She is being promoted despite questioning certain scientific orthodoxies like climate change.
https://youtube.com/@SabineHossenfelder
Who is Sabine Hasenpfeffer?
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI
— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
Because she is pushing other things israelites want like sexual promiscuity.
And 15 minute cities
and hip 3 minute ditties
because the HOOK BRINGS YOU BAAACK
>https://youtube.com/@SabineHossenfelder
lol paid shills lmao
all rdy youtube channels
100k views
no one watches that old hag
try harder topkek
I watch her, lots of LULZ watch her.
Just because you're retarded doesn't mean everybody else is.
But this is /misc/ so I expect most of you to be dumb as fuck anyway.
ironically only right wing channels are paid shills.
The bitch likes to run her goddamn mouth on topics she has no expertise in, and dumb fucks just believe her because she is a 'scientist'
Scientists now have become nothing more than a modern form of priests.
fax
Basically like Jordan Peterson. He was a middling professor who had a decent knowledge of Jung, maybe more than most as most people don't give a shit about Jung these days. That's about it then he started pretending to know anything about post modernism(not that it deserves being studied) and trying to be a philosopher priest
>Jungian here
His knowledge of Jung isnt even as good as you think, he often completely misinterprets many of Jungs aspects like the Shadow the Collective Unconscious and Puer Aeterni. He mostly grasps archetypes and personality typology. The rest he just bullshits through
>The bitch likes to run her goddamn mouth on topics she has no expertise in, and dumb fucks just believe her because she is a 'scientist'
She seems to give a good overview at the level an intelligent layperson can understand. If you've watched any graduate level teaching videos, there are too many new concepts coming too quickly on too narrow of a specialty.
Your mileage apparently varies from mine. Have you turned in your guns yet?
When that happens, I click on the x widget at the upper right hand corner.
Youtube intentionally pushes these poos to the top
>Scientists now have become
Dude her video series is wayyyy better than the previous system which was the same "priests" but even when they know it will hurt you they have to shut the fuck up and shill you the clot shot (or they get their lives ruined).
You will never stop the NPC from turning the 110 IQ grifter class into their priests , whatever form that takes
What was she wrong about?
Im a fan of superdeterminism even though it's really just determinism with a cape because QM is retarded.
sabine is one of the only public physicists who routinely defends determinism as a theory because she's not addicted to free will like the vampires who run academia.
shout out dr. hassenfelder.
Based
also
>Sabine's nipples
She shows her nipples? Got any links?
If you try to observe them they won't be there.
Quantumtits
Based.
Copenhagen homosexuals preach their theories like it's true, but never mention that it's actually still an equal playing field vs. Bohmian Mechanics.
The principal of least action directly correlates with the Copenhagen interpretation for the quantum behavior of a photon. Quantum entanglement has been verified multiple times and is a direct result of Einsteins critiques of the Copenhagen interpretation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%E2%80%93Podolsky%E2%80%93Rosen_paradox
This effectively says that since we cannot measure energy and position at the same time, then if you have two particles which originate from the same location they must communicate with one another to prevent you from performing two measurements and tracing back. Turns out they do.
String theory doesn't match any model anymore than someone saying "God does this this so it's true". There's a lot of hidden mechanisms in string theory that are used to explain why particles behave a certain way. It's not that impressive. The plum pudding model explained atoms perfectly too but it was still wrong when we got more info. Untestable theory = religion.
None of that is in violation with de-Broglie-Bohm-Theory in its latest form, homosexual.
>de broilee
tell that frog to change how his name is spelled if he wants people to pronounce it correctly
>Pilot wave theory
I don't have enough autism to give a shit.
I appreciate your candor.
>String theory doesn't match any model anymore than someone saying "God does this this so it's true".
Many-worlds theory too, may as well look for the most unfalsifiable answer possible, point to it and say "well in that case, THAT must be what is really happening since all our theories so far are consistent with it"
If she's being promoted, it's only because she's le stronk science woman telling the boys how stupid they are. What her promoters might end up regretting is failing to notice she is a german autist and will probably say something non globohomo approved one day and they she will be unpersoned.
>Many-worlds theory
Is the worst thing to happen to science since Kripke's "Possible Worlds" nonsense happened to philosophy.
>Copenhagen homosexuals preach their theories like it's true, but never mention that it's actually still an equal playing field vs. Bohmian Mechanics
Absolutely the Pilot wave theory explains so much, although it is non-local, I can accept that maybe there is one more dimension. At least it is still deterministic.
Superdeterminism is even better: it is the only serious theory that can be both deterministic, local, obey the Bell's inequalities and it is the ONLY theory that sufficiently explains retrocausality.
>I don’t touch the free will stuff because I view it as a non issue, but superdeterminism still feels very contrived to me.
>superdeterminism (which is just determinism rebranded so people will re-assess it in light of the QM-accepted world we live in) -- is no less contrived than assuming the universe has a random number generator built into it that only happens on a sub-particle scale
I don't understand why so many people believe in the Simulation theory and so few in Superdeterminism: in a perfect computer simulation, correcting for the CPU entropy, isn't everything superdeterministic?
The is no free-will, there is not random, there is no infinite, the is no infinitesimal, there is no "nothing".
"Die ganzen Zahlen hat der liebe Gott gemacht, alles andere ist Menschenwerk."
-Kronecker
I don’t touch the free will stuff because I view it as a non issue, but superdeterminism still feels very contrived to me.
superdeterminism (which is just determinism rebranded so people will re-assess it in light of the QM-accepted world we live in) -- is no less contrived than assuming the universe has a random number generator built into it that only happens on a sub-particle scale
Maybe that's the deterministic silicon-programmer in me, but yeah, idk, random doesnt seem to exist on the macro, so the idea that random on the micro is how everything works is no less contrived than "alice and bob were guaranteed to run that exact experiment and thats why their results are entangled, because they have no free will, so no other results were ever possible"
It's not really a "random number generator" so much as the mathematics forces it to be predictably random. The idea is really just that the points of energy we call particles are just ripples in a fabric in the same way that the ripples of energy in their bosonic fabric are. They behave just like waves and when we measure them, their behavior is the exact same was waves. There's no information that we've gathered about particle physics that can't be explained in a Hamiltonian. There's smaller things, like what the fuck mass actually is or what the fuck spin is. (no one knows what spin really is, they're just fucking lying. There is literally no reason why magnetic fields appear when a charged particle moves through space or why the magnetic field specifically reacts to the weak force but the electric field does not.), but the particle behavior is well explained through Copenhagen.
The only real problem with the solution you're advocating is that the solution, VERY ODDLY AMONG SCIENTIFIC SOLUTION I MAY ADD, requires that there be no undiscovered unknown hidden variables in order for the solution to work.
Right? I mean maybe i'm wrong but i'm under the interpretation that the Copenhagen interpretation must be considered "complete" and cannot be missing anything.
As a human, looking at humans, how good are the odds do you figure that we've actually managed to distill all the variables.
If I massively misinterpret the Copenhagen QM bruhaha and its requirement of no as-of-yet-unknown hidden variables, please do enlighten me.
I basically write off the entire thing because I assume it is impossible for humans to say for certainty that no variable beyond our ability to detect could be at play. Its utter hubris and sort of the shining example of what I assume will eventually destroy all of 18-19-20th century Academia-led human progress.
>t. uneducated laymen with an interest in reality's core function and rules
to distill that rant down
my monkey brain doesn't care how neatly Copenhagen solves the problem of the observed phenomena, it cares that Copenhagen requires completeness to be correct which I assume is just very unlikely so we should look elsewhere while we also obviously pursue Copenhagen to it's logical conclusions and proof of incorrectness.
But it builds this zealous church around itself that any scientist should be aghast to be a part of, that is undeniable.
The reality is that even if you knew exactly what was going on down there, down to the letter, to the exact mathematics and to the exact behavior of the universe, it would not answer a single one of life's questions. You'd just know the stupid nature of particles, which honestly might as well be unknown because everything in life will remain the same. We'll still be destroying each other's lives, we'll still fuck up the planet (even without climate change), we'll still find excuses to kill one another. Maybe we'll invent a new bomb or a computer that will figure out how to torture people for a thousand years in their brain (despite one second actually passing), or maybe we'll invent sex toys that pretend to be children or maybe we'll reduce aging and you'll get to fuck your grandma in her 20 year old body, but at the end of the day we'll still be filthy, disgusting, flawed human beings who shouldn't have existed in the first place.
Instead of looking into nature for life's questions, try to answer them yourself. Then get others to follow you and create a cult that worships a sun God, at least then you'll have a community and some degree of happiness in life.
are you ok, fren?
<3
I have a degree in physics, and I still have to deal with homosexuals and simps in the work place. I've realized that there is literally nothing in this life that forces people to be a homosexual or a simp, and that instinct/culture/consequence/etc are all bullshit compared to the limitless freedom one really has. The reality is that nothing matters beyond what you decide matters, and at the end of the day it's your decision and not destiny.
Instead of getting more ammo for understanding the world, you should buy more ammo to defend yourself against raiders when our govt collapses.
>The reality is that nothing matters beyond what you decide matters, and at the end of the day it's your decision and not destiny.
Well, maybe, but don't you want to know it just out of principle? I mean, isn't that the point of science to begin with, as it is engineering that is the field that attempts to make science useful?
Not anymore. I'm thinking I might get a masters degree in material science but that's it. If I spent my entire life trying to understand what's going on, I'd just help malicious bastards create better ways to kill my friends or those who would be my friends.
I'd rather we had a solution to end war and bloodshed than a unifying solution for QM.
Well that's simple, depose the vampires running the universities so they stop feeding children to their blood god.
We don't even have to kill them we can just put em on a farm or something far away from here.
yeah spooks all sound like you, you guys are a borg or some shit.
anyway, that post was more than enough ammo needed to continue ignoring Copenhagen QM. Thanks for your service, I will continue on my previous mission to figure out how shit works.
I am not gonna pretend my bias are not mostly aesthetics based, but I do think the term superdeterminism is warranted, because it is a lot more than just basic emergent determinism, and it's not clear to me where it's coming from. I do leave the door open to it, but until the idea is more substantial, QM with all its messes is still more appealing.
Yeah, the idea that we're doing more than watching a movie we can't interact with is obviously going to be appealing to a lot of people 😀
I'm enjoying the movie, personally. And in my experience, whether I believe in free will or not is inconsequential to the illusion of free will that I use to navigate normal life.
The wildest thing is that most people in the entire Asian continent probably don't think they have free will and they all get along fine without it. It's a western obsession to keep that shit in play, and it's rooted in punishing each other for "being bad" which we can't have if no one is really making choices.
>The wildest thing is that most people in the entire Asian continent probably don't think they have free will and they all get along fine without it. It's a western obsession to keep that shit in play, and it's rooted in punishing each other for "being bad" which we can't have if no one is really making choices.
Thank you for this, it made me realize a thing or two (grew up in Asia to expat parents).
>yeah spooks all sound like you, you guys are a borg or some shit.
Anti-scientists masquerading as the opposite, it's quite ironic actually.
No, again this is not an issue of free will for me. I don't have a problem with determinism, QM becomes deterministic at scale as we obviously live in a deterministic world. But the degree to which the "conspiracy" extends in superdeterminism feels suspect, to the extent that QM's randomness substrate comes across as more sensible.
>QM becomes deterministic at scale as we obviously live in a deterministic world
Counter-argument: Chaos theory?
I get it, theres lots of folks who just see it as a the best most complete solution, but again that's my main detractor from it.
Clearly none of us can say for certain, but I will stick on the point that the necessity of "completeness" is a major problem for the feasibility of the proposal because historically we've never actually been completely correct about *anything* as a species. So it's... an issue. It assumes a HUGE amount of hubris for the sake of an elegant solution.
With that said, I think the idea that QM at scale is deterministic is.... not usually supported by folks on your side of the aisle, and maybe thats like more of a pilot wave kind of idea? I'm truly not learned, but I dont think QM is usually viewed as deterministic at any scale (absent pilot waves or something).
The conspiracy of superdeterminism, I will again reiterate but I understand we're just prosing for prose sake so the AI can suck up some good language usage here: is no less unbelievable than the conspiracy of QM being complete.
But that is where we will have to end because we dont know enough. Really appreciate the reply though, in my opinion this is the only topic humans should be actively interested in figuring out -- and so few are.
kein problem bruder!
>Im a fan of superdeterminism
Me too, I have got spooked when I saw a broad talking about superdeterminism and "there is no free will", I started looking for the obvious signs: Adam's apple PASS, Voice SHE IS GERMAN, ultimately I think she really is a biological woman, maybe she just read the scripts her husband/lover writes for her.
>even though it's really just determinism with a cape
First it was called Determinism, then some homosexual came up with the idea that not everything is deterministic so we had to call it "Hard Determinism" then again ...... more bullshit so we must change the name again to Superdeterminism, I find that unfair, why don't they call their ideas Quasi-Determinism or Trans-Determinism. Anyway yes I am Cis Deterministic.
>because QM is retarded.
QM is worse than retarded, it is purposefully obscurantist, it is Jüdische Physik!
she also notably thinks giving particle physicists unlimited budgets to drill circles under continents is a poor use of public funding, and I have to say that's a pretty strong argument given how little public good has come out of the LHC (aside from collapsing our entire universe into a broken sim that can't render 1/1000th of the shit it used to)
>questioning certain scientific orthodoxies like climate change
She's not questioning the climate change, rather the media coverage and the way the academy works
Potholer54 is good for that too. Getting into how much actual research has been mis-represented and lied about by the media for both hysteria or denialist purposes.
Yeah I like potholer54 too
>Potholer54 is good for that too. Getting into how much actual research has been mis-represented and lied about by the media for both hysteria or denialist purposes.
>Yeah I like potholer54 too
He sure appears to bend the knee for the covid establishment line, picrel. Gonna be good to see him walk that back.
>She's not questioning the climate change, rather the media coverage and the way the academy works
Climate change is the third rail in academic circles. So is disputing "safe and effective." narrative. Here in Leaf we used to call these shibboleths "sacred cows" but that might be considered racist cultural appropriation these days.
She's been a contrarian in the physics community for years. Notable for being so even.
Some stuff she's right on, Dark Energy probably not existing for one. Others she isn't. Her love of MOND is less wise.
Thats where her name and infamy comes from mostly.
Does actually publish relevant original research, so she isn't a moron.
But she's otherwise not pushing boundaries, beyond being smarter than the average Sci-tuber.
EinSHtein himself backed a couple things people turned out to not think were correct.
The whole apparatus of understanding the Universe through the lens of humanity is poisoned by demons who've been tasked to keep the sims inside the simulation.
Sabine's line of logic follows a basic concept which is that if you drop an apple from a tree, whether it's 1 time or 1 trillion times, that apple will never fall upward.
The extrapolation of QM and anything with spooky action at a distance being conveyed as realtime info, and anything down the direction of dark matter is that none of that shit makes sense to the monkey brain that got us this far.
Odds are, the shit is wrong. Chances are we can't really grasp at a better answer, but the way the demons in academia coalesce around incorrect answers is why a character like Sabine has to advocate for pretty much ANYTHING that seems to closer align with our observed subjective human experience over this woo-woo-infinite-dimensions-of-god-playing-dice bullshit that gets passed around as "our best guess as humans so far"
>Dark Energy probably not existing for one.
Electric Universe FTW!
Still a israeli bitch repeating the usual narratives about everything else.
> LENR
Isn't this a israeli scam to discredit other nuclear experiments?
CIA knows that if everyone is a farmer, then no one is waiting tables.
And someone has to wait tables.
WHAT DID HE MEAN BY THIS
She ain't bad but talks way out of her paygrade tbh
Huh, I didn't write "desu"
absolute newfag
she will be removed when she gets too much attention
She's got some fairly interesting ideas against orthodox scientific understanding, specifically centered around calling out pop sci bullshit about string theory, pilot wave theory, dark matter, etc. Effectively bs that can't be tested and is treated like a religion by Niel "big smoke" Degrasse Tyson and Michio Kaku. She makes redditors seethe, which is always based in my book.
It's not BS that can't be tested but even if it was its worth thinking about. But it's true some of it should be separated from hard science even more
String theory, Pilot wave theory and Dark matter are all bs that cannot be tested. String theory in particular has no evidence beyond the mathematics making sense. You know what else makes sense in the mathematics? Magnetic monopoles. But nature doesn't give a shit.
Isn't that the point though, the model matches reality in predictions, it isn't supposed to explain what reality is actually. But pop sci ppl spread that lie that you seem to be falling for .
i'm not even into cannabis, just into growing plants, but what the fuck is this, those plants are fucking infested and probably diseased.
when a physicist hits the intellectual wall they pivot to writing pop sci. sagan, that one harvard guy, the jap hippy, black science man, and this broad.
ONE SHOT AT LIFE SOMETIMES YOU JUST HAVE TO GUESS
An autistic semen demon...
>She is being promoted despite questioning certain scientific orthodoxies like climate change.
She did a fair (balanced) video on low energy nuclear reactions. (LENR) She likes to skate on the edge.
Her hair is curly and her eyes are close together. Is she tribe?
>She likes to skate on the edge.
this is true.
>Her hair is curly and her eyes are close together. Is she tribe?
Germanic, 100%
no clue if rouge kike dna.
doesn't seem like it though, she has toe head kids and they all have blue-ish eyes
>Germanic, 100%
At least she doesn't (I think) have hairy moles or strange fleshy protrusions from her face. The Fraulein/Frau wall tends to hit quite hard for some.
No she definitely looks like a man. German female confirmed.
sheeeit look at how low her ears are under her eyes
Honestly she fits in here. I'm pretty sure she's autistic. She definitely acts like an autist.
>I'm pretty sure she's autistic. She definitely acts like an autist.
NGL, seeing an autistic girl explaining things gives me fells of the rope in gym class.
>TFW I'll never get to create a master race of pale skinned, blue eyed super autists with a high IQ German Aspie.
>questioning certain scientific orthodoxies like climate change
You have not watched her at all ever have you, retard?
My opinion is greater than or equal to yours.
What do you mean questioning? She's only talked about the fact that waste heat is also a problem that magic tech like fusion wont fix. It's also why people like Elon Musk who say the world can handle 100X as many humans are actually just accelerationist trying to push the world into WEF hands completely.
Superdeterminism is true there is no statistical independence, no randomness everything is infinitely predetermined, yes even this shitty thread.
Too bad he's a man
her youtube show is unwatchable. caters to the absolute lowest most braindead youtube user. case in point, little "pop" sounds when graphics/text appears on the screen. totally irredeemable, i will NEVER watch any of her content.
I only watch her music videos.
My israelitedar went off immediately with how utterly stupid her deboonk of the quantum slit delayed eraser experiments was.
Youtube promotes midwits as part of its algorithm developed my midwits.
>despite questioning certain scientific orthodoxies like climate change
You do realise it's perfectly ok to "question" climate change, right? You just have to ask sensible questions.
She just was unclear about the mechanism of climate change and chased the explanation down to it's source. She even said herself that "stratospheric cooling" was a key prediction of climate change which strongly suggests that the theory is true.
uncanny valley every single time i see her speaking.
I'm surprised no one here is has mentioned dissidentscience. When I went down the rabbit hole the one thing that I began to question was "science". I didn't realize how "science" and most "scientists" can be just as close minded as religious people.
I just watch her for the terrible german humor.
Controlled opposition. Avoid at all costs
Uh bros why was LULZ down for six hours?
>listening to a women
No, thank you.
She didnt question it, she just reclarified scientific misconceptions about the connection between CO2 and global warming. Her views on the results are still aligned with the church of climate change.
I guess she took the vax
>scientific orthodoxies like climate change.
Reminder that anyone who believe is co2 catastropheism is an absolute retard that has no understanding of science much less climate science
Her take on flat earth is actually pretty interesting and nuanced. She acknowledged that science has a legitimate problem with appeal to authority and most most scientists don't use empirical evidence for their conclusions.
She also thinks theoretical physicists are largely full of shit, that big science projects are a politicized waste of money, and pop science is completely inane.
She's german and makes other kiked scientists seethe, can't be that bad.
I find the video interesting and while she is dry presenter, she brings the facts across as I believe she finds them.
That is the problem.
I have heard her talk about "facts" from governments. She just presents without further balance.
This is why I cannot take her video's truthfully. She seems intelligent so she has to know lots of the data she is providing serves a purpose far greater than her propagandized youtube channel.
If she doesn't, she a useful idiot.
Pretty good vid. Numbers are and stat's are highly (pun intended) questionable. I would not use her information as reference material.
Sabine is so cute. I love her.
She looks like Neil Breen.
She does make a couple of good points.
She's a globe shill
Do you know that phenomenon where you think you're learning good information from a source, until that source talks about a subject you're an expert in and you realize they have no idea what she's talking about?
Seems to be the theme of the 2020s that the most incompetent of any field become financially the most successful by making a business out of writing about how their colleagues are ignorant.