Why are the most talented software developers ALWAYS either deeply racist/homophobic tradcaths or a literal satanist otherkin trannies?
Why are the most talented software developers ALWAYS either deeply racist/homophobic tradcaths or a literal satanist otherkin trannies?
Why is water wet?
Water is not wet, water is moisture itself. Water + water = more water. Not wet water.
When I stick my hand in water it feels pretty wet.
Because your hand is wet. With water.
Yeah but the water is also wet which is why it makes my hand wet
No, the water is neither wet nor dry. The concept of moisture doesn't apply to water. Fire can be hot because heat without fire can exist, but water cannot be wet because there is no moisture without water. Water IS moisture, so it cannot be itself moist. You're dividing by zero.
I dunno man. It feels pretty wet.
I agree, my water over here feels pretty wet too.
>dip water detector in water
>it detects water
you hand feels wet because you made it wet with water. the water itself isn't wet, your hand is just covered in water.
it's like paint, see? wet paint! if you wash your hands with paint, they'll be wet too! WET! that's brilliant!
>
And capsaicin mixed with water isn't spicy.
You just proved his point.
How? Water isn't wet, water only makes other things wet. Water can't be imbued with water, that only gives you water. Cotton can be imbued with water, the result is moist cotton.
Absolutely this.
No liquid is wet.
A wet object is an object that is covered in a liquid. The liquid itself if not wet. Mixing two different liquids does not yield a wet liquid, but instead a mixture.
Actually yeah. Thats the definitive answer, matter states.
Liquids cannot be wet, gases cannot be wet. Only solids can be wet.
farts can be wet, farts are gasses.
a- anon... you know what a metaphor is, right?
I think you meant to say mixture.
I don't know what wordplay has to do with the butt-feel of a fart.
>i dont know what wordplay has to do with expressing how something feels
...really?
its one thing to describe something physically, but another to take creative liberties and employ figurative language (metaphors) to do so.
>Just because something feels wet doesnt mean it is.
why should I deny what is readily apparent about a material through interacting with it? I can't deny the concept of color, just because it isn't really a physical property of the material being observed, because there still is the phenomenon of color, and I'm constantly observing it.
>The human body has no sensors to feel wetness.
but things can feel wet, you say so yourself.
>why should I deny what is readily apparent about a material through interacting with it?
Because you do not posess a sense of wetness, and how the body approximates wetness is not reliable.
I touch wet soil, I can tell its wet. I spill a drink on my shirt, I feel wet. I see a hot chick, the precum makes my pants wet. I shart my pants, they're wet.
how are you to tell me I can't sense wetness when I clearly do.
Humans use other senses to approximate a wetness sense.
it just works.
Except when it doesnt
you'd make the ladies wet too if you stopped posting so many words.
I would rather make you wet
Farts aren't only gas, there's plenty of fecal matter being sprayed out of the asshole. It's more of an aerosol than a gas.
okay, so aerosols (solid+gas) can be wet; still no liquid though. fact is, any matter can be wet, even without the presence of a liquid.
>can be wet; still no liquid
Theyre not wet. We call them wet farts because they feel wet. Just because something feels wet doesnt mean it is.
The human body has no sensors to feel wetness. We can only feel the difference in temperature and texture.
A "wet fart" isnt wet.
>Theyre not wet.
They very much are, they're the prelude to sharts.
The wetness is not the gas being wet, though. Its liquid AND gas. Not wet gas.
Yes, and the fart that contains a certain amount of liquid is considered to be wet.
No, the fart does not contain any liquid. Humidity isnt wet air, its ALSO FUCKING GAS.
"Air" typically refers to both the gas of air and the vapour content. "Air humidity" refers to the amount of water vapour in the air.
Water vapor isnt a liquid
>inane argument about definitions
please shut up
>nooo stop talking about things I'm not interested in
not technology
yeah but it's related to the subject at hand because someone presented an analogy to the tech-related subject and we're now talking about whether or not that analogy works (it doesn't)
This argument died sometime in the 50s and is upheld by moronic lit graduates, if the H2O isn't wet then the H3O is and if neither can be then nothing saturated can truly be called wet.
>H30
This is a linguistics argument, not a physics argument. Kill yourself.
that's the dumbest fucking thing I've ever heard lmao
the problem is that wetness is defined by things that are NOT LIQUID being covered in or saturated in things that ARE LIQUID. a solid can be wet but a liquid cannot.
It works the same way as anything else. Genius is 99% perspiration. Super weirdos spend all of their time alone, fixating on a particular issue, and so they get really fucking good at it.
I would bet those two demographics also yield some of the best Harry Potter x Smurfs erotic fanfiction for the same reason, even though there's no overlap between that and software development.
Programming is just an activity like any other, it isn't magical or special in any way.
yet to see black john carmack, quit being cringe and accept race theory
Yo, let's get some shit straight from the jump, senpai! Word on the street is that I met up with Zuckerberg last week and we got down to brass tacks. Me and Mike Abrash sat down wit' him and we hashed out where Facebook's role ends and Oculus starts, ya dig? We all agreed on where each other's lane was, so don't nobody be getting it twisted. It's all good between us.
Man, lemme tell y'all, them Chrome bars be killin' the game, ain't no doubt bout dat. I used ta work over at Armadillo Aerospace, testin' out dem controls for a little spacecraft. I was thinkin', damn, 20 years gone an' controllin' gravity still seem like some futuristic shit. But den I seen dem Chrome bars, an' now I know anythang possible if ya put yo mind to it, feel me? Damn right, killin' folks is a science these days, just gimme my trusty Chrome bar an' watch me make it happen, haha! #BlessUp
Yo, lemme tell ya 'bout dis shit. I done been talkin' ta dese peoples 'n they ain't even solve da prob yet! Can yah believe dat?
"Aight, so check it out bruh. I be doin' ma thang, ya know, readin' up on all these cases of serial killas an' sheit. An' den I'm thinkin', yo, dis ain't workin'. All da ideaz is dere, but da tech ain't ready, ya feel me?"
So yeah, man, wack sitchayshun wit Facebuk, brah. Me n' Mike Abrash goes way back ta de Q-LAN days, ya dig? I convinced dat brotha ta come work Wit' me an' we made some real moves togetta, knowumsayin'? It's been hella profitable fo' sho' homie.
Alrigh', check it out bruh. We gonna take a lil break 'n' focus on wat's really importan' for da users, ya hear? Dis weeken' I took on a li'l side projec' makin' sure FB's backend servas runnin' smooth wid Winsock, ya dig? Took me a coupla houz, deployzed it on a lit'le AWS T2 instanc' an' shiet. Maybe we shoulda used some mem'ry-safe func'onal lang'age like Racket, but at da endda day, I'ma stick wit whachu know, cuzz it's imp'tan' da whole team can read 'n' mainte'n da codebase movin' foward, homes.
Lack of evidence against something is not evidence for it.
oh yeah?
>tradcath
get in the woodchipper
The oestrogens from the thinkpad makes you gay.
There is a secret third option.
>the gamergate guy isn't obviously on the satanist otherkin side
lol okay, there is a third option but its not phil. its called being coldly corporate and being all in it for the money
>a hippie
developing good programming skills require autism, autists are highly vulnerable to extremist politics
Are they? Or are you taking a few odd examples of each and projecting it to the entire population?
>entire population
I'm not talking about the entire population. Most programmers are normal people. But the most astoundingly talented ones who pull off the most impressive things on their own are usually either Terry A Davis types or Maia Arson Crimew types. No exceptions.
What about that french guy who made qemu and ffmpeg?
you just answered your own question
Autism.
Social interaction = less time at the computer
To look at computation in a unique way, you must first have a completely unique mental model of the world that surrounds that. This goes for anything else.
terry wasnt super talented
his OS and his language were pretty simplistic
An idiot admires complexity
Which is more impressive, a car with a v6 engine or a wooden cart?
Obviously, a wooden cart if it can perform the same as a car with v6 engine. That would be alien science and tech.
found the idiot
The most talented people are on either side of the spectrum, schizophrenics on one side and psychopaths on the other with NPC’s in between.
>schizophrenics on one side and psychopaths on the other
They have in common that they don't give a fuck about NPCs, but for different reasons.
Schizos just are more interested in their work than in looking at others, and psychos legitimately see the world as their playground and hunting grounds.
Name an example of satanist otherkin tranny that is also one of the most talented software developers.
me
terry wasn't racist, he was just surrounded by cia glownaggers
okay, then weev
whatever happened to weev?
Pattern recognition.
:^ )
None of the id guys were any of these things. They were objectively the best devs in all of history.
Another example of one of the most underrated and amazing devs who ever lived.
>converted Doom to snes
>created a PSX emulator for Dreamcast
Deeply racist homophobic theocrat from the deep autism pits here. I've written my own microkernel and my own compiler for it and my own verilog processor to run it.
It's because I'm actually insane. Pic related.
HH?
Was he really all that talented, though? You stupid shits just worship him because he said "nagger" a lot. He was also cripplingly schizophrenic.
He was talented in one field and that was developing software for the Commodore 64. He never really advanced beyond 1987
>have you made your own compiler?
>have you built an OS alone in your mom's basement?
>have you been inspired to build a temple out of software?
If no, you are not equipped for discussing his level of talent.
you're right anon. we need to do something about the extreme politics of torvalds.
You haven't met many devs
I haven't seen a talented developer being racist , homophobic or satanic trannies. Ken Thompson, Donald Knuth, Sedgewick, Steven Skiena etc are all decent people.
Can you name a few talented developers and what they discovered, or contributed to CS that fit into your given criteria?
I love how this thread got turned into a discussion about water
Because they have divine intellect from god
>satanists have divine intellect from god
um