What is the strongest warrior culture in history?

What is the strongest warrior culture in history?

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    None.

    Warrior Cultures ironically do not survive periods of sustained & prolonged military conflict.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Are you sure about it? They are strong as fuck. They are breathing war, eating struggle on breakfast.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Have ebin warrior culture.
        >Raise your warriors from birth to death as warriors.
        >Suffer 1 (one) bad defeat.
        >Get BTFO as a people as you can't replace your losses fast enough since you're waiting for the next generation of warrior castes to grow up.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      matters not, as long as tengri is pleased

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There would still be a strongest even if it was ill fated endeavor as you say.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Better question being, why automatically assume 'might = right?'

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's the basis of god's morality.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Lol, no.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yes it really is.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The Univetse is amoral, meaning it's neither "good" nor "bad." Attributes according according "morality" are only implemented at the level of positive law and society. Try again

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              This is a retarded post unless you believe God never intervened in the world including when he laid out his opinions on morality in the bible (or the texts of whatever other religion you believe is true)

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's a rather intuitive comment. Yet because you have no idea how law is structured, you are filled with emotional supposition and wrong-think.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're a stupid retard who thinks using big words and obscure language makes you right.

                option 1:
                >god is real and he imposes his moral opinions on the world by force (might makes right)

                option 2:(what can be "intuited" from your comment)
                >god doesn't intervene in the world and has no opinion on morality

                If you God intervenes in the world at all for any reason that means he has opinions about what should and should not be that he's willing to enforce (might makes right)

                Even if God just created the systems of the world then passively observes and doesn't intervene at all he still used force (might) to cause things to be the way he wanted them to be (might makes right). (God didn't want a blank void he wanted animals to be hunting and killing each other so he created a world where animals would hunt and kill each other - might makes right)

                If God ever caused anything to exist on purpose that mans he believes that having the ability to do it gives him the right to do it (might makes right)

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                And you're a simpleton, who misbelieves ad hominem and incoherence pass for valid arguments.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Nothing about my post was incoherent idiot I laid it out in very clear language practically bullet pointed so that even a retarded pseud like you could understand

                there's no coherent argument you can make that god's morality isn't based on might makes right that's why you haven't even tried to make one you've just insulted me and made retarded comments

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No, it's incohaerens

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            *Universe

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Gods morality is based on him being the first ever to exist and him being the creator, thus the owner of what he has created (property), thus having the right to rule what he has created

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This is literally a might makes right argument

          >god owns you as property so he has the right to rule you

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >might is a good thing to have
      >"WTF MIGHT NOT MEAN RIGHT! HOW CAN MIGHT MEAN RIGHT IF I BEAT YOU AND THEN I AM RIGHT?"

      does every anti-realist have to use strawmans?
      >yes they do

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You screaming in your own head, dickface? The point is: Western-Roman culture may SEEM as if it's predicated on "big gun go BOOM!" In actuality, it's based on a sophisticated, though misplaced, set of dialectical arguments. The only reason it has yet to be 'defeated,' according your faulty perception, is that an alternative model of argument, capable of absorbing the inferior argument, has yet to be implemented en masse.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >ITS NOT BASED ON MIGHT MAKES RIGHT
          Might makes right is not a statement about morality, monkey. Its a statement about how morality is enforced.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's not a statement at all, wuss, it's a false assertion as you have no clue what makes 'enforcement' in the first instance because you have no clue how to interpret law.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Im going to pretend your post made sense.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          True, that's what happened with paganism and Christianism

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Probably the Burmese, seeing as they repelled pretty much every invader, fought with everyone all the time, and still do even in the 21st century

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They could beat all the rest due to tech.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      nice
      but all it wold take is the marines overrunning into a strategic crayon stockpile, a bunch of hookers or sports bike sales lot and you've lost

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    In terms of capability? Probably modern Western armies. Not just with the weapons, but the modern soldier knows his job nose to tail and the communication/movement/shooting phases so well practiced and nuanced that once the soldier gets in contact, it's a bunch of moving parts trained to all function together to a greater whole. Unlike in many times too, western militaries exist almost exclusively to find the enemy, force the enemy into decisive battle, and destroy him. This isn't necessarily the best option for a military for most of recorded history.

    If I had to pick an ancient one, Rome's legions. So decisive and of a league of their own the entire Mediterranean started trying to copy them, and failed. When the spirit of said warrior culture lessened, so did the Romans. Medieval probably the Jannisaries, again copied by anyone who met them. I'd say mongols, but idk if they were a warrior culture instead of just a bunch of incredibly hard men who knew discipline.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What’s your measuring metric? Remember a whole legion of romans went missing in Scotland and another legion in those forests in Germania. Yet the western Roman Empire Lives On in the Catholic Church. The Spartans are dead, but we still remember them. The afghans have done a fair job with their graveyard of empires thing and are still chucking superpowers out with faith, memes and AKs and not much else. The Vikings got around most of the know world. The brits had a massive empire.
    It’s hard to say who the best were. What’s best? Most notorious? Hardcore? Whole society warlike? Longevity? Impact in history? (What percentage of males have genghis’ Y chromosome again?) Of course if it’s just ‘number of people killed’ then the commies need a (dis) honourable
    mention.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    From what I have read on LULZ if we are talking about pound for pound without advanced military formations or sophisticated technology it should be the corded ware culture no?

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How do you top the Indo-Aryan invaders considering they invaded 3 continents and won every single war they started?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why do Indians live in your head rent free? If you're going to be obsessed, at least get your history right and try reading the Rig Veda. nagger brained fuck

Your email address will not be published.