Do we even have a clue after 60 years of AI research to make a general intelligence system?
All I see is fancy recursion and just like some combination of math shit from like 2 second year of any engineering degree.
LULZ / Science & Tech
What is human intelligence?
You need a soul for real consciousness. Maybe computers can imitate it to fool people, but probably never.
Don't read/watch pop sci garbage
[log in to view media]
Well can't you extract a soul from a human then? People are already being wasted in war, and I know plenty of people who want to be robots. We have plenty of souls to experiment with.
Souls don't exist dummy
Maybe yours doesn't
Based and christpilled
It's impossible to map the human brain with just two logical states. Tech has yet to advance
human brains are just an extensive combination of 1s and 0s at a smaller density that we haven't figured out how to get there THOUGH
>human brains are just an extensive combination of 1s and 0s
proof?
it's literally electricity
...and electricity is 1s and 0s?
in theory you can just represent it numerically through floating point numbers
I can't even sort my porn photos by similarity using meme neural networks.
Also self driving cars don't work on urban terrain.
Also no AI exists that accurately predicts the stock market.
AI doesn't generalize and is overall shit
Heisenberg uncertainty makes it impossible to know the value of the electric field to arbitraty precision
>Do we even have a clue after 60 years of AI research to make a general intelligence system?
No.
Computers operate fundamentally different than living brains. Researchers are shoehorning what little they know of living brains into AI technology and the result, although interesting, isn't all that impressive. The AI for controlling an automated vehicle is even dumber than the brain of a mosquito. Living brains probably operate a quantum level and our consciousness might even exist at another dimension.
[deleted post]
General AI does not exist and anyone claiming you be researching it is lying for press coverage.
we can't even make a proper cyber roach
how do I get smarter bros?
eat healthy
exercise
get enough sleep
do mentally challenging activities
Watch Ghost in the Shell, avatarfag.
A robot process information with 1s and 0s, whilst a human can process information analogously. In other words, humans can think in more complex and nuanced patterns than a robot can.
Analogue computation is a thing though. That's how a lot of older computers worked, and that'll likely be making a come back now that we're about at the point where you can't just make the same thing but smaller.
pretty sure that guy was talking about analogously as in seeing logos, using analogy and intuition.
I'm meant that humans can understand concepts like God without having a buffer-overflow, or regurgitate information without understanding it, like that Google AI did.
basically this
human intelligence is literally just memory.
>memorize math formulas and how to solve things, math isn't hard anymore
>memorize not to relax and blacks and you don't get capped often
>memorize english syntax, whoa I now don't sound stupid when I write
all of intelligence is literally just memorization.
[log in to view media]
How many bits is this?
32 for normal, 16 for half-precision models
Fuck knows man, my neurobiofag friends tell me that there are like 40 different ways to modulate neuron activity.
Stop avatarfagging, newfag:
https://archive.4plebs.org/_/search/filename/stylegan-asuka-face-sample.png/
https://desuarchive.org/_/search/filename/stylegan-asuka-face-sample.png/
https://archived.moe/_/search/filename/stylegan-asuka-face-sample.png/
[log in to view media]
No, you can play pretend like a bunch of these materialist people and take Dennett or Minsky to the extreme or Hofstadter and call it just a complex system with recursion and self-reference or something. Basically a bunch of edgy pure materialists like Bakker. But that stuff holds no more truth than a modern platonic theory like the one of Penrose using quantum processing seeing consciousness as something outside of the body.
A lot of these intelligence studies are also too often just focusing on the local human brain, Negarestani has a more global philosophy of intelligence and tries to define it and humans as a contrast against that localised view if you're interested.
Everything in software is only information, people use all of these words such as neural network and deep learning but it's all just a bunch of words to capture sets of algorithms attached to memory and a processor.
Human memory is not like computer memory, human processing is not like the processing of a cpu no matter how much these people cope philosophically.
These AI people are talking out of their ass and specifically side with certain philosophers with a narrowed vision.
>math too simple
Maybe don't stop at reading Medium articles? There's tons of research in AI, some of which is fairly deep in maff.
It's not that hard. Basically everything that any human does ever can be described as either a) an attempt to seek pleasure b) an attempt to avoid suffering c) instinct-driven
We start with instinct and slowly develop a decision tree based on the suffering and pleasure we experience.
People want to believe that we are something special, but that's really all there is to it
I like how you use c as a way to capture everything that doesn't fall under a or b and just call it a day pretending like you properly defined something. What you said barely means anything.
C (instinct driven behavior) is the easiest thing to reproduce on machines. The majority of "AI" today is effectively just simulating instinct and has no ability to update a decision tree. The only decision trees they use are static and created by programmers.
yes you need a man a woman a bottle of lube and about 9 months 15 seconds