Why would you root for the romans even though they were killing enslaving and raping your ancestors?Makes no sense.

Why would you root for the romans even though they were killing enslaving and raping your ancestors?Makes no sense.

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Radiochan

    Germans enslaved and raped Romans in turn lol

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Not in the same scale as the romans for example Gaul was absolutely demolished since ceaser its the most "Latinised" region in western europe to this day.

      I value meritocracy over nepotism.

      This position makes sense with the contemporary germanic chieftains and mercenaries but not with the modern european nationalists.

      • 1 year ago
        Radiochan

        And before that, the Gauls had repeatedly invaded Roman territory, torched Rome, and carried off Romans as slaves.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        rome was extinguished and all romans were enslaved total shittalian death from gaul iberia to rome

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Sextuplets of truth

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >RAPE RAPE RAPE RAPE
      have a nice day

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I value meritocracy over nepotism.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm embarrassed by the fact that my ancestors were a bunch of Ooga Booga savages while Greeks and Romans built the Parthenon and Pantheon

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Your ancestors either started a farm
      in America or worked in a factory. If you go any further back in history you’ll find that you are related to everybody and that your ancestors come from every people group except maybe some isolated islanders and childless deadbeats.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The pantheon was built by an arab architect.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Why? they we're High T brolic headhunters (especially the germanic and northern atlantic celtic tribes) who we're at the very least individually stronger than like one if not two roman legionaries (especially the more indigenous tribes). Frick I want would embarrassed about I wish I was a quarter of the men they were.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Your ancestors were ratlike creatures that ran away from dinosaurs. What does that mean? Absolutely nothing. Your ancestors also built medieval cathedrals, an achievement no lesser than any ancient building. And YOU, here and now, are at the apex of human development. So don't fricking squander it by thinking of the past, rather than the future.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Black person. He's not a germ. Hes a larper.
        No one sane would claim to be ashamed

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      they weren't really ooga booga savages.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It can't have been that bad since in Northern England there is a bronze plaque erected by a Caledonian trader. So if you are doing that then it must be civil in some sense.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Historically, most of europe was christian and christianity was to be associated with rome, in the middle ages its name still retained certain authority and prestige and was a good wat to keeo oeasants scared. If you were rhe emoeror or rome you were the shit as rome was big.
    In the neoclassic periods glorification was more towards classical greece than towards rome. Rome comes by the extent of greece.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    As romance speaker I'm glad my Roman grandpa raped grandma

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    We also descend from the conquerors, not only the conquered. People tend to indentify more with that side usually. See the berbers.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Romans barely left any genetic impact outside the italic oeninsula. Maybe in iberia and thats it.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Most of the Romanaboo larpers would be slaves.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I like the costumes.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    By the 5th century it was Pro-Roman Germanic tribes defending a bankrupt empire against Germanic tribes that had gotten pushed off the steppe and had no cultural tradition of fighting for the Roman state. Arminius was betrayed by his own people who didn't fancy a nearby tyrant over a tyrant that lived on the opposide side of the Alps. After Valentinian, Germanic soldiers loyal to the empire and were the only reason it even lasted as long as it did.

    Turns out nobody really wants to live in an anarchic state on the knife's edge of starvation where death is one flash flood or marauder ambush away, they want to chill and grow their net worth so that their children live better and more fulfilled lives. The failure of Romans and Germanics to properly integrate is a failure that cost both peoples dearly for centuries, an intact Roman Empire would have preserved European history the way that Chinese have records that go back that far

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      nice fake af fantasy.
      in the 5th century it was blood thirsty germanics who were sated by roman gold seeing an opputunity to slaughter romans and taking it

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        it was Roman legionaries from families with a history of service doing what legionaries had always done throughout their history: mutiny over shit living conditions. Only at that point in history the state was too weak to stop their ape out from raging out of control

        >Turns out nobody really wants to live in an anarchic state on the knife's edge of starvation where death is one flash flood or marauder ambush away, they want to chill and grow their net worth so that their children live better and more fulfilled lives
        They wouldn't want to live inside the late roman empire especially in the Italian peninsula other provinces were way more prosperous and richer than it

        Italy prospered under Ostrogothic rule and it was the ERE's attempt at reconquering it that really set Italy back centuries

        Roman empire was better off dead.
        A big political entity like those of china makes the continent bond to a single authority that can eventually chimp our and burn everything related to the last dynasty they didn't liked just like chinese.
        Europe would be trapped in between inquisitions and religious chimpouts in between the iron age and medieval era forever.
        The fact that the continent fragmented was a boon. as there is always a back-up state where things are preserved if one chimped out like lets say. Iberia after inquisition

        China was on the verge of industrialization until it was conquered by backwards steppe invaders, the positives outweigh the negatives and the moral of the story is don't let yourself get conquered by backwards steppe invaders or they'll set you back centuries

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          China got its progress set back not one but a thousand times by its own rulers. Read more.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Caesar burned the Library of Alexandria and Vikings ransacked monasteries. What's your point?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Caesar burned the Library of Alexandria
            Point in case, under a single political entity the systemic destruction or prohibition of developement is bond to happen

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            But the overall efficiency of development is faster when political unification permits peaceful trading over larger distances while allowing supply chains to grow deeper and more complex over time and thus facilitate further investments in labor saving technology and information flow. It is true that a high level equilibrium trap can form which stunts development but that can happen in decentralized societies as well

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          records say it was the Germans who slaughtered and torched everything in site except maybe allowing a few churches to survive due to superstition.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Turns out nobody really wants to live in an anarchic state on the knife's edge of starvation where death is one flash flood or marauder ambush away, they want to chill and grow their net worth so that their children live better and more fulfilled lives
      They wouldn't want to live inside the late roman empire especially in the Italian peninsula other provinces were way more prosperous and richer than it

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Roman empire was better off dead.
      A big political entity like those of china makes the continent bond to a single authority that can eventually chimp our and burn everything related to the last dynasty they didn't liked just like chinese.
      Europe would be trapped in between inquisitions and religious chimpouts in between the iron age and medieval era forever.
      The fact that the continent fragmented was a boon. as there is always a back-up state where things are preserved if one chimped out like lets say. Iberia after inquisition

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >By the 5th century it was Pro-Roman Germanic tribes defending a bankrupt empire against Germanic tribes
      In the East the foreign contingents in the Roman army were essentially non existent outside of small allied Gothic forced which were cancelled after Valens' Gothic wars. Only in the West was enrolment in the army actually practiced and it was in no way 'pro-Roman' or even highly widespread. It was a punishment to the losers of a conflict that they had to provide a certain amount of men into permanent service. Many times when a group were invited into the Empire they were just killed when they didn't care to manage them or thought they didn't need them any more before they were even attempted to be integrated.

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Idk, honestly i don't even know why the white euros would rather be on a continental entity that includes the brown arabs in the south rather than eurasia as a whole.
    I have always been fonder of east asians than them

    I think its just the "white" meme amerimutt spread.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Fricking implying

    My family is deeply entrenched in Sicily and has an old time coat of arms from the 1500s

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    My ancestors (british) were doing nothing of value before the romans came along
    and you could say they are no longer doing anything of value.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I don't. Im proud my ancestors saw romans as a prize and decided to conquer what they saw as property

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Then that makes them your ancestors

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *