Why cant historians and anthropologists agree on whether the turkish are white or not?

Why can’t historians and anthropologists agree on whether the turkish are white or not?

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    because they are Muslims.
    "white" means Christendom, but it also means people with white skin.
    Turks are only one.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >but it also means people with white skin
      So no meds....

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      White means European. A black Christian with albinism is not White.

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >lust-provoking image

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Don’t forget the irrelevant time wasting question.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      [...]

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They should’ve absorbed Balkan women into their gene pool. Their language makes them think they’re more mixed than they actually are. Turkey is literally a bunch of Castizos.

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Historians and anthropologists don’t really consider race to be an objective category

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    As a white person, I personally label people white or not white, by anyone who is darker than the darkest tan I can get to be non white. By that standard, Turks are white.

    Blonde white northern european seal of approval*

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Turks are gigamutts

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Turks are White.

    Distance to: Swedish
    0.16798934 Turkish_Aydin
    0.17462025 Sardinian

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    historians and anthropologists do not usually ask stupid questions like this

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    White means Europeans and WANAs. Turks are West Asian, so they are White.

    White = English, French, German, Polish, Finnish, Spaniard, Croatian, Italian, Swedish, Greek, Saami, Lebanese, Irish, Turkish, Latvian, Circassian, etc.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You list a few people here that are not seen as being white by white people. Polacks are debatable. Turks are not white.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >English, German, Polish, Finnish, Croatian, Swedish, Irish, Latvian
      whites
      >French
      whites (northern), non-whites (southern)
      >Circassian, Spaniard, Italian, Greek, Saami, Lebanese, Turkish,
      non-whites

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    All Turkics are Eurasians, not merely white nor Asiatic but both

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because the Zaza was too strong, nobody debates if literal shitskins are white

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why do Turdroaches say they're White and 100% genetically asiatic?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      og turkics were white

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Historians and anthropologist don't think in terms of early modern colonial racism.

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because whiteness is an arbitrary category and who is and isn't white is usually decided by whoever is in power.

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Unless all of your ancestors for the past 8,000 years until 1492 have been living in the following area:

    -No further south than the 48th parallel north.
    -No further north than the 55th parallel north.
    -No further east than the 10th meridian east.
    -No further west than the 6th meridian west.

    You are not white, you can never be white, and your descendants will never be white.

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *