LULZ / Misc

Who else used to be impressed by the Russian military?

Russians are crazy smart and I have always been impressed with their creativity and how diabolical some of their weapons systems are. I used to think they actually had all that tech, but when you start to add it up, from Armatas that don’t start, their broken carrier and it’s 4 planes, and now the overall performance of their army all the arrows seem to point to the same thing. I think they might have been full of shit. Great psyop though.

  1. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    they're broke, n-word, you going to float them the necessary cash for innovations? this isn't the 1920s, you can't convince intelligent people to create new shit for free.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      >amerigoblin doesn't understand anything but "PAY ME"
      Yeah same, but only because I have to share a country with animals like you.

  2. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Our army is a money laundering machine and it accomplishes it's tasks as one excellently

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      I was a conference some months ago, a retired 3 star general was speaking and he said something that stuck with me. He predicted that the RA would fall back on its strength, artillery, but then he mentioned how formidable many Soviet generals were and how much they were respected, even in the west. He claimed no such counterpart exists today in the Russian army.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        you think muttmerica has any military leaders now thar are worth a shit?

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Unlike you Sivan, we have a professional army. You have Putin’s fuckboys. Oh yeah, and our shit actually works as advertised. Nice canon cameras though bro.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >and our shit actually works as advertised.
            like the F-35?

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              The F35 is an amazing aircraft by all objective standard and constantly wins out in direct competition with every other aircraft is put up against. Thats why every country offered some jumps at the opportunity to order some. You chose old stale memes over things that actually are scams like the littoral combat ship.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                its a piece of overpriced shit like the osprey

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Its not tho. Like I said you're regurgitating memes from 15 years ago and not reflecting reality. Its not vaporware like supposed advanced russian designs or cardboard mockups like what china puts together and nobody takes a second look at. The F35 is constantly winning performance competitions across in the world by airforces looking for new stuff. It shows your ignorance when in of all things you think the US is weak in airpower.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                competitions don't mean shit will see what its like when its in combat

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Against what? Russia's non existent airforce?

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Against an S-500 for one.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Another under performing system as this war has shown.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                You can’t even shut down Ukrainian airspace. Your AA is formidable, but if you can shut down Ukrainian airspace, you don’t stand a chance against a real military. Facts.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                With NATO, there's gonna be counter-AA first, spamming decoys and standoff weapons. Ukraine has given good practical data on real life capabilities of these platforms. They are capable in terms of range, suck for low flying aircraft, lack good target hand-off between individual units, can't ID for shit - but the last one we already knew.
                Go for the Baltics already homosexuals.

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                We first need to build more hypersonic nukes and nuclear torpedoes to take out NATO fleet and coastal infrastructure, then we will take the baltics without a shot fired because America won't protect them

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                [log in to view media]

                >S-500
                You do know it's an ABMS, not a SAM, right jungle chud? Based on the performance of all the other Russian AA/SAM, I don't have much confidence in it actually working. Don't they cost like $600m? How are they going to field them in any useful numbers? Can you show me one operational S-500 unit in the Russian arsenal? Or are we talking future weapons?

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                They did protect a 40 miles long convoy near Kiev.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Su 35 mogs everything you have by price/performance. Now imagine russia + china teaming up and producing like 1000 of those per month.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                No it doenst. All ten of them aren't mogging anything. The Russian airforce has been conspicuous only by the rarely of its appearances in this war. By the way the chink versions they tried to build for their carriers had a 50% crash rate. Thats why they moved on to local designs.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                You mean the one with the thermal signature of a mini-sun bc of oversized exhaust and that got wrecked by a 9К37 Бyк system from 1979 in Kharkov ?

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                No it doenst. All ten of them aren't mogging anything. The Russian airforce has been conspicuous only by the rarely of its appearances in this war. By the way the chink versions they tried to build for their carriers had a 50% crash rate. Thats why they moved on to local designs.

                Su 35 has been shown to consistently outperform anything besides maybe f 22, and for a price of one raptor you get what - 3-5 su 35?

                This is like airborne version of kursk where t-34 mogs everything by price and efficiency.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Its outperformed nothing tho. We've seen the russian airforce in action. Its rarely shows up at all and when it does its not especially effective. Its not the t34 of the sky in either numbers or combat effectiveness.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                [log in to view media]

                >Su 35 has been shown to consistently outperform anything besides maybe f 22
                Yet, Ukraine can down them. And proof?

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                Poor dude walked into it lmao

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                >Su 35 mogs everything
                No, it doesn't. This isn't an air show nor WWII gramps. Dogfighting and aerobatics won't save it. Aren't the Ukrainians downing them anyway?

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                Its outperformed nothing tho. We've seen the russian airforce in action. Its rarely shows up at all and when it does its not especially effective. Its not the t34 of the sky in either numbers or combat effectiveness.

                Cope. Why not establish a NATO no-fly zone in Ukraine then? Come and find out)))

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                No need. Russia already cant effectively operate in ukrainian airspace.

              • 1 week ago
                Anonymous

                [log in to view media]

                >Why not establish a NATO no-fly zone in Ukraine then?
                No need to. Russia is afraid to fly their planes in Ukrainian airspace, and lobe missile from Russian. LMAO.

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                So that is why NATO is moving troops and Germany rearming. Because Russia is weak. Russia is dearming NATO and Ukraine army all at once.

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                That said I am not saying Ukraine is winning. But the Russian spin that NATO is fighting in Ukraine to have excuse of their shortcomings is the cope of the century.
                I can't wait for Putin to fuck up and try to force his way to Lithuania. Just to try what are real NATO battlegroups.

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                I don't think NATO is even a real thing anon. It mostly seems to exist on paper only. If push comes to shove I think NATO will disintegrate and completely dissolve.

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                NATO is commanding and arming Ukraine, thus Russia is fighting NATO by proxy.

                How did NATO do in Syria where russia was assisting Assad? 10 years and Assad is still president.

                But you never wanted to overthrow him am i right?

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                How NATO is commanding ZSU ? They literaly have to beg to stop using tochka-U and helo raids into russian territory (both aren't nato weapons btw)
                There is literaly no NATO made tanks, helos, planes or ships in Ukraine.

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                After the coup in 2014 Ukraine is governed by Washington ultimately. For example, a law to prohibit russian was passed which makes absolutely no sence for Ukraine as 95% of Ukrainians speak russian.

                NATO has consistently confirmed to train, supply, operate and supervise Ukrainian forces.

                https://www.rt.com/op-ed/491730-ukraine-nato-partnership-colonization/

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                >Since 2015, there has been a positive trend in the number of NATO exercises, in which staff officers and units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine have participated as observers and participants. The Armed Forces of Ukraine participated in 5 NATO exercises in 2018 and in 6 – in 2019, 1 – in 2020 (due to the pandemic of COVID-19). In 2021, Ukraine plans to participate in 11 NATO exercises.

                https://nato.mfa.gov.ua/en/ukraine-and-nato/nato-ukraine-cooperation-peace-support-operations

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                I train with dudes who are pro rugby players, they gave me t-shirts and jersey. So I am part of the team right ?

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                If they "train, supply, operate and supervise" your team then yes - you are being coached by them and as far as a coach can be considered part of the team, part of the team.

                I never claimed Ukraine was a NATO member, just that NATO wages war by proxy.

                They send the Ukrainians first and couple that with economical blockade in the hopes of weakening Russia for the upcoming first strike. So far it's not working.

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                >rt

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                Such a nonsense source you have to prohibit it just in case am i right?

                All hail freedom of speech.

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                https://www.bitchute.com/video/WBjU0JgBIuUS/

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                holy mother of cope
                "we are not fighting Ukraine, we are fighting NATO"
                You clowns are the fucking best

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                You even understand what a proxy is?

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                do you understand what getting support is?
                Oh wait, even China and Khazachstan told you to fuck off, nvm.

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                go scam some foreigners in your town square retard
                this is the literaly definition of a proxy war

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                eat a dick, you are getting BTFO by an army that trained for 8 years because you turned your own into a fucking circus by stealing everything that isn't bolted down like all russians love to do

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                >btfo by having 20% of your territory occupied
                Ukraine should btfo Russia some more

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                >20% of territory taken is the best the Russia can do against Ukraine after 4 months
                how are you losses Ivan
                Get the fuck out of here, clown

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                Considering the primary goal is to capture and secure exactly this territories, I'd say Russia is doing good.

                Just for comparison - they defend land the size of two Czechias.

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                >two Czechias
                How much is that in football fields?

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                23,666,587

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                about 3 fifty

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                Support for 8+ years before the start of the war?
                Ok, it seems like you don't understand what a proxy war is.

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                Imagine that, people support someone that is getting invaded instead of waiting for the start of NEXT INVASION, holy fuck are you dumb

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                Stop, or remove that blue triangle and reveal your inner polan already.

                Supporting someone during war, especially with offensive weapons, is part of waging war by proxy.

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                holy fuck the low IQ takes today are fucking wild, so let me lay it out for you
                DEFENSIVE SUPPORT =/= PROXY WAR
                Russia invaded Ukraine, simple as

                Considering the primary goal is to capture and secure exactly this territories, I'd say Russia is doing good.

                Just for comparison - they defend land the size of two Czechias.

                >primary goal
                fuck outta here
                you dumb cunts were hoping to reach Kiev in 3 days etc., stop lying

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                How is artillery defensive?

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                >You clowns are the fucking best
                How much funding, armor, weapons, training, intel has to be provided until you consider them part of the conflict?
                We've crossed $100 billion in all phases, every NATO country has active assets in theater.
                Is it open declaration that determines it for you?

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                >Su 35 mogs everything you have by price/performance
                Lmao, these vatn-words always chiming on about cost like it matters. Huge cope from a country with an economy the size of Spain.

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                So if you sanctioned Spain would your economy die?

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                >would your economy die
                Oh no! Now my ham costs 7% more, my economy is dying.
                It's clear that you have no sense of anything outside of your bumfuck country, go visit your babushka and stop shitposting on the internet.

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                Your people are protesting already. 70k just yesterday in Brussels alone. Imagine only because you sanctioned a Spain.

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                >70k just yesterday in Brussels alone
                Nothing to do with Russia. It was about working conditions and has been in the works since before your little special operation even began.
                Face it, you're totally fucked and you're coping HARD. muh superpower

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                Holy copium.

                > We are doing fine
                > Actually we have some inflation
                > Okay we might have some protesters too
                > Okay they are 70.00 but it's not because we sanctioned russia

                BRUSSELS, June 20 (Reuters) - Around 70,000 Belgian workers marched through Brussels on Monday demanding government action to tackle sharply rising living costs, as one-day strikes at Brussels Airport and on local transport networks nationwide brought public travel to a near-halt.

                It's all because you sanctioned a Spain, remember that.

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                It's about revising the "loonnormwet" which was enacted in 1996 you dolt. Keep coping and praying that your teethering economy doesn't collapse before your army does. Unlike yours, our prosperity isn't just made up numbers.

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                considering your taxes at 50%, I think it's noticeable

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                >Now imagine russia + china teaming up and producing like 1000 of those per month.
                Wow just imagine my fantasy how awesome would it be inside my brain

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                The F35 is a subscription service just like everything else these days.

                Why sell a good capable plane once when you can sell an unfinished plane and then keep selling patches and DLC for it.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Keep sticking to those guns and see how it works out for you. There is a reason that country after country chooses the F35. Pray you never find out.

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                Cope
                Our government was literally ousted over a dead literally-who wannabe reporter when we wanted to buy Gripens. First order of business was signing a contract for F-16s which should already have been delivered by now, but was postponed to only start being delivered in 2024. Of course, America is so baller ypu will pay no contractual penalty for non-delivery. US arms exports are backed by Central Zoggery Agency and nobody has another choice but to buy on pain of having (((something))) happen. Also, your anti-missile systems failed to protect Saudi Arabia every time. Bow to your Yemeni superiors, mutt.

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Cope.

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                Nice F15's I see they are putting out a new version,

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, it's the F-15EX. Going to be a bombtruck and export model. It's based off of the Saudi and Qatar F-15s, so, Boeing nor the DoD really had to spend any money redesigning it.

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                2 planes that do work and 2 pieces of dunning Krueger nepotized shit

            • 7 days ago
              Anonymous

              Oof those digits.

            • 7 days ago
              Anonymous

              Yeah. That whole affair is fucked. They literally fired people who pointed out errors in the software when it was being written.

          • 7 days ago
            Anonymous

            Who do we have then retard? General white rage? Admiral levine? If russia was as bad as you claim our media & officials wouldn't have to outright lie and contradict themselves, and you wouldn't be here posting this week 2 tier cope. I mean wasn't russia supposed to have run out of precision munitions back in march or whatever? And everything else not long after? Crimea coming into play before june? Lol. And here we are depleting our reserves which cannot readily be replaced to arm the second largest army in europe, fighting a smaller russian force and still losing.

            There is literally no way you can spin this as a positive for america anymore. These fancy western toys are getting destroyed, captured, and generally proving to not be the game-changers as advertised. Meanwhile russia is still cranking out war materials and not even breaking a sweat while doing it. We are utterly fucked if we have to get into a major shooting war, we're ruled by retards who sold our futures out for profit and temporary political victories.

            Lavrov or whoever the fuck that russian dude was who compared us to late stage ussr is right. We even have the incompetent, senile gerontocracy to go along with it. If you can actually still look at this rotting, grotesque, gay monstrosity of the country formerly known as america and think everything is alright then you're just way too far gone. Fucking sick.

            • 7 days ago
              Anonymous

              >We are utterly fucked if we have to get into a major shooting war
              I wouldn't go that far

            • 7 days ago
              Anonymous

              >The media would never lie to hype up a non existent strawman threat
              Thats all the media has ever done with regards to russia. Do you honestly think the retarded clown show that is the russia army we've seen over the last 120 days is some existential threat to nato?

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          >and our shit actually works as advertised.
          like the F-35?

          Retard detected.
          >"Muh F-35"
          Yeah keep crying about your tax dollars dumbass.

          No one can make anything even remotely as sophisticated as a F-35 or even the F-22.
          You're so stupid, it shows.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        The Russians also had shitty generals at the beginning of WWII but then had good generals at the end of the war.

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          this

          Stalin killed a lot of excellent generals in the purge.

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          Experience is the best producer of good generals

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        Legendary and formidable generals don't really exist in any NATO aligned country either, all we do these days is bomb 3rd worlders from thousands of feet in the air

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        Unlike you Sivan, we have a professional army. You have Putin’s fuckboys. Oh yeah, and our shit actually works as advertised. Nice canon cameras though bro.

        Keep sticking to those guns and see how it works out for you. There is a reason that country after country chooses the F35. Pray you never find out.

        The conscripts with 7 days training being given helmets with the burned flesh of the last guy in them beg to differ. You will run out of men and treasure long before my tax dollars run out. Cope harder.

        You seem to be a clear case of pride before the fall. Your shithole is collapsing and you're only fighting second tier enemy - ie Russia. Wait till you get to China. Lol. Given your poor and obnoxiously expensive performance, you'll get wrecked in half a year. Even in trade war you couldn't stand on your own. Without EU vassals you're already gone.

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          >Wait till you get to China.
          Absolutely nothing suggests china is militarily impressive.

          • 7 days ago
            Anonymous

            Question is, do they have to be?
            Seems like they're just biding time while threats bleed themselves
            They just wait 20 years and US will be 25% white, IQ too low to even maintain what it has.

            • 7 days ago
              Anonymous

              >Question is, do they have to be?
              Only if they intend on challenging american power. Ofc they dont and wont, thats just wumao cope and the usual LULZ retards coming up with fan fiction. By the way china is zero percent white and 100 percent nonwhite. The US will always beat china in that regard.

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          This, fuck this goddamned strip mall of a country.

          • 7 days ago
            Anonymous

            Off with your head

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      That's the task of all militaries, including NATO. There were talks to give AMX30B to Ukraine as we were supposed to have 850 of them in storage. But since 1994, they have been stripped, sold or used for target practice so basically there is none to give.
      Same goes for ammunition we were supposed to have, most of it have been lost to corruption.
      The only difference is that corruption in NATO is less overt than in Russia/Ukraine/Kazakhstan, and more oriented into giving contracts to campaign donors, instead of selling stuff for cash and buying mansions in Sochi or Turkey.

      Also, and that's true for all military operations, passed the first high-impact moments, every military start to fuck up, that can be resumed in the words of Tyson "Everyone got a plan until they get punched in the mouth".

      That said, if Ukraine had taken the initiative last summer (2021), and pushed to Donetsk instead of pussying out and staying on positions, we wouldn't be in this situation now, bc last year Russia was deadlocked with covid and Putin sick as shit, maybe they would have been subjected by a counter attack in the end, but maybe not.
      That's the moral of the story to all generals, push your advantage till the end, bc your never know what happens next.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      This, if there wasn't so much corruption the ukraine situation would of probably ended alot sooner.

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        >would of
        >of
        Covid lockdowns really did a number on zoomer education.

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          it a common mistake, nothing zoomer about it

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Just like USSR. Everything is faked, quotas are faked, and money is stolen.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      I'd say the Sukhoi Su-27 was the height of excellence in Russian military development. It's is a stunningly beautiful aircraft, and aircraft generally fly how the look. It can out maneuver the American F-15, which means it could have won in the 4th generation fight. The aircraft is crazy reliable, durable, and well respected by it's pilots and ground crews.
      The Sukhoi Su-57 is pretty great, but it doesn't inspire the same sense of awe and power as the 27.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Truth, but with some excellence.

      Russia anyway has choose to respond assimetricaly to US since the budget is very different.

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        >Russia anyway has choose to respond assimetricaly to US since the budget is very different
        Poverty is no excuse. Russians are poor for the same reason their army sucks: They suck. Its not an isolated incident!

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          American budget is wasted for the most part too. Russia tech is not bad ... they just lack money to produce it with quality and volume. And they lack money also to traning pilots and army.
          The budget would be enough if it not wasted like US budget.

          • 7 days ago
            Anonymous

            >they just lack money to produce it with quality an
            Because they are stupid. Its not like their society is great but the army wastes resources, their army reflects society. When a person is broke it could be bad luck or diseases, when a country is broke they are just stupid

            • 7 days ago
              Anonymous

              If they are so stupid, why are you buying their space engine for your rockets?
              Why they has had supercavitating torpedos since 1977 and you still not have them?
              Their have weaknesses, very bad ones, but if you thiunk they are stupid you could have, one day, a very bad awakening. They can be really smart and evil.

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                0.1% of their society is involved in technological development, everyone else is stupid or pretending to be, all their lives

          • 7 days ago
            Anonymous

            >The budget would be enough if it not wasted like US budget.
            Idk about that. Russia rolls with far more military than is economy can afford. Its like italy had a million troops, a vast ocean fleet in the atlantic and pacific, a large airforce including heavy bombers, and an absurdly large nuclear missile force. Even with corruption what it can afford is at least two or three times less than what it tries to field.

  3. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    [log in to view media]

    Yeah its pretty impressive alright.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >make your enemy think your shit is not on fleek when its actually bussin frfr on God
      -Sun Tzu

      You homosexuals just don't into warfare.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Great plan, we’ll make them think we can take Ukraine in 7 days and then take 3 years. That will throw them!

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >make your enemy think you're sending your elite troops and armor when really you're just offloading old inventory and culling the chaff from your forces
          -Sun Tzu

          Putin is playing 4d chess and you're failing to build a house out of legos (the instructions come with the pack, are you too stupid to even read?)

          • 7 days ago
            Anonymous

            and you somehow know what his endgame is, lametard
            what a sucky plan he has if a cockfart like you has figured it out already

            • 7 days ago
              Anonymous

              kekekkekekekek

          • 7 days ago
            Anonymous

            >this
            I don't believe russia is playing with all its pieces on the table
            then again, neither is the US.
            but neither side should be cocky- it'd likely be a catastrophic bloodbath
            that said, I want absolutely nothing to do with garden gnomekraine or its 'adl approved natsocs', it's not my problem. I was done with foreign wars for garden gnomes when I got refilled in '07. we have our own shit yo deal with here, rest of the world needs to handle itself while we get our head on straight

            • 7 days ago
              Anonymous

              This. Both side have probably top secret weapons even worse than the ones we know about it.
              The only sure thing is complete destruction of both side.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      This is new technology, comrade. More advance than USA. We call it hyper-hypersonic missiles.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      That’s literally from a propaganda film you dumb /poo/tard wognat

  4. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Now provoke them directly, fuck up and get found out n-word. Ukraine isnt iraq, theyre trying to conquer and annex these people,not slaughter them.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      120 days motherfucker.

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        20 years in Afghanistan and 10 years in Vietnam, basedcuck.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Sure thing vatn-word, with how they're chucking lugandans and donbabwians with a moist nugget, galoshes and literal 15 minutes of training. Don't need more to check for snipers. Exemplifies how you're gonna treat the ukies you do conquer - intern and torture the ones with an opinion, use the rest as cannon fodder, pull an ethnic replacement on the rest the likes of would make globohomo shudder.
      You deserve what's coming to you.

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        Lol tranny plebbitor. You shills always project. That's all you do. To the last Ukrainian with 5 minutes of training and forced to bring their own shoes because they don't have enough boots. Hahaha.
        Inb4 you call me a vat n-word when I'm literally in the US army

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Plus Ukraine has been trained and equiped by NATO for 8 years. Russia blundered initially but Ukraine is no pushover anymore.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Puchando

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Such a dumb post.

      We know what the answer is if Russia ever engages NATO forces. Its going to be entire the entire Russian army dead within a week. The problem is Russia counter response to getting BTFOed. Maybe out of 100 nukes 1 lands. But they have 8000 or so nukes. Thats like 10-80 nukes guaranteed to land somewhere.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      They've already killed more civilians than the US did during the invasion of Iraq.

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        Ukraine has donbas blood on their hands and it will be repaid tenfold.

  5. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    weren't Russians supposed to run out of ammo and food 2 months ago? lmao

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Seems like they ran out of infantry two months ago. Never thought that would possible for russia but times change I guess.

  6. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Impressed how incompetent they are

  7. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Russia is mogging your lapdog using 10% of its capacity and there's nothing you can do

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      The conscripts with 7 days training being given helmets with the burned flesh of the last guy in them beg to differ. You will run out of men and treasure long before my tax dollars run out. Cope harder.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Imagine investing billions of us dollars just to watch them blow into pieces, meanwhile your population cannot afford gas and food.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          A poor American means getting an iPhone 13 vs an iPhone 13 pro. Also, our homes come with toilets.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >homes
            you mean those cardboard boxes?

            • 1 week ago
              Anonymous

              Show us your stone mansion, Laura Croft.

          • 7 days ago
            Anonymous

            by your prices my house is worth 1+ million dollars, my apartment next to the sea 200.000$, my toilet's water doesn't fill up to the top and we're flushing them with drinking water. You can literally drink from the fucking toilet here.

            Also, 99.8% white country. I couldn't give a flying fuck about your iphone or iphone pro

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Facts.

        There is also the thing that the only things NATO have given to UA so far are 30-40 years old designs and in small numbers. Apart of the Switchblades, nothing the US has given is up to date.
        People don't realize how much NATO, MBT, helicopters, planes, missiles are advanced. Russia has only advantage in artillery numbers.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >only things NATO have given to UA so far are 30-40 years old designs

          This is just outright wrong.

          Nlaw - 2009
          Javelin - 1996
          Himars - 2010
          CAESAR - 2008
          Bayraktar - 2014

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            None of those are high-tech, and HIMARS is a 90s design.

            • 7 days ago
              Anonymous

              > Be proven wrong
              > Proceed to ignore and twist whatever you claimed
              > Pretend to be retarted on purpose

              Such is arguing with mutt

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                n-word, do you know what an ID is? Lurk more.

            • 7 days ago
              Anonymous

              >NLAW and Javelussy is the best we have guize!!!
              >a-ackhchually not
              Suck gay dick and die, bluebacker

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Bayraktar are not given, they are bought from Turkey.
            There is 6 CAESAR, 4 HIMARS.
            Javelin is 26 years old and NLAW aren't supplied anymore for like 6 weeks.
            Give Akeron MP and Spike LR-II you'll see the difference.

            • 7 days ago
              Anonymous

              It's a feint too am i right?
              Just wait until the real wunderwaffel comes.
              2 more weeks.

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah but Space Force has been taking Russian tanks and aircraft for them.
          Shhhh, it's a secret.

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        You're talking about Ukraine, right? They're on their 4th(?) Forced conscription. Thousands of UA die per-diem. They're not even given boots and helmets most of the time.

  8. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >Russian diabolical weapon systems
    >uses depleted Uranium rounds in his tanks
    lol,
    lmao

  9. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    If the war ended quickly how would Russia fill it cofers with oil money?

  10. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Conscription doesn’t work. You can have all the toys but if you have idiots who don’t want to play with said toys it’s wasted potential.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Don't most conscripts get sent behind the lines and are used as cooks, drivers, cargo loaders, etc.?

  11. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I didn't think about them at all. Tell them to point the guns in this general direction, then we can talk specs.

  12. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    If the Russian military is this shit, then the Chinese have zero chance to ever take back the little island of Taiwan.

  13. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    It turns out the Russians are also ran by garden gnomes. The whole Ukrainian conflict is generated to kill as many people that oppose LGBT tranny degeneracy agenda as possible. There are ways for Russia to end this war quickly and spare the lives of everyone involved. However, it seems that both Ukro and Rus leaders are choosing the paths of most destruction.

    Imagine 20k of Russia's most hardened soldiers, completely betrayed by leadership and thrown into a meatgrinder, with no support. It made no sense and was unnecessary. Russian officers know this.

    Everyone has the same bug problem.

  14. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    They have nukes. After they hit our 500~ minuteman silos they know, and that other thing, it's free game.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Russia has been dead broke since the 80s. Given the rampant corruption probably most of Russian nukes don't even work. Nuclear weapons need to be serviced regularly and rebuilt. They can't sit on the shelf for decades due to decay.

  15. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    The closer to communism a country is, the more their military bluffs. I felt second-hand embarrassment for Putin on Victory Day and I overall support the Russian invasion of Ukraine

  16. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Then again half of you homosexuals are bots.

  17. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    That is why you should import me to NYC. I'm ashamed to live in this shithole.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      haha. faaag. you'r here with us and not going anywhere. enjoy being hated

  18. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    i am
    don't think any other country could have done it better

  19. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >russians are crazy smart

  20. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    There's an old saying that all the power in the Russian train goes to the whistle.
    Everyone with an IQ over 90 knew that "Russia stronk" is propaganda for dumb fucks.

  21. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Russian army is a papertiger
    This is evident by now.
    The command structures are ancient, the capabilities of the army are heavily limited, the morale is incredible low.
    I mean just imagine the US army losing nearly 30k troops in 3 fucking months.
    Imagine the US public seeing all the captured US soldiers just like Ukraine is showing them .
    There would be an uproar. Remember when Iran took one boat from the US army? What outcry it had?

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      nice pasta. used to see it more often on 2ch. bots there like to talk to themsefs. the blitzCOCK one is great too

  22. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    I think Russia controls Ukraine at the moment.

  23. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    I wonder how good is american military in actuality.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      It was really fucking good.... about 4 years ago.
      Now?
      No comment.

  24. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    I had high hopes in that Skolkovo semiconductor fab, even considering going there as an expert if pay would be good, it was praised like some sort of silicon valley and what we get? Corruption before the fab was even finished.
    You just can't make high tech with such mentality. You can make some rockets with hydrazine that will poison half of your workers, yes, but going further is impossible.

  25. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    >Russians are crazy smart

  26. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Russia is primarily a land power so they aren't as interesting in projection power via but they did it during the Cold War the most economical way that made sense (submarines). Same principle applies to their land army too. They have a mass conscription based doctrine and mass conscription based procurement system. Everything is designed to be maybe 90% as good as NATO shit but way cheaper so its spamable. In the end even if they have to kill 30 million of their own to win they still win. Germoids learned this the hard way.

  27. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Russian engineers are still awesome. What is happening is that all the equipment got sold off by corrupt officials and the soldiers are left with literal cardboard boxes for “armor plating”

  28. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Seeing Russia in Syria and now in Ukraine shows they can pull off effective operations with fewer forces than the west could. They're employing massive tactics instead of artistically dumping their entire forces to just GO FORWARDS CAPTURE LAND. look at UA. they're sitting there mass murdering Ukrainians and barely need to move. They're draining UA of manpower and even NATO stock supplies.

  29. 7 days ago
    Anonymouse

    >from Armatas that don’t start,
    the recruits put it on breaks and forgott out of panic
    >their broken carrier and it’s 4 planes
    russia have no carrier, its a battlecruiser with missles and some planes
    >and now the overall performance of their army all the arrows seem to point to the same thing. I think they might have been full of shit. Great psyop though.
    take 30million peoople country 20% of a country with 150 000 men is great achievement. makes nato seethe
    iraq war had 700 000 soldiers from all countries combined. and still failed accomplish anythinh besides

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      How many working tanks do you have? 200? Lol fuck off. Suck my dick German bitch, and make sure the floors of rammstein really sparkle.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Why are they not using their armatas in Ukraine then?

      >russia have no carrier
      What's the Admiral Flota Sovetskogo Baseduza Kuznetsov then?

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        It's a naval missile launcher with an optional air wing

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          Now that's some retarded cope.

  30. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    complex stuff breaks all the time more news at 10
    especially if you steal half the parts
    yeah we have a lot of corruption so does everyone else and you're just another drone falling for the media propaganda if you believe that fucking america out of all countries is some shining example of transparent fund allocation and usage

  31. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    >Russians are crazy smart
    They're extremely good at n-word rigging stuff, innovation despite limitations
    >I think they might have been full of shit
    They've always had better booms/propulsion than the US
    Still do

  32. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    People were fooled by astroturf and hype - all war is based on deception.

    Russia and China are weak so they act strong constantly and stupid/young people hang on their every word - every single day every single website there's another shill thread about Chinese super technology, every thread I see I remind people China is winning just fine in peacetime and every single time it just passes straight through NPCs' heads because they have no programming to respond to that. None whatsoever, never had never will.

    USA can afford to be stupid. Therefore: do not follow in USA's footsteps if you are a metric country. The year so far is watching Putin make that mistake.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      I think it's also zoomers learning that war against people with supply lines to defend is a lot different than herding goatfuckers in the desert, and that NATO tech is seeing its first use-as-intended since 1991. Trump should have quadrupled production of Javelins and Stingers given how wildly cost effective they are. Brandon's admin won't out of idiocy or malice.

  33. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    >used
    I'm still impressed and more then ever becuase Russia is winning a war against NATO and nazi zionists only by using old soviet weapons and some modern equipment.
    Ukraine is full of zionist nazi garbage since the USSR times. it is a very long explanation but Ukraine was always a traitor and the place where the USSR put their trash.

  34. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    CIA thanks you for your service citizen, 10 big burgers have been deposed to your account. Pick them up at the next pride parade.

  35. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Ukraine garden gnomes really suck. Getting landlocked by Russians, how sad.

  36. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Soviet technology is the only thing that we still have. And even then our corrupted generals stole everything they could.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      The other thing you have is a dictatorial regime with zero regard for it's people and with no internal dissent. I see lots of jibes towards the US that it hasn't won a war since 1066 or whatever, but in reality the US hasn't lost the fighting part of any wars. It either loses the peace, or collapsing public support makes it impossible for leaders to continue fighting. Despite the memes, the US was kicking seven shades of shit out of the Vietcong and North Vietnamese, it defeated the Iraqi army in a few days with barely any losses, and btfod the Taliban without breaking into a sweat.
      It would simply be impossible for a US president to fight the kind of ground and pound war Putin did in Chechnya 2 because of the political pushback.

  37. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    They had pretty good advertiziment run but at the end of the day it was just marketing campaign not grounded on reality. It's still an Soviet army with Soviet tech. All the newer tech is either really small in numbers or straight out non-existant. Also full of Western parts, not really Russian, only in sense assembled in Russia.

  38. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    We have tech but we don't have money.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      >We have tech but we don't have money
      Because you are stupid. Being permapoor at a national level means you are stupid

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        Well, sorry that we are not a superpower and cannot conquer half the world to print money.

  39. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Russia's only aircraft carrier is basically a Potemkin village, a useless piece of junk that never works.
    Russia made an aircraft carrier, but has ZERO logistics or even proper equipment necessary to run the damn thing.

    Watch this

    It's fucking hilarious, I swear.
    I didn't know how stupid and incompetant the Russian army can be sometimes.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Are you sure carriers are so important in a direct confrontation with NATO? I think subs are much more important. Are almighty US carries capable to avoid supercavitating torpedos? I don't think so. Russia is a land power not a sea power anyway. They never invested so much money in projection capabilities.

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        >Are you sure carriers are so important in a direct confrontation with NATO? I think subs are much more important.

        Ok so firstly, you're Coping a huge amount. But that's okay, you're allowed to be a Ruski Fanboy and suck any dicks you wish.
        Pointing out that they are incompetant, triggers something in you and you feel like you need to defend the Russian army's honor.

        Secondly, in a Nuclear wAr Submarines are more important, because missiles.
        And in a Regular War, Airdcraft Carriers are more important because it is basically the only way to Project your Strength.
        Air Craft Carriers is the only way to enact violence accross the other side of the globe.

        Also, it's not about "Muh SUPER WEAPON".
        Russians Love their "SUPERWEAPONs" but they never seem to come to fruition or to actually work in combat scenario.

        You think an American Aircraft carrier just fucking hangs out alone in the ocean?
        You ever heard of the term "Battle group" ?
        An Aircraft carrier HAS to be escorted by a dozen boats, and two of these are Anti-Submarine specific boats.

        Also ever heard of SONAR ?
        Yeah, Submarines are not invincible super weapons like you semm to claim.

        You don't seem to know anything about actual warfare so please shut up and don't be an useful idiot paroting russian posturing speach.

        France has the Same Military Budget than Russia.
        Russia can't even invade Ukraine properly despute their "MILLIONS OF TANKS".
        So fuck off retard.
        You're as dumb as they come.
        Armchair General Fuckwad

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          >Ok so firstly, you're Coping a huge amount. But that's okay, you're allowed to be a Ruski Fanboy and suck any dicks you wish.
          >Pointing out that they are incompetant, triggers something in you and you feel like you need to defend the Russian army's honor.
          >Secondly, in a Nuclear wAr Submarines are more important, because missiles.
          >And in a Regular War, Airdcraft Carriers are more important because it is basically the only way to Project your Strength.
          >Air Craft Carriers is the only way to enact violence accross the other side of the globe.

          Are you dumb or what?
          Russia has a very large territory. A no, they don't want to project anything. They are a regional power, you are the one who want to dominate the world. If you dont understand what it means having torpedos 6 times faster than yours it's meaningless to discuss about it. They have much less gears than you have, but they spend a lot on doomdays gear. And these ones are very scary. A sarmat can take out something as large as texas or france.

          >Also, it's not about "Muh SUPER WEAPON".
          >Russians Love their "SUPERWEAPONs" but they never seem to come to fruition or to actually work in combat scenario.
          >You think an American Aircraft carrier just fucking hangs out alone in the ocean?
          >You ever heard of the term "Battle group" ?
          >An Aircraft carrier HAS to be escorted by a dozen boats, and two of these are Anti-Submarine specific boats.
          >Also ever heard of SONAR ?
          >Yeah, Submarines are not invincible super weapons like you semm to claim.
          >You don't seem to know anything about actual warfare so please shut up and don't be an useful idiot paroting russian posturing speach.

          Oh, thank you, I just discovered what a battle group are .... LOL

          Anyway, can you explain to me how do you defend your battle group from a torpedo coming at 370 km/h from
          a sub located 10km away from you?

          • 7 days ago
            Anonymous

            Ok retard.

            Just Google it.
            Every Military Analyst says you're wrong .

            >While all those weapons sound intimidating, remember this is the Russian Navy we’re talking about. Russian ships are famous for breaking down, exploding, or disappearing entirely. So why should Russian superweapons be any different? The answer is that they’re not, and its supercavitating torpedoes might be the most useless of them all.
            https://www.wearethemighty.com/mighty-trending/why-russias-supercavitating-torpedoes-arent-all-that-great-a-weapon/

            >MUH SUPER WEAPOOOON!!!
            >I SWEAR WE HAVE THE BEST WEAPOOONS
            >JUST LIKE MARVEL AND DC COMICS
            >WE HAVE
            >SUUUUUUUUPERRR
            WEAAAAAAAAPOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONS

            Every single miltary analyst is calling people like you dunmb.

            This shit doesn't work.
            There are counter measures to deploy.
            Depth charges, Anti-torpedo bombs.
            >A superfast torpedo with a range of almost ten miles would be considered a wonder weapon in the days of World War II, where a torpedo had a range of about three miles, four miles at best. But standard torpedoes have come a long way since.
            >Then, there are the options available to naval commanders of surface ships. While shipborne missiles might not be able to rock a submarine while it’s below the surface, torpedoes aren’t just for subs, whether they’re firing them or being hit by them. Anti-ship missiles are a deadly weapon in naval combat and most modern naval ships carry some kind of missile.
            >The Mark-13 Guided Missile system fires projectiles at more than three times the speed of sound, can hit targets almost 100 miles away (and sometimes further) and are deadly and proven in modern warfare. Why mess around with torpedoes when missiles will do just fine?

            • 7 days ago
              Anonymous

              >Ok so firstly, you're Coping a huge amount. But that's okay, you're allowed to be a Ruski Fanboy and suck any dicks you wish.
              >Pointing out that they are incompetant, triggers something in you and you feel like you need to defend the Russian army's honor.
              >Secondly, in a Nuclear wAr Submarines are more important, because missiles.
              >And in a Regular War, Airdcraft Carriers are more important because it is basically the only way to Project your Strength.
              >Air Craft Carriers is the only way to enact violence accross the other side of the globe.

              Are you dumb or what?
              Russia has a very large territory. A no, they don't want to project anything. They are a regional power, you are the one who want to dominate the world. If you dont understand what it means having torpedos 6 times faster than yours it's meaningless to discuss about it. They have much less gears than you have, but they spend a lot on doomdays gear. And these ones are very scary. A sarmat can take out something as large as texas or france.

              >Also, it's not about "Muh SUPER WEAPON".
              >Russians Love their "SUPERWEAPONs" but they never seem to come to fruition or to actually work in combat scenario.
              >You think an American Aircraft carrier just fucking hangs out alone in the ocean?
              >You ever heard of the term "Battle group" ?
              >An Aircraft carrier HAS to be escorted by a dozen boats, and two of these are Anti-Submarine specific boats.
              >Also ever heard of SONAR ?
              >Yeah, Submarines are not invincible super weapons like you semm to claim.
              >You don't seem to know anything about actual warfare so please shut up and don't be an useful idiot paroting russian posturing speach.

              Oh, thank you, I just discovered what a battle group are .... LOL

              Anyway, can you explain to me how do you defend your battle group from a torpedo coming at 370 km/h from
              a sub located 10km away from you?

              Every single article that shows up on google say the same thing.
              I didn't even search these terms, just the torpedo itself and everyone saus you're basically a huge retard.

              >Russia’s perhaps-not-real super torpedo
              >https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2015/11/18/russias-perhaps-not-real-super-torpedo/

              >Not really. Supercavitation takes an enormous amount of energy. The result being that your torpedo moves like the wind until there is no more power. Hence, the VA-111 Shkval only has a range of about 4.5 miles (7km), whereas its successor, the Shkval 2 has a maximum range of around 9.5 miles (15km).
              >The above is… problematic. In WW2, this would have been a magnificent weapon, but with the state of naval combat being what it is, the range on these weapons are too poor.

              So the range is too short.
              The power needed to accelerate like thatand induce super cavitation is too pricy.

              "Muh 10km". That's absolutely nothing retard. A SONAR will detect a Submarine WAY before that.

              Do you even kow how Sonar works ?
              Ridiculous.

              • 7 days ago
                Anonymous

                >So the range is too short.
                >The power needed to accelerate like thatand induce super cavitation is too pricy.
                >"Muh 10km". That's absolutely nothing retard. A SONAR will detect a Submarine WAY before that.
                >Do you even kow how Sonar works ?
                >Ridiculous.

                detection is not locating the sub .... so, you know it's there, but you keep not having defence against its torpedos. It can shot at you from 10km and you still don't know where it is and how to defend. On the contrary, your "battle group" is very well visible from the sky.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Why would you need aircraft carriers when your focus lies on ground war?
      Have you ever taken a look at a map?

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        >Why would you need aircraft carriers when your focus lies on ground war?
        Another Cooper Appears.
        >OHOOOHHH I'M COOOOPING
        >OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

        Force Projection idiot.
        How does Russia invade the US if they don't have a transport or Navy?
        How does Russia project force around the world without an aircraft carrier.

        You fuckwads are just coping like retards.
        I said
        >"Look how stupid this endeavor is. They wasted BILLIONS on a useless aircraft carrier".
        And you be like
        >"BUT BUT BUT WE DON'T NEED AIRCRAFT CARRIER"
        Then why have one in the First place? Retard.

        Russia is posturing.
        Russia is faking having big muscles.
        It's like if a DYEL was flexing his muscles on LULZ

        You're retarded and you know it.
        Do better next time.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      The funny thing is that they don't even need carriers as per their military doctrine.
      The US needs them because they have bases all over the place, so the world police needs to be able to project force anywhere at any time.
      But Russia doesn't have any distant overseas bases, allies, protectorates or possessions that would ever need protection by a Carrier Strike Group.
      It's basically a huge money sink that they keep afloat so that they can say:
      >See? We have carriers too, we're a modern military just like those amerikkkan dogs

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        This guy gets it.
        It's a huge money sink, like you said.

        And yes, Russia doesn't really interfere with other countries and focuses on land based "defensive" military.

        You swiss should teach the Russianshow to become a Forteress Country.
        They seem to be having a hard time.
        I would bet money on the fact that it's easier to invade Russia than it is to invade Switzerland.

        On second thought, don't help the ruskies. We already have one country of Mountain garden gnomes, we don't need a second one.

  40. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    There are pretty much 3.5 milatary hardware super powers that make the most navy craft, ballistic missiles, jets, tanks, guns. After WW2 it was the U.S and U.S.S.R., Europe was pretty significant during the period and I would classify them as a 0.5 at the time.

    After the soviet union fell, Russia had major issues with money and lost the Baltic countries and Ukraine that were vital to keeping their navy maintained. The somewhat got compensated because they leased the navy base in Crimea and had Kaliningrad. The European countries I would upgrade to being a military tech super power after the USSR fell, but they didn't build much of what they developed. East Europe couldn't afford it and west Europe didn't bother. China I would put at 0.5 in the last 10 years but most their shit is ripoff of tech they stole.

    Russia's New stuff does seem to be a bit hyped, some stuff had development flaws that people hid or covered up their defects.

    But there other explanations also. Their best tank the T-14 Armata, has not been used in the Ukraine, they only have a few of them, I forgot the number, like 8 to 20. It has a lot of advanced tech, and I see a lot of people suggesting it was all lies, but for the T-14, I think most the tech is real but they can't reproduce it in a cost effective way. Same issue with Russian space rockets, they have the most advanced but can't replicate them. I watched a Space-X documentary recently, they have been trying to do the opposite of what Russia did with rocket development. They are focused on making simple but very inexpensive rockets that are easy to make.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      >I watched a Space-X documentary recently, they have been trying to do the opposite of what Russia did with rocket development. They are focused on making simple but very inexpensive rockets that are easy to make.
      Ironic as the meme has always been the opposite - NASA spending $100k developing a zero gravity pen and Russia using a 2c pencil etc.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      >I watched a Space-X documentary recently, they have been trying to do the opposite of what Russia did with rocket development.
      Not "the opposite".

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        In terms of More advanced but less replicatable vs simple and cheap to produce, it is the opposite. It's some what comparable to the Tiger 2 vs the T 34 tank. German tanks for the most part were better in armor, fire power and engines, but they hand made a lot of the parts and would brake easy because no qualitycontrol of parts. The T-34 was cheap and was mass produced. The only good feature of the T-34 vs German tanks was its Turret design made it harder to penetrate.

  41. 7 days ago
    Anonymous
    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Literally never because I'm not clinically retarded.

      The Russian Federation is nothing like the Soviet Union and although I believed that Russia was going to steamroll Ukraine in the beginning of the invasion, I only thought so not because russia stronk but rather because ukraine is even weaker than they are by a lot but they've held out for so long because russia isn't going all-in and ukraine has received essential foreign support leading up to this and during.

      Hell, the late USSR was relatively weak but even then they were still mightier than the homosexualy-assed federation of poorfags.

  42. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    >use
    no I'm impressed they are completely BTFO out NATO trannies on a daily basis and proving to the world these tranny pedos are nothing but child killers and redditor larpers.

  43. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    [log in to view media]

    Still, I'm impressed by these.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      That doesn't take a lot of programming ability. Not even any calculus let alone AI.

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        Seriously? Launching rockets with precision doesn't require calcules? KEK

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          It's like coding the animation of a 2D videogame character's jump. You *can* use calculus, but there's not much point. My guess is that the guidance system takes input from three radar stations, and no prediction is involved. After a one size fits all trajectories take off sequence the code adjusts the thrust based on whether the missile is going to overshoot. There's no turning or yawning either. The rocket was pointed at the target before launch.

  44. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    [log in to view media]

    Artillery is still king and drones are a shit.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      >Artillery is still king and drones are a shit.
      Ok Satan, whatever you say.

      Too bad Russia's Artillery is still losing thewar.
      Meanwhile the Turkish Baykar Bayraktar TB2 Drone ison the main reasons Ukraine is "Winning the war" if you will.

      They are able to face Russia head on, and contain them.
      TheBayraktar TB2 is a HUGE gapmechanger, as much of an asset as are the anti-tank missiles they use to defendagainst russian tank columns.

      Go read about or watch something on the TB2, it's a under-rated super eficient weapon for spying and striking the russian army.

      These drones are the reason why so pmany Russian Generals and Officers have been eliminated during this war.

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        Losing the war: Severodonetsk edition

  45. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    >Russians are crazy smart
    Citation needed.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      are crazy smart
      >Citation needed.
      Only in Chess.
      There are a few Russian Scientific Genuises.
      The only one I can think of right now is Dmitri Mendeleiev. That guy was a real life GigaChad scientist.

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        >Only in Chess
        That's not really true either, though. Soviet chess champions were often minorities, especially Armenians and garden gnomes.

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          >>Only in Chess
          >That's not really true either, though. Soviet chess champions were often minorities, especially Armenians and garden gnomes.
          Maybe but they did dominate the Chess World during the 20th century.
          Some/a lot of of the GOATs are Russians tho, no matter what minority they came from.
          And being good at chess is one of the most direct way of saying someone is high IQ.

          >So the range is too short.
          >The power needed to accelerate like thatand induce super cavitation is too pricy.
          >"Muh 10km". That's absolutely nothing retard. A SONAR will detect a Submarine WAY before that.
          >Do you even kow how Sonar works ?
          >Ridiculous.

          detection is not locating the sub .... so, you know it's there, but you keep not having defence against its torpedos. It can shot at you from 10km and you still don't know where it is and how to defend. On the contrary, your "battle group" is very well visible from the sky.

          That technology of Supercavitating torpedos has been around since the 70s.
          50 years later it's still not being widely used.

          These torpedos musn't be that good if no one really uses them, despite their existence for the last 50 years.

          I'm not miltary expert, but if there's ONE recurring theme about Russian Military Tech, is that it is often over-hyped, and suffers the same problem that Hitler / Nazi Germany had, of developping Super Wpeaons that could "change the war".

  46. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Russian tech is 20 years behind but they do not care about their personnel and that's a strength in a way. They just throw more men and materiel at it until something gives. What good are western javelins if the Russians just have more tanks anyways? Much of the casualties in Donbass are militia raised from the "people's republics" used as cannon fodder. Remember what we see now is Russia without mobilization. And Putin is not done yet, by a long shot. They will win in the end, if the West grows weary as we usually do.

  47. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    I still think that their army is a formidable, the thing is that their current one that is in ukraine is a mix between Serbian/Chechen and some new Conscripts that are fairly fresh. While the more adapt soldiers that are fighting inside the borders are experiencing difficulties because there is no experienced backup, well, backing them up while they get encircled so they have to flee.
    I'd imagine things would be hell of a lot different if they fully mobilized or Russia itself would get attacked.

Your email address will not be published.