What would be the outcome if Russia actually fought Nato?

What would be the outcome if Russia actually fought Nato?

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Charlie India Alpha

    Nuclear holocaust, assuming Russias nukes still work that is.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      they don't
      that's why you see them chimping out to test "new" bombas
      I think they still have the know-how about how to create them
      possibly

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Didn’t the US try to test a minute man 3 missile recently just for it to fail? I guess you are a memeflag though so genuine conversation is pointless with retards like you.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          calling me a retard doesn't help ruskie nuclear program though
          they're inert, no warheads
          ruskies said they do not follow the testing agreement anymore
          so where are the boom booms?
          no boom booms?
          they do not work

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Doesn’t the US buy refined nuclear fuel from Russia even to this day because the US has lost the ability to even produce it themselves. It’s one of the few industries not sanctioned by the US and RosAtom is the largest creator of reactors, nuclear equipment, fuel, machinery and related products in the world, so if anyone has a functional arsenal it would be them while the US has yet to prove even it’s missiles from the 70s still work while Russia never stopped creating new ICBMs.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    kek how do you even have a dick grow from a knee-thigh area
    i wanna have a knee/thigh dick too

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You must suck the female knee dick.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the person that made it chopped their's off long ago, please understand.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      wait a minute, are you telling me there are people out there without thigh/knee dicks?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Depends on how many gloves come off.

      >nukes fly, no nuclear winter
      End of the US and Russia as hegemonic powers.
      Asia, Africa, and South America dominate the 21st century.

      >nukes fly, nuclear winter
      End of US and Russia as hegemonic powers. China collapses, India is stressed but has equatorial agriculture, South America, and Africa dominate.

      >no nukes
      The initial Union State push into Poland will probably cost around a million EU lives, but the war ends with Russia occupied.

      Get a yaoi artist to stroke your thigh, but *make sure she uses her right hand*. If she uses her left you get an extra anus.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    millions would die and russia would win in the end despite fucking up a lot along the way

    urpeons have done this how many times already?

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    if no nukes russian would be obliterated

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They'd be obliterated with nukes too, they'd just take down most of the west with them, assuming a majority of their missiles still function.

      So it's just about gambling whether the people who rule Russia are willing to commit suicide to kill the west, or if they think they can come out ahead by backstabbing their current leader to negotiate a deal with the west. Given the nature of the Russian, I find the latter far more likely.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    One atom bomb on any nato city
    1 million dead naggers

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You'd be doing us a favor.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    SAGE

    I came inside your gypsy mother's unwashed asshole, you underage homosexual

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      taci in pizda ma-tii de adolescent

      • 3 weeks ago
        SAGE

        Cope

        I support Joe Biden and the continued bombing of Gazan apes

        kys

        All israelite must fucking hang

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Cope

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I support Joe Biden and the continued bombing of Gazan apes

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      kys

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >If you dont blindly follow my CIA narrative you're a russian.
        Propagandists are getting worse and worse.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous
  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Russians would slaughter Europe. The only real threat would be the US. Russia would win a nuclear exchange because of how huge Russia is. Surviving Russians would relocate to a non radiated part of Russia.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They would utterly destroy the NATO equipped/trained armies in a completely humiliating curbstomp war. Oh wait.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Probably better for Russia than before Feb 22 considering everyone but the USA has demilitarized it's self sending gibs to the Ukrainians

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Assuming the nukes actually exist, and they still work, everyone loses. Either side would just let fly when faced with a tangible threat of occupation. Do you think Ukraine wouldn't nuke Moscow if they had one? There will never be hot war between Nuclear nations, because the leaders by and large aren't insane. That's why we have Ukraine conflict to begin with.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The only way Russia would inflict any serious damage on the west is if they used nukes, and that would result in Russia's total annihilation. Russia's only hope for not being totally destroyed would be to face NATO in a conventional war, which would merely result in Russia's military being totally destroyed and most of its major cities being occupied by NATO troops.

    From there, it depends on how good Russia's long game plan is, if they plan to do an insurgency to wait out the NATO occupation, or if a faction in government coups Putin (or whoever is in charge) and makes peace with NATO. Very likely NATO (read: the US) will accept a conditional surrender in order to bring the conflict to an end, because a long-term war aiming for unconditional surrender is unlikely. Worst case scenario is Russia balkanizes and now multiple tin pot dictators have access to nuclear weapons. Better to keep Russia mostly intact, to keep an eye on its nuclear arsenal, and then simply weigh it down with restrictions on militarization and probably taking away large swaths of its territory to create new buffer states.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      nice fantasy cope. you lost to goat fuckers lmao

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >successfully invading a country and failing to achieve long-term goals in your occupation is the same as failing to invade the country altogether
        Retard

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >invading a country that still has middle age tech and gdp of one USA city is the same as invading a country that is literally supported by whole western world alongside modern weapons and gorillions of dollars every week

          Retard x2

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    complete NATO collapse. They don't even have any tanks or ATGMs left since they gave them all to ukraine.

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    All western country would colapse in something like two hours
    Absolutly no one in the west (it's justified) want to fight for israelites, women and others shit like this
    In the US 80% of zoomers and milenials can't even be enlisted and the 20% that can would probably go join the russians and chinese

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      good thing we don't need useless zoomers for let's say pilot suicide drones into hordes of russo-chinks

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    nato countries can't even stop muslims from invading

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    scenario 1: Russia vs NATO, Russia is alone and will likely lose hence they choose nuclear war.
    result of scenario 1: (you) die in an irradiated hellfire

    scenario 2: Russia vs NATO, where for some reason Russia agree to not use nukes. Russia will likely lose, and when it happens the next on the chopping block are China and Iran, hence the moment the war starts is actually NATO vs Russia + China + Iran/arab league together + India (jolly) + Turkey (jolly). now Usa will likely lose hence they choose nuclear war.

    result of scenario 2: (you) die in an irradiate hellfire

    scenario 2: Russia vs NATO, where for some reason Usa agree to not use nukes. Russia will likely lose, and when it happens the next on the chopping block are China and Iran, hence the moment the war starts is actually NATO vs Russia + China + Iran/arab league together + India (jolly) + Turkey (jolly). now Usa lose.

    result of scenario 3: (you) slave in a bauxite mine

    doesn't look really good.

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Victim alliance of Russia, Iran and China would completely nuke the West.

    China would most likely invade Russia from the East.

    Madison Grant predicted all of this.

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    China would also fight NATO.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If they stay out of it they have a chance of winning, if they get involved they have a chance of glowing.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I’m pretty sure if an actual nuclear war between nato and Russia occurred then the US would be striking China regardless of them being uninvolved as the israelite running the US are hardly going to just hand the future of the planet to them. They would not be spared and the Chinese are also aware of this which is why they are massively increasing their nuclear stockpile.

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Bankruptcy for NATO.
    It's what's already happening in slow motion.
    The other thing that is being shown is just how ineffective NATO currently is.
    Their combined might is getting blown the fuck out by a few Slavs.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Their combined might is getting blown the fuck out by a few Slavs.

      Vatnik myths. Russia has the support of the largest demographic giant on Earth.

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    NATO's proven inept against Russia's half-way military action for two years. In a proper engagement the likely outcome would be multiple European capitals getting rekt in the first 36 hours, followed by immediate capitulation by the homosex populations of those countries.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ukraine was able to beat back the attack on Kyiv despite not actually expecting it. Moving enough forces around for a direct invasion of any other Butthurt Belt country would be logistically obvious... and would probably weaken lines in Ukraine. I'm not sure how Russian morale for an invasion of Poland (which they have no real ties to and which they expect to be hostile) will be if Ukies retook Donetsk.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        If it wasn't for western help Ukraine would lose this war in 2 months top.

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >The initial Union State push into Poland will probably cost around a million EU lives, but the war ends with Russia occupied.
    Why the fuck would they even try to occupy Poland? Schizo retard ramblings. They haven't even tried to occupy Ukraine, why would they reach for Poland? Do you realize what a nuisance occupying a nation is? Perpetual guerilla warfare and insurgencies. Russia got Crimea and the Donbass, that's it. There's no reverting that fact. Crimea and the Donbass will be a part Russia as a duchy, Ukraine will never join NATO, but will be granted some sort of consolation price by a special economic agreement with the EU.

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    With an even deeper depletion of white males in the west, Lansky will have achieved a massive Kalergian success

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *