Why were Germanics too powerful for Romans?

Why were Germanics too powerful for Romans?

  1. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    The establishment of barbarian kingdoms was a gradual process that happened with Roman consent. The central bureaucracy became dead weight which allowed them to inherit the lands they were controlling as vassals of Rome.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      The battered wife post. "S-sure you can take more than what your foedus entails, we were going to give it to you anyway h-haha, don't plunder too much communities on the way..."

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        They had already given up on governing those territories and subcontracted it out to local barbarian lords.

        The Western Roman bureaucracy couldn't get it's act together and eventually just dissolved

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          That doesn't have anything to do with the hilarious definitio of "consent" this thesis would need to make sense.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >Rome: Alaric, govern this territory
            : Okay
            : Hey what should I do about this issue?
            a year for a response, gets nothing back
            : Okay so I guess we should do something about this

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              >average anon's level of reading comprehension

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >They had already given up
          Because they lost. Glad we agree.

  2. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    anybody who posts wojaks deserves to be lobotomized

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      qa won. get over it

  3. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Literally the cause of the decline of Rome was its final and apocalyptic war with Persia before the arrival of the Antichrist 666 Muhammad.

    Germanics were the plague of demons with hair like women from Revelations who decimated the Christian Mediterranean World before the Katechon (Justinian/Heraclius/Emperors/Imperial power) finished them off.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >Revelation 9:8-20

      8 They had hair like women's hair, and their teeth were like lions' teeth.
      9 And they had breastplates like breastplates of iron, and the sound of their wings was like the sound of chariots with many horses running into battle.
      10 They had tails like scorpions, and there were stings in their tails. Their power was to hurt men five months.
      11 And they had as king over them the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in Hebrew is Abaddon, but in Greek he has the name Apollyon.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      The establishment of barbarian kingdoms was a gradual process that happened with Roman consent. The central bureaucracy became dead weight which allowed them to inherit the lands they were controlling as vassals of Rome.

      The plague was always a lack of ethnic pride and nationality, that's why corrupt generals and governors kept inviting foreigners into their lands, the ERE did the same.
      Most invasions in history have been welcomed.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >Revelation 9:8-20

      8 They had hair like women's hair, and their teeth were like lions' teeth.
      9 And they had breastplates like breastplates of iron, and the sound of their wings was like the sound of chariots with many horses running into battle.
      10 They had tails like scorpions, and there were stings in their tails. Their power was to hurt men five months.
      11 And they had as king over them the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in Hebrew is Abaddon, but in Greek he has the name Apollyon.

      Take your meds christcuck

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >the cause of the decline of Rome was a couple of wars that it’s rump state fought after the heart of the Roman Empire had already fallen
      Yeah no
      If you’re looking for a “cause” for the decline of the empire, you don’t start with the weird spin-off state in a completely different geographical location that somehow outlasted the EPONYMOUS REGION OF THE EMPIRE THAT HAD ALREADY FALLEN you dingbat
      Also the eastern empire survived these events by like another 800 years so you’re just doubly wrong

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >the rulling class is swarthy armenoids/semitoids while the soldier class is brown haired white natives
      christianity not even once.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      The final Roman-Sassanian war was the war of gog and magog.

  4. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    The west was weakened incredibly at the time and the foederati didn't help matters. Also, why does it matter that Rome didn't conquer all of Germania? There was no real reason to; it was heavily forested with no real population centers.

  5. 1 week ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Ah yes the roman era of poland

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Napoleon.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >Royal House of Latin original
      >The normans/anjou some British Monarchy.
      You better prove that one with some hard facts lmao.

  6. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    The romans fucked up their demographics and their entire society to the point where the germanics could push into the power vacuum. The slavs did the same in the balkans even though they were even less developed.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Slavs were kept at bay until Maurice. Slavs succeeded for the same reason the arabs did, civil war and the war with the sassanids.

  7. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Christianization alienates the western rural pagan masses that used to be the main source of manpower and they become indifferent to the state they were supposed to serve.
    Local tribes in Britain are armed to fight off the great conspiracy and roman government dissolves aside from the legions still there, until Constantine III brings them to the continent in his bid for the throne.
    Client chiefdoms on the frontier become the main source of troops for still roman warlords in successive civil wars and their elites serving at the time under still roman generals quickly christianized.
    All these germanic troops meant germanic officials climbed the ranks to the point Stillicho becomes effective regent for Honorius.
    Great migration of 406 and the execution of Stillicho precipitate mutinies by troops both roman and germanic.
    Fragile balance is achieved by the next decade with foederati kings established far from Italy under nominal roman rule.
    Few usurpers later and these foederati have taken over much of the roman west. Vandal conquest of Africa and the mediterranean permanently cripples the western empire.

  8. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >anybody who posts wojaks deserves to be lobotomized

  9. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Why are the balkans not blue? Ostrogoths conquered them.

  10. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Getmanicus conquered up to the elbe

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *