Why was Jesus lenient on adulterous women (John 8:1-11) but told men that if they even looked at a woman sexually they had committed adultery already.

Why was Jesus lenient on adulterous women (John 8:1-11) but told men that if they even looked at a woman sexually they had committed adultery already.

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      JeSIMP

      Christianity is such a homosexual cuck religion.

      Christcuckoldry is the precursor to Commumarxist thinking, yes. Jesus was a literal israelite cuck.

      (You)

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Thanks! 😀

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    JeSIMP

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Christianity is such a homosexual cuck religion.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Christcuckoldry is the precursor to Commumarxist thinking, yes. Jesus was a literal israelite cuck.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Marx
      >Cuck
      meds

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        What about them?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      If Jesus can capture saints to willingly living chaste and people finding happiness in it even if only temporarily to buy time for God to make real men out of them, then there is only value in what Jesus taught.
      In the Old Testament it was all about slaughtering the enemy and bathing in their blood if they didn’t convert in self defense of The Promises. Therefore too much slaughtering enemies is mediated with Christ who made lots of People of God that are very forgiving. Like how we put up with Pokémon for so fricking long that it is on its countless remake game.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      He said to her, "go and sin no more". You're purposefully taking what happened out of context (the ~~*Pharisees*~~ were trying to trap Jesus) to make a narrative.

      >Christianity
      >NOT Rabbinical Judaism
      Nice save, Rabbi, the goyim almost found out

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Because it means if someone looked at her and undressed her with their eyes, then someone else already has. God knows everything including your sins. The men in said situation were not about to be stoned to death.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Man looks at a woman the wrong way
      >Jehovah sees it as adultery
      >What's the punishment for adultery?
      >Leviticus (20:10-12) "If a man commits adultery with another man's wife, even with the wife of his neighbour, both the adulterer and adulteress must be put to death...."

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >A “Jehovah” poster
        >Can’t call him Jesus Christ
        Jesus Christ is the only way to heaven. Did you know that? You can’t go see God without Jesus.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          more israeli christ amirite goys

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            A saved sinner becomes a saint, which is higher than a stupid ol’ israelite or gentile by itself. Higher than Catholics also since all they do is worship angels and Mary statues.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >even with the wife of his neighbour
        Feels like this was added because of people habitually making such an excuse.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >if they even looked at a woman sexually they had committed adultery already.
    It's true btw
    women don't dream about how they want to get fricked
    they just go out and get fricked
    men on the other hand have a lot of imagination in this regard, without necessarily ever fricking those women

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >women don't dream about how they want to get fricked

      Women dream and fantasize more than men.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Men are the pursuers unless they’re permavirgins who ragepost on IQfy all day

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >he is driving me insane
    Good

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Good to see you didn't edit this one

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It's not an edit? JW.... You are more nuanced than I previously thought..

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          This drawing is about the time when Jehovah punished Pharaoh with leprosy for stealing Sarah from Abraham

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Oh you mean where Abraham let the pharaoh to "know" his wife?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Abraham knew Jehovah would protect her, and he was right

            God did not let Pharaoh dishonor her

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >God did not let Pharaoh dishonor her
            Where does it say that?

            In fact the pharaoh gifted Abraham while Sarah was in his house. Basically Abraham prostituted out his wife for material gain.
            >Genesis 12:16 And he entreated Abram well for her sake: and he had sheep, and oxen, and he asses, and menservants, and maidservants, and she asses, and camels.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Did you even read Genesis ?

            It says that Jehovah gave Pharaoh leprosy before he had the chance to rape her

            Abraham didn't sell her out, he trusted the plan and as it turns out, it all worked out in the end

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Keyword wife
            You realize the pharaoh had a harem

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            You realize Jehovah is mightier than Pharaoh

            Can jw paint something like this?

            Do you mean me ?

            I can't paint, I use Paint exe

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Jehovah is mightier than Pharaoh
            So Abraham could have just trusted in Jehovahs might and not LIED to pharaoh.
            >Lev 19:1111 “You must not steal, you must not deceive, and you must not deal falsely with one another."

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Abraham knew Jehovah would protect her
            Source?

            He did it because he feared the pharaoh he didn't trust in Jehovah's protection.
            >Genesis 12:12 Therefore it shall come to pass, when the Egyptians shall see thee, that they shall say, This is his wife: and they will kill me, but they will save thee alive.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Abraham knew he was to be the father of the Messiah, so he had to protect himself

            He gave his own wife away to do so, and essentially put her into God's care so he showed tremendous faith

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Abraham, no!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This drawing is about the time when Jehovah punished Pharaoh with leprosy for stealing Sarah from Abraham

      Oh you mean where Abraham let the pharaoh to "know" his wife?

      Abraham knew Jehovah would protect her, and he was right

      God did not let Pharaoh dishonor her

      Pharaoh: Woah who's that hottie?
      Abraham: That's my sister, Sarah
      Sarah: I am a nubile unspoiled virgin, teehee
      Pharaoh: Well I'd love to hit that if you don't mind. Hey my new bro, I'll give you a ton of gold
      Abraham: sure, go ahead and enjoy my sister 😉
      God: I CURSE YOU WITH LEPROSY FOR STEALING ABRAHAM'S WIFE
      Pharaoh: Huh? Your wife? What the frick?
      Sarah: Surprise, sucker!
      Pharaoh: You israeliteed me! Get the frick out of my country!

      How the frick was Pharaoh in the wrong here? It's a fricking conspiracy against him and he didn't even sleep with her.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Well Jehovah knew it wasn't Pharaoh's fault, that's why he was left alive

        and Abraham didn't lie btw, Sarah is his half-sister

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Jehovah knew it wasn't Pharaoh's fault, that's why he was left alive
          Yeah, really nice, afflict him and his household (his wives, siblings, children) with plagues for something that wasn't even his fault. Your god is a piece of shit and a israelite-enabler.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            They were pagans so who cares ?

            >Jehovah is mightier than Pharaoh
            So Abraham could have just trusted in Jehovahs might and not LIED to pharaoh.
            >Lev 19:1111 “You must not steal, you must not deceive, and you must not deal falsely with one another."

            He DIDN'T lie

            Sarah is his half sister

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Why the frick was he married to his half sister?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            because all of early patriarchs were married to their sisters?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >He DIDN'T lie
            >And Pharaoh called Abraham, and said: 'What is this that thou hast done unto me? why didst thou not tell me that she was thy wife?
            >Why saidst thou: She is my sister? so that I took her to be my wife

            Sure sounds like DECEPTION to me, a proper marriage scam. On top of that Pharaoh showered Abraham with gifts as his brother-in-law, which was the purpose of this plot.
            > 16 And he dealt well with Abraham for her sake; and he had sheep, and oxen, and he-asses, and men-servants, and maid-servants, and she-asses, and camels.
            Total conman behavior.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Total conman behavior.
            I think reading the bible really helps you understand that the israelites have always been like this.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I know
            >muh old testament israelites aren't the same as modern israelites.
            Nah they act the same. Slimy snakes

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I know
            >muh old testament israelites aren't the same as modern israelites.
            Nah they act the same. Slimy snakes

            Along the same lines, Abraham's grandson Jacob scammed his own father, Isaac, just to cuck his brother of the inheritance, with the help of his mother.

            >Disguised as Esau, Jacob entered Isaac's room. Surprised that Esau was back so soon, Isaac asked how it could be that the hunt went so quickly. Jacob [lied], "Because the LORD your God brought it to me." Rashi, says Isaac's suspicions were aroused even more, because Esau never used the personal name of God.[18] Isaac demanded that Jacob come close so he could feel him, but the goatskins felt just like Esau's hairy skin. Confused, Isaac exclaimed, "The voice is Jacob's voice, but the hands are the hands of Esau!"[19] Still trying to get at the truth, Isaac asked him directly, "Art thou my very son Esau?" and Jacob [lied] simply, "I am." Isaac proceeded to eat the food and to drink the wine that Jacob gave him, and then told him to come close and kiss him. As Jacob kissed his father, Isaac smelled the clothes which belonged to Esau and finally accepted that the person in front of him was Esau. Isaac then blessed Jacob with the blessing that was meant for Esau.

            Esau was so pissed he vowed to kill Jacob for that. Awful people all around.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Pharaoh would have killed Abraham in the first place if he told him he was Sarah's husband

            Abraham knew how depraved these pagans were

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Pharaoh would have killed Abraham in the first place if he told him he was Sarah's husband
            That's Abraham's ridiculous paranoia, but even if we believe that's true, why can't God just protect Abraham?
            Abraham and Sarah cooked up this plot to scam the Pharaoh out a fortune, knowing God would intervene either way.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Who are you to judge Abraham ?

            He knows what he's talking about, he lived there and you don't

            >It wouldn't be the same
            Yes it would have been significantly better lmao
            >Hmm should I tell pharoah that my Chosen personTM is scamming him
            >No I will wait until he has been scammed and then instead of punishing Abraham for being a slimy israelite I will instead inflict LEPROSY onto Pharoah for no reason
            >God of love btw 😉

            It's more impactful to give him leprosy, that way Jehovah is sure that Pharaoh won't do any dirty tricks

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >that way Jehovah is sure that Pharaoh won't do any dirty tricks
            PHARAOH WONT DO ANY DIRTY TRICKS???
            Abraham was LITERALLY the one doing the dirty tricks

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Abraham knew he'd be killed otherwise, and moreover he didn't lie

            Abraham did nothing wrong

            Pharaoh was a pagan who wanted to steal another woman for his harem

            Jehovah did the right thing, Pharaoh won't bother Abraham anymore and now Abraham is rich and he took his wife back

            The plan worked

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Pharaoh was a pagan who wanted to steal another woman for his harem
            He didn't steal anyone, he literally offered him a shit load of money. If he was going to just kill him why wouldn't he kill him any way and take his sister?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            If Abraham told him he was her husband he would have been killed

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >that way Jehovah is sure that Pharaoh won't do any dirty tricks
            Isn't Jehovah omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent? How was Pharaoh supposed to sneak one past him exactly?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Jehovah doesn't always use his omniscience

            He didn't use it in Eden for example, so he did not know that Adam and Eve would sin nor that Satan would be bad

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Jehovah doesn't always use his omniscience

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Yes that's what I said

            Jehovah's powers are subject to him, not the other way around. He can control his omnisicence.

            the Creator evidently chose not to see how things would turn out.

            Rather, he chose to wait and, as events unfolded, see how his earthly children would conduct themselves.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Jehovah doesn't always use his omniscience

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Jehovah in his wisdom did not create the first humans as automatons programmed for a fixed course.

            Instead, he lovingly endowed them with FREE WILL !

            By choosing the right course, they could manifest their love, gratitude, and obedience, thereby bringing added delight to themselves and to Jehovah as their heavenly Father.—Proverbs 27:11; Isaiah 48:18.

            >Jacob did NOTHING wrong
            He lied to his father. He betrayed his father's trust when he was old and weak. He couldn't even give his brother food without asking for something in return

            He didn't have time to explain the situation to his father

            And Esau had no respect for his birthright since he sold it for stew, Jacob deserved it.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >He didn't have time to explain the situation to his father
            Next best option cover yourself in a goat skin and lie to your old man

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            The method he used might not be the best, and Jehovah still doesn't like deception

            but Jacob had good intentions so God allowed it

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Pushing your view of morality onto Jehovah.
            You have no idea if Jehovah was pleased or not with Jacobs lying.

            Infact it would be easier to argue Jehovah agreed with how Jacob deceived his brother and father.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            We know Jehovah hates lying because Jehovah says so

            >he does not have to use this capability, just as he does not always have to use his immense power to the full.
            Are there multiple possible futures or one future?

            Possibilities are by definition infinite

            Only God can see the certain future

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Only God can see the certain future
            So there's only one possible future

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >We know Jehovah hates lying because Jehovah says so

            20 And the Lord said, ‘Who will entice Ahab to go up and fall at Ramoth-gilead?’ And one spirit said this, while another said that. 21 Then a spirit came forward and stood before the Lord, and said, ‘I will entice him.’ 22 And the Lord said to him, ‘How?’ And he said, ‘I will go out and be a lying spirit in the mouths of all his prophets.’ Then He said, ‘You shall entice him, and you will also prevail. Go and do so.’ 23 Now then, behold, the Lord has put a lying spirit in the mouth of all these prophets of yours; and the Lord has declared disaster against you.”
            He made prophets lie to the king of Israel so he'd run off to his death expecting victory in battle or some shit.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Jehovah God allows “an operation of error” to go to persons who prefer falsehood “that they may get to believing the lie” rather than the good news about Jesus Christ. (2Th 2:9-12)

            This principle is illustrated by what happened centuries earlier in the case of Israelite King Ahab. Lying prophets assured Ahab of success in war against Ramoth-gilead, while Jehovah’s prophet Micaiah foretold disaster.

            As revealed in vision to Micaiah, Jehovah allowed a spirit creature to become “a deceptive spirit” in the mouth of Ahab’s prophets. That is to say, this spirit creature exercised his power upon them so that they spoke, not truth, but what they themselves wanted to say and what Ahab wanted to hear from them.

            Though forewarned, Ahab preferred to be fooled by their lies and paid for it with his life.—1Ki 22:1-38; 2Ch 18

            >Becus elife is a gift from God,
            yeah and they get it back so who cares?
            >It doesn't matter if they will be resurrected or not
            Kind of does. If I steal something that someone can't replace the issue there is that they can't replace it. If someone makes a table and then I make an identical copy of that table the person with the original table doesn't lose anything.

            Jehovah cares because you have killed someone and that's evil

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Jehovah cares because you have killed someone and that's evil
            Why they can come back to life, nothing was lost?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            They lost their lives and the killers will be punished

            Would you like it if someone killed you while you were watching tv ?

            >John 8:1-11
            The real question is, what was He writing on the ground?

            Not a real verse

            https://www.thedailybeast.com/one-of-jesus-most-famous-lines-wasnt-in-original-gospels

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Would you like it if someone killed you while you were watching tv ?
            If I knew I was going to come back to life and god would be there going "hey m8 wanna be friends?" yeah I wouldn't give two shits

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            All those gymnastics just to agree with me that God sees lies as a tool.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Does God know the future?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Only sometimes apparently, sometimes he just doesn't because... reasons

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            If he choses so

            Only sometimes apparently, sometimes he just doesn't because... reasons

            Jehovah doesn't do it all the time out of respect for our free will

            >Jacob did NOTHING wrong
            Jacob scammed his own blind father on his deathbed.

            >this shows that Esau had NO RESPECT for his privilege and it was better off with someone who actually CARES about spiritual matters like JACOB
            The birthright thing was another incident, though even there we see Jacob's base, cunning nature: his brother comes back after having gone out hunting for days, he's starving, and Jacob refuses him to give any food unless he agrees to give up his title of eldest son.
            What kind of man forces a transaction on his own brother to give him a bowl of soup?
            >I deserved that more than him so I stole it!
            Nice morality you've got there

            >Once when Jacob was cooking some stew, Esau came in from the open country, famished. He said to Jacob, “Quick, let me have some of that red stew! I’m famished!”
            >Jacob replied, “First sell me your birthright.”
            >“Look, I am about to die,” Esau said. “What good is the birthright to me?”
            >But Jacob said, “Swear to me first.” So he swore an oath to him, selling his birthright to Jacob.
            >Then Jacob gave Esau some bread and some lentil stew. He ate and drank, and then got up and left.

            He didn't scam his father, Esau sold his birthright

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Jehovah doesn't do it all the time out of respect for our free will
            If Jehovah can know the future, then future is by nature deterministic and free will doesn't exist. You can't predict an indeterminate future.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Free will exists

            Causation is not knowledge

            >He didn't scam his father, Esau sold his birthright
            Yes he did otherwise he wouldn't have put on a goat skin and say he was Esau.

            He didn't have time to explain the situation, he was dying

            I think the Catholic idea is fricking weird and a bit fricked up to Punish babies for an abortion they had no control over, but in this case I'm arguing with this silly JW version of it where they just all come back to life any way so who gives a shit?

            Yes, the babies will be resurrected

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Yes, the babies will be resurrected
            So who cares then? Abortion is literally victimless in this case lol

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Abortion is murder and murderers won't go to paradise

            >He didn't scam him, Esau sold it so he had every right to receive the blessing

            >But [Isaac] said, “Your brother came deceitfully and took your blessing.”
            >Esau said, “Isn’t he rightly named Jacob? This is the second time he has taken advantage of me: He took my birthright, and now he’s taken my blessing!”

            His father sure didn't see it like that.

            It doesn't matter

            >Only God can see the certain future
            So there's only one possible future

            Possibilities are by definition infinite

            Only God can see the certain future

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Abortion is murder and murderers won't go to paradise
            Why whats wrong with it if everyone comes back to life?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Only Jehovah has the right to take a life

            You are usurping Jehovah's role by killing someone

            And just because they are resurrected doesn't mean they will live forever, they must be judged first during the Millennial reign of Christ

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Why would he care? He can just bring them back whenever he wants with literally zero effort.

            Better for the baby to get a 1000 year test than an 80 year test

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Becus elife is a gift from God, and taking this life from someone is a crime

            It doesn't matter if they will be resurrected or not

            If you take a life without divine permission you will be punished for it

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Becus elife is a gift from God,
            yeah and they get it back so who cares?
            >It doesn't matter if they will be resurrected or not
            Kind of does. If I steal something that someone can't replace the issue there is that they can't replace it. If someone makes a table and then I make an identical copy of that table the person with the original table doesn't lose anything.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >He didn't scam his father, Esau sold his birthright
            Yes he did otherwise he wouldn't have put on a goat skin and say he was Esau.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Abraham knew how depraved these pagans were
            Oh jw you forgot something....
            >Numbers 31:17 Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. 31:18 But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Ancient Israel: Deceiving scammers and dickysseurs
            Truly a moral template for us all to follow

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            When speaking of the destruction of the rebels Dathan and Abiram, Moses wrote that they went down “alive into Sheol.” (Numbers 16:31, 33)

            Since Sheol in the Bible denotes the common grave of mankind from which there will be a resurrection, it is evident that not all destruction—not even all destruction at the hand of God—is necessarily eternal

            So God WILL resurrect the babies slewn by Israel

            What's better, for them to grow up in a real-life snuff movie, a land filled with rape, child sacrifice, sodomy, bloodguilt, bestiality, prostitution and idolatry or be resurrected in a peaceful paradise ?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >What's better, for them to grow up in a real-life snuff movie, a land filled with rape, child sacrifice, sodomy, bloodguilt, bestiality, prostitution and idolatry or be resurrected in a peaceful paradise ?
            Anon you realise you're making a weird nihilistic argument for murder here don't you?
            >Why not just murder everyone, then they can all just go to paradise and not bother with this world :^)

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Murder is bad in the eyes of Jehovah

            If Jehovah commanded the murder of babies it's because it was an emmergency, they had to get rid of the Canaanites for all the bad they brought into the land

            There was no other solution

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Murder is bad in the eyes of Jehovah
            You just said it wasn't bad because the babies go straight to paradise, no reason to care about murder any more. In fact you straight up made a christian pro-abortion argument, where it's actually better to abort all the babies since they just go straight to paradise (except the female babies in this case since the israelites wanted to frick them)

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Not at all, the Canaanite destruction was a specific instruction for a specific time

            Jehovah hates murder in all its forms and abortion is an especially heinous crime in his eyes

            [...]
            Along the same lines, Abraham's grandson Jacob scammed his own father, Isaac, just to cuck his brother of the inheritance, with the help of his mother.

            >Disguised as Esau, Jacob entered Isaac's room. Surprised that Esau was back so soon, Isaac asked how it could be that the hunt went so quickly. Jacob [lied], "Because the LORD your God brought it to me." Rashi, says Isaac's suspicions were aroused even more, because Esau never used the personal name of God.[18] Isaac demanded that Jacob come close so he could feel him, but the goatskins felt just like Esau's hairy skin. Confused, Isaac exclaimed, "The voice is Jacob's voice, but the hands are the hands of Esau!"[19] Still trying to get at the truth, Isaac asked him directly, "Art thou my very son Esau?" and Jacob [lied] simply, "I am." Isaac proceeded to eat the food and to drink the wine that Jacob gave him, and then told him to come close and kiss him. As Jacob kissed his father, Isaac smelled the clothes which belonged to Esau and finally accepted that the person in front of him was Esau. Isaac then blessed Jacob with the blessing that was meant for Esau.

            Esau was so pissed he vowed to kill Jacob for that. Awful people all around.

            Jacob did NOTHING wrong

            Esau literally SOLD his birthright for soup, this shows that Esau had NO RESPECT for his privilege and it was better off with someone who actually CARES about spiritual matters like JACOB

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Jehovah hates murder in all its forms and abortion is an especially heinous crime in his eyes
            Why when he can just bring them back to life? What's wrong with abortion if the aborted babies go straight to paradise? Isn't it better to be aborted and not have to deal with this world?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            killing someone is a crime

            Only Jehovah has the right to take one's life

            Abortionists and murderers will NOT go into paradise

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >killing someone is a crime
            Why? They go straight to paradise and are better off?
            >Abortionists and murderers will NOT go into paradise
            So they're essentially sacrificing their lives to allow others to go to straight to paradise? Seems like a worthy sacrifice to me to save all those babies, think of how many could have been corrupted by this world and wouldn't have gone to paradise if they hadn't. True saints really.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Murderers won't go to paradise no matter what their motive

            And as I have said, the destruction of the Canaanite was an emergency

            God destroyed them in order to protect Israel, the nation that would eventually produce the Messiah.—Psalm 132:11, 12

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Murderers won't go to paradise no matter what their motive
            That just makes it even more altruistic, giving up their place in paradise to save hundreds of babies.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            The babies aren't necessarily saved.

            the resurrected ones who neve had a' opportunity to know God will be evaluated during the Millennium:

            https://www.jw.org/en/library/magazines/g201001/what-is-judgment-day/

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >The babies aren't necessarily saved.
            But you said killing the canaanite babies sent them to paradise, but now they dont go to paradise, and go on to be tested. Although from the sounds of it they get a much fairer test in a scenario where they know god is real and is literally speaking to him, so it's still a much better scenario for those babies.

            In fact why does murder matter at all if god can just bring people back to life whenever he feels like?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >But you said killing the canaanite babies sent them to paradise, but now they dont go to paradise, and go on to be tested

            The righteous won't be tested, but the unrighteous will be

            the Bible says: “There is going to be a resurrection of both the righteous and the unrighteous.” (Acts 24:15)

            “The unrighteous” are those who did not meet God’s righteous standards because they were ignorant of God’s will.

            Jesus will resurrect BILLIONS of people who died in ignorance.

            Then, in the Paradise earth, they will be taught God’s requirements, and they will have the opportunity to prove that they love God by obeying his commandments !

            This will happen during the Millennium

            “The righteous” include faithful servants of Jehovah who lived before Jesus came to earth.

            People like Noah, Abraham, Sarah, Moses, Ruth, and Esther will be resurrected to life here on earth.

            The unrighteous” include billions of people who did not have the opportunity to know Jehovah, like the babies. Even though they died, Jehovah hasn’t forgotten them.

            He will resurrect them, and they will have the opportunity to learn about him.

            These resurrected ones will be judged for 1000 years, during whoch time they will show whether they want to be loyal to God or not.

            After the 1000 years, any potential rebel will be thrown into Gehenna along with Satan, so eternal destruction.

            Please read the link I posted and you will understand everything

            [...]
            >He doesn't do it all the time out of respect for our free will
            But if he knows the future sometimes that means the future is already laid in stone by him. Are there multiple futures?

            Jehovah doesn't always chose to know the furure

            he does not have to use this capability, just as he does not always have to use his immense power to the full. Jehovah wisely uses his ability of foreknowledge selectively. He uses it when it makes sense to do so and fits the circumstances.

            [...]
            >He didn't scam his father, Esau sold his birthright
            The birthright and the blessing are two different things.
            He disguised himself as Esau to have his blind father bless him as Esau. His father repeatedly asked him if he was Esau and he said yes. Basic scam, identify theft.
            If I called your parents' house pretending to be you so they wire me some money, how is that not a scam?

            He didn't scam him, Esau sold it so he had every right to receive the blessing

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >he does not have to use this capability, just as he does not always have to use his immense power to the full.
            Are there multiple possible futures or one future?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >he does not have to use this capability, just as he does not always have to use his immense power to the full. Jehovah wisely uses his ability of foreknowledge selectively. He uses it when it makes sense to do so and fits the circumstances.
            Anon you can't be selectively all knowing, because then you're by definition not all knowing.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            You are limiting God by your reasoning

            God is not subject to his power, his power is subject to Himself. Your idea is that God must somehow have no choice but to know everything. Except he wouldn't be omnipotent if that were the case.

            God can CHOSE to foreknow events or not. He doesn't always do it in order to respect our free will. Therefore he did not know in advance that Adam and Eve would sin. He did however imediately provided a solution. He predicted a Savior, that would undo the damage done by our first parents (Genesis 3:15).

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >You are limiting God by your reasoning
            No you're just trying to state something inherently paradoxical because you've argued yourself into a corner.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            There's nothing paradoxical about it

            The ability to refrain from using foreknowledge can be illustrated with a feature of modern technology.

            Someone watching a prerecorded sports match has the option to watch the final minutes first in order to know the outcome. But he does not have to start that way.

            Who could criticize him if he chose to watch the entire match from the beginning ?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Someone watching a prerecorded sports match has the option to watch the final minutes first in order to know the outcome. But he does not have to start that way.
            Anon this is in no way analogous to being omniscient. An Omniscient being by definition knows EVERYTHING. Comparing that to an instance of a person who ISNT omniscient just isn't comparable.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Jehovah CAN be omniscient

            He is not omniscient all the time, he can CONTROL his powers

            Why do you seem to think that his powers control HIM ?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            So he can be omniscient, but for no reason decides not to know things, to preserve free will. Even though for him to be able to predict the future at all, this would mean free will can't exist, because it'd mean the future is predetermined.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >but for no reason

            I told you the reason

            The quality of LOVE is the strongest reason why Jehovah chose not to know in advance that Adam and Eve would sin.

            Love is God’s main attribute. “God is love,” says 1 John 4:8. Love is positive, not negative. It looks for the good in others.

            motivated by LOVE, Jehovah God wanted the best for the first human pair !

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >god is love
            >therefore he choses to not know things particularly at points in which knowing things would be actively helpful to everyone involved
            really selling it here today.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Jehovah does see the future when it's important

            For example, immediately after Eve sinned he forerold that a Savior would crush the serpent's head and undo all the bad that the first couple brought into mankind (Genesis 3:15)

            Infinite possibilities implies infinite possible futures by definition thus prophecy would be impossible as literally anything could happen. Of course since god does prophecy and for that prophecy to not come true would make god a liar, which you believe he can't that means the future must be set in stone for him to prophecy.

            The infinite futures are simply possibilities and not certain, they exist only in imagination

            Only God can see the certain future

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Jehovah does see the future when it's important
            For him to do it at all would require a deterministic future, which would mean free will could not exist
            >The infinite futures are simply possibilities and not certain, they exist only in imagination
            Then that would mean he could get prophecies wrong.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            God can't be wrong, he is infinitely wise

            Free will exists because God doesn't causation is not foreknowledge

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >God can't be wrong, he is infinitely wise
            Then there cannot be infinite possibilities and the future must be deterministic and thus no free will.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            How can Jehovah know the future but at the same time there are infinite futures. You can't have both.

            Apples aren't oranges jw

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            There are infinite possibiities, not infinite futures

            If my tartine is falling, there are two possibilities, either fall on its back or on the buttered side

            The future is only certain once it has reached the ground

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Infinite possibilities implies infinite possible futures by definition thus prophecy would be impossible as literally anything could happen. Of course since god does prophecy and for that prophecy to not come true would make god a liar, which you believe he can't that means the future must be set in stone for him to prophecy.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >The future is only certain once it has reached the ground
            But could Jehovah choose to know if your buttered french bread falls one way or another before it falls?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, God can know on whoch side it will fall

            So there is only one future

            All those gymnastics just to agree with me that God sees lies as a tool.

            Lies are bad

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Yes, God can know on whoch side it will fall
            >So there is only one future
            So how is there free will if Jehovah already knows what we will do? There's only one future

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Lies are bad
            I agree. Does your God agree?

            18 Then Jehu gathered all the people and said to them, “Ahab served Baal a little; Jehu will serve him much. 19 Now, summon to me all the prophets of Baal, all his worshipers and all his priests; let no one go missing, because I have a great sacrifice for Baal; whoever is missing shall not live.” But Jehu did it in deception, in order to eliminate the worshipers of Baal. 20 And Jehu said, “Proclaim a holy assembly for Baal.” And they proclaimed it.

            25 Then it came about, as soon as he had finished offering the burnt offering, that Jehu said to the guard and to the royal officers, “Go in, kill them; let none come out.”

            28 So Jehu eradicated Baal from Israel. 29 However, as for the sins of Jeroboam the son of Nebat, into which he misled Israel, from these Jehu did not desist, including the golden calves that were at Bethel and at Dan. 30 Yet the Lord said to Jehu, “Because you have done well in performing what is right in My eyes, and have done to the house of Ahab in accordance with everything that was in My heart, your sons to the fourth generation shall sit on the throne of Israel.”

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >When you accidentally prove a pagans point in your own words but you're still a loyal slave to Jehovah.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >He didn't scam him, Esau sold it so he had every right to receive the blessing

            >But [Isaac] said, “Your brother came deceitfully and took your blessing.”
            >Esau said, “Isn’t he rightly named Jacob? This is the second time he has taken advantage of me: He took my birthright, and now he’s taken my blessing!”

            His father sure didn't see it like that.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Catholic here. If you murder someone and go to confession you're forgiven if the priest absolves you. You do the prayers for penance to get less time in purgatory. Abortion doesn't guarantee a baby goes to heaven because he needs to get baptized. The babies would likely go to Limbo.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I think the Catholic idea is fricking weird and a bit fricked up to Punish babies for an abortion they had no control over, but in this case I'm arguing with this silly JW version of it where they just all come back to life any way so who gives a shit?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Jacob did NOTHING wrong
            He lied to his father. He betrayed his father's trust when he was old and weak. He couldn't even give his brother food without asking for something in return

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Jacob did NOTHING wrong
            Jacob scammed his own blind father on his deathbed.

            >this shows that Esau had NO RESPECT for his privilege and it was better off with someone who actually CARES about spiritual matters like JACOB
            The birthright thing was another incident, though even there we see Jacob's base, cunning nature: his brother comes back after having gone out hunting for days, he's starving, and Jacob refuses him to give any food unless he agrees to give up his title of eldest son.
            What kind of man forces a transaction on his own brother to give him a bowl of soup?
            >I deserved that more than him so I stole it!
            Nice morality you've got there

            >Once when Jacob was cooking some stew, Esau came in from the open country, famished. He said to Jacob, “Quick, let me have some of that red stew! I’m famished!”
            >Jacob replied, “First sell me your birthright.”
            >“Look, I am about to die,” Esau said. “What good is the birthright to me?”
            >But Jacob said, “Swear to me first.” So he swore an oath to him, selling his birthright to Jacob.
            >Then Jacob gave Esau some bread and some lentil stew. He ate and drank, and then got up and left.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I didn't know that jwanon thanks for clarifying. That's pretty funny. Abraham actually married his father's daughter.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Well Jehovah knew it wasn't Pharaoh's fault, that's why he was left alive
          Anon he gave him fricking leprosy

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Jehovah wanted to make a point that he could do way worse to him if he refused to give Sarah back to her husband !

            Why the frick was he married to his half sister?

            It was normal at the time because there was no genetical drawbacks since they were closer to the original perfection of Eden back then

            That's also why humans used to live longer

            Incest became a problem by the time of the Exodus, that's why it was forbidden by the Mosaic Law

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Jehovah wanted to make a point that he could do way worse to him if he refused to give Sarah back to her husband !
            Or he could have, you know, just told pharoah that Abraham was scamming him in the first place.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            It wouldn't be the same

            >It was normal at the time because there was no genetical drawbacks since they were closer to the original perfection of Eden back then
            So you're saying that in your new earth Onii-chan and imouto love will be allowed?

            Probably, but there will be enough humans in paradise earth to avoid this

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >It wouldn't be the same
            Yes it would have been significantly better lmao
            >Hmm should I tell pharoah that my Chosen personTM is scamming him
            >No I will wait until he has been scammed and then instead of punishing Abraham for being a slimy israelite I will instead inflict LEPROSY onto Pharoah for no reason
            >God of love btw 😉

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >It was normal at the time because there was no genetical drawbacks since they were closer to the original perfection of Eden back then
            So you're saying that in your new earth Onii-chan and imouto love will be allowed?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I'm guessing that manga showcases the daily life of the Habsburg family.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Habsburgs were mostly into cousin and aunt/uncle fricking actually

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Incest became a problem by the time of the Exodus, that's why it was forbidden by the Mosaic Law
            I don't get it
            from what I understand fast inbreeding in long term benefits the genes
            maybe they added too much foreign blood?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >You israeliteed me!
        kek

        Slaves, Hebrews born to serve
        To the Pharaoh
        Heed, to his every word
        Live in fear
        Faith, of the unknown one
        The deliverer
        Wait, something must be done
        Four-hundred years

        So let it be written
        So let it be done
        I'm sent here by the chosen one
        So let it be written
        So let it be done
        To kill the first born Pharaoh son
        I'm creeping death

        Now, let my people go
        Land of Goshen
        Go, I will be with thee
        Bush of fire
        Blood, running red and strong
        Down the Nile
        Plague, darkness three days long
        Hail to fire

        (chorus)

        Die (Die)
        By my hand (Die, die)
        I creep across the land (Die, die)
        Killing first-born man (Die, die, die)
        Die (Die)
        By my hand (Die, die)
        I creep across the land (Die, die)
        Killing first-born man (Die, die, die)

        I rule the midnight air
        The destroyer
        Born, I shall soon be there
        Deadly mass
        I creep the steps and floor
        Final darkness
        Blood, lamb's blood-painted door
        I shall pass

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Who the frick makes all these drawings?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I did but OP is an edit

      This is the original

      Stop encouraging the imposter and report him

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Who is "slave girl"?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          https://www.jw.org/en/library/magazines/wp20080601/she-wanted-to-help/

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Thanks.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        David?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Why are there two mary(s) ?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Because the bible has like 7 characters named Mary

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            :0
            Who drew these ?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Some french woman

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            He's not a woman

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            "your soul [Mary's] will have a sword that pierces it, also"
            It's in Luke.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Pierce what?

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Can jw paint something like this?

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >He doesn't do it all the time out of respect for our free will
    But if he knows the future sometimes that means the future is already laid in stone by him. Are there multiple futures?

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >He didn't scam his father, Esau sold his birthright
    The birthright and the blessing are two different things.
    He disguised himself as Esau to have his blind father bless him as Esau. His father repeatedly asked him if he was Esau and he said yes. Basic scam, identify theft.
    If I called your parents' house pretending to be you so they wire me some money, how is that not a scam?

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Damn i love JW booba threads

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >John 8:1-11
    The real question is, what was He writing on the ground?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Sand magic

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Wait, is this a jwanon thread? Post more of your porn, mate!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Sure anon ! JEHOVAH wills it !

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        holy fricking based

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          fricking legend, you are one mad lad

          Sure anon ! JEHOVAH wills it !

          I neither drew this nor posted this

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Shut up faker, everyone knows the real JWanon loves drawing big milkers

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        fricking legend, you are one mad lad

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Women cannot be asexual.
    Women love sex and love to desire sex. This is why most books are about sex and targeted to women.

    Men love sex but they do not love much, nor dislike much the desire for sex. In fact the desire for sex is more like an hindrance and a thing to eject, precisely by wanking and ejaculation that is the pinnacle of fricking a slag.
    Men still despise not loving sex, since it removes the most effective mechanism of valuation that they have (a man feels valued by a woman once she picks him up out of the male competition, telling him he won and rewarding him with the right to frick her), which leads them to the usual mockery of being shagless dildos remaining on the shelf of the sex market controlled by women, being baby dicks and being asexual.
    Men despise asexuality in men, since it shows them that sex-havers are far less dominant than the story they plays in their heads about being stronger and better than veganas.

    Women despise asexuality in men, since the few asexual men (very few are handsome) no longer acknowledge women for sex nor for companionship. Some asexual men claim to still want a gf just to cuddle, but that's already a baby-level sex and we are still in the situation of validation (and the gf still wants sex anyway sooner or later) and once they have sex with a girl that they love they see sex is not so bad.

    Women despise asexuality in women, precisely because women live on sex while their hate of their body for menstruating leads them to take pills which kills their desire for sex (but indeed kills their menstruation). They hate their life since through their own body, they acknowledge in their intimacy that they cannot win on both accounts: either have a comfy life or have an erotic life. Women want the erotic life.

    In fact sex is so crucial to a woman, that if a woman is NOT fricked senseless EVERY WEEK, her natural hysteria starts to poor out of her pores and the neurosis kicks in. Sex is literally a medicinal drug to a woman.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Unless in Christ Jesus a woman can be free from the curses, just like man can be free from all curses through Jesus Christ and only through Jesus Christ can anyone go to heaven with God.

      Menstruation can be clean and no big deal if her body is clean. Not from pills that give her death as a side effect.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        In the end times, The Antichrist tries to take power of the sun away from everyone. Like the four horses of the apocalypse. So it boils down to a war of God and Satan over who enjoys the sun.
        When Jesus comes back and rules from the temple, he just allows everyone to have the sun. It’s only the crazy ppl townies who think denying it from sinners is good idea. That is why I only come to IQfy to espouse denying the one who destroys and accuses their life. Indeeed God will choke their last breath out of them, nazi scum.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Women are like a venus flytrap, men were actually thought to possess agency.

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I did but OP is an edit

    This is the original

    Stop encouraging the imposter and report him

    Maybe now you understand why it better to stick to mostly drawing Adam, and thus, Only Jesus, as the libs say, “sweaty.”

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Because men are predator pigs

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    In ancient and medieval times women were seen as weaker, which meant they were also more likely to be lustful than men and unable to control themselves. Since men were seen as stronger, it was expected that they would have better sexual restraint than women.

    This view only changed in the Victorian era. Women from then on were seen as the sexually purer sex and far less lustful than men while men were seen as weaker when it came to controlling their sex drive.

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It’s cause in the case of the woman, she was the only one being punished for adultery even though israeli law says that both adulterers (man and woman) should be punished. The people punishing her were basically being hypocrites.

    > In the gospels, Jesus affirmed the commandment against adultery[17] and seemed to extend it, saying, "But I say to you, anyone who looks on a woman to lust after her has committed adultery with her already in his heart."[18] He taught his audience that the outward act of adultery does not happen apart from sins of the heart: "From within people, from their hearts, come evil thoughts, unchastity, theft, murder, adultery, greed, malice, deceit, licentiousness, envy, blasphemy, arrogance, folly. All these evils come from within and they defile."[19] However, some commentators, including Thomas Aquinas, say that Jesus was making the connection with the commandment, "You shall not covet your neighbor's wife."[20]

    > In the gospel of John is an account of a woman caught in adultery. Leaders responsible for executing justice brought her to Jesus and asked for his judgment. Jesus clearly identified adultery with sin; however, his statement "Let him who is without sin cast the first stone" did not refer to the precepts of law but to conscience.[24] Some commentators point out that if the woman was caught in adultery, there should also have been a man standing trial.[25] The israeli law clearly stated that both parties were to receive the death penalty.[26] By not bringing the guilty man to justice, these leaders shared in the guilt and were not fit to carry out the punishment. Not condoning her adultery, Jesus warns the woman in parting, "Go and sin no more"[27]

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I would take right tbh

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Lmao wot
      Also why doesn't the Canaanite woman have a wider nose
      Canaan was son of Ham, father of the homies

  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    he knew the degenerating effect of being a coomer

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    You say he was lenient with adulterous women, when really he was just practicing the law. Who did she commit adultery with, herself? Under Mosaic law, BOTH parties are to be stoned. You really think that a crime that is committed by two people should only be punishable for one party? Because that's completely stupid, both people deserved to die, but Jesus had mercy on her because the people who were trying to execute her were doing it in bad faith. You say it like Jesus just doesn't care about adultery, that's just not the case.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *