Why did God create this? I cannot respect or worship a God who would do this.

Animals die and turn into fossils on the ground. The ground gets pushed up over time and turns into a mountain. The fossils that were once on the ground are now high in the sky.

Why did you drop out of high school?

>over a billion trillion years

You're clearly a low IQ retard with zero education in any field. It is not possible to discuss this with you further.

[...]

Based posting-the-same-picture-in-the-same-thread-multiple-times anon

>Atheism is the truth
how do you know truth even exists

Correct. He exists already.

the fact atheism collapses into self contradiction shows that theism is correct.

I do here:
the fact atheism collapses into self contradiction shows that theism is correct.

the individual atheists rejects God due to a supposed 'lack of proof' however concepts like: reason, logic, consciousness, human thought, objective truth also cannot be proven given an atheist worldview and have to be presupposed.
So by accepting reason, logic, consciousness, human thought, and objective truth but not God you are being arbitrary and ad hoc.
Further by saying that a person cannot presuppose God to exist but then presupposes reason, logic, consciousness, human thought, and objective truth you contradict yourself.

>Reason, logic, and objective truth are human concepts
what does "human concept" even mean?
>God is still not real. Definitely not the three-headed Bible God that interacted with desert tribes and cares about if you masturbate.
You are objectively saying that God is still not real but can't even show whether or not objective truth exists? thats self defeating.
>The Universe is the total opposite of "intelligent design". It's a random clusterfuck mess of exploding balls of plasma and asteroids and radiation.
ok prove it.

>Human concept means the way human brain atoms generate consciousness and interpret the surrounding universe.
you're claiming they are "human concepts" but in that you are presupposing consciousness to exist without being able to demonstrate that claim. Whether you call them "human concepts" or not you are presupposing their existence without any demonstration that they exist.

>I'm subjectively saying it because we don't have a full understanding of reality. Not even you do, you're just some worthless homosexual who nobody would even miss if you were dead.
ok but this has nothing to do with the argument.

>Ever seen a picture of outer space from a telescope?
how does the size of the universe communicate value?

>rage quit
your concession is accepted

you aren't able to make a counter argument.
>Yeah, we don't know how all of reality works. That's why we invented axioms. The probability of God existing based on those axioms is very low.
How do you know anything you are saying is true if we 'don't know how reality works'?

>How do you know anything you are saying is true if we 'don't know how reality works'?
>I don't
then by definition nothing you said can be true, including atheism. So if atheism isn't true then what remains is theism

Thank you for admitting God exists

>No, nothing I said can be confirmed
then you lose

Truth is rooted in God

If you have an argument (which you already admitted you have no way of knowing what you're saying is true)
then you can present it but I'm not playing 20 questions with you

so again you can present an argument if are able to but I'm not going to play 20 questions

please make an argument

>Your "objective truth" is based in faulty ancient manuscripts full of errors and contradictions
such as?

>That is the opposite of truth
you just a few posts ago couldn't show truth even exists now you're asserting it does, further showing how ad hoc atheism is.

>You're not showing me how this "objective truth" works.
what are you confused about?

you refuse to clarify your point of contention, not much i can do for you

The gospels are a theological work on Christ's life not a modern day history book, they are written to convey a theological message and for an ease of understanding and remembering much like epic poems,
The goal is to convey a theological position not to convey with 100% certainty whether or not people carried a staff

>So if you can't determine objective truth from the Bible
ok prove it

So your objective truth manual is littered with contradictions, of which cannot be determined which is the real truth? This is not looking good for you.

>its a work of theology, to which there are no contradictions

This is your objective truth? LMAO

What a crock of shit. I didn't think you would stoop so low, but you revealed your hand.

You're free to fuck off now.

This is such an amusing statement because it relies on the assumption that whites are more intelligent now than they were a century ago. This guy wants to have it both ways, he wants to be based an racist, while also claiming that liberal anti-racists are the smartest people in history.

I would like to know the objective truth on wether the apostles carried a staff or not on that journey. You said truth cones from God and this book is supposed to be God's objective truth word. Now tell me.

So your objective truth book is just totally up in the air when it comes to determining which parts are the real truth and which are not. Just guesswork.

Wow, thank you for debunking your whole "objective truth" facade. Nice try Christcuck, but you lost.

I showed that you are full of shit and have no objective truth. You can fuck off now.

[...]

I gave you evidence that your "objective truth" Bible has no objective truth in it and has to be subjectively determined by the reader by comparing all the contradictions. Now you're in meltdown mode.

Countered them with what?

>"Nuh uh, that contradiction doesn't count"

How do you determine which parts of the Bible are the objective truth?

How do you determine which parts of the Bible are the objective truth?

So any tough questions and you default to saying that. Looks like you have no answer and have been defeated.

You said you had objective truth but cannot demonstrate it to me or how you get it.

Every time God fails to answer your prayers, I win.

Why don't you go to a children's cancer hospital and pray for God to heal them all that day?

You only try to believe in God to alleviate your fear of death.

You know I'm right.

Make sure to read that objective truth about loving your enemy and turning the other cheek so they can kill you and fuck your women.

What you don't seem to grasp is that I'm using the axiom you defined as truth. We have to set some frame if reference, so I'm using yours. The Bible is the opposite of what you defined as truth.

Go die for Israel you pathetic Christcuck.

>Your imaginary God also has no observable or detectable effects on the universe or life on earth
neither does: logic, reason, objective truth, consciousness, human thought, yet you presuppose them anyways to have this conversation
so if you're going to presuppose those metaphysical concepts I'll presuppose God

if you're going to presuppose metaphysical concepts without proof so will I.

ok prove it

You believe and worship some tribal israelitegod from thousands of years ago and pay a tithe to the cult.

I mean how fucking stupid can you get?

This argument was debunked by Elizabeth Anscombe, a Catholic

isn't the burden of proof on theists?

this. even if God wasn't really its still better to live as a Christian than an atheistcuck

glad it makes you seethe so much :^)

ok schizo