It's the vax. They want to kill off all the people that obey them and believe their lies (take the vax) and allow only those who resist them, and who vow to destroy them survive (antivax)
LMAO, there is overpopulation and nobody needs retard NPCs. Those who will get mutilated and flayed alive are the morons like the gates, bezos and soros. They will be replaced by more competent puppets.
The increase in cancer cases is particularly alarming in the female population. Three decades ago no cases of women with testicular cancer have been known. Now there are plenty.
Well, first off, the population is up 46% in that time span. Then we have become much better at detecting cancer earlier. For the coup de grace, our life style has become fucking awful.
Breast tissue is filled with hormone-sensitive estrogen receptors. When you have substances that are endocrine disruptive, some have the ability to fit those receptors instead of endogenous estrogen. It mimics it, taking away the benefits from what the body would have been making on its own. Regarding ass cancers, the use of toys that leech endocrine disruptive substances coupled with the microtearing from friction might be causative
The anus is extremely good at absorbing substances into the blood stream, many people prefer taking drugs up their ass because of this. This along with apply correlations between hpv tainted semen and throat cancer to ass cancer, is probably enough to explain that one kek
It's the vax. They want to kill off all the people that obey them and believe their lies (take the vax) and allow only those who resist them, and who vow to destroy them survive (antivax)
>Ass cancer and tiddy cancer rising the fastest
What does it mean?
The anus is extremely good at absorbing substances into the blood stream, many people prefer taking drugs up their ass because of this. This along with apply correlations between hpv tainted semen and throat cancer to ass cancer, is probably enough to explain that one kek
You might as well include data from a century ago and claim cancer rates have risen slightly. In reality they're just including 90s data to mask the fact that it's a monumental post-vaxx spike and that basically every vaxxer is getting cancer.
> All I'm saying is if they don't know, how should we?
First of all, they are motivated not to know. At best, their whole life and identity is invested in a system that gives people cancer. At worst, they are directly paid not to know, or even to mislead. Secondly, it's not my job to "know". It's their job to "know". I can make rational suppositions and take rational measures accordingly without "knowing". This is a freedom afforded to me specifically because I am not an "expert" nor do I want to be one.
>they are motivated not to know
Why? Isn't finding answers to this literally what they're paid to do? That's like saying a bus driver is motivated to not drive a bus. >Secondly, it's not my job to "know". It's their job to "know".
I never said it was. But OP asked us.
>Why?
I told you why and I accept your full concession.
>I never said it was. But OP asked us.
OP asked us to speculate. We're allowed to speculate. We're also allowed to take extreme actions based on these speculations. Your priest class is not allowed to do any of those things, thus they are irrelevant in this discussion. They are not part of it. I am. OP is. "Experts" are not and cannot be.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
OP never mentioned speculation. He just asked >Why do so many young people get diagnosed with cancer recently?
Also, >I told you why
If you think you did, then I'll stop asking because I won't get a proper answer.
>We're allowed to
Why do you feel the need to justify so much. I never threatened you or told you you weren't allowed to do anything. Why are you so insecure? Yes, you're allowed to do whatever you want. I just asked OP why he expects meaningful answers from people who are much less likely to find meaningful answers than the people who haven't found them. >take extreme actions based on these speculations
Taking extreme actions based on nothing but speculations seems pretty emotional to me. You're allowed to do that, but you'd be regarded as a retard.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
I accept your full concession of all my points. Ordinary people should speculate and take actions accordingly. "Experts" don't figure into any of this and "expert" opinions don't matter.
>don't exercise >obese >too much sugar/fat >bad insulin response >metabolic reactions too inefficient
good way to get cancer!
it's like in the USA: >heart disease/CVD is number one killer >being obese and not exercising is fine >you're definitely not gonna die
Notice cancer and heart disease are pretty close together too. >Patients with CVD were at a higher risk of developing incident cancer compared to those without CVD (hazard ratio [HR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.13).
also oxygen therapy >intentionally poisoning the redox process of C dio because they think more oxygen=better
you don't want to know how many people they killed during covid with that >number one treatment for covid was antiboitics, and inflammation reducers
great ideas all around
Because you are being actively culled.
That means it's working.
It's the vax. They want to kill off all the people that obey them and believe their lies (take the vax) and allow only those who resist them, and who vow to destroy them survive (antivax)
LMAO, there is overpopulation and nobody needs retard NPCs. Those who will get mutilated and flayed alive are the morons like the gates, bezos and soros. They will be replaced by more competent puppets.
Can't even tell what level of schizo you're on, you've ascended
>survive
This is not possible if billions of people die and society collapses
One could even say it's safe and effective
Too affective.
This has definitely happened before.
Tested on a smaller scale gone unnoticed.
The increase in cancer cases is particularly alarming in the female population. Three decades ago no cases of women with testicular cancer have been known. Now there are plenty.
Underrated
Butt sex and drugs and vax
Kek
Also I heard prostate cancer is on the rise too
Well, first off, the population is up 46% in that time span. Then we have become much better at detecting cancer earlier. For the coup de grace, our life style has become fucking awful.
Chances are they're all misdiagnosed.
>we have become much better at detecting cancer earlier
Sure you have.
covid
>Ass cancer and tiddy cancer rising the fastest
What does it mean?
Breast tissue is filled with hormone-sensitive estrogen receptors. When you have substances that are endocrine disruptive, some have the ability to fit those receptors instead of endogenous estrogen. It mimics it, taking away the benefits from what the body would have been making on its own. Regarding ass cancers, the use of toys that leech endocrine disruptive substances coupled with the microtearing from friction might be causative
The anus is extremely good at absorbing substances into the blood stream, many people prefer taking drugs up their ass because of this. This along with apply correlations between hpv tainted semen and throat cancer to ass cancer, is probably enough to explain that one kek
It's the vax and porn .
Really? I didn’t even read it, but first thing to come in mind was ass cancer butt sex and lol, I was right
>ass cancer
Buggery, what else?
a lifetime of terrible diets featuring high levels of plastics and who-knows-what-else chemicals
obesity rate
cell phones
more screening earlier
It's the vax
Excessive use of grooming and other household products, sources of carcinogens, and over emphasis on hygiene, which would weaken the immune system.
>the covid vaccine retroactively caused cancer to rise between 1990 and 2019
How did ~~*they*~~ do it?
All vaccines are deadly poison, retard.
Right, they're so deadly that almost nobody knows anyone who's actually died of a vaccine.
Retard.
>the covid vaccine retroactively caused cancer to rise between 1990 and 2019
Rub those two neurons, retard.
You might as well include data from a century ago and claim cancer rates have risen slightly. In reality they're just including 90s data to mask the fact that it's a monumental post-vaxx spike and that basically every vaxxer is getting cancer.
The americans are at fault. No, I will not elaborate.
The gov is leeching money off of people who are delusional and think that they are sick.
>experts aren't sure why
>expect unemployable people on a Vietnamese basket-weaving forum to give you an answer
Why are you making these insane, masochistic cattlehead appeals to "experts"? Explain why "experts" are relevant here. Protip: you literally can't.
Where's the appeal? All I'm saying is if they don't know, how should we?
> All I'm saying is if they don't know, how should we?
First of all, they are motivated not to know. At best, their whole life and identity is invested in a system that gives people cancer. At worst, they are directly paid not to know, or even to mislead. Secondly, it's not my job to "know". It's their job to "know". I can make rational suppositions and take rational measures accordingly without "knowing". This is a freedom afforded to me specifically because I am not an "expert" nor do I want to be one.
>they are motivated not to know
Why? Isn't finding answers to this literally what they're paid to do? That's like saying a bus driver is motivated to not drive a bus.
>Secondly, it's not my job to "know". It's their job to "know".
I never said it was. But OP asked us.
>Why?
I told you why and I accept your full concession.
>I never said it was. But OP asked us.
OP asked us to speculate. We're allowed to speculate. We're also allowed to take extreme actions based on these speculations. Your priest class is not allowed to do any of those things, thus they are irrelevant in this discussion. They are not part of it. I am. OP is. "Experts" are not and cannot be.
OP never mentioned speculation. He just asked
>Why do so many young people get diagnosed with cancer recently?
Also,
>I told you why
If you think you did, then I'll stop asking because I won't get a proper answer.
>We're allowed to
Why do you feel the need to justify so much. I never threatened you or told you you weren't allowed to do anything. Why are you so insecure? Yes, you're allowed to do whatever you want. I just asked OP why he expects meaningful answers from people who are much less likely to find meaningful answers than the people who haven't found them.
>take extreme actions based on these speculations
Taking extreme actions based on nothing but speculations seems pretty emotional to me. You're allowed to do that, but you'd be regarded as a retard.
I accept your full concession of all my points. Ordinary people should speculate and take actions accordingly. "Experts" don't figure into any of this and "expert" opinions don't matter.
Paper straws.
5g
There's no covid, and there's no vaccine. The injection was just some random fluid that does nothing.
Better access to healthcare and a lot of countries have various cancer screening programs.
I just want to know what causes this kind of mental illness.
>don't exercise
>obese
>too much sugar/fat
>bad insulin response
>metabolic reactions too inefficient
good way to get cancer!
it's like in the USA:
>heart disease/CVD is number one killer
>being obese and not exercising is fine
>you're definitely not gonna die
Notice cancer and heart disease are pretty close together too.
>Patients with CVD were at a higher risk of developing incident cancer compared to those without CVD (hazard ratio [HR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.13).
also oxygen therapy
>intentionally poisoning the redox process of C dio because they think more oxygen=better
you don't want to know how many people they killed during covid with that
>number one treatment for covid was antiboitics, and inflammation reducers
great ideas all around
viruses modifying their dna