Have I seen extremely talented women at conferences at panels? Yes, of course. But 100% of the women I've actually had to work with at jobs fucking suck at this, and I have worked with alot of women. It's so bad. Contributions on github are almost always empty, hardly any green in them at all. It's blatantly obvious they do not care about the actual job, and it affects everyone they work with. Everyone.
They asked me to help with some interviews at my last job and brought in like 75% women. All of them had no idea wtf was going on. In one interview, immediately after we asked some super basic frontend questions, my coworker gave some gay prompt about reversing linked lists (he meant it to be some reddit /r/ProgrammingHumor 'inside joke' homosexualry) and the woman just sat there with a completely empty expression. I don't even think she knew what a linked list was, but her resume had herself listed as a 'full-stack developer' with 7 FUCKING YEARS of experience. Told ops team we shouldnt hire any of these people because it was blatantly obvious they did not care about the industry at all and struggled with basic questions, but of course they ignored me and hired 2 women anyways. I left the job 6 months later because my fucking workload increased so much it was fucked. Felt like I was spending 3 fucking hours every day repeating the same concepts to developers who supposedly had half a decade of experience, it's like they were incapable of learning anything. Then I'd have to spend 3 more hours leaving comments on the garbage spaghetti code they'd PR, just completely incapable.
Yes I know this reads like a blog post but this shit is driving me insane. Even at my new job I'm forced to waste so much time dealing with the shit code the few female engineers write, and one of them supposedly has more experience than me. They also generally fail at working with other people on teams, they are insufferable. The male, junior engineers have consistently been more capable and easier to work with.
>They also generally fail at working with other people on teams, they are insufferable. The male, junior engineers have consistently been more capable and easier to work with.
Seems like a (you)-issue. Just like arabs will never work with a woman as boss, a woman won't work with non-chad coworkers. Have you considered getting facial surgery to fix your uglyness? This would also solve your workplace problems.
I'm sorry for you OP.
Thank God I'm in Italy and it's slower here. But not enough, my CS course is full of women and I dread the time I'll have to work with them.
The difference is indeed that many men have side/passion projects while not one one woman does anything else that what is assigned in class.
Why? Women seek as much approval as possible, and the internet commanded them.
I think inherently programming is the kind of job where you really have to know what you are doing in order to *do* it, which believe it or not is unlike many other jobs where you can just fuck about in college and only absorb the absolute bare minimum knowledge about it, and then go work it professionally.
Many students dont realize this when they pick CS major. I think its true for both males and females but most untalented males get filtered out by the large companies who can instantly tell they dont know what they're doing, while females get a pass anyway because of diversity incentives.
Not going to read your wall of text but using the number of Github commits as measure of skill is stupid
Yes, you can simply look at gender instead.
>0 contributions in the last year
aka
>I got employed
as if this was any reason to be ashamed
>employed for nearly a decade
>496 contributions in the last year
Skill issue
her labour and time aren't worthless like yours
That's what I call a cope.
it is the truth. enjoy training ai models for free.
wear your cuck badge loud and proud brotha
you're handing your work to microcuck to leech off of.
FOSS is for everyone, you, me and corporations.
It's amazing how many people don't get this.
You do it for free
>HAHAH you think you're a software developer huuuh?? well I too have the title software developer EXCEPT when I log off at 5, I just switch to the feature branch on an open-source I contribute to, then I code until the sun sets... bet you feel like a fool now, loser >:)
Grass, now.
>s.jpg
Oh no no no
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO I CANT SEE THE WOW POSTER WITH EMPTY SHELF IN HD NOW MY DAY IS RUINNNNNED HOW COULD YOU DO THIS TO ME ANON
bro you literally saved a thumbnail
Well a lot of companies allow you to use personal github account if they use github.
> 952 contributions last year
> like 40 of them to public repos
any serious company will use a private gitlab instance
>companies
>personal github account
/thread
imagine coding in your free time
> why do women...
simp enablement
>imagine coding in your free time
Well, I write "fun stuff" like microcontroller projects in my free time, and sometimes I do share that stuff. But no, I'm not spending time on "look at meeee" shit for google-goy points.
Based
Only cucks that don't value their own time will do it for free to please freetards
Github lets you show private contributions, and anonymizes them to people not part of the organization
vs how many men become programmers and then half ass it?
Why run the race when you can hang out at the finish line and fuck the winners?
Women are usually pretty bad programmers unless they're ugly/autistic/asian, then they can be mediocre web devs with enough effort and get hired pretty quickly by the thirsty nerd managers wherever they want. Eventually they move into HR or some people role.
There's like 4 women 'diversity hires' in my department at work.
I barely do anything and get paid big bucks, yet somehow everyone is still 'fully satsified' with me going 'above and beyond'. I just say a script that took me one hour took me a week, with local shitty commits spread out over a whole week (i was deathly afraid of the whole 'commit your work!' shit before), pushed when submitting shit.
And then there's the wimminz. They literally do nothing. Nobody has any idea what they're even doing other than going to random wOmAN lED cOnFERenCEs and giving 'WIMMIN ARE GUD' talks. They have no fucking idea of anything they're doing, and they are in the office maybe once a month tops. They get assigned to a project and literally do nothing for multiple months. It's fine to underdeliver, I do that too, as stated before - as long as the employer's happy, hey, what the fuck. But they do not output ANY SINGLE THING and often are not even present at weekly meetings with no excuse whatsoever. Bruh.
>But they do not output ANY SINGLE THING
There job isn't to output, it's to put out.
there is no such thing as diversity hire. we live in a capitalist system. if they could, companies would fire half of their employees to increase profits and assign their tasks to those who remain.
oh trust me, they're diversity hires. I'd agree if it was some for profit company, but - it's not a for profit company, that's all I'm willing to say.
in this case, the presence of that person may bring more publicity or donations. as long as the money paid to them >= the money they bring, there will be no problem.
>by that logic no company does, or have done, anything inefficiently EVER
people and companies make mistakes all the time, but they don't insist on continuing those mistakes. if a person does not meet the above equation, they will eventually be fired. no one pays anyone for being a woman, lgbt, person of color. try it if you want and see what happens i'll wait.
They don't bring in any money. They don't mention the place they work at whatsoever, and they don't acquire projects. We have those clowns that say they're 'technical' yet can't do shit, but at least they're good at getting in projects and they let the people that actually know their shit do their shit. Those are all men though.
>people and companies make mistakes all the time, but they don't insist on continuing those mistakes
They literally do tho
by that logic no company does, or have done, anything inefficiently EVER. Ask anybody who has ever worked a job ever and they'll tell you how wrong this is.
Capitalism doesn't mean perfect usage of resources. Just that the most efficient ones win out over long long periods of time.
On the scale of multi million / billion dollar companies theres quite a bit of wiggle room for them to be inefficient and still win out in the end over their competitors. There are other factors as well that give them wiggle room but this isn't a economics lesson.
Point is money and resources are absolutely wasted on shit like diversity hires, and other things, at companies in capitalism
Have you heard of ESG scores?
>if they could, companies would fire half of their employees to increase profits and assign their tasks to those who remain.
Companies are literally doing that.
>we live in a capitalist system
No we don't, our economy is almost exactly like the NEP under Lenin
There's plenty of diversity hires and many of them are indeed women. The entire point is to get them into the workforce so they have fewer kids. Otherwise many of these women would actually be a tax deficit to the economy (single moms collecting welfare, benefits, getting into debt, etc).
Let's face it, we've all seen those tik tok videos of young women doing nothing at big consulting firms. It's literally a fancy daycare for them because the governments wants them out "working" and spending their money in the economy instead of staying home and potentially collecting welfare.
>in b4 incel
I bang a lot of these types of girls so I know
>extremely talented women
No such thing. They got there solely because of simping and diversity programs.
I have never worked with women in my 10 years of software development
>Have I seen extremely talented women at conferences at panels? Yes, of course
They were male.
Not going to read all that shit when your picture outs you as a retarded freetard sperg
women don't actually want to experience anything, they don't love anything, they love the facsimile of it
a woman doesn't actually want to live in a hut in the woods, she wants to take "aesthetic" photos of flowers and post them on instagram with a cottagecore hashtag and then go back to her comfortable apartment. a woman doesn't want to actually live in an old timey university she wants to wear a woolen sweater and post a photo of an old book that she hasn't read and post it under the title of dark academia so they can get likes and internet clout
women are masters of deception and moving into cliques and subcultures in order to get attention. this is why you see women dressing in all black and calling themselves goths but who don't actually listen to goth music or read gothic literature, they are in it for the attention and will post photos of them wearing black on instagram that will get thousands of likes by low-born subhuman simps who will obsess over any woman with large tits who dresses like a mall goth
>your face when you realize your mother never wanted you, she just wanted pictures of her being a mom
>Zoomers first existential crisis
You guys are basically cats, your mom only had you to assuage her loneliness and fear of being alone
>women
*zoomers. everyone whether male or female born after ~2003 lacks an actual soul
good thing I was born in 2002
>women don't actually want to experience anything.
>they are in it for the attention
Males search the attention by showing how whorty they are, how good and valuable they are by doing things and completing tasks. That's it.
that's a two way street though
hiring managers aren't actually hiring these women because they think they're le codenerds, they just find them sexy and think there's some chance that by working together it's going to lead to some steamy fantasy
it also checks boxes for 'diversity, equity, and inclusion' so the company can virtue signal on linkedin
I don't know, I think it's just that women are inherently very lazy compared to men. Programming as a job is relatively easy for most positions and there are plenty of average IQ people doing it just fine, so I think it comes down to women being lazy.
The only time I worked at a company with a female programmer, she was decent. Gay though.
>0 contributions last year
>what are private repositories
Also, some of them use it just to manage repositories, review PRs or rerun pipelines. None of them count as contributions.
I moved all my github repos to a self hosted gitlab instance. get fuckled microshitters
Are you from the US, OP? It seems that US culture produces the most insufferable women with extremely inflated egos.
Here in eastern europe, all the woman devs I came across worked just as hard as the male devs, though they preferred staying at lower positions to avoid stress. Only weird experience I had was one girl who openly started browsing a bondage blog during a meeting where I could clearly see her screen cause I sat right next to her.
@OP, GitHub is very gay and measuring anything with it is a waste of time. It's Facebook for unemployed nerds. Even stuff like arVix is better because that stuff is notionally being prepared for publication. At best, some projects will end up getting bought. Usually, it's just an India codemonkey honeypot. In the future, it will be ML training.
You can click OP's post number to reply newfriend :^)
I dont know, nagger, I live in Switzerland devs make on average around 120'000 CHF (125'000 euro) a year and there are almost no female ones around.
In Zürich maybe. The 'average dev' that would be comparable to an american dev would be a guy that only did an Informatikerlehre. Those guys earn like 70-90k max, if even.
You underestimate how stupid murritard codemonkeys are.
github is so trash nowadays, found this here, this guy is going full politics mode, check it out.
motherfucker has written a whole book in his readme: https://github.com/AleksandrHovhannisyan
what a vagina haver
>When hiring, we find a slight bias in favour of females in male-dominated fields, and a strong bias in favour of females in female-dominated field.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597823000560
It's over for men, kek.
only incels upload shit to GitHub in their spare time. you niggas working for free? ahahahahahahahahahah
Because they're not suckers.
Programming is a high-paying bullshit job, the duties and results of which are fairly opaque to the wage-payers, which makes it the perfect job for coasting.
If you're unironically trying hard at your salaried white collar bullshit job, you're a loser. If you see other people successfully coasting and that makes you mad, you're a loser.
You should be doing as little as you can possibly get away with. Just enough to give your employer and clients the illusion that your job isn't bullshit, so that you can keep collecting a paycheck, which you'll use to pursue actually worthwhile things: support your family, make art, tinker/invent, work on your own company - build things that improve you and your family's lives.
Or would you rather continue seething on behalf of your employer, Globocorp™, that these heckin' female worker units just aren't shoveling their fair share of bullshit?
Get a life, loser.
You live in a world that would cease to function without computers. You probably start to cry when a website is unreachable for more than 5 seconds. You will definitely start shitting and pissing everywhere if you suddenly cant get money out of your accounts for any length of time. The idea that programming is a "bullshit" job just shows how divorced from reality you are.
When the world actually starts collapsing because so many dipshit retards think the same as you and think its fine that absolute morons are put in charge of making sure that doesnt happen, I will laugh at you.
Nice projection, loser.
>I will laugh at you
I won't be thinking about you at all (just like your boss and the women he hired).
You're not your job. If you choose to be your job, your tantrums will only increase in magnitude and frequency. Find a more nobler purpose than shuffling bits.
why are (you) pretending that bait posts are any worse of a use of one's time than whatever the fuck it is that you'd call what you're doing
who gives flying fuck about you think
>omg my github contribution number!!!
Remind me again why anyone should care about this when they are employed by a private company? If you're trying to get hired by another company there are other ways to show your experience without exposing your companies data on github lmao
remember that post about the woman whining that fizzbuzz was too hard?
>see woman working in software somewhere
>check out her github profile
>it's just food recipes, boilerplates, empty repos, and forked tutorials
every time. I swear the only "women" who do real work on GitHub are trannies.
Not reading all that, but in general, I've found that only LULZ and Blind posters take issue with women. LULZ and Blind are both communities which serve as sewage drain resting places of men who can't function in social settings and whose idea of a response is to be vitriolic about everyone and everything whenever anonymity allows it. Hating women, Indians, or whatever else is often these people's way of patchworking the holes in their lives. They're not unsuccessful and lonely because they haven't put the work in or because they're asocial borderline autists who struggle to make eye contact when ordering takeout. No, that would mean THEY have to do something about the problems they face. No, it's actually women, Indians, or whatever else. People on LULZ and Blind are basically sick with the flu, and rather than taking their medicine, they elect to spend as much time as possible sick while whining about how some woman or Indian tech support wagie somewhere isn't taking THEIR medicine. You guys should grow and develop as people, but we all know that's not how your brain works.
you're in here with us homosexual. get off your high horse.
Not everyone on LULZ or Blind is a dipshit. I'm not on a high horse. I'm making a simple observation about a worm I pass by on my way to work. The fact that the worm and I live in the same neighborhood doesn't make us the same.
Ad hominem
Hasty generalization
Strawman
Sweeping generalization
Genetic fallacy
Either bait post, or woman moment.
Just so you know, when you bust out your wikipedia-tier understanding of logic in the middle of an argument, people don't stop responding because they're blown away by your intellect. It's because you're boring, and they'd rather do anything other than waste an hour rolling around in the mud with someone so communicatively stunted that they delegate their opinions on an opinion out to predigested buzzwords.
>woman moment.
Ad hominem.
Either bait post, or incel moment. (Are you blown away by my intellect?)
do something productive instead of farming dopamine response for your brain making retarded bait posts
Projection.
Either bait post, or logic-let moment.
How is that different from OP?
>You guys should grow and develop as people, but we all know that's not how your brain works.
Did you even read my fucking post you retard? I say in the first sentence I have been impressed by the work and achievements of women before. Maybe you should 'grow as a person' and learn how to read. How would you feel if you've wasted hundreds of hours working with people LARPing as fucking programmers? I wouldn't feel this way about working with women if it hasn't been a huge hassle and waste of time.
>Did you even read my fucking post
No. Did you read my post? The first sentence is literally
>Not reading all that
Ironic. Not reading the rest of what you have to say because I don't care.
>>Not reading all that
This implies that you atleast read some of it, are you actually fucking retarded? And if you read some of it, then you read the first sentence.
>This implies that you atleast read some of it
No it doesn't. I'm waiting for a long build to finish, so I can spare a minute to help an ESL. If I said
>I'm not watching all that
when you posted a ten minute webm, "all that" is meant to emphasize the sheer length of what you've sent and how I'm disinterested in you, the topic, your langauage, or whatever else to an extent that I refuse to read some or all of it. Nothing at all about anything said in that first sentence necessitates that I read even the first sentence. Regardless, me saying sad men on LULZ and Blind should grow and develop as person isn't logically eclipsed by you adding a caveat about there being some smart women, somwhere, right before a tirade about how the vast majority of women in tech are incompetent. Nothing about the first sentence undermines what I said. Let me know if you need any more help digesting what I've said.
what the fuck is blind?
>Get in using pussy
>Then they reveal their secret competency
You're retarded, these women are being strategic. Women exposing themselves to male criticism is game over.
>manager is no coder who needs to drag half the company in meetings for every decision she has to make to cover her ass if something goes wrong
>autistic redditor vegan cat mom that talks to herself out loud and is the reason I bought noise cancelling headphones
>tomboy with zero interest in tech that sweet talks the onions boy into doing her work
webshit is hell
You described every fucking office job.
I let the women be managers so they can take the heat from the execs whenever our execs decide to get uppity so I can stay locked in my server room to do the actual work. then I go over their heads and show the execs what ***I*** did so I get brownie points and the manager gets nothing but C-level salt
They get to "manage" so they feel important, I get raises, stock options, and respect from the C suite. Works in my organization
>Gets cut in layoffs
my last manager got laid off. I didn't
t. $15/hr help desk jockey who has a one-way rivalry with the women in his workplace because some girl at some point didn't want to go to prom with him
Imagine being so bad at ptogrammers that female programmers look competent to you LMAO
Let’s take a break from retardville for a sec and compare two possibilities.
>possibility 1: women are biologically incapable of understanding computer science theory and software engineering principles. Though there is no empirical evidence to suggest this is the case, and though the evidence to suggest a similar effect from a sociopolitical slant is equally nonexistent, women are undeniably worse than men at <skill> because <personal antecdote>.
>possibility 2: you guys can’t get laid
Keep losing.
Now you're just bullying women. It's not their fault they're bad, they're missing the brain required. Denying my systemic and insurmountable advantages is simple gaslighting.
The only people losing are women for being shitty programmers (Asian women excepting of course).
>women
Stopped reading there.
Fuck off drama troon.
women ultimately do not want to work jobs. they just feel forced to work them due to feminism, and because they dont want to be tied to any specific man. they want the sexual freedom of having their own income. the work itself is not important and it gives them little to no satisfaction, its just a means to an end. because its not in their instincts.
If you wrote even 1 line of open source software in your life, you should kys bootlicking slave
If I'm writing dogshit code, I'm gonna get paid for it
Most guys have no idea just how easy women have it. My moment of realization was when I was a 5/10 woman and I was surprised just how much attention she got. Like constant stream of it. Guys not just giving compliments but willing to do things or even give her free things or discounts just for being a woman.
Sadly, not even women are aware of this difference. The only ones who get a taste for it are those who decide to cosplay as a man for a while.
So why would a woman really try if they have it so easy? Would you also give a video game your all if it was easy a fuck, to the point where you couldn't really lose? No, you become complacent. You even expect not to have any setbacks whatsoever and that's why women are they are.
The best programmer on my team is a woman, but then again she used to be a he a while back so take that for what you will
You answered your own question.
>don't bother understanding anything about your field
>get hired anyway
If men had this luxury, you'd see a whole lot of men like this, too.
Feminism, feminism want women in every single sphere and moving women to manager jobs and control HR from companies.
Feminism use gender studies as infiltration system for universities and companies, women get promoted by feminism HR women with gender studies titles.
Bot post.
Just look path career from women in Tech on LinkedIn, some social group activities in university, some entry level job and then jumping from companies as manager titles.
>women are in clubs
>women get jobs
>women are managers
Who cares? Have sex
Because the US and EU suck their clits and shower them in money, and they go along with it. Civil rights law also means that you're incentivized to hire them regardless of competence.
Why would they need to code if some retarded simp can do it for her?
show her full face
>linked lists (or any data structure) as an interview question
>exchanging inside jokes to belittle a candidate
she dodged a bullet there