Why did European and Asian art development diverge so much?
East Asia may have lagged behind tech wise but they were extremely prosperous and highly developed societies. Artists like painters do not require an industrial revolution
Why did European and Asian art development diverge so much?
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI
— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
Souless; Souless; Souless; Souless; Souless; Souless; S O V L.
Reinassance was trigerred because all of europe was sending gibs and tribute to the vatican, a religious institution with ornamental and symbolic purpose.
The vatican created a entire orbit of artist arround itself to propell its influence, artisany needs demand and the vatican alltogether with the trade and religion center italy was DID created demand for artistic development.
Other places did not had a leech religious institution financing art on demand with the tribute from an entire continent.
Other two factors is that asians just saw art as representative, not imitative.
China had perspective painting before da Vinci invented it for you. Could have developed from Marco Polo's (or his contemporaries) souvenirs.
If you can't make a living out of art you won't have artists
Making a living out of it was easier on medieval europe than in east asia
all paintings above were during the enlightenment
Art was already established by the high middle ages/reinassance
The rest just followed that process
Is there any good art archival sites for stuff this old?
European painting as a whole surpassed East Asia only after the Renaissance. East Asia stagnated at all levels during the Renaissance, and the Qing Dynasty paintings looked the same artistic style as the Tang one thousand years ago.
The exact opposite happened, European and East Asian art followed a similar pattern where realism was replaced with a move towards more abstract representation
Nonsense, Tang and Qing painting look nothing alike, what similarity is there between Zhou Fang and Bada Shanren
Because of their proximity it took longer for roman art techniques to diffuse their way to East Asia
Why didn't east asians developed that kind of art inb4? They had resources to do so.
italians taught white devils how to draw.
this is 1300 german art
wow much renaissance Italy very wow
>meanwhile 1432 Netherlands
wrong post but you get the idea.
that's a flemish painting
Why the fuck would two different cultures who had little contact with each other not have unique styles of art?
i always wondered why Japanese art conveys expressions the way it does. It seems quite different to Chinese art, though I'm no expert
It's proto-manga style
Why do chuds don't understand the concept of art style?
Who is the artist for the Netherlands piece there?
ukiyo e is pop art, not a fair comparison
It's not that they sucked, they just never pursued realism