Because religious hypocrites hate everyone who doesn't think like them. This is because religious hypocrites think that heaven is something that they can earn by their good deeds, so become worried and angry when someone doesn't share their opinion.
But Christians, who have been saved by the gospel of Jesus Christ, love all and wish that everyone would be saved.
>For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
John 3:16
So, pic related is the gospel message, and I hope that you can share eternal life with every other sinner who has trusted in Christ alone for their salvation!
The pendulum of history swings both ways. Ten years ago atheists were dunking on Christians, now theists learned all the tricks and dunk back. It's a pointless but amusing back and forth.
>Belief, not mere thinking.
Satan wants to attack the gospel more than anything else in the world. He wants to redefine belief to mean works. He tries to convince people that belief doesn't really mean belief.
How does it feel to be an agent of satan? How does it feel to be a follower of Cain?
Is there evidence of God? No. "God" is, at best, an unsubstantiated theory. At worst it's just a load of crap that someone pulled from their arse. Maybe those two things are the same thing though.
You might as well believe that Bigfoot created the universe. There's just as much evidence for that theory as the "God" theory.
I'm not against atheism, I'm an atheist (I don't have a complex about it, I just don't think so), but internet atheists are so embarrassing I really can't deal with it. It's one thing to hear people botching an argument you disagree with, but when they make me sound stupid by association, it's hard to listen to.
Re: pic related, I'm a physicist, physics has no particular relevance to theism or atheism. I understand why people think so, but it's not true.
Physics is based on the positivist method and materialism. They contradict religion. Also, religions give their own picture of the world, which contradicts the modern scientific picture of the world
>Physics is based on the positivist method and materialism. They contradict religion.
It predates "positivism" by centuries minimum. And it's not "materialist", any more than mathematics is "numberist". It's the study of matter, it's not a philosophical position at all. And Newton, Gallileo, Kepler, and most every physicist you've ever heard of would be very surprised to learn that their work contradicted religion, because they were all believers.
Like, I get where this idea comes from, strip mall protestants who think religion will collapse if Moses didn't have a pet dinosaur will definitely agree with you loudly, but these people don't actually know anything.
>Why are you all so against atheism here?
Website giving all viewpoints the same visibility + mods that have been complacent with utter shit content for 7 years + board not pertaining to a subject where evidence actually matters = perfect recipe for maximizing retardation
>how do you explain scientists who are not atheists?
Easy: very few people apply the scientific method to stuff they're not trained to apply the scientific method to in college.
Of course there are many atheists who have moral attitudes.
Then how do you explain scientists who are not atheists? Do you have to certify as an atheist to practice science?
>Then how do you explain scientists who are not atheists?
Most often they come from societies where you have to be religious if you don't want to be ostracised. So they just go along with religion because they want to be able to do their work in peace without being harassed.
I'm a complete atheist, which includes rejecting modern feelings based """science""" as just another form of organized religion and social conditioning; only mathematics, physics and astronomy are still valid today
I don't think modern science is feelings based. Sure there are some topics that people don't want to use science for, like investigating racial differences (unless there are legitimate medical reasons to investigate certain racial differences).
There are indeed cultural reasons why people don't want to touch those topics. But maybe those cultural reasons are valid. Nobody wants to start a race riot.
Because religious hypocrites hate everyone who doesn't think like them. This is because religious hypocrites think that heaven is something that they can earn by their good deeds, so become worried and angry when someone doesn't share their opinion.
But Christians, who have been saved by the gospel of Jesus Christ, love all and wish that everyone would be saved.
>For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
John 3:16
So, pic related is the gospel message, and I hope that you can share eternal life with every other sinner who has trusted in Christ alone for their salvation!
The pendulum of history swings both ways. Ten years ago atheists were dunking on Christians, now theists learned all the tricks and dunk back. It's a pointless but amusing back and forth.
>believeth
Belief, not mere thinking.
>Belief, not mere thinking.
Satan wants to attack the gospel more than anything else in the world. He wants to redefine belief to mean works. He tries to convince people that belief doesn't really mean belief.
How does it feel to be an agent of satan? How does it feel to be a follower of Cain?
>He wants to redefine belief to mean works
He did. You have to go back.
How does it feel dismissing the Apostles?
>now theists learned all the tricks and dunk back.
No they don't lmao
There were at least 2 fedoranons this week who got schooled on burden of proof by theists lmao
doubt it
Hi, Worker. I can't believe Jesus is God. I'm going to hell if it's real.
I now believe in Jesus. Now brb I'm gonna goon to gay furry porn all week-end.
Cause atheism is just infinitely begging the question.
No, atheism is based on observation.
Is there evidence of God? No. "God" is, at best, an unsubstantiated theory. At worst it's just a load of crap that someone pulled from their arse. Maybe those two things are the same thing though.
You might as well believe that Bigfoot created the universe. There's just as much evidence for that theory as the "God" theory.
I'm not against atheism, I'm an atheist (I don't have a complex about it, I just don't think so), but internet atheists are so embarrassing I really can't deal with it. It's one thing to hear people botching an argument you disagree with, but when they make me sound stupid by association, it's hard to listen to.
Re: pic related, I'm a physicist, physics has no particular relevance to theism or atheism. I understand why people think so, but it's not true.
Physics is based on the positivist method and materialism. They contradict religion. Also, religions give their own picture of the world, which contradicts the modern scientific picture of the world
>Physics is based on the positivist method and materialism. They contradict religion.
It predates "positivism" by centuries minimum. And it's not "materialist", any more than mathematics is "numberist". It's the study of matter, it's not a philosophical position at all. And Newton, Gallileo, Kepler, and most every physicist you've ever heard of would be very surprised to learn that their work contradicted religion, because they were all believers.
Like, I get where this idea comes from, strip mall protestants who think religion will collapse if Moses didn't have a pet dinosaur will definitely agree with you loudly, but these people don't actually know anything.
Atheism is Jacobin
>Why are you all so against atheism here?
Website giving all viewpoints the same visibility + mods that have been complacent with utter shit content for 7 years + board not pertaining to a subject where evidence actually matters = perfect recipe for maximizing retardation
Atheism and science are two different things.
>Atheism and science are two different things.
Indeed. The former is downstream from the latter.
Then how do you explain scientists who are not atheists? Do you have to certify as an atheist to practice science?
>how do you explain scientists who are not atheists?
Easy: very few people apply the scientific method to stuff they're not trained to apply the scientific method to in college.
Of course there are many atheists who have moral attitudes.
>Then how do you explain scientists who are not atheists?
Most often they come from societies where you have to be religious if you don't want to be ostracised. So they just go along with religion because they want to be able to do their work in peace without being harassed.
I'm a complete atheist, which includes rejecting modern feelings based """science""" as just another form of organized religion and social conditioning; only mathematics, physics and astronomy are still valid today
I don't think modern science is feelings based. Sure there are some topics that people don't want to use science for, like investigating racial differences (unless there are legitimate medical reasons to investigate certain racial differences).
There are indeed cultural reasons why people don't want to touch those topics. But maybe those cultural reasons are valid. Nobody wants to start a race riot.
What does this have to do with history or humanities
>why are you all so against hell here?
Gee... I wonder...
Agnostics are the best