What would he think of trannies?

What would he think of trannies?

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    he'd want to fuck one

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    He was a close friend of Miwa, so I doubt he would have had issues with them.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      If he hung out with Akhiro Miwa, I'd say he had no issues at all...

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      If he hung out with Akhiro Miwa, I'd say he had no issues at all...

      drag queens aren't the same thing as trannies.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Supportive

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    His views make no sense.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      just like 99% of views of anyone

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    is there a mishima flowchart?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Mishima was very elitist and didn't like democracy but his social views were pretty liberal (which shouldn't come as a surprise, the man liked gay sex). If you don't believe me, read his novel Beautiful Star, where he expresses pretty egalitarian views on women. And no it's not just the characters or some sort of ironic narration, the novel tackles many societal issues and his own views come through. Anyway, he was clearly a mtM transsexual (male to MALE)

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >gay sex
      No, he did not.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >the man liked gay sex
        i think you're projecting

        We know that he had gay sex you retarded naggers.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >If you don't believe me, read his novel Beautiful Star, where he expresses pretty egalitarian views on women
      He wrote an essay praising misogyny.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        What's the name of the essay? I'm not saying that he's not misogynistic at all nor do I try to deny that he was some type of a traditionalist. But if you read some of his more socially engaged writings, it comes off as surprisingly liberal, and non-moralizing. He was for example an anti-communist, but many times in his writing he expresses certain sympathies for their views. He certainly wasn't a chud.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Be careful with the word "misogyny."

          It is not anti-semitic to say that israeli people have a certain level of media or market dominance, just as it is not misogynistic to say that women are sometimes more interested in form than function, or are sometimes physically weaker, and perhaps even mentally weaker, than men.

          If what I stated above are true facts, then there's no "anti-semitism" nor "misogyny" there. A person trying to bring up exceptions to what I stated there, as if I was somehow "dead wrong," would be more lie than truth, so I certainly don't think we need to play games of ideological warfare here.

          Sometimes a fact about reality just doesn't fit a fictional ideal, and so writing an essay on observed facts isn't misogynistic nor hateful in any form at all, at least not inherently. The conclusions drawn could be hateful, sure, but to that effect, what conclusions are actually being drawn? And if those conclusions even are hateful, are they wrongfully hateful, or rightfully hateful?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          https://masakijinzaburo.substack.com/p/discourse-on-misogyny-by-yukio-mishima

          He was an archetypical chud.

          ----------------------

          Women have no connection to the abstract spirit. In music and architecture nothing decent has come of women's hands, and they always sully transparent abstract structures with a sticky sensibility. An absence of organizational ability, an excess of sensibility, trivialism, a meaningless specificity, and a low-grade realism - these are all womanly flaws, and in the arts a womanly style is unproblematically "bad" style. I cannot but curse the literary history of Japan, which has continued endlessly with damp sensibility.

          Although abstraction is in one aspect the ability to know moderation and restraint, because women lack these things, even masculine women like George Sand write and are proud of unreadable tedious works without beginning or end. I love Nōgaku most among Japanese arts, but its principle of restraint is entirely due to the invention of men. Hearing recently that there are schools that allow women to enter the stage of Nōgaku, I am astounded by their lack of principle.

          My hatred of Romanticism comes entirely from my hatred of women. Tearful works, sob stories, heartbreak suicides, the pushing of solitude - such things all flatter women and are the degradation of art.

          In fact, the degradation of art stems entirely from the advancement of women in society. When women complain about something, male artists with no backbone have always compromised and submitted to them. That feminist France delayed granting women the franchise for so long is because France knew what art is. I wish we would tie women MDs5 and suchlike together with rope and throw them into Tokyo Bay. As for women who show their faces in public, like Ancient Greece, sophisticated prostitutes are alone enough.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Even I open doors for women, allow them to enter cars first, and lend them an arm when crossing the street as a compromise with the world, but inside I am telling them to eat shit. In general, even going by average life expectancy, women necessarily live longer than men, and it is strange that short-lived human beings must take care of long-lived human beings.
            >Women are inferior, and I have rarely met a woman who is not foolish (this naturally includes clever fools). In truth, further, I am afraid of women, but what I fear most in men also is the foolish man. Indeed, there is nothing so fearful as a fool. As a note, because there are also foolish PhDs and many intelligent people who have received no education at all, I am not taking educational attainment into issue at all.
            >I believe that generally women are low-class and men are high-class, because I think that men created culture by focusing the energies left over from the reproductive function.
            -
            >Thus, the type of woman that I like is close to idiotic3, but the mechanism of complete idiots is uninteresting because too clearly visible. To be idiotic enough to ask whether tenor is the lowest male voice is charming and good. What are called intellectual women are in fact nothing like intellectual in the true meaning of the word, and that they hold no charm for me is surely because they are generally not beautiful and because, for all the sterile knowledge crammed into their heads, they are exceedingly poor at deciphering humor, and because they are essentially complete idiots.
            https://masakijinzaburo.substack.com/p/women-i-like-by-yukio-mishima

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              He basically says he likes dumb fuck-pieces. Seems pretty misogynistic to me.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I know. Watch that fag come in this thread and say this isn't misogynistic actually. Idk why he wants to convince us that Mishima was liberal. Is he feeling guilty for enjoying the work of a misogynist?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Mishima hated romanticism, wtf? He WAS a romantic!!! (technically he was probably a modernist, but one with a certain amount of romantic influences imo)

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Many such cases, actually. See: Ezra Pound. Perhaps romanticism is something that can never be undone even if one despises it?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Even I open doors for women, allow them to enter cars first, and lend them an arm when crossing the street as a compromise with the world, but inside I am telling them to eat shit. In general, even going by average life expectancy, women necessarily live longer than men, and it is strange that short-lived human beings must take care of long-lived human beings.
            >Women are inferior, and I have rarely met a woman who is not foolish (this naturally includes clever fools). In truth, further, I am afraid of women, but what I fear most in men also is the foolish man. Indeed, there is nothing so fearful as a fool. As a note, because there are also foolish PhDs and many intelligent people who have received no education at all, I am not taking educational attainment into issue at all.
            >I believe that generally women are low-class and men are high-class, because I think that men created culture by focusing the energies left over from the reproductive function.
            -
            >Thus, the type of woman that I like is close to idiotic3, but the mechanism of complete idiots is uninteresting because too clearly visible. To be idiotic enough to ask whether tenor is the lowest male voice is charming and good. What are called intellectual women are in fact nothing like intellectual in the true meaning of the word, and that they hold no charm for me is surely because they are generally not beautiful and because, for all the sterile knowledge crammed into their heads, they are exceedingly poor at deciphering humor, and because they are essentially complete idiots.
            https://masakijinzaburo.substack.com/p/women-i-like-by-yukio-mishima

            >Masaki
            This guy is a major chud sycophant though. Some japanon should verify the translations.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              True, but he's not smart enough to write something this funny so it must be real.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >the man liked gay sex
      i think you're projecting

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      He called women retarded in two essays.
      Anyway, he would have no problems with HSTS, but would hate AGPs, like most gays.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Would like them because he too is a histrionic homosexual.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      So, like you?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        No offense but why are you defending a DYEL who played samurai when he never killed a man in his life?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          ?
          it's ok if you like trannies anon

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Stfu homosexual, you're not the same person I replied to.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Are you sure?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Oh so you're just another catty schizophrenic shithead.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                And you're just another retarded leftist. Go back fellating they/thems on twitter.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Not gay enough!

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    He dated them.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Read Onnagata

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    He'd see them in a tradition vs modernity context and highlight them as heralds of the latter.
    He'd describe them as a symptom of modernity failing upon its preachings, where the traditional customs are secularized and allowed to be denigrated as a release valve from the opressive mechanisms of modernity.
    The real question to ask here is if according to him, this would be an acceptable side effect when compared to tradition's shortcomings and if it's a writing on the wall for modernity or not.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    He has a cameo in Black Lizard (1968) and gets kissed on the lips by one (Miwa).

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      If any author did that today they'd cancel him for being woke. Like that guy trying to retroactively make the greeks not gay

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    He looks obscenely ugly to me

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    weak delusional idiots who he might or might not want to fuck

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    He'd be one.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >The story they tell about making a joke about Mishima's height and him getting mad and storming out

    30 mins in

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Japanese drag queen
      >looks like a Turkish women
      What the fuck

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Would

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >AAA I'MU TROONINGUGAAAA!!!!

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The tolerance of samurai society towards gay sex is a not often talked about driver of his attraction to that lifestyle

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I think he would have seen transgenderism as a misguided and misdirected attempt at capturing the female essence. He was very close and thought very higely of Onnagata, and believed that an Onnagata can capture the essence of femininity more than a women can. He would advise trannies to not dwell on the physical aspects, and suggest them to become crossdressers who embrace the special twilight of femininity lived as a male.

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    we dont have to wonder. He loved them and had interactions with them by virtue of his lifestyle. Mishima wasn't nearly as conservative on certain issues as lit and the new right make him out to be (not that he wasn't generally)

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's because he wasn't a conservative, he was a traditionalist, the Japanese aren't bothered by men crossdressing, probably because of Kabuki and androgynous beauty...and samurai and monks fucking little boys

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He'd fucking love them. Imagine how much more dramatic a suicide roleplay would be if it was a tranny watching him.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *