Allan Day, Red Hat >Facilitating the unrestricted use of extensions and themes by end users seems contrary to the central tenets of the GNOME 3 design.
William Jon McCann, Red Hat >I guess you have to decide if you are a GNOME app, an Ubuntu app, or an XFCE app unfortunately. I'm sorry that this is the case but it wasn't GNOME's fault that Ubuntu has started this fork. And I have no idea what XFCE is or does sorry.
Owen Taylor, Red Hat >The Power Off option is hidden because we don’t believe it’s necessary in that menu. The primary way that a user would shut down (if they, say, need to disconnect power) would be to log out and shut down through GDM.
Bastian Nocera, Red Hat >We're not designing a desktop for people who like to choose their own terminal emulators.
Jasper St. Pierre, Red Hat >I am in no way adding SSD to gnome-shell/mutter
Honestly I hate the fucking gross foot logo and avoid Gnome programs because of it. I stopped using Evolution because I couldn't turn off the disgusting foot loading logo. Foot fags, all of them, I guess.
This faggy youtuber argues that the only reason we use classic application menus and not the fullscreen tablet interface for opening applications is because we're just too used to it. Couldn't be because it genuinely is a goddamn mess to navigate pages and pages and pages of applications like this and have to constantly manually rearrange and put applications in folders.
Not sure
Why would you want a desktop with a tablet interface?
Allan Day, Red Hat
>Facilitating the unrestricted use of extensions and themes by end users seems contrary to the central tenets of the GNOME 3 design.
William Jon McCann, Red Hat
>I guess you have to decide if you are a GNOME app, an Ubuntu app, or an XFCE app unfortunately. I'm sorry that this is the case but it wasn't GNOME's fault that Ubuntu has started this fork. And I have no idea what XFCE is or does sorry.
Owen Taylor, Red Hat
>The Power Off option is hidden because we don’t believe it’s necessary in that menu. The primary way that a user would shut down (if they, say, need to disconnect power) would be to log out and shut down through GDM.
Bastian Nocera, Red Hat
>We're not designing a desktop for people who like to choose their own terminal emulators.
Jasper St. Pierre, Red Hat
>I am in no way adding SSD to gnome-shell/mutter
linux devs be like
yes it's very much a complete mystery as to why the "year of the linux desktop" never happens. completely unobvious and cryptic.
>And I have no idea what XFCE is or does sorry.
absolute homosexual thing to say lmao
This is beautiful, post more I wanna laugh at these dumb asses holy shit hahahah
You wouldn't. Use KDE.
The K in KDE stands for krap.
Imagine using a proprietary toolkit
The K stands for Kool - KDE is only for Kool Kats
The parts of Qt that KDE is built on are FOSS
gnome is great
Honestly I hate the fucking gross foot logo and avoid Gnome programs because of it. I stopped using Evolution because I couldn't turn off the disgusting foot loading logo. Foot fags, all of them, I guess.
you can use gnome without ever seeing the foot logo.
Oh I see, GNOME is living rent free in your little schizo head 🙂
kunny desktop environment
I'm gonna make the cocaine desktop shell
Will make you amped and help you lose weight
God GNOME is so fucking ugly I hate it so much.
This faggy youtuber argues that the only reason we use classic application menus and not the fullscreen tablet interface for opening applications is because we're just too used to it. Couldn't be because it genuinely is a goddamn mess to navigate pages and pages and pages of applications like this and have to constantly manually rearrange and put applications in folders.
Why does Gnome want to be MacOS so bad? Why can't it just be happy being Linux?
because