Why does it get the same hate as rust?

Why does it get the same hate as rust?

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    very different things, rust is hated due to the devs' sanctimonious attitudes and politicking. Btrfs got a bunch of flak because in its early days it was full of bugs and people lost data. Btrfs, at least, has improved over the years, rust seems to be getting worse.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Btrfs got a bunch of flak because in its early days it was full of bugs and people lost data.
      Also Fedora switched to using it by default so spergs here think it's a Red Hat product even though RHEL itself is never using it.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Try and mount the filesystem in degraded mode. It doesn't let me.
    nobody can help you if you just say "it didn't work" without the error messages you get. (check dmesg too).

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    to add to this

    [...]
    >Try and mount the filesystem in degraded mode. It doesn't let me.
    nobody can help you if you just say "it didn't work" without the error messages you get. (check dmesg too).

    you don't even say what raid profile you were using. How could we possibly help? If you're this stupid I'm just going to assume you had everything in single mode like a retard.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I'm just going to assume you had everything in single mode like a retard.
      that's the simplest explanation for it tbh

      >Btrfs got a bunch of flak because in its early days it was full of bugs and people lost data.
      Also Fedora switched to using it by default so spergs here think it's a Red Hat product even though RHEL itself is never using it.

      the RHEL people are averse to it since their stock-in-trade is maintaining frankenkernels with huge patchsets for a fucking decade. I forget what RHEL 8 is using but 7 was 3.10 and btrfs was in a much rougher state back then, I don't even want to think about what trying to backport all the stuff that's happened in btrfs for a decade would look like.

      For Fedora this isn't much of a concern, they just ship an updated kernel.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's a resource hog, same as rust.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    People hate it?!

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Wait until you lose data and it puts your drive in an unrecoverable state. I've had it happen twice and I'm never using it again.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        But I have been using it for 5 years now without issues... 3 on openSUSE and 2 on Fedora

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >unrecoverable state
        More like waiting for it to boot for two to seven hours. Now I just use ext4 and a UPS so I won't repeat that hell.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I've heard of this bug. With my pc, wine decided to corrupt and took btrfs out with it. The entire file table was unreadable. I like drive encryption, but I couldn't get past the password at boot.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't hate it but it's incredibly unstable

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    shit logo
    still worse than zfs

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      check my 8

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      worse than zfs
      call me when I can arbitrarily reshape pools and vdevs

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      zfs is based

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        worse than zfs
        call me when I can arbitrarily reshape pools and vdevs

        shit logo
        still worse than zfs

        why is it taking so long?
        shouldn't it cap at disk write, like 120MB/s?

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Don't think it does.

    Love the flexibility. Can add, remove, replace drives no problem. None of this inflexible bullshit that ZFS has.

    Been using RAID5 data w/ RAID1C3 meta data for years without issue.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It is possible to they to fix RAID56?

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Bloat

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is it stable if i don’t use raid?

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >btrfs
    >Forced on Fedora before being mature
    >Introduced around the same time as LVM and turned partition setup from straightforward to what-the-fuck
    >called itself "betterFS" when it was and is clearly not better than EXT4.
    I can't speak for Rust but btrfs suffered the same fate as most AAA game titles. Got released half baked and now that the kinks have been mostly worked out it still sits on that bad starting reputation. I put btrfs on my OS's partition for the first time with Fedora 37 and it's been a week without data loss so it's got short term stability down.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      around the same time as LVM and turned partition setup from straightforward to what-the-fuck
      Where's my lvm-vdo + ext4 shithat?

      >inb4 it's right there you double nagger
      no it's not, I want it working on 5-lts.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >"betterFS"
      Huh. I always read it as "butterFS."

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It comes from the B-Tree data structures it's built upon.

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because people wanted ZFS, but got a shittier copy that swallows your data if you use RAID 5 or 6.
    It's like a dollar store ZFS

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it's a great filesystem and the only people that disagree are contrarian BSDtranny ZFS shills and ext4 boomers

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    lmao this fag deleted his post like a day after people made fun of him. I guess you really did have everything in single mode? You're right up there with the guy that had 8 drives in raid 0.

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    because g is a bunch of contrarians and the moment something makes life even a little bit easier they rage against it

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Idk I've used it for around a year now on my home NFS data/Jellyfin server and it's been very good.
    Monthly scrub
    Balance when adding a new disk, mirror metadata

    Just werks pretty much

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >meanwhile JFS is ignored
    Such a shame that a rock solid fs lives in obscurity only because it didnt started with the right company

Your email address will not be published.