What's JFK's legacy?
well one of martyrdom, people attach their dreams onto him and his brother. however, he was not a very competent president, and he was a terrible human being.
People will argue about his assassination until the end of time.
Really? You think in the year 3000 people will give a fuck about some leader from 1970?
Average LULZ poster
We still talk about Roman emperors. Why wouldn't future people talk about American presidents?
Really? You think in the year 2000 people will give a fuck about some leader from 44 BC
After the US collapses it will be accepted by the history books that the JFK assassination was a government coverup along with the many corrupt things this country has done.
But your average person won't know or care.
>After the US collapses
Just two more weeks
Do you really think the US will exist in 3000 years? We'll be lucky if humans haven't completely sudoku'd by then. What happens when countries like Saudi Arabia figure out how to make super weapons?
Given how much war, genocide, destruction, hatred, inhumanity we've seen in the last 3000 years, it's pretty easy to see mass devastation sometime in the next 3000 years with weapons capable of making the entire earth uninhabitable. We're facing WW3 because two countries that were one country 40 years ago can't get along. Hell, if it weren't for one man we would have had all out nuclear war during the Cuban Missile Crisis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasily_Arkhipov)
What? Is it really a reach to say that the world is in trouble? How exactly am I demoralizing you? Go find a wife, have kids, live life the way you want to. Doesn't change the fact that Kim Jong Un is plotting to invade South Korea and potentially use nukes.
>Countries are just going to break MAD because... because they just would ok
Nukes were not even around 100 years ago and right now we have two separate countries threatening to use them. What's going to happen in 3000 years? Are we going to disarm the world of the knowledge of nuclear fission? Get real.
>Putin's sabre rattling in totally legit guys
>He's going to use nukes because... because he just is ok
>Man with a gun pointed at you says he might shoot you
>Why are you worried about dying bro lmao
Because it happens in literally every war
>No stop I'm going to use nukes
And then no one listens because using nukes and staring WW3 is something literally no country wants
>Because it happens in literally every war
Okay, so in the next 3000 years, how many wars will we have? Countless. And every single one of these wars, every single world leader will agree they don't want WW3? What happens when a country feels like its nuclear defenses can stop nuclear attacks? Why wouldn't they nuke the shit out of everyone into submission?
>demoralized idiot tries to drag others down to his level
You see it every day more and more on this website.
>Although trying to guess who the culprit is fine, doing it as a contest or to the detriment of enjoying the story is unwise and misses the point
>No it's definitely happen this time
You sound young. People screeching about how the world is on the brink of collapse tend to be young. They get excited very easily the first time they see anything that looks like a major paradigm shift. It's why college students are always at the forefront of every "revolution", then grow up to be regular people. Well, most of them. Some of them stay "revolutionaries" and become smelly adjunct professors at community colleges.
>People screeching about how the world is on the brink of collapse tend to be young
I'm saying there's a large probability that humans will wipe themselves out in 3000 years. That's not exactly the brink of collapse.
I'm 31 years old. I've substantiated my claim multiple times in this thread and the only responses I get are "lol doomer". How about coming up with counter points if I'm so off base.
>I've substantiated my claim multiple times
>Uh this politician did the same bullshit sabre rattling that happens in literally war so that means their going to use it
I said they might use it. You seem to have difficulty grasping the concept that the world MIGHT not be here in 3000 years. As if even discussing the possibility of global war in 3000 years is so far beyond the comprehension of a sane person that it can only be the insane ramblings of a lunatic.
Yes because no one is that retarded to do it
>NO SOME DUDE WILL TOTALLY USE NUKES BECAUSE I SAID OK BECAUSE THEY JUST WILL I NEED TO BE NIHILIST DOOMER AND JACK OFF OVER HOW SMART I'AM
>I NEED TO BE NIHILIST DOOMER AND JACK OFF OVER HOW SMART I'AM
All I said was the US might not be here in 3000 years and you started this pointless argument. The only person jacking off to his own intelligence is you. You're so wise. I'm humbled by your stance that humanity will go on forever unscathed by our reckless wars.
>I'm humbled by your stance that humanity will go on forever unscathed by our reckless wars.
Yes because nuclear powers have avoided war each other because of nukes.
>In the 80 years of multiple countries having nuclear powers we've never had a nuclear conflict
Yet we've had extremely close calls like the Cuban Missile Crisis, where 2 out of 3 soviet captains authorized a nuclear strike against the US navy.. 80 years is only 2.6% of
3000 years. I accidentally hit post.
Did it happen you retard
>NOO BUT IT COULD HAVE OK
>No but it could have
That's been my point since the first fucking post you dunce. Yes it didn't happen, but it could happen in the future as nothing has really changed since then and it came down to blind luck that Vasily Arkhipov was in charge of that nuclear submarine.
The bay of pigs fiasco
Why do people act like he was some turbo progressive that was totally end the Cold War and get rid of the CIA?
because he was. he is literally the sole reason for the civil rights act to exist
The absolute state of LULZ
who proposed it you illiterate retard
> he is literally the sole reason for the civil rights act to exist
That was LBJ you mong
Vietnam and the beginning of the end for the US
He was literally sending American advisors to Vietnam
>beginning of the end for the US
To be fair, democracy and rule of law in America is on the brink of collapse if the Project 2025 agenda gets through.
>no for real guys this time it's going to collapse!
>He was literally sending American advisors to Vietnam
And? He had Diem coup’d like a week before Oswald BTFO’d his cranium. Had he lived he would have been faced with the same choices as LBJ, the same retards for advisors, and Kennedy was MORE anti-communist than Johnson. Johnson never became fixated on getting rid of Castro. Kennedy did.
What an absolutely reddit-level of understanding. Please fuck off
I'm referring to the people who think JFK could have stopped the Vietnam War from happening
>the people who think
Literally who? You replied to me, retard
>You replied to me, retard
And that post being
Holy fuck how retarded are you
Kennedy is why Vietnam happened to begin with. Coup’ing Diem was a retard move and I unironically wish Nixon had won in 1960 because he wouldn’t have done something so fucking stupid
>it hasnt happened yet
>that means it will literally never happen
No empire lasts forever.
you talk like a fag
Two more weeks
Dying like a pussy after not getting anything he proposed through Congress. KWAB.
That quote "don't ask what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country"
Liking it or not it's a very popular phrase
Yeah but it's a dumb phrase when your country is run by incompetent retards that are actively poisoning it.
Nah. The point stands. In that scenario what you can do for your country is to cure the poison.
>Dude we're all going to be like because of da nooks
>No why is everyone calling me a doomer homosexual
Just replace nukes with climate change and it's literally the same thing
You haven't made a single point this thread, I don't expect you to now.
>Two more weeks
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save name for the next time I post.