What is the logical end of feminism?
What is the logical end of feminism?
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI
— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
What is the logical end of feminism?
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI
— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
Women just breeding with chad and not chuds
cope. there is no indication of an increasing skew in sex partners among men over time, even in the decade that marked the rise of dating apps. unless you're saying that more women are just choosing not to date/reproduce/etc.. but le chad harems is a complete meme.
Recent polling done on relationships done in US showed that 63% of men 18-29 reported being single, but only 30% of women reported the same, the only conceivable reason for that discrepancy is that the same man is fucking multiple women who all think they are his bf.
he is their bf* obviously.
>only conceivable reason for that discrepancy
You can't conceive of women dating men in their thirties?
I can conceive of it, but your argument is that there was no skewing in sex partners and that's definitely demonstrably untrue. Even if all of the discrepancy comes from women dating older, the reason women date older in the first place is because older men are more powerful, wealthier and higher status, which gives even more credence to the haremization thesis.
>your argument is that there was no skewing in sex partners and that's definitely demonstrably untrue
you brang up the results of a recent poll on relationship status. how is that a more reliable metric for this question than data directly dealing with sex partners?
How do you explain this data then
how do I explain the data that I posted that I just referred to? are u saying that an increase in sexual inactivity is de facto proof of an increasing chadopoly despite the rate rising at a proportionally equal rate for women?
Rising at an equal rate doesn't mean it doesn't disproportionately affect one sex.
I know the nature of the rise has different implications for women but that's not relevant to the question at hand.
Well either way I think all of this fundamentally ignores the fact that men and women are different when it comes to mating strategies. A man has to prove he's good enough to the woman he wants, a woman can get pregnant and married whenever she wants if she simply lowers her standards enough, so an increase in reported sexlessness among women can also be interpreted as women just not being willing to settle.
>an increase in reported sexlessness among women can also be interpreted as women just not being willing to settle.
I said this was a possible interpretation at the beginning. I think delayed marriage (although you could also argue that it's a cause for that) and increasing social isolation are big factors though,
and I'd say the more traditionally described hypergamy is plausibly a factor as women are increasingly educated and are even starting to outearn men now. so their standards don't even have to rise for hypergamy to have an increasing effect.
but at least rising standards are consistent with the data unlike the meme that le top 1% is hoarding all the bitches who are all gigasluts riding le carousel etc.
>but at least rising standards are consistent with the data unlike the meme that le top 1% is hoarding all the bitches who are all gigasluts riding le carousel etc.
But the end result of this kind of hypergamic womanhood is something that looks very similar to haremization though, it's just that liberals like you don't believe stuff in society exists unless there's a formal law that says it must exist.
why is this not happening already?
there's nothing stopping it from happening unless you were talking about literal polygamy.
I can use other metrics to demonstrate the meme is false btw if it comes to that.
It has been steadily happening the last 50 years, it just doesn't switch over night, like most social phenomena.
the first graph I posted disproved this. the top 20 and 5% have not been having an increasing number of sex partners over the past 3 decades.
In my country the number of women who will marry a rich man who already has kids from a previous marriage instead of a bachelor who earns less money has increased by something like 1000% since 1980.
Another option is that women and men have different definitions of being single. Women might think of themselves as not single because they went on a couple dates with a guy, that same guy may think he is single because they are not boyfriend/girlfriend. Fialy common in my area. Girls consider it socially taboo to be single because they think something is wrong with them if that is the case, so consider themselves not "single" first chance they can
it was 34% women and even ignoring other factors like women dating older men literally nothing about the hypothesis of men not feeling the same level of commitment require the number of these men to be a markedly lower percentage than the excess of single women.
both the GSS and NSFG data shows a similar rise in sexlessness in under 30 men and women.
the excess of 'single' men*.
There was just a study done that showed that 62% of men under 30 are single, but only 30% of women are. It was bad enough that even the normally, yes queen slay mainstream press are panicking about the results.
*report* being single. they're obviously not all in polyamorous relationships which is in less than 2% of relationships. nothing about the discrepancy inherently demonstrates chad harems. the mainstream press is retarded and always looking to sensationalise everything.
Women should be MORE sexually selective, you dysgenic freak.
women don’t get to choose because they’re irrational and easily emotionally swayed
Women are breeding with fat uneducated smokers with ADHD
Women breed within their social group though, if you controlled for education level and income, you would see that what is going on there is that poor people and insanely wealthy people have 4+ children, but the middle classes have barely any.
If this was true i would be drowing ln pussy lmao except for the fat part tho
ADHD Master Race.
>What is the logical end of feminism?
The end of all gender, true and total gender equality via the establishment of the 1 true gender.
this. Women DO NOT have sexual feelings desires or fantasies for 95% of men.
what do the graphs mean
Women
>rate ~80% of men as below average compared to 50% of women rated by men.
>Don't view guys less than 5'10 sexually desirable.
>rate looks and personality equally among men
>lie about what they want in a man, where men are more honest.
Aren't highly religious far-right studs the only group above replacement rate?. While leftoids masturbate to sissy porn in their basements?
On the first Feminian Sandstones we were promised the Fuller Life
(Which started by loving our neighbour and ended by loving his wife)
Till our women had no more children and the men lost reason and faith,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: "The Wages of Sin is Death."
This is the logical end of feminism and liberalism -a mtf marrying a ftm
Imagine the sex...
The logical end of feminism is the invasion of any pre-existing culture by a foreign, more authoritarian culture (see Islam in Europe as an example) or a reawakening of the native culture and the total removal of women's rights.
Ultimately, though, the idea of feminism will be seen in the history books as a failed experiment that either resulted in the death of specific European(ish) cultures or the near death of them.
Islam taking over Europe is such a meme. The hardline Salafi shit only really sticks among underclass ghetto dwellers and first gen immigrants. Second, third and fourth gen Muslim kids are gradually becoming just as secular and Americanised as their white peers, especially if they go to college and aspire to anything beyond working in their uncle's kebab shop.
The hardline Salafi shit is specifically what bored college educated people do bro. Working class people don't have the means to hijack planes. The "le poor guy become terrorist" narrative just isn't true.
Maybe the odd Muslim equivalent of chuds do, but broadly speaking emerging middle class, college educated Muslims in Western Europe are pretty much like your average Western liberal in outlook with their Islamic identity becoming something akin to generic POC status within that whole framework.
At least Islam is prone to globohomo pandering. The day I saw a tranny priest I knew Christianity was officially over. What a cuck religion to allow itself to get sabotaged like this I don't blame the converts.
that's not a real priest with Holy Orders, just a larper from a random play pretend denomination.
>The logical end of feminism is the invasion of any pre-existing culture by a foreign, more authoritarian culture (see Islam in Europe as an example)
It's not the first time happened in Europe either. The brown IE men completely raped matriarcal white Europe into oblivion taking all the white women for themselves in prehistoric times.
Darktroon's post
tranny chocolate
trocholate
Islam because only psychopaths who control women will breed thus become the dominant group in future societies
that's it at right in OP pic
Female obsolescence
The end of feminism is the death of all women.
>feminism
>logic
True feminism seeks to ensure equality of all social classes, free expression, personal freedom and equality of the sexes. It has no logical end, since equality can always be improved and there are countless social issues that require justice in this world.
>What feminists will tell you the logical end of their movement is
Total equality, where nobody is ever sad or unhappy and nothing bad ever happens ever. No, seriously, they've convinced themselves that everything bad (even bad weather in some cases) is caused by the mythical 'patriarchy' and that once that is removed everything will be wonderful and utopian.
>The actual logical end of the feminist movement.
Either complete societal collapse, with the countries that fell to it being torn apart and colonised by the countries that didn't fall for it. Or, the entire feminist movement failing apart or being taken apart by the countries they currently infest in order to protect those countries. If either of those somehow don't happen then Feminism will become increasingly invasive, tyrannical, and controlling - because their ideology contradicts reality, and what they're doing cannot end to their stated goals; so they'll come to the conclusion that they just need to do Feminism harder.
> Female sexual selection is dysgenic
ADHD is probably correlated with IQ somehow and smoking with being chad/alpha.
No, females do not select for intelligence that has been debunked
This has to be photoshop, there is no way Chris Chan was at this event.
It’s real
Your confusing consciousness with intellect
My students with ADHD often out-perform my normal students even without studying
This comment makes me think non-adhd people are dumb (not sarcasm)
They'll just take the land off leftoids when they all die off. since they're not having children. Fascists chads just keep on winning.
Holy cope. Sorry to break your fantasy tranny. But fascists are outbreeding you leftoids. non-whites also have collapsing birthrates due to leftoid mind poison.
/misc/ wins again (:
It's true. leftism is a disease which makes you incapable of breeding. Don't worry though, we /misc/ chads will keep the human race going (:
After the inevitable collapse of western civilization women will go back to what they've always been; inferior chatel.
Population control.
Now that famine and disease can't do it and war is a bit too much. There is nothing left but this.
Oh and feminism exist so that men can have sex with women, without marrying them.
The abolishment of men and women as gender roles. The abolishment of the family and monogamy. Free love being the only type of love allowed.