fat women dont care and will justify what ever their pants are, high waisted has always been in because it makes your legs look longer and goes up to the natural waist and follows the natural curves of the body
>high waisted has always been in because it makes your legs look longer
This, why would you purposefully heck up your proportions by wearing low rise and make your legs looks shorter, man or women. Also only 15 year olds get turned on by seeing mid riff.
It’s simply done by greedy as heck companies to save on fabric and there not even comfortable, when i switched to high rise i never looked back. My shirt never untucks and my cock and bollocks have more space.
they are all old and ugly, but look better with high rise than low rise
Anonymous says:
>bourkas >Cant recognize an SNL skit
Zoomer spotted
Anonymous says:
>SNL
actually who cares
Anonymous says:
Trump lost
Anonymous says:
I know it was SNL, SNL hecking sucks shit
Anonymous says:
>SNL
Szoylent boy discovered
Anonymous says:
Whats wrong with a milfy housewife?
Anonymous says:
The midriff isn’t the turn on, it’s the nearly exposed pussy.
Anonymous says:
you hecking coomers are all degenerates. You really think people should just walk around like that? Would you get turned on if your mom dressed like that? Idiot
Anonymous says:
I don’t terribly care for the style. I was just point out that you missed the point of it. That being said I am a degenerate.
Anonymous says:
Anonymous says:
I do and I am a proud degenerate
Anonymous says:
>nearly exposed pussy >eight to ten inches away from the top of low rise jeans
Anonymous says:
You’re being intentionally obtuse.
Anonymous says:
Nah. You’re just a weirdo coomer.
Anonymous says:
fag
Anonymous says:
>see slight tummy >makes your legs look like tiny baby legs
not worth it
Anonymous says:
I agree. I was just explaining to anons the point of the style
Anonymous says:
Only if you wear skinny jeans or you’re fat. Again, it never was low-rise vs high-rise.
>both skinny jeans >both trash
All those morons fighting for wichever not even understanding that both type of pants can be enjoyable as long as you are building a coherent silhouette.
Ffs anons if you had been here long enough you’d know that /fashion/ is just fighting for whatever is in fashion while constantly being 2-3 years late, that’s why they are now being aggressive towards dunks and forums while they are rocking gazelle which were in fashion 3 years ago, stop being stupid i hecking beg you, form has purpose and yojr goal should not be to judge a form but to try to understand its function
Left isn’t skinny jeans, but they do look like shit too I guess.
Anonymous says:
Are you a virgin? you can see a pussy at the click of a button these days. It takes more creativity then that to turn me on these days now that i’m older. Slaggy everyday clothes don’t do it for me anymore. It’s got to be lingerie and stuff like that.
Anonymous says:
You’re a hecking stupid man.
Anonymous says:
Why?
Anonymous says:
>Are you a virgin?
Bro, I’m not trying to explain my own personal feelings about the style. I simply explained part of why the style was popular. It was tantalizing. Yes it would take more to turn a grown man on. I’m 29, I’m assuming you’re around my age. Seeing just that won’t be enough at this point. However it would serve its purpose and at the very least get us to take a second look. It would express something about the woman’s’ character, that she’s probably loose. Which again is the point of style. To convey a little about yourself.
Anonymous says:
Once you have seen a few pussies and can get it anytime you want shit like this doesn’t turn you on anymore, especially as you get into your thirties. Only literal 15 year old boys get turned on by this shit, i would know i was around that age when this shit was popular, now i don’t think much of it.
Anonymous says:
>exposed pussy
Lol just go to the beach for that
>see slight tummy >makes your legs look like tiny baby legs
not worth it
Who cares short women are hot anyway 🙂
https://i.imgur.com/Hpi4rkq.jpg
>tfw midriff has been back for years >tfw there are coomers that refuse to leave their house that will b***h about midriff not being fashionable anymore until it has gone out of fashion again >they will just keeping b***hing about it forever
What do you expect from >peoples whose brains have been atrophied from years of pornography.
Anonymous says:
Taller men look better with legs that appear shorter than normal. They have so much length that they don’t want it to dominate their appearance.
Anonymous says:
>Taller men look better with legs that appear shorter than normal. They have so much length that they don’t want it to dominate their appearance.
no they dont, high waisted pants look good on everyone and that is how pants should be worn
Anonymous says:
Midriff is even sexier than cleavage
Anonymous says:
hecking this. I barely register cleavage when looking at girls.
Anonymous says:
High rise makes girls look like midgets and hides the curves from the torso which makes girls look ugly, low rise with hourglass figure is the most erotic fashion trend
Skinny twink here. This anon is entirely correct. Detractors don’t seem to realize most women don’t expose their stomachs with their outfits every day which is the sole application in which low rise looks good.
low test detected, woman on left is incapable of breeding
Men also look just as good in higher-waisted pants, especially manlets.
Skinny twink here. This anon is entirely correct. Detractors don’t seem to realize most women don’t expose their stomachs with their outfits every day which is the sole application in which low rise looks good.
I’m not, they really don’t make women look curvy at all. Whatever curve a girl might have gets hidden by their dorky look. Also if a woman has no curve and wears them it just accentuates the fact that she has no curves. This goes for skinny and fat girls.
[…]
[…]
samefagging for lowrise lul
Nope I’m a different Anon that just doesn’t like high rise jeans 🙂
When your average US adult women was at a healthy weight 30-40 years ago you delusional Gen Z moron. Nobody thinks the fashion industry selling you pants with modified high denim waist wrap for your fat stinkin guts is a grandiose return to the ways of “proper” fashion. Go run a lap, pig.
what are you typing? your idiot ESL, I said they look better and were always the norm and make them look better
>Nobody thinks the fashion industry selling you pants with modified high denim waist wrap for your fat stinkin guts is a grandiose return to the ways of “proper” fashion. Go run a lap, pig.
I never made this Claim and I am 28 years old. Touch grass
Right looks better though and follows the natural curvature of the body, men look better in high rise too, there is a reason it was the norm for centuries.
For me, it’s not even low-rise vs. high-rise. Skinny jeans just look ugly in general, high-rise or low-rise. The recent popularity of high-rise flared pants proved me that. Thank god they’re on their way out. That said, low-rise don’t heck up the proportions of everyone. You can’t generalize like that. It’s not just a "low-rise fit skinny people better" either. It entirely depends on the body build of the wearer i.e. their waist size, their hips size, their torso length, their height, their legs size. Also, while girls in low-rise can look really fine, there’s indeed no point to it if she’s not wearing a crop-top. On a final point, low-rise clothing was also a thing or two before the 2000s.
>tfw midriff has been back for years >tfw there are coomers that refuse to leave their house that will b***h about midriff not being fashionable anymore until it has gone out of fashion again >they will just keeping b***hing about it forever
The leftists are pushing an agenda to put more meat on womens bones and promote wide hips and big butts. This is so when communism is implemented we will have prime breeding stock and lots of meat to harvest. Republicans are in on this too. You think the raid of mar a lago is about trump? Kek. It must be nice to have the wool over your eyes
Actual communism(based on class relations and class conflict) has been irrelevant for over 30 years. You people have no idea what communism actually is, you think it’s western liberalism, it isn’t and never has been. What the heck have wide hips got to do with pushing towards a classless and stateless society.
>Nobody is a classical Marxist anymore
bullshit. Nothing i see what is going on is ”communism” why would the ruling groups and corporations want to a spread an ideology what seeks it’s destruction. They wouldn’t and communism doesn’t even have to be socially liberal. If actual communists had some power there would be strikes every week and hunger marches like in the thirties, not someone just getting into university because they may be gay or black.
this is true, but as a leftists all others around me are people who like blm, and lgbt. I talked about how mass immigration undermines workers rights and how lgbt is not natural and healthy and they thought i was a trump supporter
Anonymous says:
You are an old fashioned leftist, not the modern type like them, i’m the same as you honestly, the more working class leftists are usually like this.
>what went wrong?
The woman on the left weighs 20lbs more and would look like shit in low wasted jeans.
Fattys happened
Fatties were common when low rise like was popular in the early-mid 2000’s and it wasn’t a good look seeing their hip blubber and bellies go over the jeans. It wasn’t that long ago.
Anonymous says:
>You are an old fashioned leftist,
yes, also a traditionalist catholic too.
>the more working class leftists are usually like this.
here in Canada it is very rare, they only care about LGBT, BLM, and Video games. they do nothing for actual working class people and workers rights, gun rights, housing
Anonymous says:
You proved my point that nobody’s a classical Marxist. Again, read Gramsci.
Anonymous says:
Nice fiction, would make a funny scifi comedy, idk why communism is involved tho, i dont remember those parts of das kapital lmao
I’m just having fun gentlemen. I was sure it would be obvious that it was a wildly ignorant, satirical post
All those morons fighting for wichever not even understanding that both type of pants can be enjoyable as long as you are building a coherent silhouette.
Ffs anons if you had been here long enough you’d know that /fashion/ is just fighting for whatever is in fashion while constantly being 2-3 years late, that’s why they are now being aggressive towards dunks and forums while they are rocking gazelle which were in fashion 3 years ago, stop being stupid i hecking beg you, form has purpose and yojr goal should not be to judge a form but to try to understand its function
Imagine being peak physiological efficiency with all of the knowledge available and one still just cant help themselves not go MMMM TATHTY like a stupid 8 year old boy whose hands are glued to a nintendo when not pillaging franeknfood out of plastic bags as he runs around in public, sloppily weaving between an unimpressed crowd. Have some hecking dignity. Average american woman is 5’4 170lbs for christssake.
so you hate fat girls or just fat people in general?
girls are always going to be considered hot by a lot of people regardless of weight.
Just check instagram or tinder and you will see that any fat girl with a high waist jean is considered "thicc"
Fat dudes can be useful during low intensity physical labor. Also i am not trying to heck dudes nor treat them gently.
Anonymous says:
>"thicc"
that’s just gayspeak for fat
nobody likes fat except chubby chasers and there’s only like two of them on the planet and they’re both disgusting fetishists from somewhere in southern india
Yeah it’s not very healthy for you to have your belly exposed to the cold. Maybe it would be fine if you’ve done extensive cold exposure training, but how many people do you know personally who have done cold exposure training beyond ending a shower with cold water?
how come to only argument against high rise is that "muh fatties wear it" as if it changes the fact that skinny people look better in high rise than low rise
But yet, trannies didn’t wear them back then and they still don’t right now. It’s not "feminine" enough for them and you can’t conceal a dick in tight jeans, especially women tight jeans.
yes you can, you put your balls up in your abdomen and then pull your cock and sack back between your legs and tape it to your lower back with duct tape.
that’s how transvestites do it.
it’s fun to squeeze their stomachs when their drunk because their so full of piss sometimes they can’t hold it and it makes their ass wet and the tape comes loose and they usually get hard.
sometimes i help them along by pissing on them myself.
trannies just want a strong masculine man to treat them like chattel a couple of hours a week and then leave them alone the rest of the time so they can chain smoke and shave their bodies and clean their colons.
you don’t need to be there for that.
you should be out chasing other girls and making money and buying gifts for all of them.
There was shit loads of fat chicks in 2001, processed foods and obesity was a thing then, it wasn’t that long ago in the scheme of things, plenty of girls looked horrible with their fat folds hanging over their low rise jeans.
You people are romanticizing a time when there is a high chance you were not even alive then, i was. The average girl didn’t look like paris hilton.
only attractive women look good in low rise. but if a woman is not attractive, i dont want to see her outside or even perceive her. therefore low rise always wins
Low rise caused an epidemic of people with fat in the wrong places, everyone who wore one of those in the 00’s now look like a hecking lump
High waist are just better
I’m not a zoomer. I’m just trying to make sense of your stupid post. Are you talking about low-rise jeans causing an epidemic of people with eating disorder because the standards of beauty back then was thin people and girls starved themselves? If so, then yeah well, sucks to be them. Truth is, you had to go to the gym and be fit to fit in low-rise jeans. Britney Spears wasn’t rail thin back then nor was Jennifer Lopez. They were fit. If you looked like a lump after the low-rise jeans era, that’s on you. >waists got heckED
What the heck are you talking about?
It’s like a game of pong, the waist line fell and fell until it hit the top of the pussy which it bounced off of and is now rising until it bounces back or covers her entire body
You guys say high-rise is good because fatties can hide their belly, but isn’t the high waist restrictive? Doesn’t the waistband pinch on their belly when they sit? How would they be comfortable at all?
nicer than a woman wearing yoga pants up to her chest
Anonymous says:
fatties were shamed and laughed at in the 2000s and they should be again, allowing them to put the problem out of sight and out of mind is a disservice to the general public. I’m fine with muffin tops making a return as long as fat shaming accompanies them.
Low cut is made for skinny b***hes who got zero ass so they got to show something to compensate.
Anonymous says:
fat asses are not attractive and never will be, wide hips and a flat stomach are infinitely more attractive than a fat ass. I hecking hate zoomers.
Anonymous says:
im sorry that you homosexual millennials will never understand the true beauty of women. Fat tits and ass go great with wide hips and flat stomachs
Anonymous says:
You hecking zoomers are incapable of applying even a slight level of nuance to sex appeal, the only sexual characteristics your coom addled, porn rotted, instant gratification seeking pea brains are able to recognize are absolutely base and animalistic; and it’s for that reason that you are the one who will never understand the true beauty of women. A tight butt, perky tits, flat stomach, wide hips and long slender arms and legs are the absolute peak of lasting feminine elegance. You debase society by drooling over a standard that any slut can achieve by shoving calories down her throat. Enjoy watching your gluttonous, hog of a woman balloon to 175kg over the years, perhaps then you’ll reconsider your infantile stupid beliefs on sex appeal.
Anonymous says:
>getting this mad
holy heck gay millennials are pathetic rofl
Anonymous says:
>writes an essay
just come out of the closet already
Anonymous says:
unbelievably based, and great taste.
Long legs, perky butt, flat stomach, decent booba, good face and thick hair and long arms.
great taste friend
Anonymous says:
low cut is made for chubby goths to show off muffin tops
Anonymous says:
Low rise is definitely hotter
Anonymous says:
Now I have an erection
Anonymous says:
High cut is way hotter, emphasized the curved. Low cut is just skanky and disgusting
hoes figured out they can tuck their guts in and eat what they want, high waist jeans are basically zoomer spanx. ugly chubsters never stood a chance at being /fashion/ during low cut era so they tricked their skinny friends into changing the game.
1. fatties wore low rise in the 2000s like everyone else, stop ignoring it
2. high waisted jeans were the norm before the 2000s when people were skinnier
3. fat people wear high rise =/= high rise looks bad on everyone
fatties were shamed and laughed at in the 2000s and they should be again, allowing them to put the problem out of sight and out of mind is a disservice to the general public. I’m fine with muffin tops making a return as long as fat shaming accompanies them.
You hecking zoomers are incapable of applying even a slight level of nuance to sex appeal, the only sexual characteristics your coom addled, porn rotted, instant gratification seeking pea brains are able to recognize are absolutely base and animalistic; and it’s for that reason that you are the one who will never understand the true beauty of women. A tight butt, perky tits, flat stomach, wide hips and long slender arms and legs are the absolute peak of lasting feminine elegance. You debase society by drooling over a standard that any slut can achieve by shoving calories down her throat. Enjoy watching your gluttonous, hog of a woman balloon to 175kg over the years, perhaps then you’ll reconsider your infantile stupid beliefs on sex appeal.
>base
why yes, it is based to like women with fat tits and ass lol
>so liking beautiful and mature women is animalistic?
That is not at all what I implied. I very clearly stated that wide hips are peak femininity. Carnal desire in relation to primary sexual characteristics is animalistic, basing desire on evolutionarily driven forces is animalistic. It is a low brain oonga boonga mindset that applies no nuance to the characteristics that truly make women elegant and beautiful. When all you’re capable of appreciating are these traits rooted in excess you are incapable of fully appreciating the beauty of women. You are no different than our animalistic ancestors, your taste is banal and unrefined. You might as well be a cave dwelling pleb if you genuinely believe a large ass and tits are the epitome of feminine allure.
High rise was the standard through most of history for men. Especially when you tuck your shirt in, high rise will always be best. Low rise with tucked in shirt makes you look extremely top heavy, actually looks like shit. Even if you have wide hips high rise looks better than looking like a deformed Johnny Bravo.
Women should not be allowed to wear pants regardless of cut.
High rise was the standard through most of history for men. Especially when you tuck your shirt in, high rise will always be best. Low rise with tucked in shirt makes you look extremely top heavy, actually looks like shit. Even if you have wide hips high rise looks better than looking like a deformed Johnny Bravo.
//fashion// has always been a proana board newfriend. I am not hating on sexually developed women, wide hips are the number one indicator of female sexual development and I’ve upheld them as the peak of feminine appeal. Fat tits and ass indicate that a woman will become a lardass hog within a decade and will never be as attractive as a perpetual fashion industry standard figure. //fashion// has truly fallen to the zoomer plague.
nothing, high waisted pants were always the norm and make everyone look better
Fatty
fat women dont care and will justify what ever their pants are, high waisted has always been in because it makes your legs look longer and goes up to the natural waist and follows the natural curves of the body
>high waisted has always been in because it makes your legs look longer
This, why would you purposefully heck up your proportions by wearing low rise and make your legs looks shorter, man or women. Also only 15 year olds get turned on by seeing mid riff.
It’s simply done by greedy as heck companies to save on fabric and there not even comfortable, when i switched to high rise i never looked back. My shirt never untucks and my cock and bollocks have more space.
(You)
they are all old and ugly, but look better with high rise than low rise
>bourkas
>Cant recognize an SNL skit
Zoomer spotted
>SNL
actually who cares
Trump lost
I know it was SNL, SNL hecking sucks shit
>SNL
Szoylent boy discovered
Whats wrong with a milfy housewife?
The midriff isn’t the turn on, it’s the nearly exposed pussy.
you hecking coomers are all degenerates. You really think people should just walk around like that? Would you get turned on if your mom dressed like that? Idiot
I don’t terribly care for the style. I was just point out that you missed the point of it. That being said I am a degenerate.
I do and I am a proud degenerate
>nearly exposed pussy
>eight to ten inches away from the top of low rise jeans
You’re being intentionally obtuse.
Nah. You’re just a weirdo coomer.
fag
>see slight tummy
>makes your legs look like tiny baby legs
not worth it
I agree. I was just explaining to anons the point of the style
Only if you wear skinny jeans or you’re fat. Again, it never was low-rise vs high-rise.
Left isn’t skinny jeans, but they do look like shit too I guess.
Are you a virgin? you can see a pussy at the click of a button these days. It takes more creativity then that to turn me on these days now that i’m older. Slaggy everyday clothes don’t do it for me anymore. It’s got to be lingerie and stuff like that.
You’re a hecking stupid man.
Why?
>Are you a virgin?
Bro, I’m not trying to explain my own personal feelings about the style. I simply explained part of why the style was popular. It was tantalizing. Yes it would take more to turn a grown man on. I’m 29, I’m assuming you’re around my age. Seeing just that won’t be enough at this point. However it would serve its purpose and at the very least get us to take a second look. It would express something about the woman’s’ character, that she’s probably loose. Which again is the point of style. To convey a little about yourself.
Once you have seen a few pussies and can get it anytime you want shit like this doesn’t turn you on anymore, especially as you get into your thirties. Only literal 15 year old boys get turned on by this shit, i would know i was around that age when this shit was popular, now i don’t think much of it.
>exposed pussy
Lol just go to the beach for that
Who cares short women are hot anyway 🙂
What do you expect from >peoples whose brains have been atrophied from years of pornography.
Taller men look better with legs that appear shorter than normal. They have so much length that they don’t want it to dominate their appearance.
>Taller men look better with legs that appear shorter than normal. They have so much length that they don’t want it to dominate their appearance.
no they dont, high waisted pants look good on everyone and that is how pants should be worn
Midriff is even sexier than cleavage
hecking this. I barely register cleavage when looking at girls.
High rise makes girls look like midgets and hides the curves from the torso which makes girls look ugly, low rise with hourglass figure is the most erotic fashion trend
You have no argument other than this. High rise simply looks better, on both skinny and fat girls.
Have you ever seen a fat girl in high rise jeans? They look like complete shit, even worse than they would in a lower rise.
post examples?
Just go to outside and have a first hand look yourself 🙂
Fat girls are the ones can’t use them
low test detected, woman on left is incapable of breeding
Men also look just as good in higher-waisted pants, especially manlets.
coping fat girl spotted
Skinny twink here. This anon is entirely correct. Detractors don’t seem to realize most women don’t expose their stomachs with their outfits every day which is the sole application in which low rise looks good.
The 2022 is better, but I’m glad we live in the era where women wear both. We are truly blessed.
The woman on the right is such a hecking dime
Correct opinion. Just look how great and classic the broad on the right looks
peak female fashion, its a shame they dont look like this anymore
Wrong, high rise looks plain bad. Makes women look like shapeless dorks.
Anon,.. why you think they are so popular?
This, high rise popular cause it let’s them hide their fatness
samefagging for lowrise lul
>doesn’t know how to check for samefags
newgay
>Makes women look like shapeless dorks.
projecting low rise cons onto high rise pants is amazing lmao
I’m not, they really don’t make women look curvy at all. Whatever curve a girl might have gets hidden by their dorky look. Also if a woman has no curve and wears them it just accentuates the fact that she has no curves. This goes for skinny and fat girls.
Nope I’m a different Anon that just doesn’t like high rise jeans 🙂
Ahhh. I see. -_-
It’s on purpose by feminist, to look like males.
I look at vintage photo and think of hairy pussy and my pp get hard
When your average US adult women was at a healthy weight 30-40 years ago you delusional Gen Z moron. Nobody thinks the fashion industry selling you pants with modified high denim waist wrap for your fat stinkin guts is a grandiose return to the ways of “proper” fashion. Go run a lap, pig.
what are you typing? your idiot ESL, I said they look better and were always the norm and make them look better
>Nobody thinks the fashion industry selling you pants with modified high denim waist wrap for your fat stinkin guts is a grandiose return to the ways of “proper” fashion. Go run a lap, pig.
I never made this Claim and I am 28 years old. Touch grass
They don’t look better on rectangle-shaped bodies and low-rise pants were a thing in the 70s.
>They don’t look better on rectangle-shaped bodies
yes they do
>low-rise pants were a thing in the 70s.
yes they were but that doesent mean they were the norm, high rise was always the norm until the early 2000s
no it wasn’t
>make everyone look better
so true
nothing looks good on fatties, high waist makes everyone who isnt an obese blob look normal
Low cut is making a comeback.
Thin girls better be making a comeback as well.
Right looks better though and follows the natural curvature of the body, men look better in high rise too, there is a reason it was the norm for centuries.
Fat b***hes are too lazy to hit the gym, so stores adapted to sell more jeans.
I miss seeing Nelly Furtado in those
this. modern womens jeans have to have ample fupa room
>what’s the endgame?
To change the fashions every year so that you have to buy new stuff.
Otherwise, nobody would buy stuff until it wore out.
Feminism happened
Are you really this stupid?
Filthy roastie or tranny.
>what’s the endgame?
unless the keep going up after that, into denim bourkas.
>denim bourkas.
insha’Allah
the end game is to abolish all beauty standards for women
Fatties
For me, it’s not even low-rise vs. high-rise. Skinny jeans just look ugly in general, high-rise or low-rise. The recent popularity of high-rise flared pants proved me that. Thank god they’re on their way out. That said, low-rise don’t heck up the proportions of everyone. You can’t generalize like that. It’s not just a "low-rise fit skinny people better" either. It entirely depends on the body build of the wearer i.e. their waist size, their hips size, their torso length, their height, their legs size. Also, while girls in low-rise can look really fine, there’s indeed no point to it if she’s not wearing a crop-top. On a final point, low-rise clothing was also a thing or two before the 2000s.
2000s low rise was lower than 70s low rise
>tfw midriff has been back for years
>tfw there are coomers that refuse to leave their house that will b***h about midriff not being fashionable anymore until it has gone out of fashion again
>they will just keeping b***hing about it forever
I don’t care about the outside world, I care about the media, I want to see low rise midriff bearing hot girls in movies and videogames
literally this midriff is always in style for all women any time it’s over 70 degrees
The leftists are pushing an agenda to put more meat on womens bones and promote wide hips and big butts. This is so when communism is implemented we will have prime breeding stock and lots of meat to harvest. Republicans are in on this too. You think the raid of mar a lago is about trump? Kek. It must be nice to have the wool over your eyes
Actual communism(based on class relations and class conflict) has been irrelevant for over 30 years. You people have no idea what communism actually is, you think it’s western liberalism, it isn’t and never has been. What the heck have wide hips got to do with pushing towards a classless and stateless society.
Nobody is a classical Marxist anymore. Read Gramsci, dumbheck.
>Nobody is a classical Marxist anymore
bullshit. Nothing i see what is going on is ”communism” why would the ruling groups and corporations want to a spread an ideology what seeks it’s destruction. They wouldn’t and communism doesn’t even have to be socially liberal. If actual communists had some power there would be strikes every week and hunger marches like in the thirties, not someone just getting into university because they may be gay or black.
this is true, but as a leftists all others around me are people who like blm, and lgbt. I talked about how mass immigration undermines workers rights and how lgbt is not natural and healthy and they thought i was a trump supporter
You are an old fashioned leftist, not the modern type like them, i’m the same as you honestly, the more working class leftists are usually like this.
Fatties were common when low rise like was popular in the early-mid 2000’s and it wasn’t a good look seeing their hip blubber and bellies go over the jeans. It wasn’t that long ago.
>You are an old fashioned leftist,
yes, also a traditionalist catholic too.
>the more working class leftists are usually like this.
here in Canada it is very rare, they only care about LGBT, BLM, and Video games. they do nothing for actual working class people and workers rights, gun rights, housing
You proved my point that nobody’s a classical Marxist. Again, read Gramsci.
I’m just having fun gentlemen. I was sure it would be obvious that it was a wildly ignorant, satirical post
It’s hard to tell that’s exactly how some people talk.
Nice fiction, would make a funny scifi comedy, idk why communism is involved tho, i dont remember those parts of das kapital lmao
>both skinny jeans
>both trash
All those morons fighting for wichever not even understanding that both type of pants can be enjoyable as long as you are building a coherent silhouette.
Ffs anons if you had been here long enough you’d know that /fashion/ is just fighting for whatever is in fashion while constantly being 2-3 years late, that’s why they are now being aggressive towards dunks and forums while they are rocking gazelle which were in fashion 3 years ago, stop being stupid i hecking beg you, form has purpose and yojr goal should not be to judge a form but to try to understand its function
>+30lbs
/threas
>high waisted pants
>mogs every low waisted pic
always
imagine any red blooded male not wanting to see left over right, imagine a world where women weren’t too hecking fat to wear it.
>what went wrong?
people got fat
>what’s the endgame?
cover up the gut
>what went wrong?
The woman on the left weighs 20lbs more and would look like shit in low wasted jeans.
Fattys happened
*woman on the right
Women look so ugly in high rise
are you a gay?
They look better in low rise
Low rise > High rise
I actually find that hot to be honest
man she’s built like a tall lanky middle school boy
The things I’d do to that tall lanky body…
>foreshortening makes your legs look shorter
Makes you think if it’s really the low-rise’s fault…
No, but those are really nice handjob nails.
Is it even possible to bring low rise pants back when every single girl is ashamed of her stomach?
I really hecking hate fat girls
Why?
Imagine being peak physiological efficiency with all of the knowledge available and one still just cant help themselves not go MMMM TATHTY like a stupid 8 year old boy whose hands are glued to a nintendo when not pillaging franeknfood out of plastic bags as he runs around in public, sloppily weaving between an unimpressed crowd. Have some hecking dignity. Average american woman is 5’4 170lbs for christssake.
so you hate fat girls or just fat people in general?
girls are always going to be considered hot by a lot of people regardless of weight.
Just check instagram or tinder and you will see that any fat girl with a high waist jean is considered "thicc"
Fat dudes can be useful during low intensity physical labor. Also i am not trying to heck dudes nor treat them gently.
>"thicc"
that’s just gayspeak for fat
nobody likes fat except chubby chasers and there’s only like two of them on the planet and they’re both disgusting fetishists from somewhere in southern india
both look bad just wear a skirt
Diarrea 24/7 in 2001, not joking, all the girls arrived late in school to dump brown liquids
Yeah it’s not very healthy for you to have your belly exposed to the cold. Maybe it would be fine if you’ve done extensive cold exposure training, but how many people do you know personally who have done cold exposure training beyond ending a shower with cold water?
Left is trashy and repulsive.
Right is trashy too (too tight, showing off curves) but not nearly as bad as the left.
did you read any bible scriptures before logging on to your favorite far right extremist anime forum today
This is peak female fashion
>0 curves
brutal
She still looks great
Meanwhile, in high-rise land…
Low-rise sits where the body bends.
trannycore lmfao
is that a woman or a tranny
Nothing beats low rise
She would look better in low rise
Low rise makes no sense anatomy-wise, high rise actually sits where the natural waistline is.
Low rise is the superior choice, Stacys wear low rise and Chads love women in low rise, it’s just nature
>reddit speak
how will low rise bros ever recover…
>those legs and feet
I’ve already came twice today
high rise anything looks better than low rise
what about high rise vs low rise for men?
We men don’t wear high rise, only Clint Eastwood and old men wear high rise, it looks just as stupid as women in high rise
why not just say that high rise is stupid?
high rise = instant kino
It is. But not in modern trashy way.
Funny how zoomers and feminist try to copy styles from the 80s-90s, but nobody feel the soul of that time.
lmao feminine hips
Cope
high rise is great for men, I only wear high rise pants
There isn’t a single straight man who would prefer the left look over the right look in a blind taste test
Don’t mind me, just posting the superior low rise
>Don’t mind me, just posting the superior low rise
>doesn’t post low rise
lol, lmao
If you can see her navel it’s low rise
For Low Rise Lover Chads
High Rise Lovers
say that to his face and not online and see what happens
He’d say you are right, then he would buy low rise and Stacys would swarm him immediately, then he would thank me for showing him the light
WHO ARE YOU?!
For low rise to look good, you actually need a flat navel. With high rise, girls can hide their fat gut.
No one said you had to pair low-rise pants with a crop-top. Picrel looked pretty cute with a normal length shirt. Long-tops can heck off though.
This, crop tops look better, but normal shirts work too
High Rise
Perfect cover to move mad packages. No one will suspect a thing. Smart granny. Kid won’t be joining mom & dad in prison.
Switch the high rise jeans for high rise dress pants, iron the dress shirt, have him smile, and fix his expressionless posture/stance.
how come to only argument against high rise is that "muh fatties wear it" as if it changes the fact that skinny people look better in high rise than low rise
Not really, skinny people look better in low rise
>THICC women
nothing, absolutely nothing went wrong
Average Low Rise Enjoyer
but anon…
He would look better in low rise, they had shitty fashion sense in those times, and now women have the same shitty fashion trend
See, old people were the ones who wore high rise, they don’t call high rise jeans moms jeans for nothing, and they look stupid
Btfo
child bearing hips
The average high rise wearer
High rise mog
SO DO I WEAR HIGH RISE OR LOW RISE?
high
BUT TELL ME WHY OR SOMETHING ANON
high rise = longer legs, better silhouette, nicer looking, look thinner
low rise = tiny baby legs, look shorter, long torso
do this with mid rise now
Mid looks more balanced.
mid rise = cant go wrong with it, overall balanced, use this if you dont like the feeling of high rise pants
High Rise = Ugly
Low Rise = Sexy
talk me out of wearing high rise this week
Wear whatever you want, I just honestly believe low rise looks way sexier, but to be honest not everyone has the body for Low Rise, the sad truth
Are you a dumpy, slack-assed zoomer woman? If yes, pull those granny pants high.
high rise = mike wazowski
mid rise
High rise, always
Low Rise
>women are more modest
i want to go back
>what went wrong?
we considered trannycore to be hot in the 2000s
But yet, trannies didn’t wear them back then and they still don’t right now. It’s not "feminine" enough for them and you can’t conceal a dick in tight jeans, especially women tight jeans.
I’d love to see one try though
yes you can, you put your balls up in your abdomen and then pull your cock and sack back between your legs and tape it to your lower back with duct tape.
that’s how transvestites do it.
it’s fun to squeeze their stomachs when their drunk because their so full of piss sometimes they can’t hold it and it makes their ass wet and the tape comes loose and they usually get hard.
sometimes i help them along by pissing on them myself.
trannies just want a strong masculine man to treat them like chattel a couple of hours a week and then leave them alone the rest of the time so they can chain smoke and shave their bodies and clean their colons.
you don’t need to be there for that.
you should be out chasing other girls and making money and buying gifts for all of them.
>wearing trousers
Thank God it did, crop tops look horribly trashy
>what’s the endgame?
Androgyny, and that’s a bad thing.
it is only scary because it’s rare
if more people started dressing like david bowie, it would be less frightening to the kids who don’t get out much.
Girls got fat. 2001 still looks better in my opinion.
There was shit loads of fat chicks in 2001, processed foods and obesity was a thing then, it wasn’t that long ago in the scheme of things, plenty of girls looked horrible with their fat folds hanging over their low rise jeans.
You people are romanticizing a time when there is a high chance you were not even alive then, i was. The average girl didn’t look like paris hilton.
What about mid-rise?
Midrise master race
only attractive women look good in low rise. but if a woman is not attractive, i dont want to see her outside or even perceive her. therefore low rise always wins
women got fat.
Low rise caused an epidemic of people with fat in the wrong places, everyone who wore one of those in the 00’s now look like a hecking lump
High waist are just better
They got fat because of muh body positivity. They just don’t want to go back in shape. High-rise made them lazy.
Shut the heck up zoomer, we’re talking about the 2000s here, there was no body positivity in the 2000s
Waists got heckED because of low rise jeans
I’m not a zoomer. I’m just trying to make sense of your stupid post. Are you talking about low-rise jeans causing an epidemic of people with eating disorder because the standards of beauty back then was thin people and girls starved themselves? If so, then yeah well, sucks to be them. Truth is, you had to go to the gym and be fit to fit in low-rise jeans. Britney Spears wasn’t rail thin back then nor was Jennifer Lopez. They were fit. If you looked like a lump after the low-rise jeans era, that’s on you.
>waists got heckED
What the heck are you talking about?
what the heck are you on about?
It’s like a game of pong, the waist line fell and fell until it hit the top of the pussy which it bounced off of and is now rising until it bounces back or covers her entire body
I think you mean "what went right"
High rise or low rise?
Either one can look great if you’re tall and thin.
low is superior while high is fine as long as the shirt isn’t hecking tucked in. or in other words: high is fine as long as I don’t know it’s high.
people really hating on milfcore?
I like milf in jeans like picrel, but I never liked your kind of jeans back then.
based
cringe
definitely prefer the right. low rise looks like an emaciated holocaust victim
I agree with you
I want to cum on the left
I want to cum in the right
You guys say high-rise is good because fatties can hide their belly, but isn’t the high waist restrictive? Doesn’t the waistband pinch on their belly when they sit? How would they be comfortable at all?
it’s not about comfort
>but isn’t the high waist restrictive
no, unless youre some fat slob. High rise if youre in shape you dont notice it. only fatties suffer because they dont want to loose weight
that would be hell on my balls
you dont feel it on your balls because its high rise and it sits where its supposed to be, its not like pulling up low rise
yes it was chud
you do know there are other pants out there other than skin tight jeans
the waistband doesnt pinch at all if you’re skinny. It feels great tbh.
do you stupids really not go outside, almost every skinny woman i see outside wear high rise
no one said only fat women wear high-rise
nah these are too high for my physicality
>nah these are too high for my physicality
theyre perfect, youve been used to seeing low rise too long
too high to accommodate
Exactly, that’s the problem, they should wear low rise cause it’s sexier
it’s not, they literally erase the curves that make women hot lmao
lol no
rofl gross
nicer than a woman wearing yoga pants up to her chest
Low cut is made for skinny b***hes who got zero ass so they got to show something to compensate.
fat asses are not attractive and never will be, wide hips and a flat stomach are infinitely more attractive than a fat ass. I hecking hate zoomers.
im sorry that you homosexual millennials will never understand the true beauty of women. Fat tits and ass go great with wide hips and flat stomachs
You hecking zoomers are incapable of applying even a slight level of nuance to sex appeal, the only sexual characteristics your coom addled, porn rotted, instant gratification seeking pea brains are able to recognize are absolutely base and animalistic; and it’s for that reason that you are the one who will never understand the true beauty of women. A tight butt, perky tits, flat stomach, wide hips and long slender arms and legs are the absolute peak of lasting feminine elegance. You debase society by drooling over a standard that any slut can achieve by shoving calories down her throat. Enjoy watching your gluttonous, hog of a woman balloon to 175kg over the years, perhaps then you’ll reconsider your infantile stupid beliefs on sex appeal.
>getting this mad
holy heck gay millennials are pathetic rofl
>writes an essay
just come out of the closet already
unbelievably based, and great taste.
Long legs, perky butt, flat stomach, decent booba, good face and thick hair and long arms.
great taste friend
low cut is made for chubby goths to show off muffin tops
Low rise is definitely hotter
Now I have an erection
High cut is way hotter, emphasized the curved. Low cut is just skanky and disgusting
hoes figured out they can tuck their guts in and eat what they want, high waist jeans are basically zoomer spanx. ugly chubsters never stood a chance at being /fashion/ during low cut era so they tricked their skinny friends into changing the game.
1. fatties wore low rise in the 2000s like everyone else, stop ignoring it
2. high waisted jeans were the norm before the 2000s when people were skinnier
3. fat people wear high rise =/= high rise looks bad on everyone
high rise looks bad on everyone
>low rise looks bad on everyone
ftfy
Hot
fatties were shamed and laughed at in the 2000s and they should be again, allowing them to put the problem out of sight and out of mind is a disservice to the general public. I’m fine with muffin tops making a return as long as fat shaming accompanies them.
>feminism
>mogs your malnourished women
Not even a competition.
big tits/ass = sexually developed woman
you writing an essay to prove that its bad is a sight to behold
Just as I said, base and animalistic.
so liking beautiful and mature women is animalistic?
>so liking beautiful and mature women is animalistic?
That is not at all what I implied. I very clearly stated that wide hips are peak femininity. Carnal desire in relation to primary sexual characteristics is animalistic, basing desire on evolutionarily driven forces is animalistic. It is a low brain oonga boonga mindset that applies no nuance to the characteristics that truly make women elegant and beautiful. When all you’re capable of appreciating are these traits rooted in excess you are incapable of fully appreciating the beauty of women. You are no different than our animalistic ancestors, your taste is banal and unrefined. You might as well be a cave dwelling pleb if you genuinely believe a large ass and tits are the epitome of feminine allure.
Women should not be allowed to wear pants regardless of cut.
proof for literally anything you said?
#
sexual dimorphism
#
fat =/= mature
pic related
cope, seethe and go watch more Andrew Tate
who tf is andrew tate
Zoomer FOTM pickup artist, grifter, and womanizer.
Congratulations would you like an award?
I’m not advocating to watch him, I’m implying that’s where anon gets his zoomer beliefs on testosterone.
yea we saw you heck up your post before deleting it lol
>go watch more Andrew Tate
>unironically doesn’t like mature women
der ewige coomer
Most people here don’t, a 30 year old woman isn’t mature, a 50 year old milf is.
>t. milf hecker
the words of a low test male, sad sight
low test = not liking beautiful mature women
>base
why yes, it is based to like women with fat tits and ass lol
High rise was the standard through most of history for men. Especially when you tuck your shirt in, high rise will always be best. Low rise with tucked in shirt makes you look extremely top heavy, actually looks like shit. Even if you have wide hips high rise looks better than looking like a deformed Johnny Bravo.
went from a low rise cringe thread to guys actually hating on sexually developed women wtf
//fashion// has always been a proana board newfriend. I am not hating on sexually developed women, wide hips are the number one indicator of female sexual development and I’ve upheld them as the peak of feminine appeal. Fat tits and ass indicate that a woman will become a lardass hog within a decade and will never be as attractive as a perpetual fashion industry standard figure. //fashion// has truly fallen to the zoomer plague.
bro the women youve posted on here barely have wide hips
>bro
I’ve posted three women standing sideways stupid. Pic related is
from the front
Have you never seen a woman before?
this abomination of a thread got derailed so hard by an actual stupid stupid making essays about tits and ass being bad
tits and ass are good when tight and perky, fat flabby cellulite bait is bad
this is good
this is bad
the derailing continues
it’s alright, it’s a shit thread anyway, arguing over low cut and high cut is dumb. women shouldn’t wear pants at all.
lowcut is better, simple as
Low-cut only looks better in the top left example.
>not liking tummies
shiggy diggy niggy biggy
I do
Low cut looks better in all 3 examples
nope
The high rise hides her figure and midriff, it looks bad
Only 15 year old boys get turned on by shit like that, you have to be 18 to post here.
>The high rise hides her figure
no it doesent it makes her legs look longer and enhances her figure
>midriff
not all outfits show the midriff, most do not. high rise makes it look better you type like a 14 year old
low test dicklet detected
it’s one person defending low rise in this thread btw
yes, it’s me
It’s at least two because I’m one of them.
three
4
>>on a body that belongs on a low rise
so an ideal womens body? fatties cant compete
>on a body that belongs on a low rise
so no ass, narrow hips, and thin thighs? dont fall for trannycore, Verified Chad with a PhD in Pussy
High waist is based. Low rise is for hookers, methheads and white-trash.