What does?

What does LULZ think of graham hancock?

  1. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    pseud

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why?

      Loved him when I first heard him. Then followed him on social media and saw the sheer amount of historical misinformation he was spreading. Not a fan.

      Can you post examples?

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Can you post examples?
        I haven't been following him in years, I wouldn't be able to find it. Checked his facebook page now, stuff looks cringe but no outright misinformation. Keep following him though and I think you'll see. Especially if he addresses a topic you've read about before.

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          >i dont have proof but wait and you will find your own proof
          Lmao

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            OP isn't asking for proof. It's asking what I think. And that was provided. If I offended you, I'm sorry.

            • 8 months ago
              Anonymous

              You talk bad of a person because of the "sheer amount of historial misimformation" you say he spreads but cant provide a single example.
              What does that say about your opinions?

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                It says I keep my opinions even when my special neat folder of "historical misinformation I have seen on facebook" screenshots gets deleted? Maybe I should believe every influencer the moment I lose sight of the receipts....

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                >>>>I saw him do it
                >>>Why can't I see him do it then
                >>You can, just watch
                >NO! NO WATCHING! JUST SEEING!
                Stuff just keeps getting cringier

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                >just google it bro

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                There's no need to provide examples when every word Hancock has ever written has been misinformation.

  2. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Loved him when I first heard him. Then followed him on social media and saw the sheer amount of historical misinformation he was spreading. Not a fan.

  3. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Its certainly an interesting topic, not saying I believe it but its fun to entertain, and there are some intriguing things he's posited, like the Sphinx water erosion hypothesis and the stuff with Gobleki tepe

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      And there the evidence of pre-clovis settlement in America, there's certainly more going on history than we know but by no means necessarily what he says

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        clovis dick in your mouth sorry

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      What about this?

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        block in my country, where are you from so I can switch the VPN on

  4. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I like Bauval more especially early Bauval
    Hancock is a Erich von Daniken level retard now

  5. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Started off great with an excellent book on the Ark of the Covenant.
    Had a mid-career slump talking a lot of tosh about ancient civilisations with no evidence.
    Might be getting better, I dunno; I just know what Cernovich says about him on his twitter. Maybe I need to eat some ayahuasca to appreciate it.

  6. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wow LULZ is truly a shitty place for discussing history.
    Im out of this board. Delete this thread if you want mods

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Wow LULZ is truly a shitty place for discussing history.
      You've just realised that NOW?

  7. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    while most of what he says is bullshit, I respect his integrity to admit when he's been wrong and his challenge of retarded egyptology

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *