>born in moderate climate without any serious natural disaster or disease like tropical cyclone , earthquake ,drought , malaria , sleeping sickness
>despite no very big continent but 80 % of land can grow food and have sufficient
water for crops like france netherland germany
>extremely perfect location for trade route and prevent from invader ( that why there're only european colonized africa and asia but not african and asian colonize europe )
>abundance of industrial resources like iron and coal is main reason why european industrialization are successful
>but but but !!!! we're cold as fuck !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
this seem like only problem you have
while africa or asia
>have of continent are useless savannahland or desert
>very mountainous and dense jungle that would be obstacle for settlement and start farming
>extremely inclement weather you can died from flood this year and died from starvation by famine due drougth next year
>bad location that very favourable for invade and conquering
reminder if you're wypipo and still bragging over genetic or being a superior race bullshit please acknowledge that all of it is just because fortunate not your ancestor effort at all
>this bait thread again
Africa had watermelons... here's my surprised face...
>professional bird watcher writes amatuer armchair anthrpology book with nothing but unsubstantiated speculation but strikes gold when blackrock publishes and pushes his shit to the top
i remember 10 years ago when we use to btfo this piece of shit everyday. it kind of faded into obscurity but i guess you fags are going to try for round 2 with zoomers.
most domesticated animals came from africa, and africa did in fact once have agrarian societies with vast trading networks. Too bad they all got genocided by the current group of nigs and then enslaved my mudslimes. Not sure what that has to do with white people but 'random chance lmao' certainly wasnt the cause of their failure.
You can tame zebras. and north/south america simply hunted all their useful domesticatable animals to extinction.
first reply best reply, check the date zoomers. fact checkers at based incorporated verified the op as being a homosexual in 2013.
Ah yes, the Alps isolate Europe from the rest of Eurasia. I did not read the rest of your favourite blog, you uncultured bitch.
KEK
They certainly do for a part of it. The most important civ (rome) was protected by alps for 100s of years. Also it names several other mountain ranges. Keep being a retard.
Lol
lemme just drop a couple of old chestnuts here to inb4 any more gay shit
Jared Diamond is a filthy garden gnome.
kek thank you
based posters. IT literally only takes a few of these jpgs to just unravel the whole fraud
homosexual garden gnome garden gnome. 15 years ago I wouldnt even know he was a garden gnome, let alone how being a garden gnome would motivate him or influence his argumentation/perspective.
We live in another world from that time.
it seems a bit like spenglers decline of the west - these garden gnomes just hate whites
whats wrong with the decline of the west? ive been meaning to read that, any screencaps or infographs deconstructing spengler's arguments?
your pic related is unfounded. i have read the book and that last line is straight up untrue. fuck off you illiterate cunt
i was enjoying that read(regardless of spelling errors) until he says bigfoot is real and has no diseases.
Already throughly deboonked. Native Americans (South native) had access to crops, animals and resources on par with Europeans but never developed past stone age tech and minor metallurgy. Jared's book is a giant cope on why European and Asians developed faster than nig nogs.
>acess to animals
>only animal is Llama
cope made you forget this
Llamas can carry and pull loads and they can be harnessed to pull a carriage for human transport.
>>only animal is Llama
Horses and Camels were Native to NORTH AMERICA -- they travelled by the same land bridge to Asia .
Europeans put the horse and camel to work.
Indians ate all theirs .....Maybe Llama taste funny
got any sources to support your claim? you cant cite the book or else youre dishonest, and no it doesnt contain sources.
While some on this site dump on the ideas in this book in favor of other explanations like the selective pressures of ice ages on increased brain to body ratio, it is worth pointing out that both ideas can be true at the same time, a possibility not explored in the book. Jared seems to assume that the average intelligence of all the races is equal, and frankly he should know better, but it is also undeniable that having top tier crops is a huge advantage. On the other hand, if blacks had developed the intellect and propensity for abstract thought that whites got, africa would have been an utterly boundless pile of insurmountable riches architecture scientific advancements and philosophical texts. But n-words never got that. They're dumb. You play the hand you're dealt.
He doesn't "assume;" it's a propaganda piece pushed to giant bestseller status for normies who read 1 or 2 books by garden gnomes a year to form the basis of their intellectual foundations to absorb and parrot for the rest of their lives.
dumbest shit ever. cope so hard. we had it hardest and still dominated you all. white pride bitch bro
Ruined it when you started on arable land, africa has more arable land than anywhere else and not by a small margin either.
Try again tomorrow.
no it not , only few area chunk are lush green and it mostly dense jungle
Definition of arable (Entry 1 of 2)
1: fit for or used for the growing of crops
arable land
Definition of arable (Entry 2 of 2)
chiefly British
: land fit or used for the growing of crops
Africa remains a net importer of food, although it has 60% of the world’s uncultivated arable land. As its population has doubled overall and tripled in urban areas in the past 30 years, agricultural production and food security have struggled to keep pace. Africa is the only continent where the absolute number of undernourished people has increased over the past 30 years.
You stupid fucking chud! DRC alone had double the area of France, Germany and Poland COMBINED. Furthermore, it's a lush tropical climate which means THREE crops per year, not just one. Not to mention all the wonderful things that can only be grown there. Not to mention it's only ONE country in sub-saharan Africa, and only constitutes about 10% of the land area there. Retarded subhumans like you are LIVING PROOF the OLPC program was a fucking mistake!
>lush tropical climate
Means waterlogged soils, soil nutrients draining away in the constant rains, constant attacks on you & your livestock by tsetse flies and God knows what else.
Yup that's why the Philippines, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, and Myanmar are all constantly on the verge of starvation....ah wait
there's edible food everywhere all of the time dog
Mennonites grow 3 crops a year in the central and South American jungles using adapted European techniques. They say growing crops down in Paraguay is so easy and lucrative the only downside is everyone fighting over the money.
If they were able to cultivate so much food and provide their populations with a surplus, they could have easily scouted and brought draft animals from Europe to increase the productive capacity of their civilization considerably. The problem isn't a lack of resources, but simply a lack of intellect and initiative that white European populations have.
>nearly everything is edible.
>daimonds and other materials are easily accessible.
>Giant animals are everywhere.
>No winter
>Still never advances beyond the fucking stone age in most areas.
survival hardship and muh hard working meme can't make you rich
You should checkout the rat utopia experiment to see what abundance dose
Then explain why Anglos conquered 26% of the world if hard working doesn't get you anywhere.
they have coal for industrialization then go invade for more resources
The U.S, South Africa, and Australia have huge coal reserves. Why did those indigenous populations never industrialize? Or do coal reserves only magically appear in gounds where Indo European and Finno Ugrics touch?
That map needs more coal
those were forests?
Alot of it still is forested .
I misread your post so I'm the double dumb gorilla n-word.
But yes that are.
Do you have a map of oil deposits as well?
We were self sufficient once , fun fact the origin of the company BP starts with a gold find in central Queensland Australia.
>We were self sufficient once
What happened with Australia though? Here boomers became lazy and shipped everything to Asia and brought in 150 million useless trash.
we got retarded by a bunch of globalist post ww2 policies that the population had no vote / say in like everywhere else in the west.
Sad, a lot of horrid decision in democracy seem to happen when people have no say in it.
Also, I would love to see if it's possible to drag icecaps into the outback to form freshwater lakes.
There is water underfoot in the deserts of Australia, the mound springs and oasis are what allowed nomadic stone age people to live entirely in the desert.
Oh yeah, I keep forgetting you guys have one of the largest fresh water basins in the world. Did you guys ever have plans to use them to make your middle country useable?
Fuck off we're full!
>Eromanga basin
According to this map, the Siberians peoples should have been able to crush the Russians them they expanded eastwards, but not only did they not, a fuck load of them also got geocoded completely.
Sadly coal is useless.
>t. Turkroach
Works better than goat poop.
Laughable map, the Brits fueled their industry with domestic coal sources not even mentioned on your meme map. Minor sources on the east coast of North America also fueled industry here, not the deposits out wes that have still been largely untouched.
africa have barely coal , and other high values mineral require a machine that consume coal as a fuel for dig it up
you got my point , other wypipo's copiums in this thread are meaningless
If that was the case why is the primary export for half of africa coking coal??
Where is West Virginia ans Wales on that map?
That map is fucking trash. There’s huge coal deposits in the Eastern USA, especially West Virginia and Pennsylvania, that aren’t shown. It also shows big deposits over much of Arizona, where I live, but this is horse shit. There’s maybe two or three coal mines in the whole state.
The largest coal deposits in the world are in Australia.
Abos did absolutely nothing with them (and why would they).
What do abos do anyways?
fuck chickens and do rituals with trash
pretty metal tbqh
Beautiful music
Sleep in the road.
Huff petrol.
Beat women savagely.
Masturbate their own offspring (this one is very disturbing)
Tear a hole in their brand new government houses roof and build a fire on the carpet.
The list goes on and on.
Have a spearfight
I shitpost on LULZ then get my jollies when someone mentions aboriginals in such like light as
not knowing they have been reading posts from abo mitts the whole time.
kek, I believe, you even if it might be total bullshit.
if the kid laroi gets to claim he is an abo i get to as well my nanna is a half murri.
True, in here as long as you have 1% NA DNA you can claim to be a native.
I've seen many an abo thread, I always thought they were taking the piss, then I talked to my brother in law who spent part of his marine Corp career building homes for abos, and he confirmed their curious nature.
He said they build the village in the same spot because it's sacred to them, then every few years it gets destroyed in a flood, then the government pays to have the soldiers rebuild it in the same spot. He was one of those soldiers.
That sort of retarded shit only happens in places in the middle of nowhere beyond the reach of law and civilization , all of the aboriginals just about you see in populated areas are descendants of aboriginals armed and sent to wipeout their rivals to make space for settlers serving the dual purpose of ending perpetual warfare between tribes.
Ey white fella, got a smoke? Nah? Fackoff then cunt
don't humbug me balla
Damn n-word you are fuckin retarded. I had to read garden gnome Diamond's book in highschool 10 years ago and even then I knew it was full of shit.
Something like 40% of all the coal in Europe was located in the UK. And later they found oil around Scotland. They also have/had the best richest trade route since the colonial era, and they were the closest country to the new world right after Portugal/spain. All while being on a tiny island (natural protection). If that is not luck, I don't know what is.
And yet you brown hoardes sat on a mysterious black liquid for 10,000 years, so plentiful that it would bubble up out of the ground and, at times spontaneously combust. Still...you found nothing useful about it. I guess thats bad luck then.
And the natives of what we call Pennsylvania, West Virginia...they sat on arguably the finest coal in North America and naught came of it...nor the iron ore in Minnesota and the UP. Yet we are expected to believe that Britain was lucky in having those resources, and that gave them a leg up on the white mans burden.
And now the euro man is made to apologize to boring dullards for his entrepid nature, his indefatigable spirit. Yes, a species so smitten by this planets grandeur, that he quite literally dug every element that exists out of the earth just to know it better, to understand what he stood on, where it came from, and to where it goes...yet we are the despised. We are the ones that the hoarde aches to replace.
Why do you expect people who are literally hunter-gatherers to make use of fucking coal. How much of a subhuman ape are you? What's your education level? Are you a rural hick?
funny how the lush green fertile areas are where the retarded evil n-words are and the area that had civilization is a desert, maybe evolution doesn't stop at the neck
sahara used to be more greener and more fertile
thank to white people's CO2 emission for their high quality life aka industrialization
The Sahara has been expanding since at least the Roman colonization of north Africa you stupid pork fried rice n-word
It's been expanding since the earliest Egyptian Pharoahs.
They built pyramids in the fucking desert.
The Nile was twice the river, then, but it was still a fucking desert outside its immediate vicinity.
The whale bones of the sahara tell a different story.
that true
and even more accelerate by european's industrialization but now westoid told china india and other 3rd worlds to reduce co2 emission it's absolute disgusting
Global warming is making the Sahara greener.
We didn't cause the problem, but we're fixing it.
Check your facts, Thai tranny.
Acceleration after the industrial revolution doesn't matter. The vast majority of blacks live south of the Sahara in the lush tropical regions of Africa. With all the resources, terrain, and climate to put together functioning civilization they were never able to build one to last.
There are a few very late instances of African "civilization" that a particularly big dicked n-word was able to scrape together, but they all fell into ruin because the negro peoples are unsuited to civilization both genetically and culturally.
It is absolutely possible to bend nature to man's will. To push back the ocean, to drain swamps, to beat the cold of winter, to tame rivers, and to irrigate the desert. But they did nothing. Look at early city states in the fertile crescent, through generational labor they turned barren desert into productive farmland. Civilization is not something that man builds, so much as something that he carries within him. Anywhere whites and chinks and arabs go they can put a functioning civilization together, no matter the difficulty. blacks can have civilization handed to them and still squander it.
Off brand chud blaming white people that for something that happened in Africa before history was even being recorded?
OK fuck off.
>Indo Europeans industrialized before Yamnaya culture spread out.
>and before the Iron age
What the hell are you on about? And the middle east and north Africa are drying out because they keep degrading their soil quality by destroying marshes and planting the same crops in the same areas for thousands of years
europe so fertile unlike africa it can grow high quality food anywhere
The Sahara is infertile, the other half is some of the most fertile land on earth.
On that note, why did the most advancement in Africa take place in the desert? Egypt didn't need a huge amount of fertile land. They had the Nile at least.
Yet sub-Saharan Africa never advanced. Only when Whites arrived did anything change, and after the Whites left, the Africans never did anything with what the Whites left behind. South Africa never built upon the electrical grids and railroads built by Europeans. They use those things but decades and decades later they have no idea how to repair them.
Anon do you think Africa is one huge desert or something?
Ummm brah
Is abbo pussy tight?
>Picture taken in high summer
You do know why Nord boomers invade your country every winter?
To fuck their kids and trannies probably
Yes
piracy is everywhere even in " le tropical paradise " like southeast asia
what's your point ?
What about the guns? Did they just grow out of the ground only in Europe or what?
Chinks made first firearm dipshit.
the geography in America is better.
why aren't indians geniuses?
>getting blamed for everything
>luck
Fine.. it changes nothing. That book was written by a garden gnome btw
>Diamond
>Silverman
>Silverstein
>Goldstein
>Goldman
Imagine loving money so much you name yourself after it
Even if the shit you spouted were true (it’s not) it doesn’t change the fact that n-words are subhuman.
shit b8. niggies stinky
sage
So African n-words aren't low IQ apes but just the most unlucky gamblers in human history huh? Doubt.
>diamond
Let's try a thought experiment. Assuming all humans everywhere had the same predisposition to sucess and civilization building, where would we expect the most sucessful societies to come about? If there is no differences in the people, the difference must come from the land. So, logically, the most powerful and successful civilizations must come from the richest lands. And which is better land? Africa, with its temperate nad steady climate, good farmland, diversity of crops and wildlife, tons of ores and natural resources such as coal and oil, as well as large amounts of lumber? Or Europe, with its frigid and fluctuating climate, killing conditions (such as winter), treacherous and often unfarmable terrain, limited usable crops and wildlife, and difficult to extract natural resources?
And what happens when we tru to adress these problems, assuming it's all down to culture? We punish sucess, reward failure, tie lodestone around the necks of the sucessful, and forcibly integrate those who should never be integrated, inciting untold friction, suffering, cultural alienation, hatred and effectively shoot our societies in the head. All for the sake of a belief without evidence that is held to religiously. And to solve this you'll cause more hatred, violence, and killing when your deluded fantasies fail to live up to reality.
Methinks you're full of shit
It's not about luck, it's about having a psycho mindset to ruthlessly exploit what nature gave you into expansion, into new resources and biomes, into further exploitation, etc. Europeans had it, the chinks had it and lost it, and the Americans never had it. "Muh Earth Mother" is a cruel mistress, as it turns out.
His book is riddled with lies.
To me this argument neglects cause and effect. So I think he's generally right that certain areas were good for civilization and certain other areas were less good for civilization. But what effect does living in an area good for civilization have on human evolution versus living in an area that's not good for civilization?
I think since civilized humans tend to steamroll humans who aren't civilized, civilized areas would create an environment where certain civilized traits; delayed gratification, increased abstract thought, higher IQ, etc; are more beneficial to survival than traits normally associated with survival in hunter-gatherer groups. So there would obviously be differences between Africans north of Sahara (involved with civilization) and Africans south of the Sahara (not involved with civilization until very recently). Whether it's "luck" or not doesn't really matter, the differences would still be there.
The moral arguments are somewhat irrelevant. Nobody is willing to give up anything of their own to make things "fair" to the civilization-distant peoples of the world. So being civilization-compliant is obviously better. Civilization always beats non-civilization after all.
How to trigger a pigsking: the book.
But there are black pigs, you know that right ? And the wild ones all look like you.
there are hints of truth in it, be he takes it way too far
it's true that the Americas didn't have pigs, sheep, cattle, etc.
but they could have developed pastoral bison farming
hell, jungle monkeys in Thailand tamed water buffalo and elephants so the excuses for Native Americans are thin (unless it's in specific places like the Andes)
Yes, there are specific places in the Americas where metal resources are poor, but in so many places where they were easily accessible they did no metallurgy beyond ornamental gold and copper over useful tools
Diamond points out how amazing the rivers in Europe are and how they're untraversable in Africa. This is true, but he ignores how undeveloped North America was despite the Natives having access to incredible rivers like the Mississippi. Their coastal trade was garbage too comparing The Americas at the time of Columbus to the Mediterranean or East Asia 1500 years earlier but Jared ignores it except to say that people only want to trade along the similar latitudes since crops would only grow in the same types of climate
This makes no sense since trade is generally done for things you can't get in your location, and things like the POTATO would have grown wall all across the Americas, but it took some Spanish Conquistador to come along and figure it out
>there are hints of truth in it
Stopped reading right there garden gnome
excellent anon
you really think africa is a barren desert? lmao
you are really overestimating the ability of n-words to utilize what they were given.
>nego apologist
n-word, please
How does Jared Diamonds argument stack up today now that Africans have access to all the animals and plants that Diamond claimed gave Europeans all the advantage?
not just that but billions of dollars of foreign aid and investment. where does it all go?
Systemic racism
cold climates select for a higher IQ population.
Depends if you think high IQ correlates with sociability in which case, I introduce you to East Asia.
Yep, and only whites have both traits.
the mongols did colonize europe
so did the umayyads
Only Eastern & Southern Europe (respectively).
Old bullshit. Try again.
Read this first:
Shortest History of Europe, John Hirst
Then:
Lessons from History, Willy Durrant
Then:
Hero With an African Face, Clyde Somethingerother
and yet the arid desert produced finer (arabic) civilizations than the fertile south
n-words are and will continue to be useless
Not one African crop was domesticated south of the Equator
African "civilization" consists of the castoffs of Fertile Crescent civilization, plus a few local domesticates like sorghum and Guinea fowl
(((Jared Diamond)))
Im so happy god made me white , just being successful is enough to create untold amounts of seethe
Oy vey this and sapiens will be your children's history book in the next 10 years
This is for serious discussion.
Europeans couldn’t really go to Africa or India before the use of quinine. European biology is adapted to their land, cold being an advantage as it removes pests and parasites that would otherwise would pollute the land and kill them. Any sane person that have been in a jungle will totally prefer the seasonal cold of the northern hemisphere because If it’s cold you can always warm up but if it’s hot and humid you are fucked. Also, mosquitoes.
Just to let you know, it's written in his book that it's possible to tame zebras.
Doesn't that make Africans completely useless?
Actually, that's the opposite of how it works.
if africans never really worked, it's because they never really needed to.
I read his books years ago and its apparent within a few pages that he is simply an anti racist trying to bend reality to make primitive people seem more advanced than what they are.
yup exactly. he admits exactly what he's going to do because he has indigenous friends who are "smart". if they are so smart, why the fuck didn't their people develop anything significant in the way of technology or science?
W E
W
U
Z
K A N G Z
oops wrong pic !
Alcoholism stupid cumskins
Well I guess that justifies mass immigration and ethnic replacement of Europeans.
Do minecrafts like buffalo or tarrant do anything?
No. Only scaling up their ideas would work. Small scale has the opposite effect.
If ISIS destroyed a boat in the Suez or went after power grids, it would do far more damage to the world than just blowing themselves up in a crowded area.
Deboonked
https://westhunt.wordpress.com/category/ggs
Their fragile ego cannot handle the truth, the have to feel "special" 24/7 or else they chimp out. Top kek! "me the best me the best me me me"
Asia is the origin of human civilization and this retard just said its a bad land for humans to exist in.DH88M
Absolutely retarded take
Jared Diamond didn't even believe what we wrote, he knew he was trying to trick people by flipping his own finding backwards.
Africa is thr most natural resource rich continent on the planet. With very easy access to them.
On the other hand Europe has much much less and its much harder to access.
Scarcity and necessity with survival hardship breeds innovation and cooperation, Not Abundance
>half of continent is useless savannahland or desert
There is virtually no cold season (its relatively negligible) in the areas between the desert and jungle - the savannahs. Malay has even worse floods and they did just fine.
The savannahs should have been teeming with civilization and crops. Its a widespread area of fucking grass. Why haven't n-words domesticated the zebra?
>very mountainous
Other than ethiopia/east africa and the majority of southern africa, the western part isn't mountainous at all. And mountains won't make it any more hotter than like, turkey.
>dense jungle
All n-words had to do is invent the axe and start going ham. Fire also helps to clear out extra vegetation.
>bad location for invade and conquering
Really?
Any more colder than turkey*
Whites literally lived through some of the coldest, most inhabitable areas during the ice age. We had to toil through the ice and snow and if we didn't, we died immediately.
n-words have always had food near them 24/7. They could literally go up to a tree and pick fresh fruit off of it, GTFO.
Africa should be teeming with civilization and sciences. Instead they live off other countries that are less suitable than their shithole. No, whites do not have a better playing field and you are a homosexual for thinking it.
It is precisely because whites had it harder that we became more intelligent. We evolved to think ahead and grapple with abstract concepts to survive. It is precisely because of our suffering that we were able to inflict our will upon this world.
whites didn't come from the north
Not true, nordics werent living in the icecap,they were here in the south shagging mamuts meanwhile we fucked their women.
>"Cope" the book
If you think that original man comes from africa and you also think that white people then came out of africa and evolved in the "Lucky Zone" , then as sam kinison says I guess the wytepipo were the only ones smart enough to "MOVE WHERE THE FOOD IS!"
Yes because of genetic luck
Uhh, Diamondbros?
> Single tamed animal
> "This proves the species can be domesticated"
Retard
You do realize that Eurasian horses literally spawned from zebras? Pretty much all of the eurasian megafauna did
And humans are the descendants of apes. What's your point, memeflag retard?
Not me im rh negative.
Sorry aussiebro. Keep swimming, you'll evolve one day
why swim when i can levitate using my vrill alone?
i don't feel bad for the blood of the machine because you do serve a use.
>vrill
It's Vril, with one l
HAHAHA you really are a simple monkey Bulwer-Lytton uses 1 l and he is a fiction writer attempting soft disclosure European mysticism use 2 l's and the r is pronounced as a rolling H.
I'm not going to get crazy and make the claim that all species are domesticable, but the evidence is pretty strong that with selective breeding they absolutely are. We got the western dairy cow out of the auroch, modern horses and ponies from their wild ancestors, dogs from wolves and housecats from their wild ancestors. Ever heard of Dmitri Belyaev? Because of him we have data on the process occurring in real time. It only took them a few generations to get their first examples of foxes with domesticated behaviors and physical characteristics from birth. Around 60 years later and there are multiple fully domesticated housepet tier lines of foxes. You're either a dumb n-word who's completely unfamiliar with the literature or you're being deliberately obtuse.
Katherine hepburn had a pet clouded leopard and Osa Johnson and her husband made pets out of every animal you can imagine by taking them as infants.
>I'm not going to get crazy and make the claim that all species are domesticable,
some, like elephants (or orcas or pandas) just don't want to breed while in captivity so domestication is nearly impossible and you just have to tame wild ones
but with enough work and generations you can turn a wild hog into a "pig" or a bison into a "cow"
and it's not like they didn't know domestication of some animals was possible, they had domesticated dogs in the Americas and Africa
there is no way one individual could learn enough history, in 50+ languages, in a lifetime to give any sort of authoritative opinion on this.
English, motherfucker; do you speak it?
Funny how the resource curse only applies to none-white country that couldn't progress after they reaped an abundance of natural resources like the Ghana Empire and Mansa Musa with his mountains of gold, yet the impotent plains of Germany are one of the many flourishing hubs of western progress despite the lack of resources. And then there is America with an abundance of natural resources that managed to speed-run world hegemony status is under 150 years because of the protestant work ethic and natural resources.
>the temperate climate of Europe led to whitey scaling Everest, reaching south and north pole, exploring Meridian trench, constructing Panama canal. It was all luck of the draw.
>it was just blind chance that whitey discovered the source of the Nile.
My friend recommended that and the tv show it's based on. Was a long time ago. He since hooked up with a short Chinese girl and his two kids look Chinese. Don't consume white demonizing media folks.
I mean i cant hold any grudge to the n-words.
In some sense romantically as that sounds they hunted, ate and fucked and (brith is for the females).
There is nothing wrong with that objectively.
The problem is that they can't integrate into society and are making excuses as to why. It is not because of centuries of oppression or poor geographical positioning, but because the most autistic whites are smarter than the dumbest normal blacks.
You can take a bunch of n-words and adpot them they will usually not be distinguisable from their white counterparts. Maybe their females are a bit different.
There have been actual studies on this here in the US, blacks adopted by whites and vice versa, and genetics wins every time. Adoption has little to no bearing on the outcome of intelligence.
As an American, I disagree. But I understand that you can't speak the truth with muslims and n-words raping your women multiple times a day. Anarcho-tyranny really sucks.
Wouldnt that indicate that american homes are one standard deviation below standard. Then again i ve seen other studies. I dont categorily denie that n-words dumber. But there are have been different studies. And your studies is a bit self defeating.
I really don't see how you drew that conclusion based on the one single example I gave, I've read multiple studies but the bulk of them seem to be mostly making excuses for the results and viewing them through a lens of political correctness in order to try and explain them away, even though the results all point in the same direction. At some point maybe it's time to just accept reality.
For years, this book was taken as gospel - still is. I ignored it b/c I don't read pop history. But it took LULZ to tell me what it's thesis is and to debunk that thesis. That's why I'm here, for info and truth.
*its
I never read that book so i cant rebunk it thesis.
But you can outline that thesis, and i might "rebunk" that for.
CP Grey ( Whom reddit loves ) did a similar thing / fake history video
>>Ohh the North American natives could not prosper because they lacked Horses !!!
I went WHAT ??? -- the Horse was native to North America, it crossed into Asia and Europe by the same land bridge that Indians used to get to North America ---- then they hunted them too extinction.
>>The Natives had agriculture -- potatoes and maze corn ... Me : WHAT ??
They were basiclly still wild plants -- the Potato was still poisonous when the White Man found the Peruvians growing it -- ( they had some ten step way to wash out the poison ) -- never thought to breed it out of the plant like the white man did -- same with the corn -- 99% of the plant was inedible -- one stalk of corn would produce enough flour for a single dorito ..
>the Horse was native to North America
> the Potato was still poisonous
you're as much as a fucking retard as (((jared diamond)))
Jared Diamond is full of shit. A lot of the other peoples he talks about actually DID domesticate plants and animals, so the idea that they didn't have access to domesticable plants and animals is absurd on its face. E.g. amerindians had corn, potatoes, squash, and many other crops, and domesticated llamas and alpacas. While Africans did not domesticate nearly as many, there are clear non-domesticated analogues to domesticated animals in Africa. wild hogs (pigs), zebra (horses), african bees (honey bees), guinea fowl (chickens), as well as actual domesticated crops like sorghum, millet, and yams. Jared Diamond's only evidence that the animals are "non-domesticable" is simply that they are not domesticated.
>>born in moderate climate without any serious natural disaster or disease like tropical cyclone , earthquake ,drought , malaria , sleeping sickness
Europe can have hard winters. There was also "The Little Ice Age."
no very big continent but 80 % of land can grow food and have sufficient
>water for crops like france netherland germany
Germany wasn't great for agriculture until the great forests were cut down. It took a ton of work to make Germany into a land with fields. Even then the heavy soil wasn't great for farming until Europeans invented certain types of iron ploughs.
They also drained a ton of bogs in the north for more farmland.
And quite literally built the Netherlands .
Yup, much of country was actually built rather than just settled. Soon they'll become unstoppable if it continues.
The dumb garden gnome doesnt know that areas of Europe were swamps that had to be drained to make arable land. Entire forests had to be felled to make fields for crops. These half wits know little of this history, as they do not consider it history. We had hurricanes of mongols, cyclones of Huns, earthquakes of Moors. Theres not an acre in Europe that is not soaked in blood, sweat, and tears.
and though I hate the dutch...as do all real Anglos, they pushed the raging north sea back and planted bloody tulips where black waves once thrashed their shores. Non Euros will do anything to justify their not charging into the promised land. They think Europe was always a comfy land of villages and hedge rows. Fortes fortuna juvat.
And what is really disgusting...the one thing we could not overcome, is the jealousy of the hordes, and our own traitorous kin that shamed us into handing over the world to the unworthy, those that reaped where they did not sow, that revel in self pity, that drag us backwards towards an artificial restart, to "set things right" for the underachievers. They expect us to feel ashamed of our history, although they had a 6000 year head start, yet could barely move beyond human sacrafice. And now they denegrate our self sacrafice and call it loathsome. White supremacy was always an invocation, not a statement of fact. These idiots will never understand that.
So now we euro men have been relegated to third tier, while those that never had a spark of adventure in their souls, hold the reins, and as such...hold us back. We constantly feel like we should be doing something more, like constructing moon colonies, or colonizing Antarctica...something, anything...anything is better than being ruled over by dollar chasers, and whining negroes, and big titted whores bouncing up and down.
I remember seeing a video representing battle by casualty rates on a map with red dots, and Europe just glows red all the time once the Romans come into play with it only stopping in 1945.
Watch this video of The Alt-Hype dismantle the non-sense of Jared Diamond's Guns, Germs & Steel book.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/qvaxPH3ftUQ/
Earthquakes are in Europe, retard, and it was malarial even in parts of England before we fixed it
GG&S puts forth some interesting theories. I have another theory: Africa sucks because it's full of n-words.
>didn't race-maxx luck
Jared diamond = garden gnome
garden gnomes people are better at more perception and logical that other indo europeanChuds
lol. lmao.
then why are n-words in America still stupid and self destructive despite living in the same country as whites for several centuries now?
Because you did a racism
How come bug people, poos, garden gnomes, and spics are doing far better than n-words? Why do garden gnomes, bug people, and poos often do better than whites?
Because they did a racism too
How come Somalians that immigrate to the US perform better than blacks born in the USA?
Serious answer, because they are mixed with Arabs, so they benefit from genetics slightly. I believe that the intelligence of people that were slaves in western Africa before Europeans arrived, then sold to slave traders by fellow Africans, were generally lower than the rest of the continent, including their immediate neighbors.
I read a book which was a bunch of accounts of early European arrivals to the western coast, and they described about half of the population as being an underling slave class. Surely they weren't the best and brightest in their native land.
Somalians don't integrate, they just don't behave like n-words, similar to spics
Kek, thankfully for you I was born here and I plan on dying here. Just keep the bugs and poos out for me if I ever want to visit will ya?
Ooga Booga Ching Chong suck my high white ding dong
n-word
Living in USA the white race doesn't seem prosperous. They seem like retards.
White it is true white pepo were in geographically perfect places, there has to have been more to it than just that.
1. Why are meds viewed as lazy while colder climate whites viewed as more productive? There has to have been a genetic component that made colder climate whites more productive and more prone to planning. This is the so called "prodestant work ethic".
2. Middle easterners were in geographically perfect: fertile lands, trade routes to europe in medieval times, oil. Why are they subhuman garbage?
3. You don't mention how atheistic nations are the best and most technologically advanced... I mean that's what happens when you aren't taught that this life is meaningless, when you aren't taught to ignore science and read your same garbage holybook one trillion times instead of other books trying to decipher it's stoneage wisdom. Low IQ and the ridgigity of religion could be holding non-whites back. Yes, low IQ and religion are linked.
Cope of an argument…fucking retard..threw this book out..maybe i should have kept it for shits and gigs
A History of Warfare by John Keegan explains the dominance of Western civilization far more coherently.
>no bad diseases
>black death literally annihilated half of europe
black death come from asia , europe has literally no its local diseases
it doesn't matter you fucking retard. HALF of Europes entire fucking population was ANNIHILATED. HALF. and they were STILL able to come back and we a world super power. in fact, the black death didn't defeat europeans, it inspired them and finished the cultivation of the faustian spirit, giving birth to the desire to control nature rather than be controlled by it. this is something a non-white is incapable of understanding, and something most modern whites have long lost.
african or southeast asian lost their live all the time due tropical disease like malaria chorela , more than fucking europe black death combine
cope harder your opinion are irrelevant
yeah, and you didn't learn anything from it. instead of trying to overcome nature you let it take its course, which is why your country has been historically inferior to any european country.
keep coping? what am I coping for? the history speaks for its self. i don't know why you asians have such a terrible inferiority complex. take pride in your own history instead of trying to tarnish someone elses and downplay their achievements to cope with the fact you have none of your own. the only thing your countries are known for are ladyboys and underage hookers so get your head out of your ass
What's the difference between thousands of years of luck and fate? God exists.
Actually, all these environemental factors influence IQ and genetics greatly. OP you are gay.
>>born in moderate climate
>this definitely worse than picrel
It absolutely is.
There is nothing worse than cold for human survival.
retard , europe winter still have wild animal for meat and snow for water , africa has nothing , they're bad luck not because of IQ or genetic
>europe winter still have wild animal for meat and snow for water , africa has nothing
>africa has nothing
equitorial africa, where the majority of the population of subsaharan africa lives is a tropical climate. They don't have a winter in the european sense anymore than you do you dummy
homosexual africa has 1000s more plants and species than most places in bunch of areas
>africa has nothing
How did Rhodesia feed almost all of Africa? How come South Africa grows vine, fruit and all shit you need?
>africa has nothing
Sir you can't grow crops in freezing temperatures and you had to be extraordinary fit to hunt animals where if you failed to get meat, you died. This is also why Europeans are supper altruistic, if they didn't stay with their tribe and work together, they would very likely be dead.
No. You don't believe in this shit.
why did they make the new cover so ugly lol
anyway, kill garden gnomes
What a garden gnome. Luck to build such huge buildings and walls to keep invaders out. Luck to constantly work on weaponry and food supplies and innovation on boats, million other things
> great wall of china
>luck
>not hard work and perseverance
It doesn't matter why all that matters is that we are superior and we need to stop the kalergification of the superior race.
aren't guns and steel like the same thing?
These types of books are why historical non-fiction is such a fucking joke. It's all about citing sources which agree with your theory. You can prop up literally any idea if you dig through the mountains of worthless books, magazines and reports long enough.
I'm sorry to be That Guy but GG&S has been thoroughly debunked. Unironically.
Verification not required. Cope, seethe, and also dilate
That looks like NEGROlegendary propaganda
Couldn't resist
saved
n-word
Hey, remember how all the Greeks and romans had massively successful colonies and even branched off independent civilizations on the northern coast of Africa?
Carthage rivaled Rome, and it was a Greek colony in one of the shittiest parts of shitafrica.
>Luck is having a high enough IQ to figure out leaving shitty death zones is a good thing.
Got it. We're retarded or something.
> all of your scientific discoveries and inventions were pure flukes, beginners luck.
yes , white have a comfy life for most of the time while africans isn't so they can figure more things
being in survival hardshipness don't make your rich
>moderate climate
>*BLOCKS YOUR PATH*
we're gods chosen homosexual it's why the garden gnomes hate us, get over it
Africa is one of the breadbaskets of the world. Look at how much food they export. Check it out, the only people stopping them from being fed is themselves.
garden gnomes will pay their karmic debt. I forgive my grandparents for being deceived. I will not follow their tracks.
Except that don’t these retards believe everyone came from Africa? So basically you’re telling me that the smart ones found somewhere easy to live and the retards stayed in Africa and ungabungad?
Why didn’t they migrate too? Or is it because they’re genetically retarded?
How come Aus is successful? We are on a desert? Answer: we are white and didnt have socialists until the 70s
Zebras are hard to domasticate ?Nah, the book's advantage is that it combines elements from so many fields to make the grand naratives, that you have to diaprove too many elements from too many fields to demonstrate the falacies.
White people move to South Africa --> successful
White people move to Australia -> successful
White people move to America -> successful
I just debunked your entire theory
Best part of multiculti South America? The parts with the most whites
White people brought technology and knowledge that was already developed in Europe to make outside places more hospitable, so you aren’t directly disproving OP’s point because all of the success still started in Europe.
Read it back in 2020. Intresting read, and it really tries to explain things on purely nonracist basis,which is the reason some people irrationally hate it.
Some info was really intresting, not that it's rare or something, i just never encountered it.
I never realised how polinesians and oceanians pretty much colonised the ocean in a way that's allmost implies an experiment.
Intresting read overall
People usually go butthurt on authors nonracist stance but do not have an intellectual courage agree with the author on a point's where he is correct.
I enjoyed the book, too. However, it was somewhat marred by a daft 'woke' preface. The book itself is reasonable, but in my edition they tacked on a long explicitly nonracist gush that colored the rest somewhat. I particularly liked the history of the food supply, though.
>I particularly liked the history of the food supply,
Yes me too. A lot of his insights cling to a basic geography and biosphere of the regions. And well, i think he is right in many things.
For insnce modern man allmost does not realises that the weather is shit and will fuck you up> Just 100 years ago famines in Russia happened allmost every year. Siberia is simply out of question, it's a region where even natives barely managed to survive. On one retarded set of years in 1890 European russia had allmost equatorial rains that fucked up the fields, and guess what? African heat that fucked everyone crops in the next year.
I had an intresting conversation with my uncle on the topic, the thought is that extreme weather condition mostly tend people to optimise their lives to a harsh conditions. It's not progressive at all, people have no chill, they are always in a race against weather, season changes and a luck. 1890s peasant lifestile does not implies anything else than dumbing down hard work in a race against impending winter.
Ivan doesn't have time to sit on his ass and making music - the short summer must be worked to the fullest, if you do not want to have another famine and see your father going off to a woods to die because he decided that the family will not survive with the old man eating.
Weren't Russian farmers owned slaves though? Or was that not all of them
If it's only about geography and climate, Aztecs would have been be the dominant culture.
The author was cherry picking.
>despite no very big continent but 80 % of land can grow food and have sufficient
Europe's soil is shit compared to African soil.
Also, nothing about work ethics and social structure?
>posts deboonked book
One of the worst douchebags I ever met insisted I read this book and told me Jared Diamond was the smartest man on the planet, and it wasn't even close. Literally just say wypipo bad in a sort of fancy pseudo scientific way and you're the smartest man on earth to these demented lunatics.
>Whites
>More prosperous
Amazing to me that people see 10k years of recorded history with dozens of different cultures and races being on top for hundreds of years at a time and go yup, 18th century is when history started and white people have been winning non-stop.
I think it is because the american civilization is very young and it still has to go through its first historical cycle of collapse. The nordics and germanics who piggypack the usa's success and self identify as whites (they are not) probably suffer from memory loss and Stockholm syndrome.
>despite no very big continent but 80 % of land can grow food and have sufficient
not in Australia where the majority of people are white and have still created a solid society unlike the Aboriginals
perfect location for trade route and prevent from invader ( that why there're only european colonized africa and asia but not african and asian colonize europe )
Mongols made it to eastern Germany and Moors made it to southern France
>abundance of industrial resources like iron and coal is main reason why european industrialization are successful
I thought it was the expoloiting of colonies that made it so succesful
while africa or asia
but this is of course a bait thread, I only commnented this in case someone repeats them for real
(((Jared Diamond)))
White people invented the use of the horse-drawn wagon thereby enabling civilizations to rise including the Danube Valley Civilization.
Also, evolution was on the White man's side. Hail Tyr-Caelus! Hail Wodan! Hail Perun!
If by "luck" you mean "work ethic"
You will never outshine the work ethic of the people that built this country. Though you may work..
>white race are more prosperous than others just because of luck
So we are chosen by God? Feels good, man. You can just give up if that's the case, btw.
The cope of subhumans that need to be bring up by the white man is unreal, is also thankless proving that was a waste of effort.
n-word