What does LULZ think about ta? is it worthwhile to learn it alongside mathematical finance
What does?
Falling into your wing while paragliding is called 'gift wrapping' and turns you into a dirt torpedo pic.twitter.com/oQFKsVISkI
— Mental Videos (@MentalVids) March 15, 2023
Patterns define everything in this reality. x pattern = statistical proclivity towards y outcome. It isn't rocket science
what about abacuses?
This isnt a good place to ask, sci/ psueds don't know any models of anything that have any relevant predictive power. They are just good goy who absorb whatever they are told too to make them good little wageslaves
TA is nothing more than a graphical representation of the past.
TAfags fail when they expect past performance to dictate future behaviour.
case in point, you are a stone cold retard
Not an argument.
>What does LULZ think about ta?
"think"?
let me tell you what I *know* about TA: there is ZERO scientific evidence it works
learning TA is about constantly combining and adjusting indicators rather than rigorously building a permanent foundation and then applying it.
>learning TA is about constantly moving the goalpost when things are not going your way to try and fool your youtube viewers into thinking it works and buy your course
there, fixed it for you
Yes, the first is explicitly true (the goalpost is profit) and therefore we constantly adjust to get it. the second thing corresponds to making profit too; an interesting consequence of multiple people using the same ta and acting on it dynamically alters the effectiveness of that TA for everyone. mathematical finance is recursive stochasm
shut up nagger, your astrology-tier lines mean fuck all
You seem really stupid, in fact yor are probably the resident actual schizo depicted here
judging by your manic outburst for no reason. But let me ask you this. When you see thing you want to purchase on sale for half price are you more or less likely to buy it?
>uses value investing arguments in TA analysis
orthogonal, TA is simple chart gematria.
if you see a stock you believe is worth $100 go down from $200 to $50 of course you'll want to buy it, but that's because you have done your homework valuing the company by looking at a myriad of reports and other information. you need ZERO technical analysis to buy shit at a price you think is convenient.
(also, setting up a stop-loss condition is not TA, it's simple algorithmic risk management)
shhh, I don't want your "it came to me in a dream" psychoanalysis. I asked you a very simple question. Are you capable of answering it
I answered, but your gematria schizo brain is too stupid to read
So you are too schizophrenic to be able to answer a very simple question? I figured as much.
Objects in motion tend to stay in motion.
You will always be poor and I will always not be poor 🙂
>Objects in motion tend to stay in motion.
so by your own schizophrenic words, if a stock goes down it should keep going down until it reaches zero.
why the hell would I buy a stock that is going to zero?