Do you really wanna go back to living in mud huts and sacrificing humans in forests? I see too much hating on Romans on here.
So this is your daily reminder that you are all writing with something called the Roman alphabet.
Why do people here hate civilization?
Yes
Rome got hijacked by israelite, was never the same again
Ancients were all israelites to begin with, if anything they got mutted by hoards of naggers from the north (who they imported to deal with labor shortages, hmmmm) and lost most of their edge. Then in the Renaissance you have some small pockets of people in Italy and roman conquered continental Europe, who have suspiciously "israeli" ancestry, once again bringing Europe out of the mudhut age
>people
Incels want EVERYONE to be as miserable as they are now. Craving for everything disgusting is caused by pure resentment and envy.
Nooooo! That's just some random people from the internet. If I hate globohomo, love russian military, and shill for taliban it does not mean that I look like that!
>shill for taliban
Ironic nafotroon, I thought this was history board.
>Leftist argues
>Starts with selfies
Kek everytime
Dismantling the industrial society is the only hope for the preservation of the natural environment.
At this point I'm starting to believe it is the only hope for the human race too.
If Roman's were aware humans would use fossil fuels to barely survive they wouldn't have created civilization.
Romans didn't 'create' civilization they merely adopted it.
that's what no pussy does to a nigga
Wrong, people here hate modernity because, defying the term, it's so primitive you can't even call it a "return" to primitivism, as humans have likely never been so primitive. It's pure decay, a civilization collapse.
There is much to be admired about Rome, however, it also represented the END of Classical civilization. The Classical world died with Rome.
They're pretending and fantasizing because they don't understand how reliant on technology their entire lives are. They literally post these delusions on an internet forum
Medcel cope image
Bait
>Le Rome was le civilization and increased living standards
Up until the modern 'state' of the 1700's, literally the only thing that changed during those meme wars autists are so obsessed over was the outfit the soldiers who popped by your village to take away a couple goats in taxes and rape a few women wore.
Your average italian, brit or greek lived the exact same way for millenia until the industrial revolution.
Let me guess, you're an atheist who spends a lot of time on reddit
Give me a tangible benefit to local communities Roman presence had.
Being so peaceful that they didn’t need walls, for starters. But also being such a large and organize state meant cosmopolitanism on a large scale. It meant that most small farmers could no longer afford to keep their farms going, and that was because the rise of large latifundia had not only driven the price of foodstuffs so low, but also greatly stabilized it so that their society wasn’t rocked by periodic famines. In fact, food was so cheap that it was cheaper for the state to buy it give it away for free than it was to withhold it and have to deploy the army to put down food riots.
>Being so peaceful that they didn’t need walls, for starters
Was never the case in Britain though not even in the southeast. Outsider raids aside roman control was nominal in most places even the iceni remained intact through the whole roman occupation and like all other surviving tribes were given free reign after the last legions were gone.
Wrong, 1 AD Britain in particular was nothing like it was in 1000 AD. Big difference between 1000 and 1700 too but not as big.
soulles vs SOVL
And here we see a homosexual pretending that Roman Britain is anything like actual Rome.
Because civilization is a never-ending process of domestication through systematizing and abstract rules and laws that destroys human individuation.
Most people who find their way to this site do so because they just want to be left alone to think and say what they want.
I was born in civilization, molded by it
The life for common men was better in the high/late middle ages than in antiquity.
What even is civilization? Anglos lived in communities and had well established laws, technology etc
Or is it just stacking rocks and living in inferior slum cities
See tribal north america the puritans arrived in but with iron and cows.
Answer my question, what is civilization?
>What even is civilization?
Some non-zero share of the population not growing their own food. Used to be 10% back then, now is 90%+.
Most civilizations like Sumerians and Romans were majority farmers though, Celts of similar proportions
before the romans, the anglos had not arrived to britain.
>"Anglos"
Retard detected
why do people fellate the slave owning pederast gay Romans? I would hardly call that "civilization"
It was relative to all the societies around them. Civilization means that Romans were resolving their differences in a court room with lawyers, rather than as blood feud with hired thugs.
Real human progress began during the Renaissance which partly was a rediscovery of ancient learning but was on further study almost entirely something new in substance if not style. And the ones who made the most progress were not Italian or Greek. They were Brits, French, Dutch, Germans.
Pic very rel
Romans lived in favelas