Why did Celts have three different haplogroups? How to explain it

Why did Celts have three different haplogroups? How to explain it

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They are defined by polymorphisms that developed recently. There is not rocket science to it

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    U106 is overwhelmingly from Nord rape.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    U106 is overwhelmingly from Nord rape.

    [...]

    ???

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It is a bot.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >"western" europe
    >poland is not included while easttugal is

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >r1b
      >poland

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      poland's not western europe

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It ain't even Central Europe.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Only the blue is a Celtic clade, and there are way more r1b clades than that those are just the most prevalent ones. R1b-U152 is Ligurian for example

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      No, all the early Celts are U152. Check Patterson's paper.

      https://i.imgur.com/R1BePBU.jpg

      Why did Celts have three different haplogroups? How to explain it

      Because they didn't replace all of the local lineages upon celticization.
      Ireland barely changed at all until the historical era.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        What languages did the original L21 and DF27 speak?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Some dead-end Bell Beaker languages that would be incidentally closer to Italic/Celtic than other known IE languages.
          Lusitanian and Ligurian, among others, may have been in a similar situation.

          A lot of DF27 pre-Celtic Iberia was non-IE, too.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Tène_culture#Genetics
            >R1b1a1a2a1a2c1a1a1a1a1 (R-M222)
            It's L21. Explain pls.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            There is L21 native to France, but it's not the Celtic signature.
            https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19Gymz7VkuP7OcR8vr5WPjBxtf1Kj2MHRJUWJrMejjCI/edit#gid=0
            Majority of Knoviz (pre-Urnfield), Czech, Hungarian and French LaTene samples with sufficient coverage are U152.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I20519 is DF27 from Czech
            I19857 and I14861 are DF27 from England
            Explain?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            No clue about the Czech.
            There is atlantic geneflow throughout the bronze age so DF27 in England isn't too surprising.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Only the blue is a Celtic clade
      Why most of Gauls were U152, why celtiberians were DF27

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        No, all the early Celts are U152. Check Patterson's paper.
        [...]
        Because they didn't replace all of the local lineages upon celticization.
        Ireland barely changed at all until the historical era.

        It's pre-Celtic, not Celtic. Calling it early Celts doesn't make any sense.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >hey guys here's a language family
    >we could talk about cognates, grammaticalization, proto-Celtic dating and urheimat, even the Italo-Celtic hypothesis
    >HAHA NOPE
    >frick linguistics, lets sperg about genetics
    it's all so tiresome

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      it's always like this, every thread will eventually devolve into a sports competition involving haplogroups.
      be the change you want to see anon

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why did U106 hate all the other R1bs, historically speaking?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      same reason octopus punch fish I figure

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Their common ancestor lived at the same time as the ancestor of Z93 (Indians) and Z283 (Slavs).

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    R1a just feels more pure than R1b, sorry.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    There are zero z2103 in ancient greek samples.
    It's all R-PF7562.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >zero z2103
      Many M269 (xL51) which are this Armenian shit anyway.
      >ancient greek
      It's the dominant line in modern Magna Graecia so there either was an Armenian rape or it's just from Greeks.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    why do Norse myth have 3 distinct founding nationalities?
    (r1b, r1a, I1)

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I1 were a slavecaste, the beef is between branches of R1 as usual.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >slavecaste
        >thor had to disguise himself as a r1 troon like his zoophile uncle Loki just to get close enough to one of them.
        I'm sorry but.. r1 is troonclade, it's in the lore.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >meaningless babble
          Literally no dynasties with I1 in Europe.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Clan based societies develop clan exclusive lineages whenever one clan us succesful enough to proliferate

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    R1b originated in Europe, regardless if they left and came back, which is true for I as well. Doesn't matter what it was before that.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The same is true for R1a as well, it probably originated in Eastern Europe.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        R1b originated in Europe, regardless if they left and came back, which is true for I as well. Doesn't matter what it was before that.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The same is true for R1a as well, it probably originated in Eastern Europe.

          R1b originated in Europe, regardless if they left and came back, which is true for I as well. Doesn't matter what it was before that.

          Why do you care at all? Europeans are those who lived there since the Iron Age, not in the Stone Age.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            the ural mountains are the border of europe.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Because of the amount of misinformation there is about how these clades originated outsjde of it which is false when looking back to the stone age. As for the others, (E, G, J etc.) they were peripheral at best but I agree the Iron Age is the cutoff anyways.

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    celtic is a language group, not an ethnic group. the atlantic coast of europe stretching from ireland/scotland down to southern iberia was all interconnected through trade and language, but there were several relatively distinct ethnicities. very similar to each other on the grand scale of the globe though.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Different Bell Beakers cultures evolved isolated from each others but still maintained strong cultural/trading bounds. The irruption of the German cultural element was the greatest destroyer of the Atlantic cultural unity.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >the German cultural element
      See

      Their common ancestor lived at the same time as the ancestor of Z93 (Indians) and Z283 (Slavs).

      Celts aren't an actual genetic people, when will people get this. They're a linguistic cultural group. Nobody in Ireland for example was replaced by a bunch of mainland European Celts. They are the same pre-celtic stock that was on the Island for thousands of years.

      >aren't an actual genetic people
      See

      [...]

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Celts aren't an actual genetic people, when will people get this. They're a linguistic cultural group. Nobody in Ireland for example was replaced by a bunch of mainland European Celts. They are the same pre-celtic stock that was on the Island for thousands of years.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah? And who was living in Ireland and Scotland before the Vascones came? Or elsewhere in the islands even and before the Beakers even?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        some dumb weird buttholes that liked to push around rocks and didn't produce enough food for demographic power

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The Picts were other Beaker peoples so you're wrong.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not referring to the picts. I'm referring to the frickers that were hanging out there over 5k years ago. but yeah the "picts" liked to push around boulders too. scottish people still do weird stuff with rocks and have weird attitudes about them. it's actually something closer to fear and superstition than reverence.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            There were replacements from the mainland at least once. The Goidils did the Picts wrong mate

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      not exactly true about ireland, ireland had a lot of invasion and settlement from scandinavia around 1kya in particular. but the point you are making is true, as scandinavians aren't celtic and their invasions didn't eliminate the celtic stock you are referring to. but there is more scandinavian genetic material in ireland and scotland today than most people realize.

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    history didnt begin with the romans

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *