Why is it illegal to kill adulterers?


Warning: Attempt to read property "comment_date" on null in /var/www/wptbox/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1043

Warning: Attempt to read property "comment_date" on null in /var/www/wptbox/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1043

Warning: Attempt to read property "comment_date" on null in /var/www/wptbox/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1043

Why is it illegal to kill adulterers?

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why do you think non-violent acts of assholery should be punished by death?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why not?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Because people have a right to life which you do not have the authority to revoke for the sake of revenge.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          You don't have a right to fuck around in marriage. A human would cut the relationship off. Being an adulterer is a choice and deserves no sympathy.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          God gifted you with fists, you can use them.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >inherent right to life
          uhhh no? no one has a right to live it's just a privilege

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            Incorrect. Everyone has a God-given right to life.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            oh cool, an anon who is pro-choice! we love to see it 🙂

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Female adultery can ruin your entire life by making you raise another man's children, so it ought to be harshly punished
      Male adultery is kinda irrelevant tho, as no woman will be tricked into unknowingly raising another woman's kid if her husband cheats

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Raise children communally, problem solved

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Raise children communally
          mandatory genetic paternity verification at birth for all children.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            This is so racist omg

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              If a woman hasn't been spreading her legs for other men then she should have nothing to be afraid of when her child gets it's paternity verified at birth. Obviously if the child has a father other than the husband then the wife gets no alimony or child support and the husband gets a no fault divorce automatically.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          So you support the government having control of your children? I dont believe you have kids dude

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            Do you know what a community is

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          uh no? We arent fucking animals and we have a natural inclination to love our particular children.

          Why the fuck cant you just bend to human nature instead of bending human nature to your cuck fetish?
          Why cant you just be normal
          too much porn?

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            Many hunter gatherer societies raise children communally and it's likely that prehistoric people did as well. Why wouldn't they, when their tribe is like their family and everyone looks out for each other?

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Primitives were actually cucks all along
              Shocking

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Generally, the more positive adult role models a child can learn from, the more well-rounded and prepared for adulthood that child will be. Have you never heard the phrase "It takes a village to raise a child"? It's awfully closeminded to think that just because it differs from your own notions of how children "should" be raised that it is necessarily a bad thing.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >It takes a village to raise another man's child
                It's gonna have to because I ain't doing it

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Why the fuck cant you just bend to human nature instead of bending human nature to your cuck fetish?
            The golden question to all leftists.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            >we aren't animals
            >just bend to your ingrained animal behaviours bro
            go back.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          You "people" are sick.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            What exactly is wrong with it objectively? Explain in your own words without citing religious doctrine or how icky you think it is.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              Men who don't have a biological connection to children aren't meant to take care of them. That's why child abuse rates are so much higher in blended families. That's why when a new male takes over a harem (monogamy is a fairly recent phenomenon in our history as a species), he usually kills the previous one's offspring. But if you're the type that's oblivious to this then there is no point trying to convince you. You are practically a religious devotee to a pseudo scientific dinosaur of an ideology.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Communal child rearing is extremely common in hunter gatherer tribes.
                Humans =/= lions and comparing humans to animals with unrelated social hierarchies is probably causing a lot of your schizophrenia.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Not him, but dominant males killing the offspring of other males is a fairly common occurence among a number of primate species, including among our closest relatives the chimps.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Those bands of hunter gatherers are basically an extended family, they're closely related to begin with. You will never have your horrific CHAZ dystopia.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >monogamy is a fairly recent phenomenon in our history as a species

                no

                only fetish leftists peddle this myth

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        This is not a man. I say this with all seriousness, you are not a man if you knowingly let a woman and her bastard spawn who deceived you like this continue to live.

        When he dies, he will be laughed at regardless of it is hell or heaven to which he goes. His father will laugh at him. His father's father will laugh at him. And they will all be right to do so.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >her bastard spawn
          Don't bring the poor kid into it, it's not his fault. But by all means if a redditcuck wants to bash his wife's head in I couldn't care less

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            Their every breath is an insult.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            >it's not his fault
            his? it's the daughters that are bastards

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >you should murder your family because your wife cheated on you

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            >your family
            Ironically it is only the reddit tranny you picture that would act otherwise natural cuckolds that they are. Stop projecting and start testosterone therapy, you clearly need it.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Do you also believe tiktok videos are spontaneous captures of real events?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Shit like this has made so paranoid that I would never be able to trust a woman under any circumstances. I decided to swear off all relationships because of it.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          psyop working as planned

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          You should never trust a human (whether male or female) over anything important.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          You've read this before?

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, and other similar stories.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              What other similar stories?

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                I don't have any of them saved. I read a similar one about how the poster's father killed himself after getting similar results from a DNA test, that none of his children were his.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                I remember that.

                https://www.reddit.com/user/throwra_qsummerstorm/comments/k4478y/23andme_revealed_my_mom59f_11year_affair_which/

                Is this it?

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yep

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                If you lurk the 23andMe or AncestryDNA subreddits you'll find stories like that every so often and you'll find people in the comments coping and trying to find whatever unlikely reason they can think of for why someone's DNA test would come out different from what they expected besides adultery/paternity fraud and 9/10 it will be because of adultery.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                What would be wrong with killing that bitch? Most real cultures would immediately hang, slit the throat, or stone that bitch. This is over-the-top heart wrenching. I fucking hate American culture so much.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                To make matters worse no woman in America who has committed paternity fraud has ever gone to jail or been imprisoned despite it being fraud.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        adultery should be illegal, but honor killing an unfaithful spouse should probably still be illegal, since the state needs a monopoly on violence

        it should be illegal for the man as well because it can still lead to the breakup of the family and is a violation of a marriage

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's akin to fraud and rape. To raise another's man child, to buy a house on false pretenses, to marry a secretely unfaithful, to invest in a family that treats you like a living ATM can have life-ruining results that the law refuses supply the victims of such crimes with justice.

        Furthermore, to sleep with someone while exposing them to aids, at worst, and humiliation, at best, is akin to rape by fraud and should be treated as such in the eyes of the law.

        Dante sentenced traitors to the Ninth Circle of Hell for a reason. Adultery is the personification of sociopathy and psychopathy on the part of its perpetrators.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Dante sentenced traitors to the Ninth Circle of Hell for a reason. Adultery is the personification of sociopathy and psychopathy on the part of its perpetrators.
          Then why are the other circles populated?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        This is not a man. I say this with all seriousness, you are not a man if you knowingly let a woman and her bastard spawn who deceived you like this continue to live.

        When he dies, he will be laughed at regardless of it is hell or heaven to which he goes. His father will laugh at him. His father's father will laugh at him. And they will all be right to do so.

        Shit like this has made so paranoid that I would never be able to trust a woman under any circumstances. I decided to swear off all relationships because of it.

        Does cheating negate every other good thing the relationship brought to his life?
        He mentions that she had given him 0 reasons to complain during their 33 years of marriage and that he genuinely loves his stepdaughters. Does the fact that she cheated on him negate everything else about the relationship? You don't stay married for 33 years if there wasn't genuine love in there somewhere. Everyone makes mistakes.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >I was lying to your face everyday
          >I'm a good person
          Pick one.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            So you're going to throw a marriage that objectively enriched your life because she made one stupid mistake?
            Did nothing about those 33 years spent together count?

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              Again, it's 33 years of deception and betrayal.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              She sucked another man's cock then came home and kissed him on the lips and he told her he loved her, no man deserves to be treated like that. If you're unhappy in a relationship then leave homosexual, you don't get to eat your cake and have it too. Deception is among the worst betrayals, it is a complete disregard for pure human trust and love. You see no problem with this?

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              Not him.
              The man had to tolerate this woman, pay her bills, if she was sad he had to make her happy and so on, for 33 years.
              While another man got to fuck her for less effort and knocked her up too.
              Its insulting.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Giving birth to another man's child not once but twice over the course of 33 years is one stupid mistake

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              >one stupid mistake
              >affair went on for 4 years
              yeah now its obvious you are a woman trying to rationalise your own whorish behaviour through others. i really feel pity for the man who chose to be with you

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              Fraud is the opposite of enrichment. She objectively defrauded her "husband" in this situation, dishonored him, and deprived him of his agency to live his life according to his own fully-informed decisions.

              Rather than throw away his marriage, he should sew his wife up in a leather sack alongside a pitbull and some venomous snakes before throwing that sack away - preferably off a bridge into the sea.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          t. woman or simp

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Lmao, this post is so clearly written by a woman its not even funny.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            >I was lying to your face everyday
            >I'm a good person
            Pick one.

            t. woman or simp

            And you wonder why women are heartless

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              >make absolutely retarded post
              >get called cunt
              >wahhhh

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        so this is what they mean by being in on the joke

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's fucked up but you can't help people who don't want to be helped. This guy doesn't have the spine to leave the woman who betrayed him in the gravest way so maybe he deserves this.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >This guy doesn't have the spine to leave the woman who betrayed him in the gravest way so maybe he deserves this.

          Nigga, he's old and his children are adult
          She ruined his life and "leaving" her is nowhere near enough of a punishment

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, she literally took everything from him. He'd have to pump a gallon of Clorox down her throat using a portable gardening hose to even come close to repaying her in kind.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'm amazed that the cuck wants to face the guy and punch the fuck out of him but never mentions anything violent about his wife.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          He thinks it makes him a man to want to challenge the other guy even though it makes him a pussy to absolve his wife of all responsibility even though she was the one who betrayed her oath to him and is deserving of vengeance as such.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        I hope this is fake. I think I need to throw up, I'm actually going to have to sit down.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        How do you even begin to take revenge on her? I genuinely can't come up with any form of torture that comes close to the same level of suffering. Even killing the bastard daughters in front of her and burning her body with acid and killing her arms and legs with tourniquets and making her live with that doesn't bring enough justice. 30+ years of betrayal, 30+ years of living a lie. His entire life erased at the hands of the person he was supposed to be able to fully trust. His life is gone, at 50 there's no time anymore to start life from scratch. No time to miraculously heal and make a true family with someone. He lost everything at no fault of his own. I cannot come up with any deed that would repay this amount of betrayal in full. Traitors of any kind and especially adulterers really do deserve fates much worse than death, and an eternal afterlife full of the most gruesome torture.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          The key lies in not burning her body with acid but slowly slowly pumping it straight down her throat and up her sensitive regions via a feeding tube and enema (and/or turkey baster) respectively. The destruction of a man's life and self-worth deserves no less a form of punishment.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >ruin someone's life
      >there should be no punishment because
      why?

      Because people have a right to life which you do not have the authority to revoke for the sake of revenge.

      >right to life
      show me a picture of it

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Adultery is not a victimless crime, even now, especially during the time period it was harshly punished due to the importance of continuing one's bloodline which could be sabotaged by the birth of a farmhand's bastard.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      There are more meaningful things than mere life, which we trample on every time we walk across a field of grass. The celebration of virtue, honor, and justice define the ideal human condition and must be incentivized at all cost.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >honor killings are OK dude it's just natural to hand out the most extreme punishments for non violent offenses
        Sure is third world in this thread all of a sudden

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          What a bigoted sentiment. Virtually every culture, not just western ones, has some tradition or practice bearing value making them practices and traditions that we can learn from.

  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    If by adulterers you mean retarded disgusting tranny rural retard pieces of shit who think they can claim ownership of every even slightly dark haired woman in the world and claim they're all his wife because he's married to a disgusting slack jawed gangly dinaric phenotype haplogroup I2 looking dark haired bitch and terrorize, threaten, harass anyone who is attracted to any women with light brown or darker hair because they're all "his wife" then yes I agree those types of people should be skinned alive

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Who the fuck is that guy do you know him irl?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Haploautism: not even once

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous
  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Are ya winnin, son-

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because the moderm man is retarded. Killing people for adultery was the norm for most societies throughout history.

  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because Christians sold out 300 years ago and embraced democracy and human rights.

  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Women's suffrage

  7. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Implying LULZners can get a girlfriend in the first place

  8. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    If women can cheat on their hubbies how come I can't fuck prostitutes?

  9. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's illegal? That doesn't sound right.

  10. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    OP, why do you ask? Did you get cucked again?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Nope

  11. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Thou shalt not kill

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >The Torah and Hebrew Bible made clear distinctions between the shedding of innocent blood versus killing as the due consequence of a crime. A number of sins were considered to be worthy of the death penalty including murder,[14] incest,[15] bearing false witness on a capital charge,[16] adultery,[17] idolatry,[18] bestiality,[19] child sacrifice to pagan gods,[20] cursing a parent,[21] fortune-telling,[22] homosexuality,[23] and other sins.

  12. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Why am I not allowed to murder people its not fair

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Seethe homo

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Ironic coming from someone who is assblasted they can't kill their nonexistent GF for thinking someone fucks better

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >you should murder your family because your wife cheated on you

      literal cucks

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >you should murder your family because your wife cheated on you

      So this is what championing workers rights looks like

  13. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    It should be illegal to commit adultery imo, but the death penalty is a bit too harsh.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      this
      exile the bitch and cap alimony/child support at $30/mo

  14. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >muh limited government
    >arachic
    >good reasons

  15. 3 months ago
    Dirk

    >The combination of a salacious adultery story; a murder in front of eyewitnesses; and a circus-like trial is a recipe for an exciting tale. This is indeed true of the 1916 Rossi murder that is the subject of Ron Roizen’s book, The Rossi Murder: And the Unwritten Law in 1916’s Wallace, Idaho (2021). Herman J. Rossi was a Wallace, Idaho, community leader, serving at various times as the mayor of Wallace and as a member of the Idaho legislature.

    >In late June 1916, Rossi returned from a political trip to the state capitol to find his wife had spent three days—much of it in bed—with a local musician and alleged bootlegger, Clarence Dahlquist. Rossi pulled his wife from her bed; slapped her; tore off her nightgown and threatened to throw her naked into the street. Next, he went to the kitchen and drank two cups of black coffee and then walked down the street to the Samuels Hotel lobby where he confronted Dahlquist and shot him. Dahlquist died the next morning.

    >Ron Roizen, a trained sociologist who has long studied and written about topics related to alcohol, recounts each day of Rossi’s murder trial. The high-profile prosecution attracted standing-room-only crowds to the Shoshone County courthouse and was reported in newspapers across the region. Rossi’s defense attorney John P. Gray argued that his client went temporarily insane after discovering his wife’s infidelity. Headlines such as “Fight Made to Rescue Wife from Liquor Habit” (p. 14) highlight the role that Mabel’s drinking played during the trial and in the wider court of public opinion. Rossi testified, for example, “My wife’s drinking kept me from being as prominent as I wanted to be in public affairs. Because of her vice or disease I kept out of public life to a great extent”

  16. 3 months ago
    Dirk

    >Rossi’s defense also centered around him as a victim due to his wife’s infidelity—a situation that for many warranted Rossi’s actions. This was the so-called “unwritten law.” He testified, “I realized the drinking woman was more likely to become immoral than other women. I have had that fear over me always” (p. 170).

    >While there was no doubt that Herman Rossi had shot and killed Clarence Dahlquist, the jury deliberated less than 20 minutes and found him not guilty by virtue of temporary insanity.

    >According to author Roizen, “Alcohol, in a word, was 1916’s heroin” (p. 267). Herman Rossi’s ten-year effort to save his wife from alcohol and his status as a cuckhold were enough to sway the jury. According to Roizen, these elements carried more weight with the 12-man panel than the expert witness testimony that both the prosecution and the defense presented.

    tl;dr politician comes home, finds out wife cheated with the saloon pianist, shoots him, found not guilty due to temporary insanity

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Unironically the correct decision.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >these elements carried more weight with the 12-man panel than the expert witness testimony that both the prosecution and the defense presented.
      based

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >shoot the man who fucked you wife
      >NIGGA THAT'S NUTS, THIS GUY IS CLEARLY INSANE
      Vaudeville.

  17. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I believe if your wife cheats on you and has the baby of another man and its a girl. You have the right to impregnate the girl and claim her as your wife.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Fap bank deposit accepted.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >get to revenge-humiliate both the wife and her lover by marrying their daughter
      >getting a pure virgin instead of a used up ran through roastie out of the deal
      BAAAAAAAAAAAASED anon you are the king

  18. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Damn smell like incel in here

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >smell computer screen
      >smells like an incel
      that's just you, bro

  19. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because in civil society you don't kill people over a business arrangement being violated without consequences.

  20. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    In New York, an adulterer killed the husband of the wife he was fucking, and ended up making one of the very first successful insanity defenses.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Source?

  21. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I mean most people who kill their wife/husband while caught cheating usually get off with an "act of passion"

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      You don't "get off" with that, you might get a diminished charge like second degree murder instead of first.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Who is most people? Because I've seen plenty of people who don't.

  22. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Women generally prefer monogamy but will occasionally cheat with an alpha male when they're ovulating. Men would prefer to have sex with as many women as humanly possible, but most of us aren't Chad enough for that so are forced to be monogamous.

  23. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I agree if your daughter turns out to not be yours you should get to take her as a wife in compensation.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >hits pipe
      think about it rationally

  24. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    there are some times when no DNA test is required to prove anything. yeah...

  25. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why should a man be punished for satisfying your wife because you couldn't?
    It's your fault, not his
    You could have at least made up for it or prevented your wife from coming in contact with these men
    It's a competition and you lost, killing someone for fucking your wife is being a sore loser

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because he is meddling in other people's affairs he knows is wrong.

  26. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Some Indian tribes had a slightly lighter yet still significant penalty for adultery.

  27. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because the government loses a taxpayer.

  28. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I've been snapchatting this dude's wife for a couple months now and this thread convinced me I need to stop. Sorry to whomever she's married to. Next time don't marry a whore, bro.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      pro-tip: when that marriage inevitably fails, you can be her plan B man that she goes to. The vast majority of relationships fail and then women usually have a rebound man. This is not your problem or fault and you can capitalize on it

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        spoken like a true weasel

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        You are less than human.

  29. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Here's how precolonial negroes dealth with it

  30. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Sword duelling should be legal for settling disputes related to matters of fidelity. Death sentence is too one sided. Not to mention you should already have your woman in control.

  31. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Crime of passion in this regard carries a lesser prison sentence than 2nd degree murder.

  32. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's not in Shariah

  33. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The state exists to protect women and their interests.

  34. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because the state has a monopoly on violence. The question is why adultery isn't a crime. Marriage is state sanctioned but not state regulated.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      bump

  35. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    It practically isn’t. aren’t crimes of passion ruled manslaughter which is a

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      a misdemeanor*

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *