>In fact they already have
How? No private company has even been to the moon yet, let alone Mars and beyond.
Even SpaceX's little trips to lower orbit still rely on astronauts trained by NASA.
Do both of you realize that spacecraft get put into orbit by their flight computers? The astronaut even if onboard is totally hands off on this part of the flight, and have been effer since the first sounding rockets shot gerbils into high altitude.
Well it's more that you need a perfect track record of everything and also a really really good reason to be there. You need the educational background, often alot of military background, etc etc. It really depends if you're there just to be a mission commander, a test pilot, a payload specialist, etc, or some combination thereof, and you might just be pulled out the program just because reasons.
> perfect eyesight > athletic body AND high IQ > tons of political connections as well > perfect mental health > cannot be too tall or too short
yep, very easy indeed. Btw, being an astronaut is probably the most boring and uncomfy job ever > need to wait several hours for the launch, doing absolutely nothing while seated in an uncomfortable position > sometimes you will have to use diapers and shit on yourself > eat tasteless food for months
all of that for what? to see a blue ball through a tiny ass window?
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>blue ball
Imagine being so retarded to unironically believe this
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
sorry, but flat earthers cannot even explain moon phases without resorting to "mystery magic", while the astronomical model makes perfect sense
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
You get to preform little experiments that you're told to do with the equipment you have there. They give you really detailed instructions, so don't mess them up. You also have to excercise just keep your musclular system in tact, and you can sleep in a sleeping bag velcroed to the wall.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
sounds horrible, I will take my comfy wfh dev job where I can sleep in my comfy bed with the AC on, then fuck my wife and eat her delicious food (all during work time)
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
I mean you get to move around in microgravity and sometimes you can use a thinkpad though. It's pretty neat.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>move around in microgravity
that sounds fun, but it surely gets old after 1-2 days
3 weeks ago
DARPA Maid Donald Anderson
the best job is being aragorn king of gondor where every moment is pure adventure
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>athletic body
In comparison to stemdards who sit all day.
In reality, they are probably slower and weaker than the average 16 year old boy.
>perfect eye sight
Just wear glasses lmao.
Perfect vision just means eye sight that hasnt degraded due to saying inside all day.
>high iq
Fair enough
>cannot be too tall or too short
Be average.
WOOW, its so hard to be an astronaut.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Petulant reductivism doesn't make you look smart, it just makes you annoying.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Petulant reductivism
Idk wtf that is but you are a homosexual I think
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>American literacy
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Ok so I just googled it.
I dont think i committed >Petulant naggerism
Or whatever,
I think you are just retarded
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>cannot be too tall or too short
Their accepted heights range from 4'10" to 6'4". That's 99% of the adult population you disingenuous homosexual.
Most of that other shit also applies to any run of the mill infantry grunt job.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
you can't do the most fun astronaut job (spacewalk) if you're too short or too tall though.
>Do both of you realize that spacecraft get put into orbit by their flight computers? The astronaut even if onboard is totally hands off on this part of the flight, and have been effer since the first sounding rockets shot gerbils into high altitude. >what is apollo 11
Yeah, on apollo 11, they were firing the engines for the first 4 minutes and staging all automatically until the flight computers put the stage into Earth orbit so they could decide on going ahead with TLI.
at faking moon landings? Couldn't be done in this day and age. People are too media and technology savvy now. It was easy to fool people with blurry 10 FPS tv footage back in the day.
>. It was easy to fool people with blurry 10 FPS tv footage back in the day.
what did the obese pedophile mean by this? never heard of slow scan tv before, have you, vladimir?
Well they have a particular set of public purposes, so how would a private company be a better NASA then NASA?
You could say there are better rocket manufacturers, since NASA really doesn't do much in house manufacturing, you could say SpaceX is a very good launch provider, but they're contracted by NASA to launch payloads, same with ULA. You could say there are universities that do areodynamic research but NASA might support that research, so really the question doesn't make sense.
When you have a massive system like this, the phrase "Does it work?" is too reductionist to query the actual abilities of the system. I have no doubt that they will reach orbit and have it safely return from orbit. Whether it will be as financially sound or as safe for human life as intended is a little but more up in the air.
Is this a joke? NASA is over budget on some projects by more than the entire value of space x, they are THE primal, archetypical counterexample of why your government should never pretend to do high technology or more generally ape competence.
The overwhelming majority of actual space exploration is carried out by NASA. You don't see private companies sending rovers to Mars, orbiters to Saturn, or creating infrared telescopes that can see 12 billion years into the past.
"NASA seems to have been crawling with this stuff for quite a while. When I read Linda Hunt's book, 'Secret Agenda', it was a big time education for me on why, because a lot of these Nazi war criminals ended up being put in NASA...they set up NASA, literally set it up. At the NASA facilities, they had some incredibly unusual programming that they did to some of us. I had one experience at age fifteen, I was taken to Goddard, which is a NASA facility outside of D.C. One of the things they seemed to like to do is dress up just like they are in Star Trek...they actually wear Star Trek uniforms with the Enterprise logo on them. Sometimes they would hypnotize me to think they were Dr. Spock, Bones, Captain Kirk, so I could not remember what their faces really looked like. One of the things they did at Goddard was very professional, very ingenious. They hooked me up to some kind of a computer system, very high tech for that period of time. They had earphones — more like a helmet on my head — and I don't understand how all this worked — but I closed my eyes and I could actually see images flashing in front of my face. I have been to Huntsville, Houston, Cape Canaveral, and Titusville I think was also a NASA facility...they did some nasty torture there."
Kathleen Sullivan
http://members.tranquility.net/~rwinkel/CKLN/HTML2/transc17.htm
Her full book:
https://fightingmonarch.files.wordpress.com/2019/08/unshackled-by-kathleen-sullivan-.pdf
Bonus old NASA memo about avoiding FOIA
https://sgp.fas.org/othergov/nasafoia89.html
I know, from years of research, NASA technology and Aquino's programming, combined with the Project Monarch standard sleep, food, and water deprivation and high voltage, made Kelly a subject of state of the art genetically multigenerational MPD/DID psychological mind-control engineering. They talked about scrambling my immediate memory with two private porn films they were arranging to have produced locally. These were titled How To Divide a Personality and How To Create a Sex Slave. These films are the kind NASA became involved in producing for the dual purpose of 'scrambling' memory and documenting their mind-control procedures. The resident Huntsville, Alabama pornographers were two local cops, one of which was (and is) a Sergeant. This served NASA and the CIA well when cover-up was necessary. The How To Create a Sex Slave film depicts the common 'spin' programming, which in essence is the combination to unlocking or accessing a specific programmed act."
Cathy O'Brien
http://www.whale.to/b/obrien_b1.html
"I was raised in the affluent area of Woodland Hills, California, but was abused my entire life in many locations in and out of California, including hospitals, universities, and United States military and NASA bases, where I was subjected to 'high-level' programming. I was taken from chairs that performed different operations, like one that spun, then to an isolation chamber. They put huge eye machines up to my face and had me close one eye and then the other in order to program each side of the brain separately. Some things were then reversed and programmed into another area of my brain through the opposite eye. They called this 'cross-programming.' For other functions, both sides of my brain had to be operating syncronistically. Information for mind file use was stored only on one side of my brain."
Brice Taylor
http://whale.to/x/ThanksfortheMemoriesbyBriceTaylor.html
Nasa is an R&D and jobs program, no private company has such budget. morons that says that nasa is expensive or that spacex has a better program are clueless, spacex doesnt give back their development to the society nor provide high valuable jobs. Every dollar invested in nasa gives back 8 to the society.
And all of that is before we mention the space research itself
SpaceX's revenue this year is ~$9B. (~$4B is from Starlink)
SpaceX projected revenue next year is ~$15B (~$10B is from Starlink)
The year after that will be ~$22B prob.
NASA's budget is ~$30B.
I'd say within 5 years, SpaceX will surpass them in terms of yearly funding/revenue.
In sheer federal budgetary consumption? That's already happened many times over.
In profitability? Of course! Despite the incalculable enrichment NASA's exploits've ultimately provided to the entire human race, just about any company operating in the black (both euphemistically for space and budgetary surplus) surpasses them in profit.
Eventually, NASA will be relegated to something akin to NOAA (to those familiar with modern maritime meteorology & radio), a sort of "keep the lighthouses lit" and "provide timely space weather forecasts" and "inspect spacecraft for safety standards compliance" somewhat akin to the Coast Guard, with likely some high speed super spook gun bunnies for zero-gravity dynamic violence in specific non-Speace-Force situations.
Or not, or something... who knows? Is your thread coming along nicely, OP?
I wouldn't be startled if NASA eventually got split into a part dealing with space science/exploration and a part handling earth-orbit regulation (for US corps/individuals).
Basically anyone is allowed to build a rover anon.
Who would NASA trust to build a rover for an interplanetary surveying mission is likely going to be JPL though.
Of course. It is America after all. Not China/Russia
In fact they already have
never.
>In fact
when an american says something is fact, it's usually compulsive lies.
>In fact they already have
How? No private company has even been to the moon yet, let alone Mars and beyond.
Even SpaceX's little trips to lower orbit still rely on astronauts trained by NASA.
>Even SpaceX's little trips to lower orbit still rely on astronauts trained by NASA.
COPE!
Do both of you realize that spacecraft get put into orbit by their flight computers? The astronaut even if onboard is totally hands off on this part of the flight, and have been effer since the first sounding rockets shot gerbils into high altitude.
*effer
sorry phoneposting.
This. being an astronaut is easy af, one of the easiest comfiest jobs out there, but you need political connections
Well it's more that you need a perfect track record of everything and also a really really good reason to be there. You need the educational background, often alot of military background, etc etc. It really depends if you're there just to be a mission commander, a test pilot, a payload specialist, etc, or some combination thereof, and you might just be pulled out the program just because reasons.
> perfect eyesight
> athletic body AND high IQ
> tons of political connections as well
> perfect mental health
> cannot be too tall or too short
yep, very easy indeed. Btw, being an astronaut is probably the most boring and uncomfy job ever
> need to wait several hours for the launch, doing absolutely nothing while seated in an uncomfortable position
> sometimes you will have to use diapers and shit on yourself
> eat tasteless food for months
all of that for what? to see a blue ball through a tiny ass window?
>blue ball
Imagine being so retarded to unironically believe this
sorry, but flat earthers cannot even explain moon phases without resorting to "mystery magic", while the astronomical model makes perfect sense
You get to preform little experiments that you're told to do with the equipment you have there. They give you really detailed instructions, so don't mess them up. You also have to excercise just keep your musclular system in tact, and you can sleep in a sleeping bag velcroed to the wall.
sounds horrible, I will take my comfy wfh dev job where I can sleep in my comfy bed with the AC on, then fuck my wife and eat her delicious food (all during work time)
I mean you get to move around in microgravity and sometimes you can use a thinkpad though. It's pretty neat.
>move around in microgravity
that sounds fun, but it surely gets old after 1-2 days
the best job is being aragorn king of gondor where every moment is pure adventure
>athletic body
In comparison to stemdards who sit all day.
In reality, they are probably slower and weaker than the average 16 year old boy.
>perfect eye sight
Just wear glasses lmao.
Perfect vision just means eye sight that hasnt degraded due to saying inside all day.
>high iq
Fair enough
>cannot be too tall or too short
Be average.
WOOW, its so hard to be an astronaut.
Petulant reductivism doesn't make you look smart, it just makes you annoying.
>Petulant reductivism
Idk wtf that is but you are a homosexual I think
>American literacy
Ok so I just googled it.
I dont think i committed
>Petulant naggerism
Or whatever,
I think you are just retarded
>cannot be too tall or too short
Their accepted heights range from 4'10" to 6'4". That's 99% of the adult population you disingenuous homosexual.
Most of that other shit also applies to any run of the mill infantry grunt job.
you can't do the most fun astronaut job (spacewalk) if you're too short or too tall though.
I should correct my statement, they were fruit flies, then mice.
>Do both of you realize that spacecraft get put into orbit by their flight computers? The astronaut even if onboard is totally hands off on this part of the flight, and have been effer since the first sounding rockets shot gerbils into high altitude.
>what is apollo 11
Yeah, on apollo 11, they were firing the engines for the first 4 minutes and staging all automatically until the flight computers put the stage into Earth orbit so they could decide on going ahead with TLI.
>4 min
I meant 10 minutes obviously
>Even SpaceX's little trips to lower orbit still rely on astronauts trained by NASA.
mega cope. what's next? "oh they drive to work on roads so basically they're a government entity anyway"
>What hasn't happened yet can never ever happen.
People like you are the cause of the stagnation of our times.
>>What hasn't happened yet can never ever happen.
You're hallucinating a sentence I didn't write. Perhaps you should consult with a doctor about that.
at faking moon landings? Couldn't be done in this day and age. People are too media and technology savvy now. It was easy to fool people with blurry 10 FPS tv footage back in the day.
>. It was easy to fool people with blurry 10 FPS tv footage back in the day.
what did the obese pedophile mean by this? never heard of slow scan tv before, have you, vladimir?
nta
https://archive.org/details/american-moon-massimo-mazzucco-2017
also, the interview after apollo 11 is really fucking sus
If they're not hiding something then they must be aliens wearing skinsuits
Post skin color.
Well they have a particular set of public purposes, so how would a private company be a better NASA then NASA?
You could say there are better rocket manufacturers, since NASA really doesn't do much in house manufacturing, you could say SpaceX is a very good launch provider, but they're contracted by NASA to launch payloads, same with ULA. You could say there are universities that do areodynamic research but NASA might support that research, so really the question doesn't make sense.
And then how does that factor JPL into the equation? technically part of NASA.
A "non-profit" will. Do what you want with that information.
only if pic related works
Spoiler: it won't
It will.
Eventually.
2 more weeks
yeah, sadly the odds are not on her side
but who knows? it's not impossible for it to work either
When you have a massive system like this, the phrase "Does it work?" is too reductionist to query the actual abilities of the system. I have no doubt that they will reach orbit and have it safely return from orbit. Whether it will be as financially sound or as safe for human life as intended is a little but more up in the air.
the goal of the civil ''servants'' is to siphon money from the population. they dont give a shit about space or improving people's lives.
private companies build everything they launch
if you're talking about activity entirely funded and controlled by the private sector, it's going to happen as the cost of spaceflight goes down.
>believing in their moon landing hoax
they never had a chance to begin with
In terms of dead astronauts? Probably not.
Is this a joke? NASA is over budget on some projects by more than the entire value of space x, they are THE primal, archetypical counterexample of why your government should never pretend to do high technology or more generally ape competence.
Oh no, it's a retard.
not until a company brings someone to the moon and back
The overwhelming majority of actual space exploration is carried out by NASA. You don't see private companies sending rovers to Mars, orbiters to Saturn, or creating infrared telescopes that can see 12 billion years into the past.
"NASA seems to have been crawling with this stuff for quite a while. When I read Linda Hunt's book, 'Secret Agenda', it was a big time education for me on why, because a lot of these Nazi war criminals ended up being put in NASA...they set up NASA, literally set it up. At the NASA facilities, they had some incredibly unusual programming that they did to some of us. I had one experience at age fifteen, I was taken to Goddard, which is a NASA facility outside of D.C. One of the things they seemed to like to do is dress up just like they are in Star Trek...they actually wear Star Trek uniforms with the Enterprise logo on them. Sometimes they would hypnotize me to think they were Dr. Spock, Bones, Captain Kirk, so I could not remember what their faces really looked like. One of the things they did at Goddard was very professional, very ingenious. They hooked me up to some kind of a computer system, very high tech for that period of time. They had earphones — more like a helmet on my head — and I don't understand how all this worked — but I closed my eyes and I could actually see images flashing in front of my face. I have been to Huntsville, Houston, Cape Canaveral, and Titusville I think was also a NASA facility...they did some nasty torture there."
Kathleen Sullivan
http://members.tranquility.net/~rwinkel/CKLN/HTML2/transc17.htm
Her full book:
https://fightingmonarch.files.wordpress.com/2019/08/unshackled-by-kathleen-sullivan-.pdf
Bonus old NASA memo about avoiding FOIA
https://sgp.fas.org/othergov/nasafoia89.html
I know, from years of research, NASA technology and Aquino's programming, combined with the Project Monarch standard sleep, food, and water deprivation and high voltage, made Kelly a subject of state of the art genetically multigenerational MPD/DID psychological mind-control engineering. They talked about scrambling my immediate memory with two private porn films they were arranging to have produced locally. These were titled How To Divide a Personality and How To Create a Sex Slave. These films are the kind NASA became involved in producing for the dual purpose of 'scrambling' memory and documenting their mind-control procedures. The resident Huntsville, Alabama pornographers were two local cops, one of which was (and is) a Sergeant. This served NASA and the CIA well when cover-up was necessary. The How To Create a Sex Slave film depicts the common 'spin' programming, which in essence is the combination to unlocking or accessing a specific programmed act."
Cathy O'Brien
http://www.whale.to/b/obrien_b1.html
"I was raised in the affluent area of Woodland Hills, California, but was abused my entire life in many locations in and out of California, including hospitals, universities, and United States military and NASA bases, where I was subjected to 'high-level' programming. I was taken from chairs that performed different operations, like one that spun, then to an isolation chamber. They put huge eye machines up to my face and had me close one eye and then the other in order to program each side of the brain separately. Some things were then reversed and programmed into another area of my brain through the opposite eye. They called this 'cross-programming.' For other functions, both sides of my brain had to be operating syncronistically. Information for mind file use was stored only on one side of my brain."
Brice Taylor
http://whale.to/x/ThanksfortheMemoriesbyBriceTaylor.html
Nasa is an R&D and jobs program, no private company has such budget. morons that says that nasa is expensive or that spacex has a better program are clueless, spacex doesnt give back their development to the society nor provide high valuable jobs. Every dollar invested in nasa gives back 8 to the society.
And all of that is before we mention the space research itself
SpaceX's revenue this year is ~$9B. (~$4B is from Starlink)
SpaceX projected revenue next year is ~$15B (~$10B is from Starlink)
The year after that will be ~$22B prob.
NASA's budget is ~$30B.
I'd say within 5 years, SpaceX will surpass them in terms of yearly funding/revenue.
In sheer federal budgetary consumption? That's already happened many times over.
In profitability? Of course! Despite the incalculable enrichment NASA's exploits've ultimately provided to the entire human race, just about any company operating in the black (both euphemistically for space and budgetary surplus) surpasses them in profit.
Eventually, NASA will be relegated to something akin to NOAA (to those familiar with modern maritime meteorology & radio), a sort of "keep the lighthouses lit" and "provide timely space weather forecasts" and "inspect spacecraft for safety standards compliance" somewhat akin to the Coast Guard, with likely some high speed super spook gun bunnies for zero-gravity dynamic violence in specific non-Speace-Force situations.
Or not, or something... who knows? Is your thread coming along nicely, OP?
I wouldn't be startled if NASA eventually got split into a part dealing with space science/exploration and a part handling earth-orbit regulation (for US corps/individuals).
Where are SpaceX's mars rovers or orbital telescopes?
people dont get that spacex is a glorified transport company that also entered in the telecom market
Would SpaceX even be allowed to build a rover
Basically anyone is allowed to build a rover anon.
Who would NASA trust to build a rover for an interplanetary surveying mission is likely going to be JPL though.