Why is that that oppressors and conquerors have been white? Those in power are usually white too. What's the historical reason for this?
Why is that that oppressors and conquerors have been white? Those in power are usually white too.
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
It's ok. Whatever really. Stronger. White. Friends.
A bigger understanding. Pirates.
white is better, more beautiful, more intelligent. simple as.
>inb4 then why is western civilization crumbling
all good things must come to an end. The european civilization reached its peak by landing on the moon, which is an incredible historical achievement. it was all downhill from there. If you're on the top, you can only go down
>white is better, more beautiful, more intelligent. simple as.
I can smell the brown coming from this post.
>The european civilization reached its peak by landing on the moon, which is an incredible historical achievement
America did that. Europe didn't do shit, hell it's being pushed around be has-been world power
>America did that
German scientists did that
>German scientists did that
Not exactly. They still had American scientists, money, support as well as being baled out by the US after the war.
>White is more beautiful and better than non-white
Nah that era of beauty standards is fading.
>Who built the ships in order for the Europeans to sail over to America? Who was responsible for advancing mathematics, astrology, medicine, etc, in order to make America possible? You are also forgetting that America = Europe. Americans are -or rather used to be- European. America is losing its edge because the European American population is decreasing.
Sad. Leeching off America to try to maintain some form of relevancy.
>Most whites prefer other whites
>The other whites create mutts
>Most mutts try to go back for whites
>Asian, indians, MENA fucking bleach themselves with laser or cream to look whiter
>Latin america shits on sudacas, elites are whites
>Haiti, South Africa, again elites are whites
The only exception to elites being white is middle east world but that's because royalty got rich because of oil and shit.
All in all, white people are just more aesthetically pleasing to the eye and generally less dumb than mutts or naggers.
>MENA fucking bleach themselves with laser or cream to look whiter
I never seen anyone do that aside from Iranians. And it is far common for Whites to use sun tan to look like MENA.
>And it is far common for Whites to use sun tan to look like MENA.
More like southern European. Nobody in Europe really likes nafris
>Nah that era of beauty standards is fading.
This. If white people ever die out, blame one group: Shitskins.
>I can smell the brown coming from this post
Even if I was the brownest brownskin there is, how would that affect the validity of my post? White is more beautiful and better than non-white. That's why Asian women risk their health trying to get whiter skin.
>America did that
We went to the moon because of Germans, stupid. The entire American and Soviet space programs were full of German Nazis.
>Europe didn't do shit
The USA simply appeared on the map out of thin air. Who built the ships in order for the Europeans to sail over to America? Who was responsible for advancing mathematics, astrology, medicine, etc, in order to make America possible? You are also forgetting that America = Europe. Americans are -or rather used to be- European. America is losing its edge because the European American population is decreasing.
>America did that
When they were inhabited by 90% white Europeans yes.
Cold conditions means planning ahead, which then means higher collective intelligence.
White people needed manpower for their engineering brains, so they moved to other areas to replace the existing civilizations and/or civilize the locals.
>Cold conditions means planning ahead, which then means higher collective intelligence.
Then why aren't the Eskimos the smartest people?
Maybe they are, but it’s simply too cold to advance much there. No growing season = no way to increase food supply when population grows = halt to societal advancement. Inuit peoples are very advanced in many ways surviving the Arctic without modern technology. Maybe they just realized it’s better to have your own plot of land where I won’t be bothered than genociding all your competition so you get the “best” land. Ultimately that is where Western civilization has led and the realization is what is sending us downhill. Why advance when 80 million people died during WW2? That’s 3% of the global population, and essentially all of which were Europeans and East Asians, the most “advanced” people. If we have another one today with the same proportion of casualties, then that becomes 240 million dead humans. That’s one-third of Europe’s present population, or Two-thirds of the USA’s population, or One out of every 6 Chinese people, or 2 Japans. If we go nuclear then it’s closer to 90% of Europe, Asia, and North America. In all honesty the Mideast will play a bigger role in the next one if that comforts you. If Western Civilization advances we’ll just invent new WMD so we can get closer to 100%. That’s why we are failing - we can’t ensure the peace. Key lesson: learn Spanish. Buenos Aires isn’t that bad. Don’t think Australia or NZ will survive this. And if you’re really feeling adventurous and future oriented, move in with the Inuit because North America is theirs in a few thousand years after the radiation cools off.
>Maybe they are
Not all Eskimos live in Igloos today. Many descendants of Eskimos have moved to warmer, advanced countries. So, do we see an overrepresentation of Eskimo descendants in STEM or other areas of academia?
>Maybe they just realized it’s better to have your own plot of land where I won’t be bothered than genociding all your competition so you get the “best” land
What do you mean by "better"? In order to compare two situations, first you must know what your goals are. In other words, we need to know what the goals of humanity are before we can proclaim whether living like Eskimos is "better" than living like 19th century Europeans. I believe that the goal of humanity is to simply survive and thrive. We can survive by living like Eskimos, but we can't thrive. It is only by technological and societal advances that we are able to produce a surplus of energy and food, increase our life expectancy, and eventually colonize our solar system. None of that is doable if we live like Eskimos. So, in what way is the life of an Eskimo "better"?
>Why advance when 80 million people died during WW2?
People are going to die, whether they die from a polar bear attack or a bullet. Dying in a war is worth it if it means securing the future of humanity. This is what the Axis powers tried to do. They failed, which is why we are now experiencing the drawbacks of modernity without any of its benefits.
When Polar Bears kill 80 million I’ll believe you
You fool! You just committed one of the great historic blunders - the most well known of which is of course 'never get involved in a land war in Asia', but only slightly less significant is 'never start a thread on LULZ with an image more interesting than the text!'.
>History began in 1492
I'll take "OP has never heard of Genghis Khan" for 600, Alex
>why is it that the history of conquests is taught in such a selective manner?
there, fixed it for you.
White people did basically everything that actually mattered in recent history. That's why. Don't let the copium addicts in this thread tell you anything different.
Perfect hips and butt
Have u ever heard about the bantu expansion, give it a go it would change ur opinion
good thread fellas
Because we are more advanced, smarter, and more attractive.
>a few tribes of white people from Eastern Europe invented Chariots and then ruled the entire planet with an iron but fair fist