don quixote, whose second part details their adventures once they find out that a novel's been written about them. >memoirs of hadrian
a perfect novel, imo.
But since that’s also credited as the first science fiction novel, we’ll give this “honor” to E.T.A. Hoffmann’s The Life and Opinions of the Tomcat Murr
The multiple contradictory accounts of the various gospels have an avant garde sense about them, as if the author was trying to encourage independent thinking and to take a stand against the dogmatism of priests in favor of the legalistic free debate of the senatorial classes; after all very few thing can actually be agreed upon when the accounts are cut down to the things that they 'all' agree that they saw or heard.
>Scientists have literally agreed that most parts of the bible are true
Especially the part about God commanding you throw the fucking rocks at (sic) literally fucking everybody
>science agrees that God is mostly real
Time for that scientific faith check
Why do the "epic owns" on Christianity always come from the part of the bible that was from Torah and the hebrew bible but no one actually dares the criticize israelites?
Don't tell lies, that's instant lightning up the arsehole from a deity.
*tips fedora*
*tips fedora back* good tidings fellow hobbit!
>the author
The new testatment was written by multiple people and the old testatment is a collection of israeli texts wrote and collected by different people.
and he's an avant garde genius. You agree with this so much you've come to LARP the story!
BASED FRODO BAGGINS
>science agrees that God is mostly real
Time for that scientific faith check
>the author
The new testatment was written by multiple people and the old testatment is a collection of israeli texts wrote and collected by different people.
Maybe some in Hinduism or one their unitary branches. I don’t know much about it. But the Bible suffers for needing to hook up the Old and the New, of course. It’s a massive embarrassment how little sense there is, and probably why so many convert to Islam or Mormonism, and certainly the cause of so many religious murders as factions splinter.
Does anyone recommend this author? I forgot whether it was Yourcennar or Duras for which the consensus on this board was esssentially that she's really fucking boring to readl
I do recommend her. Haven’t read Duras, but give it a try anyway.
itt: anons demonstrate that they know nothing about literature.
Time to prove you are not complete morons, why is Tristam Shandy or any other work from before the postmodernists, not postmodern.
Meant to mention him above!
Lucian’s A True Story
But since that’s also credited as the first science fiction novel, we’ll give this “honor” to E.T.A. Hoffmann’s The Life and Opinions of the Tomcat Murr
don quixote, whose second part details their adventures once they find out that a novel's been written about them.
>memoirs of hadrian
a perfect novel, imo.
Lucian’s A True Story
But since that’s also credited as the first science fiction novel, we’ll give this “honor” to E.T.A. Hoffmann’s The Life and Opinions of the Tomcat Murr
Zeno's Conscience
The bible?
The multiple contradictory accounts of the various gospels have an avant garde sense about them, as if the author was trying to encourage independent thinking and to take a stand against the dogmatism of priests in favor of the legalistic free debate of the senatorial classes; after all very few thing can actually be agreed upon when the accounts are cut down to the things that they 'all' agree that they saw or heard.
and it is, of course, a fiction.
Scientists have literally agreed that most parts of the bible are true
>science agrees that God is mostly real
Time for that scientific faith check
>Scientists have literally agreed that most parts of the bible are true
Especially the part about God commanding you throw the fucking rocks at (sic) literally fucking everybody
Why do the "epic owns" on Christianity always come from the part of the bible that was from Torah and the hebrew bible but no one actually dares the criticize israelites?
Yeah man good point I’ve never seen anyone criticise the israelites on LULZ…
Don't tell lies, that's instant lightning up the arsehole from a deity.
*tips fedora back* good tidings fellow hobbit!
and he's an avant garde genius. You agree with this so much you've come to LARP the story!
BASED FRODO BAGGINS
Mt Ararat was never even underwater you know.
Did you just learn the term avant garde? You are already abusing it.
*tips fedora*
>he doesn’t know yet
Oh, you Catholics are so funny.
>the author
The new testatment was written by multiple people and the old testatment is a collection of israeli texts wrote and collected by different people.
I wonder whether other religious books are as full of contradictions as the bible. I should read more about different religions.
Maybe some in Hinduism or one their unitary branches. I don’t know much about it. But the Bible suffers for needing to hook up the Old and the New, of course. It’s a massive embarrassment how little sense there is, and probably why so many convert to Islam or Mormonism, and certainly the cause of so many religious murders as factions splinter.
I love how the thread died when someone named the israelites.
Satyricon by Petronius
The Tales of Baron Munchausen
The Qur'an
Does anyone recommend this author? I forgot whether it was Yourcennar or Duras for which the consensus on this board was esssentially that she's really fucking boring to readl
I do recommend her. Haven’t read Duras, but give it a try anyway.
Meant to mention him above!
Also, A Pickle for the Knowing Ones
Yourcenar is one of the few f*moid authors i would ever recommend to a homie.
Glad you like her, but crawl back.
Suck my dick troon
>always ALWAYS thinking about floppy crossdresser dick
Just go.
itt: anons demonstrate that they know nothing about literature.
Time to prove you are not complete morons, why is Tristam Shandy or any other work from before the postmodernists, not postmodern.