Before religion and STDs were big they had no reason to hide it so their genes should have been bred out by now.
Why didn't Homosexuality go Extinct in Ancient times??
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
It's not genetic it's learned behavior.
This. Homosexuality is spread by fucking children
and also by not retaining God in their knowledge, Romans 1
No it's moral.
Most evil people are heterosexual.
Homosexuality can develop from repression or lack of proper nourishment during childhood. Osho once observed that everyone goes through a "homosexual" phase at some point in childhood — a phase in which a boy or a girl thinks the other has the same "private parts" as he or she but still feels some form of attraction. Often this phase is so brief that it's not remembered at all. A person remains homosexual into adult life if they fail to properly mature past this phase, which can occur due to said repression or lack of nourishment (such as a father properly bestowing a sense of confidence in his son, or a mother in her daughter).
>biological reproductive mechanisms must be actuated by a parental figure
Not even once.
Because it isn't natural it comes from Satan.
>Don't have buttsex, it's evil and a sin.
>*Puts a special organ in men's butts that make them have orgasms*
How many prostate orgasms have you had anon?
a word created by man to separate himself from "nature"
Because it's beneficial to the survival of genes.
A non-breeder has free energy that can be spent to support his or her family in hard times, ensuring that his or hers relatives survive and pass shared genes down the next generation.
And Christian church offered plenty of options for homosexual men and women to hide in. Added bonus was the fact that church was accumulating wealth, further reinforcing the evolutionary reason for homosexuality.
>Because it's beneficial to the survival of genes.
That isn't how genes work my man
They actually do, doofus.
That doesn't mean what you are imagining that it means here.
He was talking about the family as in brothers, sisters, etc.
I know what he means but unless we find a "gay gene" someday he's probably wrong.
Priests never reproduced though and nuns didn't either so genes spreading are irrelevant there
That was not my point.
>Why didn't Homosexuality go Extinct in Ancient times??
Because there was a social obligation to have kids for everyone, homosexuals included.
>Priests never reproduced though
Because Homos bred, retard.
LGBT identityhomosexualry is something that is very new. Historically homosexuals just like fucking people of the same sex as a fetish. In many societies the world over they still saw themselves as men and women who have a duty marry, create families & have children with the opposite gender, and then go back to fucking boypussies/rubbing clits.
>an entirely different sex
Still it doesnt make sense, gays in the past bred more often and recently now that homosexual breeding is falling the homosexuality is exponentially rising, zoomers are much more gays than boomers and boomers supposedly were the gayest ever because of collective lower testosterone in pregnant women due to the stress of ww2. Im gay myself and believe homosexuality can be caused by societal changes/being born in a more "bourgeouis"/prosper, but also overprotective environment that isolates boys from fighting and therefore assimilating with other boys - thus boys are viewed as exotic by the gay child and in puberty, as we all know, "the exotic becomes erotic". Children really are overprotected these days so it might be.
Another cause might be those testosterone/estrogen in womb hypothesis but i find them a bit shoe-horned - but perhaps its really the microplastics in pregnant women that have been rising in recent years that have been causing that hormonal imbalance and give the gay.
In the end, i think something should be done to find the cause, not just for the sake of knowledge but also because homosexuality on the rise really poses a threat to natality rates. And inb4 >le elites want us gay so only immigrants breed!, no, like one third to a half of people on grindr in my country are immigrants and this is too much coming from a country with very few relative immigration
Because it’s a polygenic trait. There’s no one single ‘gay gene’ you need to select for, but thousands of them. These genes also activate based on certain stressors so you will eventually get gays again on a long enough time scale.
The gene for homosexuality has a passive and an active form. Actives breed themselves out. Passives are just carriers.
It's a birth defect affecting hormones
They turn into sissy homosexuals as they grow
As a woman I believe that male homosexuality is the height and culmination of masculinity.
Because men are fucking sexy and it's not my fault that you can't see that hetereotard
There's a biologist who wrote this book in the 70s
"Homosexuality in animals: homosexuality as a natural defence against overpopulation"
I didn't read it but the title is quite self explanatory
It's nonsense and wishful thinking
It's like searching a biological purpose to autism
dont underrestimate what biology can do.
Look at the genders birthed after ww2 in germany. There were way more boys born than boys.(dont remeber the exact number, something like 70% boys but dont nail me on that one)
You can trace that back to the lack of men in society at the time (because they were rotting in the fields between berlin and Moskow)
KIN SELECTION (AKA the Gay Aunt babysits and buys presents for your family) DUMBASS
It's why Elephants, Rhinos and more protect calves that aren't theirs, too
Non-reproducing members basically add EXTRA RESOURCES to raising offspring. Food, protection, warmth, and even a secondary parent if the real ones die.
Hate gays all you want, but Kin Selection via non-producing individuals is paramount to the survival of multiple species, including HUMANS. AKA nonproducing or communal animals ADOPTING and giving CHARITY etc.
Homosexuality can be advantagous to the group when there is a risk of overpopulation you have another productive member of the group that isn't going to reproduce, read up about the super uncle theory.
Most homos aren't the super uncle type.
Genes at best have only a marginal effect on determining homosexuality. Else we'd see most/all identical twins have identical sexual orientation. But that's not the case in reality. Find a better crackpot theory as to why this painfully obvious malignant aberration is akshchually nature's genius design.
>this painfully obvious malignant aberration is akshchually nature's genius design.
>implying nature is "good"
Because most of them were various shades of bisexual, they fucked men but were still expected to marry and breed.
Because homosexuality is a result of epigenetic developmental mistake, not genetic.
The evidence for this is the relative uniform frequency of homosexuality across all human populations.
The data seems to indicate that, no matter what culture, country, religion, race whatever. 1-2% of humans are born gay. If there was a genetic reason for homosexuality, there would be some isolated population somwhere wherein there was two or three times more gays, and there would be some isolated populations somwhere wherein there was no gays at all.
This tells us that homosexuality is not a genetic disorder, it's a developmental disorder. When a new babby is formed there is a 1-2% chance of error when the brain is being built of getting the sexual orientation wrong, and thus creating an homosexual human.
This is of course overly simplified since there are bisexuals, and there are people that are only slightly gay feelings and people that are full blown mega-gay. And male babies are actually more likely to be gay than female babies ect.
Actives fucked young boys as well as having wives and children
Passives were slaves or poorfags who were expendable and likely to die anyway
Homosexuality isn't genetic, it is due to hormonal conditions in the womb causing the brain to develop like that of a heterosexual of the opposite sex.
Therefore, while there may be genes that reduce the incidence of homosexuality, there is no gene for homosexuality that can be selected out thereby making homosexuality impossible.
I'm gay according to this picture 🙁
Me too! Wanna make out?
Don't worry it's just pseudo science. Your hand shape is genetic, homosexualry is not..
I thought a longer index finger for men meant highest testosterone
being gay isn't genetic, and you're forgetting that bisexuality is much more common than exclusive attraction to one sex.
If a monkey fucks a male monkey and then later fucks a female monkey, he's still producing offspring. Fucking that other male monkey as well doesn't affect his reproduction at all.
Homlsexuality genetics are older than humans or primates. It's probably mammalian and irrelevant so it had no pressure to be selected out.
>the gay genes
Sexual attraction is a complete mess made up of countless diverse genes, upbringing, culture etc. etc. It's extremely unlikely that all the stars would align for "homosexuality" to stop existing
its not a thing you are not born gay.All men have extra sex drive so you are basically able to fuck anything.You see bunch of shepherd men fuck sheep in the whole world nobody considers it a valid sexually.You can program a human or an animal to fuck anything.