There is loterally nothing as “french” or “english”
Both are meme ethnicities that arose out of successive historical rapes
I have more respect to ethnicitues that established themselves and expressed themselves natively like ancient greeks from mycenae to roman invasion, italics from etruscans to germanic invasions and germanics
>There is loterally nothing as “french” or “english” >Both are meme ethnicities
Don't be an idiot.
https://i.imgur.com/Jqk7uuM.jpg
What's the cause of this
Edward III was a descendant of Harold Godwinson by way of his mother, Isabella
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isabella_of_France
Edward III
Isabella of France
Philip IV of France
Isabella of Aragon, Queen of France
Violant of Hungary
Andrew II of Hungary
Béla III of Hungary
Euphrosyne of Kyiv
Mstislav I of Kyiv
Gytha of Wessex
Harold Godwinson
I can understand that accusation for the French, but how is English not an ethnicity? Anglo-Saxons come and intermingle with Celts, thus giving rise to the current English stock. What about that is objectionable to you? That's how basically all ethnic groups are born.
What's the cause of monarchism? The easy answer is that monarchs prepetuate monarchism, but really its just one stage in the wider history of humanity, our story from hunter-gatherers (primitive communism) to the future (communism). The British proletariat will overthrow their oppressers some time, it is inevitable and this has actually been proven by science (see: Marxist-Leninist dialectical materialism).
Hunter gatherers were ruled by brutal ooga booga leaders who tried to make sure everyone was fed and that their band was protected. The idea of prehistoric communist hippies is a fantasy.
Walter Stewart, he fought under Robert the Bruce and eventually married his daughter. The Bruce's ran out of male heirs. That's how the House of Stewart came into any serious claims.
It's a consistent pattern throughout history that societies are very often ruled by foreign elites, especially settled agricultural ones. You see this everywhere, it's simply the natural tendency of human organisation. "Classes" are just proxies for ethnicities.
Classifying Germans as "foreign" to Anglos is a bit silly, no one has gotten organically upset over Napoleon who is a lot more foreign to France than that
Honestly not much different in comparison with other kingdoms. Either there were royals imported from French or German lands, and rarely they were from the nation they were ruling.
genetics
The English are a natural slave race.
Brits out of Ireland? No, Brits out of England!
There is loterally nothing as “french” or “english”
Both are meme ethnicities that arose out of successive historical rapes
I have more respect to ethnicitues that established themselves and expressed themselves natively like ancient greeks from mycenae to roman invasion, italics from etruscans to germanic invasions and germanics
>There is loterally nothing as “french” or “english”
>Both are meme ethnicities
Don't be an idiot.
Edward III was a descendant of Harold Godwinson by way of his mother, Isabella
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isabella_of_France
Edward III
Isabella of France
Philip IV of France
Isabella of Aragon, Queen of France
Violant of Hungary
Andrew II of Hungary
Béla III of Hungary
Euphrosyne of Kyiv
Mstislav I of Kyiv
Gytha of Wessex
Harold Godwinson
>Kyiv
I can understand that accusation for the French, but how is English not an ethnicity? Anglo-Saxons come and intermingle with Celts, thus giving rise to the current English stock. What about that is objectionable to you? That's how basically all ethnic groups are born.
What's the cause of monarchism? The easy answer is that monarchs prepetuate monarchism, but really its just one stage in the wider history of humanity, our story from hunter-gatherers (primitive communism) to the future (communism). The British proletariat will overthrow their oppressers some time, it is inevitable and this has actually been proven by science (see: Marxist-Leninist dialectical materialism).
Hunter gatherers were ruled by brutal ooga booga leaders who tried to make sure everyone was fed and that their band was protected. The idea of prehistoric communist hippies is a fantasy.
Hunter-gatherers tend to be closely related so I doubt most were anything.
*anything like that
By the standards how are the Stewarts Scottish? The myth origin and earliest recording of the name seems to be a Breton man.
Walter Stewart, he fought under Robert the Bruce and eventually married his daughter. The Bruce's ran out of male heirs. That's how the House of Stewart came into any serious claims.
>Implying the Tudors aren't as French as the Plantagenets
Stephen was 90% french too
It's a consistent pattern throughout history that societies are very often ruled by foreign elites, especially settled agricultural ones. You see this everywhere, it's simply the natural tendency of human organisation. "Classes" are just proxies for ethnicities.
Tudor was the most kino house imo
b
Classifying Germans as "foreign" to Anglos is a bit silly, no one has gotten organically upset over Napoleon who is a lot more foreign to France than that
There is the Conqueror and then there is everybody else
the more german the more shit they became, makes sense.
You are also forgetting Cnut and descendants, who were also danes.
welsh are english and have been so for 800 years
stop pretending theyre different just because they have a meme dead language
Honestly not much different in comparison with other kingdoms. Either there were royals imported from French or German lands, and rarely they were from the nation they were ruling.