Why do so many sites break if you don't browse them with judenscript enabled?
Is it really that hard for modern sõy devs to make a functional site without it?
Why do so many sites break if you don't browse them with judenscript enabled?
Why do so many sites break if you don't browse them with judenscript enabled?
Is it really that hard for modern sõy devs to make a functional site without it?
they never understood that everthing could work without js and that js is added for visual and helpful additional stuff, like reloading parts of a website without pressing f5.
they do it on purpose, they want to force to to accept the advertising, tacking, and other assorted malware they've added in order to view the content. They know full well that zero JS or active content of any kind is needed to display static text or images, which is all most sites do. They just deliberately try to get in the way of people who can't be spied on and sold out to the ad agencies that are paying their salaries. Make no mistake: Web developers are very much complicit in how bad the modern web is. They were not forced to do it against their will.
This. The devs might be retarded and actually think it's helpful but the bigwigs know exactly what they're doing by making the web unusable without JS.
I'd say even the web devs on the front line are to a large part complicit in it. They know that those bigwigs sign their salary checks. Tell them that they're polluting the web one eventlistener at a time and they'll stick their fingers in their ears and say they can't hear you, because their jobs depend on their willingness to sell out to the advertising-industrial complex. You can't get a man to understand something when his livelihood depends on his not understanding it.
I understand it, but I don't care
JS shouldn't be used for visual shit. That's what css is for. Webnaggers gonna nig. Papa John's payment section has been broken on their site for over a year now. Can't use PayPal, no, I will not enter my card details.
Because it means adding almost double the code in many cases and gl getting time/resources allocated for something that would help the 0.5% of users who don't use JS.
JS is useful for offloading the task of generating dynamic components onto to client computers. This more practical and efficient than have server do everything.
React/Vue and other SPA frameworks make it impossible.
And even with server-side rendering you often have to detect it and serve different response (only new content vs. full page).
But it's definitely possible and not that hard if you pick apropriate tools.
This
Another problem is browsers ignoring standarisation or not implementing a lot of things
Did you know Safari on iOS won't autoplay videos like the fucking spec requires if the poophone is in low battery mode? Fucking naggers I hate safari
autoplay shouldn't exist at all, the standard should be for a browser to never play media of any sort without explicit user interaction
FUCKING THIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIS AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH I HATE AUTOPLAY!!! I HATE AUTOPLAY!!! I HATE AUTOPLAY!!! I HATE AUTOPLAY!!! I HATE AUTOPLAY!!! I HATE AUTOPLAY!!!
Are you crazy ? You are fucking ! You fucking fucking you bloody. FUCK YOU BLOODY ! Bastard. Bitch. Fuck You ! BLOODY FUCK YOU BLOODY ! Bloody mother fuck bitch. Benchod bloody. YOU BLASTARD ! BLOODY NO ! Why you fuck me i fuck you bloody ?
A lot of deep web sites don't use javascript, or at least work without it. It's pretty easy to make a html/css only website, but it will be lacking in functionality, will be slower to load (in some cases), and puts more strain on the server having to serve up whole pages all the time instead of just the data that changed
check how htmx works (there are similar and older alternatives), you can make dynamic websites that don't reload full page. on requests server serves HTML snippet and the elements on client script which part is replaced by that response snippet.
It relies on server-side HTML templates a lot. But it's almost as expensive on server as formatting the data to JSON.
From HTTP header you can deduce on server if client supports JS and either serve that small snippet back or full website. You can make a lot without ever writing your own client-side javascript.
This is a user side problem. Upgrading to a modern computer would solve all JS issues.
you're a fucking retard, browsers are nothing but HTML/CSS renderers and a JS engine, not using JS makes 90% of the browser and all of the hardwork that went into JIT compilers and the V8 engine etc. pointless. Just fucking upload word documents and send them to each other you luddite cunt, yes CSS has some logic in it but its not enough at all to do anything properly interesting with. CUNT
>Is it really that hard for modern sõy devs to make a functional site without it?
It's extra work.
And if less than 0.1% of visitors don't have JS enabled no amount of extra work is worth it.
The number can go up to 1-2% if you include cases where the Javascript breaks or simply doesn't execute properly for some random reason. Still may not be worth it for many sites/apps though.