>Can you post examples?
I haven't been following him in years, I wouldn't be able to find it. Checked his facebook page now, stuff looks cringe but no outright misinformation. Keep following him though and I think you'll see. Especially if he addresses a topic you've read about before.
>i dont have proof but wait and you will find your own proof
Lmao
2 years ago
Anonymous
OP isn't asking for proof. It's asking what I think. And that was provided. If I offended you, I'm sorry.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You talk bad of a person because of the "sheer amount of historial misimformation" you say he spreads but cant provide a single example.
What does that say about your opinions?
2 years ago
Anonymous
It says I keep my opinions even when my special neat folder of "historical misinformation I have seen on facebook" screenshots gets deleted? Maybe I should believe every influencer the moment I lose sight of the receipts....
2 years ago
Anonymous
>>>>I saw him do it >>>Why can't I see him do it then >>You can, just watch >NO! NO WATCHING! JUST SEEING!
Stuff just keeps getting cringier
2 years ago
Anonymous
>just google it bro
2 years ago
Anonymous
There's no need to provide examples when every word Hanwiener has ever written has been misinformation.
Its certainly an interesting topic, not saying I believe it but its fun to entertain, and there are some intriguing things he's posited, like the Sphinx water erosion hypothesis and the stuff with Gobleki tepe
And there the evidence of pre-clovis settlement in America, there's certainly more going on history than we know but by no means necessarily what he says
Started off great with an excellent book on the Ark of the Covenant.
Had a mid-career slump talking a lot of tosh about ancient civilisations with no evidence.
Might be getting better, I dunno; I just know what Cernovich says about him on his twitter. Maybe I need to eat some ayahuasca to appreciate it.
pseud
Why?
Can you post examples?
>Can you post examples?
I haven't been following him in years, I wouldn't be able to find it. Checked his facebook page now, stuff looks cringe but no outright misinformation. Keep following him though and I think you'll see. Especially if he addresses a topic you've read about before.
>i dont have proof but wait and you will find your own proof
Lmao
OP isn't asking for proof. It's asking what I think. And that was provided. If I offended you, I'm sorry.
You talk bad of a person because of the "sheer amount of historial misimformation" you say he spreads but cant provide a single example.
What does that say about your opinions?
It says I keep my opinions even when my special neat folder of "historical misinformation I have seen on facebook" screenshots gets deleted? Maybe I should believe every influencer the moment I lose sight of the receipts....
>>>>I saw him do it
>>>Why can't I see him do it then
>>You can, just watch
>NO! NO WATCHING! JUST SEEING!
Stuff just keeps getting cringier
>just google it bro
There's no need to provide examples when every word Hanwiener has ever written has been misinformation.
Loved him when I first heard him. Then followed him on social media and saw the sheer amount of historical misinformation he was spreading. Not a fan.
Its certainly an interesting topic, not saying I believe it but its fun to entertain, and there are some intriguing things he's posited, like the Sphinx water erosion hypothesis and the stuff with Gobleki tepe
And there the evidence of pre-clovis settlement in America, there's certainly more going on history than we know but by no means necessarily what he says
clovis dick in your mouth sorry
What about this?
block in my country, where are you from so I can switch the VPN on
I like Bauval more especially early Bauval
Hanwiener is a Erich von Daniken level moron now
Started off great with an excellent book on the Ark of the Covenant.
Had a mid-career slump talking a lot of tosh about ancient civilisations with no evidence.
Might be getting better, I dunno; I just know what Cernovich says about him on his twitter. Maybe I need to eat some ayahuasca to appreciate it.
Wow IQfy is truly a shitty place for discussing history.
Im out of this board. Delete this thread if you want mods
>Wow IQfy is truly a shitty place for discussing history.
You've just realised that NOW?
while most of what he says is bullshit, I respect his integrity to admit when he's been wrong and his challenge of moronic egyptology