE WORDS AROUND.
She is also pigeon holing the discussion w/ the term 'From what you have read'.
This is a logic fallacy called anecdotal evidence or cherry picking.
Lesbians call in more domestic violence complaints (per capita) than any other relationship grouping.
Pandora's cosmetic case is about deception.
ie women's deception bring misery into the world for men.
>I'd crush the whore in a debate, she's a witch
Start focusing on Witch hunts (a culling of degens w/ STD and pedos) and witch trials (a perversion of legal standards
Catherine the Great.
honestly, women are more violent, men can take a joke, can reason things out, or just take a few swipes at each other and become friends, bitches are the one who are the first to resort to violence and when they do they refuse to back down even after being beaten and apprehended
female leaders statistically are more likely to be warmongers
are you stupid? of course women are less violent than men
Remind her that Saint Olga burned down an entire town during a war.
Women aren't competent or trustworthy as teachers. They shouldn't be allowed to do any real jobs without male supervision.
>saint olga
I mean ya but isn't she the saint that regretted her actions and tried to convince her son not to be as blood thirsty only for the grandson to take the words of her grandmother into consideration?
?si=BNjm-GH5W7aF19aI
>regretted her actions
Regret won't bring those dead back, their lineages are forever lost in time thanks to a slut on a power trip.
Behead christcucks.
Sparta
Nikki Haley
They aren't
They're just less effective at it. So many men get hit by women and it's seen as nothing because of sumps.
Your answer:
>This question is a prime example of female passive-aggressiveness.
>This answer is a prime example of why more straight-forward aggression is superior.
gl
Pretty based lol. What’s unfortunate is they’ll basically give you a failing grade for that kind of shit. “How dare you disagree with my biased premise that I made up!” — female teachers who now dominate academia and don’t have a shred of impartiality between the lot of them.
>Now let's talk about SIDS is totally not murder
I don't see an issue with what your professor is showing you. It's a PROVEN fact that men commit majority of violent crimes, especially crimes of passion AKA crimes committed because they were so overly emotional and mentally unhinged. You know what else is a proven fact? Countries who had female presidents handled the COVID pandemic better than countries with male presidents. A huge portion of men are so incompetent that they don't even wash their anuses in the shower. Amerimutt males specifically don't even wipe their ass after SHITTING. Disgusting.
Anyone with half a brain is aware that because women are more empathic than men, they are able to make better decisions for not only themselves, but groups as a whole. People who don't have their worldviews tainted by misogyny are better fit to run countries, and in most cases, that would be a woman.
>because women are more empathic than men, they are able to make better decisions for not only themselves, but groups as a whole.
It allows them to make MORE EMOTIONAL decisions than men. Just look at all the roasties making doe eyes for immigration and "nu-uh"ing anyone who brings up the MANY problems with it.
Hell, there's a great example RIGHT NOW of that: the governor of New Mexico blatantly violated the Constitution because "oh no muh children" and she fucked up so hard the police are just ignoring her. And her response? Tripling down. There's your "empathetic better decision maker" for you, a wannabe dictator.
>fucking solids
>committed because they were so overly emotional and mentally unhinged
LMFAO, you mean when a woman lead a man into expectations and then she say 'I didn't say that' or 'that's your fault for forming expectations'?
>female presidents handled the COVID pandemic better than countries with male presidents.
What a joke, you mean they agreed w/ your personal ignorance. Nothing factual about opinion/consensus, just a show of your gullibility to accept an ARTS degree holder as an expert.
>men are so incompetent that they don't even wash their anuses in the shower. Amerimutt males specifically don't even wipe their ass after SHITTING. Disgusting.
Stawman fallacy, and not even true.
The fact you get UTIs doesn't reflect on male hygiene, whore.
>Anyone with half a brain is aware that because women are more empathic ..... misogyny are better fit to run countries, and in most cases, that would be a woman.
Dumbest thing I've read on /misc/, empathy rarely solves problems, b/c there are no solution. There are TRADE OFFS, which women are too poorly educated to even know basic logic fallacies or even paradoxes.
Pandora means 'all giving', ie gives away resources she's too incompetent to create.
Your entitlement is why society is going to shit.
Show your tits.
>and no, I don't really want to see your tits. But it's the only thing you've got going for you.
Total myth that women are more empathetic than men.
Women very very obviously despise the vast majority of men and joke publicly about their destruction and show zero signs of empathy for problems that face men. What women do have is an in-group bias — they do work together as a team to push a unified agenda better than men who compete out of necessity.
What’s always funny about comments like yours is everytime someone makes a similar negative generalization about blacks your type always say “WE HAVE CONSIDER THE WHY THERE ARE REASONS”.
Apply the same basic logic, why are men more violent? Because men have greater expectations placed upon them and are exposed to harsher competition than women by and large.
>women are more empathetic than men.
The leaf was baiting but what you wrote must be stressed. One just has to look at internet memes to see how empathetic the sexes are. Women's empathy for men online is unexistant, while men constantly create new memes to encourage men and manhood worldwide.
Easiest example to mention is Zyzz and his inspirational message of "we're all gonna make it brah".
Where's the f-male example? Nonexistant. Closest that exist are vtubers, but their message is not aimed specifically at men, they are generalized. Most vtubers act snobbish towards their fans, even if they start with an innocent mask, they soon drop it and show their selfish selves.
"men"
Wars in Africa tend to be way more violent and atrocious. Look up Idi Amin, Robert Mugabe, the Sudan civil war, and Nelson Mandela necklaces.
Let's see if your teacher still wants to say it's just genetics.
All the angl* queens of the last centuries.
There's also a chinese empress who was batshit insane, created many novel ways to torture peasants.
What are you studying?
>internationally all woman policy would decrease wars
>domestically, violence would increase
That's an A paper tho
Women were over twice as likely to start wars when they gained monarchacal rule. Queen regents started wars far more often than kings.
Also, abortion is murder, so women are responsible for millions more killings every year than men.
Queen Boudica.
QRD? Didn't she just react to the roman invasion? Or are you referring to her suicidal charge?
Both. I can only imagine the rage she felt at both of her daughters being raped by the Romans. 75k dead. Violent, based bitch.
>the rage she felt
From what I know of women nowadays, I'd say she got wet herself awaiting the BRC.
A peaceful world is boring.
Then why do I only remember all the batshit insane ones from the past? Do you think I remember any of those bitches for their policies? I remember women like Joan D'arc being burned at the stake because her movement was just so peaceful right?
Not even the correct use of a semicolon. What a disgrace
but their decision-making skills create violence through failure and inept definitions of justice.
Catherine the Great,
Margret Thatcher.
>any violent woman leaders I can name drop
Lmao pretty much all of them. You're a former bong colony, so drop Matilda or Elizabeth I.
Don't mind me, I'm just the lead architect of World War 3.
Female leaders can only come about in peaceful societies. Women in power does not cause peace, peace causes women in power.
Tzarita Catarine instantly comes to mind. Margaret Tatcher if you want to include miners abuse. There were others, google it.
A) Selection bias
B) Hillary Clinton was willing to put boots on the ground in Syria if she had won the presidency while President Trump laid the groundwork for withdrawal from a longstanding military engagement and otherwise did not engage in any new military conflicts, his only notable actions being use of a MOAB bomb on an AQ cave system and a single targeted killing of an Iranian general, both of which were extensions of existing conflicts and are miniscule fractions of the kill count of the prior 2 presidencies.
no, the question is where do you want the war to take place? in far-away lands for fake causus or within for no reason at all other than a fake sense of compassion.
with men in power, they fight one another they dominate one another and with women in charge, they create inhospitable living conditions that sound good on paper, invite the third world onto your doorstep make entire nations unsafe with vandals from foreign lands and then are too cowardish to walk back on them or take accountability.
add some pictures of our lovely modern societies and how well they fare.
Women are highly emotional and initiate violence more often in domestic disputes. Lesbian relationships have significantly higher levels of violence than heterosexual relationships. Women are hardly less violent, but they are not as strong as men. In heterosexual relationships, females initiate violence 70% of the time.
Respond to the prompt by writing about Mary I, Catherine the Great, Isabella, but AGREE COMPLETELY WITH THE PREMISE. Bonus points for quoting Aristophanes' Assemblywomen completely out of context. Finish essay by remarking that more women are involved in Western governments than at any other point in human history, and that we are approaching a golden age of global peace and stability.
>Bonus points for quoting Aristophanes' Assemblywomen completely out of context
THIS, very PA!
And don't for get the Latin language
Dominator
Dominatrix
Executor
Executrix
Governor
Governtrix
Prosecutor
Prosecutrix
Senator
Senatrix (not a real word as they weren't allowed)
>gives new meaning to the term 'how's trix?'
Trix or treat
Prostitutes turn tricks
Be sure to ask if she knows the meaning of MISANDRIST, she doesn't even know what she has become. And if a man can be a Misandrist.
You might be better off looking at what Peterson has stated about women being just as aggressive as men they just express it in different ways and are a lot more passive aggressive. Obviously that alone is no citation but figure out where he got that info from and you’ve got a talking point at least. I hear you though it’s really unhealthy to say the least that most teachers are women because they’ve fully let their own bias and sexism cloud their judgement — they make leading questions and if you don’t reply how they want your grade suffers. It’s pathetic really. And nobody seems to notice, nobody seems to care.
Women never lose in war.
They win no matter what because they still get taken as breeding stock by whoever wins.
It's the ultimate shit test.
In this at least the no work no pussy homosexuals are correct, if for the incorrect reasons: women are the gatekeepers to the ultimate resource, and any man -- or, as a nation of men -- willing to overcome all the others will be rewarded with that prize.
If women want a world of peace then they have to accept strictly-enforced national borders and a monogamic societal structure as their duty toward that.
No less will do.
Golda Meir, Thatcher, Clinton, Madeline Albright, Condie Rice ...
To name just a very few not counting all the warring queens in older times
On average and on the individual level, they undoubtedly are. However, people seeking positions of high power do it for a reason. So there's no difference between the two sexes in that regard. Just look at Thatcher and the Falklands. One of the most retarded wars in history.
Women are more violent statistically, but weaker. When put in charge or in influence over groups of men (armies) they cause more war too.
It's mostly petty violence if you can call it that. They don't go out in the streets and beat each other up like guys do in the weekend. Some few roasties fight, but 99% of all fights you see are men vs men. It's probably because you live in a country full of vile shitskins, be they men or women.
Yes it's definitely that but still, if you qualify it as any violence, women are higher. Especially in lesbian relationships.
And they are quicker to call upon men to commit violence. Women get the ick if their man cries over his dad dying. They get the ick if another man confronts him/them and they talk it out or walk away.
>be woman in charge of a country
> hate another country because of a small slight
>have no respect for male life in any capacity
>Google search " is going to war wrong"
> see articles from all the other women leaders
>"10 reasons why you shouldn't be ashamed to go to war"
> "everyone told me not to go to war, but it's the best decision I ever made for myself"
> "going to war wasn't for me, but here is what I learned about myself in the process"
>" is raining hellfire on civilians wrong? Meet the women who say "no""
> goes to war
>oopsie.
Here is a literal study you can use to prove him wrong
The English Reformation. Henry VIII founded the Church of England, and his son Edward VI continued it, putting down some rebellions amongst the nobility in the process. Then Mary I came to the throne and wanted to undo the CoE and bring back Catholicism. So she declared Protestants to be heretics and had a few hundred executed. When Elizabeth I came to the throne, she wanted to reinstate the CoE, so she declared Catholics to be traitor and had priests executed. She's also the one who defeated the Spanish and the French and started England on its path to empire.
Women have a tendency for passive aggressive behavior. They like to start fights between other people more than fight themselves.
And they don't value male lives