Why do people here think that teaching teenagers about how to have safe sex.


Warning: Attempt to read property "comment_date" on null in /var/www/wptbox/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1043

Warning: Attempt to read property "comment_date" on null in /var/www/wptbox/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1043

Warning: Attempt to read property "comment_date" on null in /var/www/wptbox/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1043

Why do people here think that teaching teenagers about how to have safe sex. (sex ed) Is a bad thing, and '''GrOoMiNg'''. Yes this includes teaching them about gay sex because gay students do exist and the purpose of sex ed is to reduce all po0ssible harm related to sex.

  1. 3 days ago
    Gershon

    30 years ago you would be beaten half to death in Ireland for saying that

    • 3 days ago
      Anonymous

      Oh hey Gershon. lol you get to learn some of my backstory in this thread.

    • 3 days ago
      Anonymous

      ok? not anymore lol

      • 3 days ago
        Anonymous

        His best friend just died a CISO of a major corporation.
        Cease and desist or this will get very ugly, for you.

  2. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    I was groomed by a glowie who has a house in Virginia and a whole room just for Legos(tm).
    Unless you're being groomed my a Mason, they're doing it wrong.

    • 3 days ago
      Anonymous

      Where in va?

  3. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    Gay sex isn't really sex sticking your dick in poo is bad

    • 3 days ago
      Anonymous

      gay sex is sex? your ass is partly a sexual organ.

      Why would you let complete strangers ~~*teach your kids about sex*~~?

      because teenagers will have sex, we cant stop that, so we might aswell try and reduce the harm caused by a lack of knowledge of safe sex right? if a teacher wanted to take advantage of a student, he would do it anyway.

      Why do the teachers, so basically the state, need to do this?

      why not? why does the state need to teach about maths and history?

      I wouldn't trust the people who want to enthusiastically teach 8 year olds the mechanisms of anal sex and kink to teach sex ed. Sex ed should be at most teaching how to use a condom and how babies are made.

      If a gay kid wants to know the intricacies of gay sex he can certainly find it out on his own.

      I said teenagers, about 15 I'd say is the right age, sex ed is trying to reduce the harm caused by a lack of knowledge for safe sex, so yeah, this includes how to not harm yourself or others whilst having anal sex, I know you think its icky, but grow up man.

      • 3 days ago
        Anonymous

        >your ass is partly a sexual organ.

        No its not.

        • 3 days ago
          Anonymous

          Why do males have a prostate then?

          the issue isn't teaching teenagers the appropriate material the issue is how its taught and that it is also pushed on younger kids

          there is no need to teach it to younger children.

          • 3 days ago
            Anonymous

            the majority of people groomers is targeted to are the ones wanting to teach or show kids the sexually explicit content

          • 3 days ago
            Anonymous

            Prostate has nothing to do with sex you degenerate, you can coom from any simulation on your body if you're psychology conditioned (broken) enough to reinforce it

            • 3 days ago
              Anonymous

              Males have prostate to provide fluid to sperms. Any pleasure part is purely post-modern extrapolation.

            • 3 days ago
              Anonymous

              Why does it provide pleasure when touched? why doesnt that happen when you touch anything thats not a sexual organ

          • 3 days ago
            Anonymous

            A working one is like a pump and a switch for urine and semen. A healthy one does not over-inflate into the rectum. Its a sign of cancer, illness, or gay worms.

      • 3 days ago
        Anonymous

        >because teenagers will have sex, we cant stop that, so we might aswell try and reduce the harm caused by a lack of knowledge of safe sex right? if a teacher wanted to take advantage of a student, he would do it anyway.
        You know most teachers are female right? And that most school abuses are female on male right? And that parents should teach about sex to their children not strangers in a public place right?

        • 3 days ago
          Anonymous

          Parents can be irresponsible.

          They don't stop at teenagers Seamus. That's the main issue. They introduce this shit as young as they can, in as much detail as possible.

          Do 7 year olds need to know what a clitoris is? What gender fluidity is? What is the type of person who wants to push that onto kids, teach kids that?

          https://www.njspotlightnews.org/2022/05/nj-se-ed-guidelines-controversy-firestorm-westfield-parents-vin-gopal-fox-news-republican-campaign-issue/

          bla bla bla slippery slope etc

          • 3 days ago
            Anonymous

            The slippery slope is probably not a fallacy because we have seen it in action multiple times. They used to say "we wont be trying to teach your children to be gay it will be behind closed doors." Now look where it is now.

            • 3 days ago
              Anonymous

              This.
              We're cooking frogs and they gaslight us that the water ain't cooking.

            • 3 days ago
              Anonymous

              >They used to say "we wont be trying to teach your children to be gay
              slippery slope go wheeeeee

          • 3 days ago
            Anonymous

            In twenty years we've gone from men in decades long monogamous relationships wanting to get hitched to having kiddie drag shows, a push to normalize polyamory, etc.

            I hate to admit it because I was Pro-LGBT at one dumb point. But the Fundies were right, or dare I say, optimistic in their predictions.

            • 3 days ago
              Anonymous

              >the Fundies were right, or dare I say, optimistic
              read 2 Kings 22 carefully to understand what manasseh was up to

              Why does it provide pleasure when touched? why doesnt that happen when you touch anything thats not a sexual organ

              two kinds of people are obsessed with pleasure
              * rich wastrels who think theyre entitled to it
              * prostitutes whose job it is to provide it

            • 3 days ago
              Anonymous

              >the Fundies were right, or dare I say, optimistic
              read 2 Kings 22 carefully to understand what manasseh was up to
              [...]
              two kinds of people are obsessed with pleasure
              * rich wastrels who think theyre entitled to it
              * prostitutes whose job it is to provide it

              wait no its 2 Kings 23 the same story from 2 Kings 22 but the verse that needs to be considered is 23:7
              > And he brake down the houses of the sodomites, that were by the house of the LORD, where the women wove hangings for the grove.

            • 3 days ago
              Anonymous

              heres the Biblical perspective on how adults become sodomites

          • 3 days ago
            Anonymous

            >bla bla bla slippery

          • 3 days ago
            Anonymous

            >Parents can be irresponsible
            What makes you think government drones would be more responsible? The parents made the kid, so they usually at least have some interest in the kid's well-being. The teacher gets paid no matter what.

            • 3 days ago
              Anonymous

              if a zebra mother isnt part of a harem, the next zebra who wants her will murder her baby in front of her. historically you hear stories about the step mom who was cold towards her step daughter but when the mom gets custody of the kids she will pimps out her own daughters to get a man for herself

      • 3 days ago
        Anonymous

        They don't stop at teenagers Seamus. That's the main issue. They introduce this shit as young as they can, in as much detail as possible.

        Do 7 year olds need to know what a clitoris is? What gender fluidity is? What is the type of person who wants to push that onto kids, teach kids that?

        https://www.njspotlightnews.org/2022/05/nj-se-ed-guidelines-controversy-firestorm-westfield-parents-vin-gopal-fox-news-republican-campaign-issue/

      • 3 days ago
        Anonymous

        >gay sex is sex? your ass is partly a sexual organ
        citation required

  4. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    Why would you let complete strangers ~~*teach your kids about sex*~~?

  5. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    I wouldn't trust the people who want to enthusiastically teach 8 year olds the mechanisms of anal sex and kink to teach sex ed. Sex ed should be at most teaching how to use a condom and how babies are made.

    If a gay kid wants to know the intricacies of gay sex he can certainly find it out on his own.

  6. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    Why do the teachers, so basically the state, need to do this?

  7. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    An adult who is talking about anal sex (and how it's normal) with children must be gulaged straight to the uranium mines asap. Dixi.

    • 3 days ago
      Gershon

      The commies were right. They kept homosex illegal till '91

  8. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    >sex
    >reproduction
    Gays don't have sex anon. They perform sodomy.

    • 3 days ago
      Anonymous

      The ass is partly a sexual organ.

      • 3 days ago
        Anonymous

        Even if it involves a sexual organ the use of it is not used for sex. It's still sodomy.

        • 3 days ago
          Anonymous

          sodomy is a religious term, most schools have grown out of that, what are you trying to establish here? I never said gays can reproduce.

          • 3 days ago
            Anonymous

            You said they can have sex. They do not actually have sex because sex involves reproduction. Also. I am not establishing anything. It's obvious.

            • 3 days ago
              Anonymous

              I'm not debating you on pedantic definitions lmao

              • 3 days ago
                Anonymous

                >syntax
                This isn't a debate. It's an annihilation.

  9. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    Why are you posting a picture of a cartoon little girl while asking this question OP?

    • 3 days ago
      Anonymous

      I just picked a random pic in my anime folder idk

  10. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    Post your bussy.

  11. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    > safe sex
    is within marriage

    • 3 days ago
      Anonymous

      >le christianity

  12. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    gay sex is not natural therefore it is grooming
    you are teaching them about something they'd never regularly do in a sane mind
    if you disagree you are mentally ill and can go kill yourself for all I care
    if it was natural there wouldn't be all this inorganic push back about trying to teach kids about it and you know thats the truth
    thats why you fags immediately victimize yourselves for your gay weird shit you do for sympathy

    • 3 days ago
      Anonymous

      Why isn't gay sex natural?

      • 3 days ago
        Anonymous

        Its fine for them to be taught the basics on reproduction and stuff like that, but when you start getting into fetishes and kinks it is fucking weird and needs to stop. Teaching kids about being gay is not necessary because gay is not the norm and is basically a disturbing fetish because sex is for reproduction. You do not need to be teaching children to be hedonists.

  13. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    > gay students do exist and the purpose of sex ed is to
    Nah you just want to tell all kids about how buttsex is normal. Otherwise you would separate students into gay and non gay classes.

    • 3 days ago
      Anonymous

      seperating them would be discriminatory and incredibly humiliating for the students, you just find it icky.

      • 3 days ago
        Anonymous

        Then you just want to tell all children about how buttsex is good and natural.

  14. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    when I was in middle school ages 12-14 sex-ed was covered alongside the general reproductive information and was done in health class. It didn't need it's own full semester or year long class. It wasn't taught to kids in elementary school. There were no props or videos or cartoons about it

    • 3 days ago
      Anonymous

      ok?

      • 3 days ago
        Anonymous

        the issue isn't teaching teenagers the appropriate material the issue is how its taught and that it is also pushed on younger kids

        • 3 days ago
          Anonymous

          No the issue is all of it. I’m tired of you lukewarm centrist homosexuals. “You can’t teach kids about degenerate extramarital sex… until they’re TEENAGERS!” The only appropriate sex is heterosexual sex within marriage and it’s not the state job to teach them how to sin.

          • 3 days ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not for teaching them so they know how to do it but I think it's a good idea to give them information so they learn how their bodies work. No amount of proper information will make a teenager want to have more or less sex and I put the blame entirely on the parents for raising a deviant

  15. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    Sex education has only increased promiscuity and stopped people from having children. Its decay pure and simple. The promised result was not what we got. Stay away from other peoples children you fucking groomer.

    • 3 days ago
      Anonymous

      Please show me how it increased promiscuity.

      • 3 days ago
        Anonymous

        before adultery was legalized most people only had 1 lifetime sex partner

      • 3 days ago
        Anonymous

        >Please show me how it increased promiscuity.
        Behold reality.

  16. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    Nothing wrong with sex ed, it was part of the biology program at my school and it was given by an educated biology teacher instead of a perverted drag queen or a fag in a gimp suit.

    Modern sex ed is cultural marxist propoganda taught by unqualified perverts to kids that are way too young and that is the real probpem.

  17. 3 days ago
    Anonymous
  18. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    >being gay is natural
    >kids can't figure it out on their own i have to help them :^)
    pick one

    • 3 days ago
      Anonymous

      That is completely not what I'm saying, I'm saying that gay teenagers will engage in gay sex whether we like it or not. therefore we should teach them how to do it safely.

      >the purpose of sex ed is to reduce all po0ssible harm related to sex.
      so it should be "anal sex is damaging and improper and should not be attempted by anyone"?

      lmao go back to bed grandpa

      • 3 days ago
        Anonymous

        it's literally the same as normal sex ed. wear a rubber and don't fuck 100 different people. everything else is fetish shit that the "teachers" get off to

  19. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    >the purpose of sex ed is to reduce all po0ssible harm related to sex.
    so it should be "anal sex is damaging and improper and should not be attempted by anyone"?

  20. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    Because it is, it's fine to explain how the reproducting system works, and what the mating process is, what men look for and women look for. But that's not what they are teaching at "sex ed".
    What they teach at sex ed is left wing propaganda designed to destroy the family unit.

  21. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    Ok, so you need a 15 minute lesson about don't fuck people in the ass because it causes ruptures/injuries, and if you don't want babies use any of the availible contraception options, which all come with instructions.

    The quesiton is, why would you need more than 15 minutes of common sense considering biology is still a class. At least it was the last time i heard about it.

  22. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    Because it is grooming.
    >luv da lord
    >'ate queers
    >simple as

    • 3 days ago
      Anonymous

      cringe

  23. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    Statistically sex education leads to teenagers having more sex and same goes for drug education.

  24. 3 days ago
    Anonymous

    Sex education is simple
    The telos of sex is procreation, therefore sexual behavior needs to be directed towards that end for it to be moral
    You don't have a right to have sex however you want, you only have a right to do what is right, and that is natural sexual intercourse towards the natural end of family formation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *