LULZ / TV & Film

What did we think of this film?

What did we think of this film?

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    a miserable pile of cruelhouse and brerb

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      fpbp
      /thread
      checked and Uncle FillPilled

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The third thread I've lurked in this week and this is the first time seeing this reference. Thank you, anon. Based and checked; but I expected to see something like this a lot sooner, /v/

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It was alright I guess
    I don't like when documentarians openly take one side and act hostile to the other, even if it's something I happen to agree with. It undercuts the whole thing

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >when documentarians openly take one side and act hostile to the other
      The entire point of the doc is that there is only logical side to take. How did you miss that?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        only one*

        Is it worth a watch if I don't care about politics and just want to laugh at dumb trannies?

        it's funny for the first half then tries to get a bit serious and sad but still funny for the second half

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Then its just propaganda

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >the truth is propaganda but baseless claims accompanied with threats are not

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      despite your digits i disagree. he presented himself in a fairly calm and balanced way and let the interviewees bury themselves with their own nonsense.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah that much was fine, I'm talking at the end when the whole thing just switches to his personal crusade

        >when documentarians openly take one side and act hostile to the other
        The entire point of the doc is that there is only logical side to take. How did you miss that?

        Because if your goal is to convince/convert people then being hostile doesn't work, no matter how sound your logic. And if it ISN'T trying to convince anyone, then it's just more masturbatory Conservative media that exists to convince boomers that they're winning while their nation and race die out around them.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >when the whole thing just switches to his personal crusade
          well, he is building a movement. can't wait for his next kino. SBG for life.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Or maybe you know, it's just a documentary presenting a reality and letting the viewers think for themselves? Or is that not a thing in america?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >letting the viewers think for themselves?
            Taking a side in the documentary you are making is the opposite of letting the viewer think for themselves. The parts where he let the politician and that gay academic talk themselves into a pit where great. He should have left it at that.

            The goal wasn't to convince anyone it was to put a spotlight on the tranny movement so fencesitters realize what exactly is going on.

            Why is it paywalled on some website nobody heard of then?

            It doesn't work on the person you are talking to, but those people are never going to be convinced anyway, and are impossible to have an honest conversation with.

            The audience it can persuade are people who passively support but in practical terms pay no attention to the trans movement and the industry around it. That is an exteremely large audience who are never exposed to reality of these people.

            I'm not talking about the mentally ill troons or die hard troon advocates, I'm talking about the normies in the audience.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Why is it paywalled on some website nobody heard of then?
              Because it wasn't made to convince anyone of anything it was made to get the sort of dudes who unironically watch alt-right youtubers to buy a subscription to the daily wire while feeling like they are 'sticking it to the man' or whatever.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                An awful lot of troons are seething about it for something locked to alt-right youtube spheres

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                troons seethe about everything. I don't know any normies who have seen this film. Like everything cancer it has just blown up on twitter which is making it seem like a bigger deal than i suspect it actually is.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                they are so mad all the time when people say maybe you shouldnt be mutilating your body

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >troons are freaking out about something that barely exists
                you don't say

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                They are sticking it to men who pretend to be women and women child abusers, it's right there in the doc.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Sticking it to child abusers while at the same advocating male genital mutilation?

                Matt Walsh will vehemently defend circumcision to anyone who dares question the will of Benny Shapiro

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It seems you want to ignore the child abuser part
                >NOOO THE PERSON ISN'T PERFECT SO YOU CAN'T DO ANYTHING
                It's always the same thing with you, arguing to inaction, he's sticking it to child groomers, good for him, tell him that baby genital mutilation is barbaric and sucking a bloody baby's penis is what garden gnomes do.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                So you don’t consider male genital mutilation against infants child abuse. Lol.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >genital mutilation against infants child abuse
                "I made up this thing and I'm really angry about it existing in my head"

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yup, you’re brain broken. Circumcision IS male genital mutilation, it does still happen, and you just saw Matt Walsh defending the practice.

                interesting comment, what year was it posted?

                Judging by his “What is a woman” profile picture, it was very recent. Lol

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                i don't follow this homosexual and this 'What Is a Woman?' shit didn't enter my sphere until very recently, wouldn't know if he changed his Icon to that last week or a year or two ago when he was in the middle of making the film and would of changed his opinion of it later on/Not showing full context since it seems to be cutting out quite alot of detail and only showing this one teeny tiny Barnyfag-like screen shot and all its missing is the KYS. Last bit is 'hows it invalidate his documentary other than doing it himself by being the most uninteresting to listen too/boring looking and amateurish commentary style and probably brain dead as well given i'm not 100% he even understood the joke behind [email protected] threat hes read off recently.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >circumcision doesn’t exist and if it does it’s not child abuse.
                Post nose.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It is abuse why aren't you able to read, you're delusional?

                Body == image of God =/= mutilations

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Oh good so you and I agree then and it’s Matt Walsh who thinks it’s acceptable to cut off a baby’s foreskin. Got it. Go tell him how you feel then.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >sticking it to men who pretend to be women and women child abusers
                Lol just like you stuck it to gays, blacks and feminists? In a few years conservatives will be bending over backwards to appease trannies while screeching about whatever the next thing the left is pushing

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >I'm talking about the normies in the audience.
              Then I disagree. There may be other ways to approach the issue, but this one is suitable for what it is.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The goal wasn't to convince anyone it was to put a spotlight on the tranny movement so fencesitters realize what exactly is going on.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It doesn't work on the person you are talking to, but those people are never going to be convinced anyway, and are impossible to have an honest conversation with.

          The audience it can persuade are people who passively support but in practical terms pay no attention to the trans movement and the industry around it. That is an exteremely large audience who are never exposed to reality of these people.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This only makes sense for to obscure topics. If there already exists a dominant narrative in society, devoting 50% of your doc to representing that narrative would not only be wasteful, it would also contribute to the systematic drowning out of the dissenting position.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        He already contributes to that plenty by putting the content behind benny's paywall.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Pretty much all documentaries related to a political subject take a specific side. Documentaries are not research papers (not that research papers are exactly objective and unbiased these days either).

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I don't like when documentarians openly take one side and act hostile to the other

      That’s literally been the case for the past 40 years against the right you zoomer homosexual

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why on earth would you want your documentaries to be objective. Outside of history and similar gay shit, sides should be chosen

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I don't think you know what objective means. Objective does not mean arbitrarily staying in the middle. Objective just means you don't let personal feelings sway you. For example it is OBJECTIVELY morally correct to kill trannies. That's picking a side. And it's objectively the right side because trannies are wrong by every measure.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          seems you have an even worse idea of what objective means than the other guy.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No, I don't. If there's a war between people who think 2+2=4 and 2+2=5 then the second group is objectively wrong and all objective people will automatically side with the first group. You literally do not know what the word objective means. It doesn't mean neutral at all times. It means you judge things based on logic and reality alone.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              the objective reality is transgenderism is a delusion. but the documentary doesn't pursue proving that point. instead it takes "a side" and refuses to engage the concept directly.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                are you fucking retarded

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                i accept your concession

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Refuse to take a side? In the end the layperson, a real woman, answer the question the blue haired freaks and child abusers couldn't in 3 seconds flat.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                what made you think that was a relevant response?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              so like how half the country believes the democratic and fair election was stolen?
              lmao

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                America has never had a democratic or fair election. These has never been a legitimately earned seat of power in this country. If you think otherwise you are insane.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What I want is for the reality of the situation to speak for itself so that people who didn't know or disagree with you won't have any room for debate. If you make it obvious that you've taken a side then you make it easier for people to doubt what you have to say.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What is a film?

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't care how many times you shills post this, I won't watch your reddit film. Fuck off.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The "everything everywhere all at once" thread is two pages down bub.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Keep shilling for The Daily Wire for free dipshit, waste all the time you like. I still won't watch your reddit culture war documentary.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You go sister, stick it to them, we we will all be women together.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous
            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >people who think not having troons on screen leads to their deaths call other people triggered

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >visits forum that talks about films
          >enters a thread about a doc she hates
          >tells people there they are shilling for a movie company

          Female logic

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >be a LULZedditor lurker
          >don't know that people mean YOU when they call things "reddit"
          >attempt and fail to use it to fit in
          kek

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is it worth a watch if I don't care about politics and just want to laugh at dumb trannies?

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    well, what IS a woman?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Matt Walsh will vehemently defend circumcision to anyone who dares question the will of Benny Shapiro

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This is the real thing. The film has nothing new or interesting to say. It’s just not good, typical shlock you’d expect from DW.
      [...]
      Conservatives when you ask if they can conserve something other than Israel

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >conserving the century-plus old American tradition of circumcision
        >LULZ coomers are upset by this

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      interesting comment, what year was it posted?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He's not wrong.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      by that logic you would defend abortion and gender transition on kids too, if parents can take on the liberty of their children

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Then trannies chopping off their genitalia isn't amputation either you garden gnome apologist retard

      Anyone promoting circumcisions for babies for any reason or any other type of maiming is piece of shit you shouldn't listen to

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Klavan is the only good host on Dailywire

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Coincidentally Klavan is the only one of them who has achieved actual success outside of being a neo-con grifter

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Was decent but hamstrung by the fact that major figures in the troon movement won't give their opposition the time of day. He lucked his way into getting into the office of the dumbass politician and that guy walked out 5 seconds into the interview when he realized it was a conservative.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You gotta wonder about the correctness of any movement too scared to debate or even engage.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    don't need to see it, i already know everyone who pushes this troon and multiple gender shit is a subhuman freak

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This is the real thing. The film has nothing new or interesting to say. It’s just not good, typical shlock you’d expect from DW.

      Matt Walsh will vehemently defend circumcision to anyone who dares question the will of Benny Shapiro

      Conservatives when you ask if they can conserve something other than Israel

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    And yet nobody could amswer the question.
    So what is a woman? And I am asking to /lgbt/

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It was answered multiple times and you chuds can't accept it.
      A woman is an individual that identifies herself as someone that belongs to what conforms that group

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        what group exactly?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Women, anon. What is this thread about?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            do you know what a circular definition is?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              they make it too easy

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              The bible only tells the truth. I know because the bible says so.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Cool, I am agnostic.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        this is an insane definition. like you can't just say you are whatever and it makes you that. and no one he interviewed in the doc even debated that they would just get offended and refuse to discuss the topic.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >to what conforms that group
        this doesn't mean anything

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You've only accounted for what someone is identifying themselves as, not the thing itself.

        Why do you idiots keep doing this? You're describing a state of affairs and not the things therein; and then you just keep repeating the state of relation over and over as though it's satisfactory.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        are you saying hons aren't trans?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        And I am an apache ah-64 attack helicopter

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    shitty version of this

    ?list=PLWHTKnB0jqZD9cR0zMpNLCvNeqf2UlfIB

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why did anon bang 15 black women? what was his endgame?

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What is a bus?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >all that money to repaint the outside when the inside is still going to reek of piss and mental illness

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >I'm too stupid to understand Social Constructionism: The Movie

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What is truth?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        truth is an english word

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          What is this English word? What is it supposed to represent?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      So what is our shared collabarative community definition of what a woman is, Mr Cultural Maxist?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        it is mutable, meaning it changes between groups and changes over time. its even different across individuals. that's why "a woman is whomever identifies as one" is accurate because womanhood is an identity, both personal and social, not an immutable characteristic.

        but this is just me describing the idea of social constructionism. this movie purposefully refuses to engage with the concept in good faith, implying the host and producers are simply too stupid to dismantle it

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >good faith

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            what a powerful counter-argument

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          what are you identifying as when you say that you are a woman?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            identifying as whatever that person's concept of a woman is. I said "it changes between groups and changes over time. its even different across individuals" and your response is "ok, but what if I didn't understand that and instead asked you to give an essentialist definition"

            ya'll keep proving my point. you can't understand social constructionism and then act like your inability to understand the concept is some sort of "gotcha".
            > I'm too fucking stupid to understand what you're saying so that makes me smart actually

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >ya'll

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >it changes between groups and changes over time. its even different across individuals
              it literally does not

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              can you define the word woman without using the word woman or referring to it directly?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >please god, just give me an essentialist definition of woman. I've never met a woman in my entire life. I need to fucking know PLEASE

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I've never met a woman in my entire life
                if you can use it in a sentence, why can't you define it?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No it's just you who demonstrate that you don't know what a woman is. Imagine your mental retardation.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >essentialist
                kek, you sound like the essentialist definition of a homosexual.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Matt Walsh’s definition refers unto itself too “biological human FEMALE.”
                His whole point in the movie is that gender and sex are interchangeable/not different.
                Lmfao what a retarded movie they literally didn’t think it through at all. Apparently, neither did you.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The point is that gender doesn't exist and can't serve you as an identity. You're born either male or female. Nothing can change that.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >UHHH UHHH UHH REDIRECT DONT ADDRESS THE COMMENT
                LMFAO. Anon, he’s criticizing all these people for being unable to give a non circular definition of the word and his definition is also circular.
                You’ll never grow or learn if you don’t accept and admit when you’re wrong.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                see

                You're missing the word "adult" there buddy.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Okay, “adult biological human female” is still a circular argument kekw imagine being content dishonestly try and prove your point. You obviously don’t actually care about what’s true at all, makes sense given that you worship a fictional cartoon character invented by garden gnomes to subvert Europe.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You can call a 6y/o girl a female but you can't call them a woman.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                how is "adult human female circular"?

                is this just gonna end up with you confessing to solipsism? because if so can you get it out of the way now and not waste our time?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's not circular, it's based, it has foundations in reality.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                are you saying 13 year olds are adults?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You tell me.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Always have been since the dawn of history, go ask any hunter gatherer tribe. For the boys they have hunting trials at 14 to determine if he can provide for his family. Can you have a family? = yes? == adult.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >14
                I was skinning animals with grandfather since age 10 but it's just not that good of a quantifier with increasingly city-slicking populace. Maybe schools should have trips to the butcher shop along the museum or waste disposal facilities.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I remember reading in anthropology about this guy who upset his village elders so much that they never let him to the manhood ritual so he was never able to take a wife or have kids. Literally an incel by decree.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I knew you would shift to that argument

                No, the reason we have "woman" is to differentiate with "girl." Both are females. One is a woman.
                If you want to quibble that the time we choose to call someone an "adult" is somewhat arbitrary, go ahead. No one denies that. What is clear though is that both "woman" and "girl" refer to females of our species.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                this destroys the leftoid

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I proved you wrong. Your screeching means I'm right. Gender doesn't exist and every person is born male or female. Adult females of the human race are called women.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                A woman is a female but a female isn't necessarily a woman. You absolute mongrel, you don't know anything you fucking philistine, stop embarrassing yourself.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >A woman is a female but a female isn't necessarily a woman
                A woman is a female you pretentious dipshit. You will never be a woman if you were born with a Y chromosome , the rarity of intersex births doesn't the basic logic is sexual dimorphism in our species either lmao

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Anon. A female fish is not a woman. Only a female human is a woman. His point was that female and woman are not tautolagous words because there are female creatures that are not women. A female deer is a doe, for example. A female deer is not a woman.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If deer could talk they'd call does women

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Uhhh, okay. I guess that's why I said sexual dimorphism *in our species* you raging brainlet

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Don't call me a brainlet when you were the one who didn't bother to read the reply chain. The guy you bitched at was proving a tranny wrong. The tranny said that "adult human female" can't be a definition for woman because female = woman. The guy you replied to proved him wrong, because not all things that are female are called women. You fucking illiterate.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Don't call me a brainlet when you were the one who didn't bother to read the reply chain.
                Might want to reread it yourself lmao

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >A woman is a female but a female isn't necessarily a woman
                >A woman is a female
                You just repeated me and then you argue against me, are you a woman? Are you fucking dumb? Re-read what I said and also give me the definition of a "mare".

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Do you not understand basic math? If A=B then B=A. You're a fucking moron

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Except we're talking about groups

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Go look at some Venn diagram you philistine. This isn't equations, it's possession of traits.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_(mathematics)

                The Symmetric property still applies to groups jfc

                A woman is a female and a female is a woman. There is no non female woman or non woman female.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Group female
                -woman
                -girl

                retard

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I mean I'm just being autistic but you're simply wrong and doing a disservice to the argument. Female is a biological term, woman is a human-descriptive term, they're not equal in meaning.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I guess I should clarify this is in the domain of just humans?
                >There is no such thing as a non female human woman
                Is a better way to put it.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you can have a female plant but it is not a woman, a woman is a human female..

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'll simplify this for you

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                don't forget age

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm on phone and retarded (missed that too) cut me some slack

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Wait so it's A = B and B = A but B = C and C =/= A. Doesn't that technically mean that the intersection of a venn diagram is essentially the symmetric property?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Go and do your homework Timmy

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That's a way of saying "I don't know". Within the domain of human females there is no such thing a non female woman or a non woman female

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                wow, you're getting close. as if C=A^B but A~B. just stop you're embarrassing.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Okay, anyways *in the domain of human females* there is no such thing as a non female woman and a non woman female. Might want to reread that lmao

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                good job Timmy! as an additional exercise try to think about how not all humans are female and not all females are human. extra marks!

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Go look at some Venn diagram you philistine. This isn't equations, it's possession of traits.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_(mathematics)

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Woman = biological human female = human born with 2 chromosomes

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                that's a tautology

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Yes and that’s a circular definition retard lol. Female = woman according to him.
                “Biological human female” so “biological human woman” Walsh admits in the film he believed they’re interchangeable. Stop trying to weasel out of this idiot lol

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You forgot the word adult dumbass

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I got a female cat, it's not a woman. You can't feel shame don't you? You should be put on a child predator's list, if you can't feel shame at such embarrassment, you probably don't feel shame at committing misdemeanours or even worse things. There's a reason why trans have higher chances of molesting children, they just need the opportunity.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No, the reason we have "woman" is to differentiate with "girl." Both are females. One is a woman.
                If you want to quibble that the time we choose to call someone an "adult" is somewhat arbitrary, go ahead. No one denies that. What is clear though is that both "woman" and "girl" refer to females of our species.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                female = woman / girl
                woman = female
                girl = female
                girl ≠ woman

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're missing the word "adult" there buddy.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Matt Walsh’s definition refers unto itself too
                XX vs XY, yes. There is no issue with this and gender being a separate definition from biological sex is a semantic argument only pushed forward by left wing ideologues. There is no difference. You are born a man or a woman biologically, your psychological temperament where you are more masculine or feminine does not affect this.

                You can be a masculine woman and a feminine man, that doesn't mean you're magically the other sex because you pretend to be. That's the other issue with trannies, they as men or women turn the opposite sex into a simplified stereotype to purse because they can't truly understand the inherent biological differences between men and women. It's a literal symptom of their mental illness.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                they can't and it upsets them because I think deep down they know their ideology is bizarre rationalizations

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              How does one know if they are a woman?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              You have your definitions all wrong, it's not a semantic issue. First we need to lay the ground for our case: there's the metaphysics of reality, we don't know ultimate reality, then we know whatever we know, then there's the metaphysics of nature "naturalism" in this naturalism phenomenon there's "matter" and from this matter emerges some principles (mass, energy, and other physical and chemical properties) these matter possess universals and particulars distinctions, we as entities are able to distinguish between universals and particulars, now let's move to the case of humanity. Humans are entities, all humans were born from other humans, all humans were born as a by product of the union of an sperm and a ovum, humans produce sperms and ova, a human entity can't produce sperms and ova by itself, some humans produce sperms and some others produce ova, we call humans that produce sperms "A", we call humans that produce ova "B", "A" and "B" have different genetic composition, "A" and "B" are different, therefore "A" can't be "B" and "B" can't be "A", there you go it doesn't matter how you name them, and it doesn't matter how many time passes, these are universal rules.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >it is mutable, meaning it changes between groups and changes over time
          bro it literally does not

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >cuckservatives have spent the last decade seething over the fact that society's definition of "woman" has been changing
            >>"bro it doesn't change tho"

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              can you tell me what the latest definition of "woman" is then?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >"ok, but what if I didn't understand anything you've said and instead asked you to give an essentialist definition again"

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                what has the definition of woman changed into then... to confirm that it has changed

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >bro what if I just ask what the CONTEMPORARY essentialist definition is instead. is that a less retarded question?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >if I keep using the word essentialist they'll think I'm smart and concede
                lol
                lmao
                lol

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                'non-essentialism' would literally just be a seizure

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I don't care what dumb rhetorical trap you think you've lured the cuckservatives into, if you wanna go play stupid wordgames with them then be my guest.
              I'm not interested in your stupid wordgames.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >it is mutable, meaning it changes between groups and changes over time. its even different across individuals. that's why "a CHILD is whomever identifies as one" is accurate because childhood is an identity, both personal and social, not an immutable characteristic.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >good faith
          LOL YOU FUCKING UGLY LYING FREAK

          Here's a trick people, you cannot be ugly if you have good thoughts, this person is a ugly freak because he tries to lie to people.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >we made something up so you better learn about it or we will call you dumb for not playing along with shit we made up
      >what? Why would it be bad that we are telling hundreds of millions of people they are living in their own little solipsistic bubble nothing could go wrong

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It was ok. Should’ve been a lot more interview footage where people make fools of themselves and a lot less Matt Walsh doing anything else. If he was a more skilled interviewer and wasn’t just a social media culture war retard trying to appeal to Daily Wire shitheads it could have been a lot better.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nobody asked

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    LULZ is fucking obsessed with it.

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How does this make you feel?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Kek, those nipples

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      did she glue hair around her nipples to look more like a man?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Women are hairy Anon, pump enough test I to them and they'll grow their own long black hairs like that.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      mtfs are atrocious freaks and perverts but there is something about an ftm that strikes me as much more tragic. I can't really explain why I think this.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        mtfs are usually driven by lust and fetishization
        there's not really any benefit at all to being ftm, making it more likely they were just genuinely duped into thinking it would make them happy

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah that makes sense. The fact that mtfs are driven by autogynephilia and other perversions is undeniable. I can't really conceive of the possibility of the inverse happening for ftms.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They are also small and weak, so are not competition to other men. We can tolerate their existence somewhat.

          mtf are like poison in the potential mating pool, they are a direct threat that needs to be extinguished.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >mating pool

            Oh fuck off with your zoomorphical retarded takes you fucking incel, if it were the law of the jungle you'd be hung by the neck along with any type of degenerate tranny

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        ftm are usually the sad kind of mental illness that should be on suicide watch and mtf are usually the dangerous kind of mental illness that should be on a sex offender registry

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >dangerous kind of mental illness that should be on a sex offender registry
          like the men caught urinating in 'public' those fucking freaks!!

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >interviews Jordan Peterson
    into the trash it goes.

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You couldn’t pay me to watch some Dailywire “muh jesus” neckbeard give his opinion on anything

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Transgender ideology is built on self hatred and the religious worship of shallow, sexist stereotypes. It teaches people that they were born wrong if they're a girl who likes kickball or a boy who likes having long hair and cooking. There's no reason a man can't fulfill the same roles and adopt the same traditions as a woman, and vice versa. There's no reason to "change" your "gender" in the first place because "genders" ought to be equally able to pursue their passions. The concept of gender identity is inherently sexist and limiting. It's built on bigotry. The man who came up with "gender identity" is a murderer who caused two boys to kill themselves. In reality all we have is biological sex. Your sex doesn't determine your hobbies, your roles, your fashion or your personality. You choose those things. As an individual. Isn't that a better, more free world? One where sex is all that exists and people are free to pursue whatever they want regardless of their sex? "Gender" is a needless restriction and it does not serve as a genuine identity. The logical progression of breaking down the differences leads to tomboys and femboys. It leads to people who don't let their biological sex influence their hobbies or fashion. The transgender cult is all about building up those limitations and enforcing them so strictly that any little boy who so much as glances at a Barbie doll gets put on hormone blockers so that he can be railroaded into becoming "a girl" because "only girls like dolls". We used to have a culture that said "if you're a boy you ought to like sports" and now we have a culture that says "if you like sports you ought to become a boy". We skipped right over the healthy, rational middleground that says there's no reason a girl can't play kickball with her friends without mutilating herself and taking testosterone.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      trans people are totally accepting of GNC people. no one looks at a girl who likes sports and says "hey you might be a repressing man". this is a conservative/terf canard.
      all this philosophizing and trying to logic your way out of the existence of trans people is so tiresome. terfs repeat these same talking points every time. people don't feel trans because they feel like their interests or behaviors don't line up with the stereotypes of their birth sex. it's completely absurd. as one of many kinds of proof, look at all of the trans women and trans men here who DO have the stereotypical interests and behaviors of their birth sex
      I actually agree with you: gender is a needless restriction. sex is what matters, and the people who transition are the ones who deeply and persistently wish they were the opposite sex. simple as. "transgender" is a misnomer; the true process is "transsexualism". it's an attempt to alter one's sex to bring it more in line with one's desired sex. terfs think of it as "transgenderism" - someone of male sex who puts on a dress to purportedly serve the gender role of woman. but the vast majority of trans people do not see it that way, and probably no one on this board does

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >attempt to alter one's sex to bring it more in line with one's desired sex
        But you can't do it, you sex still remains the same.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You're so full of shit it's unreal. I'm not reading your lies past the first sentence. I'm a feminine man and you trannies target me for grooming every single day of my life. I have not gone a single day, for years, without one of you telling me I should start estrogen.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >trans people are totally accepting of

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I don't think you spend a lot of time in LGB communities then, because groomers harass us on a constant basis. They bully and pick on people and tell them they need to start hormones. They gaslight by claiming hormones can "make your eyes bigger and more cute" or "shrink your big shoulders down" or "give you a second puberty and keep you younger". I've seen all of this first hand, and it's absolutely abhorrent. Also one of the main issues here is the adherence to the idea of "socially expressed gender". There's no such thing. A young boy who wants to wear a dress or play with a barbie isn't expressing himself as a girl. He's expressing himself as a boy. Boys are allowed to do those things too. Only harmful sexist stereotypes tell us that those things are for girls in the first place. That's the issue. We need to remove those labels and realize that boys and girls can express themselves in a variety of ways, not just the sexist ways our society tells us are masculine and feminine. There's no logical need to change your gender if each gender is equally able to express themselves in every way the other gender can. The concept of social gender is harmful in and of itself, and the creator of the term was thoroughly discredited because his experiments lead to the suicides of two boys.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I'm straight and I get contacted by trannies on dating apps all the time. It's annoying. I put "Please don't contact me if you aren't a biological woman" on it, and they reported it.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That's the most objectively wrong thing anyone has ever said. Transgender "women" are men who were gaslit into believing in a false identity. They were groomed into thinking their "true self" is hidden behind drugs and surgery. But that's not the case for anybody, ever. They only feel that way because they were tricked into developing body image issues by a cult of groomers who use a false ideology to instill self hatred in vulnerable people. You should be teaching people to love and accept the way they were born. That's their true self. Do not support this transgender fad.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You're pushing the idea that people can be born wrong and that their happiness can only be found through drugs and surgery. You're marginalizing actual tomboys and femboys by supporting a dangerous fad based on dishonest grooming techniques. You should be helping people love the way they were born by celebrating feminine men and masculine women. But instead you're holding everybody back and reinforcing the stereotypes that made these people confused and miserable in the first place.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        There's no such thing as "transgender". You are whatever you were born as. It can't change. Nobody is ever born in the wrong body. You've adopted a harmful and cancerous ideology that flies in the face of all reason and human decency. Boys don't have to stop being boys to feel pretty. Girls don't have to stop being girls to enjoy sports. The ideas you're supporting are bigoted and sexist. You're not a good person. Your fad doesn't make you unique or interesting. It just makes you a fool who can't think for himself and isn't brave enough to defy stereotypes. Stop enabling death cults that prey on the vulnerable and sensitive. Stop reinforcing sexist stereotypes. Stop marginalizing and erasing tomboys and femboys. Stop attacking LGB people for refusing to have sex with you.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        We don't need labels, but people like you insist on creating them. Your biological sex is either female or male, that will always be a reality. But beyond that you can express yourself however you want. You can dress however you want. You don't ever need to tell people you're "gender fluid" or "trans" to excuse the fact that you're a man who wants to wear makeup. Just say that you're a man who doesn't mind going against the grain. That's what a free world looks like. That's what our world should look like. Most people won't judge you for shaving your legs and wearing makeup. Some people will even find it attractive. The transgender fad is actually hurting real LGB people. It's telling them they aren't allowed to defy stereotypes. It's telling them that women have to get surgery and take testosterone if they don't want to be "girly". Do you not see how harmful the transgender fad is? How much is victimizes real LGB people? The world you want is within reach and supporting this fad will only take us further away.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        There's actually no such thing as transgender. That ideology is a recent invention and has been proven illegitimate. It's a work of fiction, no different from claiming to be "trans species" or "trans racial". In a healthy world we would be celebrating tomboys and feminine men for their differences, not gaslighting them into destroying their bodies. The world becomes a more liberated place when we disregard stereotypes about how men and women are "supposed to act and dress" and simply accept people as they are. As they ACTUALLY are, as feminine men and masculine women, not as made up identities invented by homophobic conversion therapists who actually want to kill LGB people.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >we would be celebrating tomboys and feminine men for their differences
          why? it's one thing to not bully them for it, but why must it be celebrated?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            So that people have a respected and positive role model to look up to when they realize they aren't 100% normal. Basically as a way to safeguard these vulnerable people from tranny rhetoric and tranny brainwashing that seeks to marginalize them. Maybe when we're a generation or two removed from this tranny cult bullshit we can just go back to having it be neutral.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              why the fuck should a guy be respected or celebrated for wearing a dress? what about that is something that requires applause? I'm fine with not bullying people for choices like that. But tolerance is not approval. Why isn't tolerance enough?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Because trannies go out of their way to isolate and ostracize people so that they're more pliable for grooming. Did you miss my point? If 100% male crossdressers are celebrated a little more in the public sphere then trannies won't have any many grooming targets because those men won't be as vulnerable. Same goes for women too, we should have more women who don't shave in the media so that women don't get gaslit into thinking that their natural body hair is unnatural and is a sign they should trannify. None of this would be necessary if trannies were just killed on sight and we could go back to mere tolerance. But as it is now, we need more safeguards against tranny groomers.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Trannies doing "X" is no logical reason to do "Y" if "Y" makes no sense on its own. You're allowing trannies to dictate behavior.

                I think you're crossing a very dangerous threshold when you say tolerance is not enough and that applause/congratulation should now be the norm. The whole point of tolerance is that we agree to disagree about things we each don't approve of. I tolerate things that I don't approve of in other people because as part of a reciprocal social contract others are required to tolerate things I may do (or be) that they don't approve of.

                tl:dr - you're fucking with the social contract by making it about approval/celebration rather than tolerance

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                That's a fair point. Ideally I agree and I only want tolerance, because I'm against enforced conformity no matter what it's conforming to. I just really hate trannies and groomers and don't want them to have any more opportunities to do what they do. I want feminine men and masculine women to be comfortable with themselves and never ever again fall for this tranny cult.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      why do they want crossdressers and tomboys to go extinct? so they can sell pills and surgeries or is there more to it?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Because femboys and tomboys undercut their entire ideology. The idea that it's possible to just love yourself as a feminine man or a masculine woman means it's not necessary to transition. It means the entire trannyfication process is elective and harmful. There's no "life saving" element to it, but they depend on that lie to gaslight parents and children into going along with it. So trannies try to kill us so we don't point out how oppressive and manipulative their ideology is.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          kek absolutely, I used to crossdress and 'friends' tried to brainwash me into becoming a trannoid. they get so angry when you resist, you need to be in the same miserable confused spot as they are

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You chuds are so OBSESSED with us transfolk. It would be hilarious if it wasn’t so sad.

    Me and my sisters will continue to live our best lives while you incels stew in your own hatred. xxoo, slay.

    PS. Have sex

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      what I found in the documentary, posts like these and everything in between is it all comes around to something sexual. 'Why do you care? you just want to see dicks!' 'You must secretly want to fuck them!' it all came from years of people ironically saying 'haha you must like 2 fuk teh gays' and now we have brain dead NPCS recite this unironically because its all they can think about. Absolute coom-brained mentality.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      we just feel sad for you. I'm not obsessed and don't think less of trans people but I think a lot of people have been misled and the potential consequences are horrific

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      YWNBAW

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Extremely fucking based and I hope more films come out like this. We need to put the trannies and their mental illnesses on blast.

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It is a cult.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      SAFE AND REVERSIBLE AND ALSO NO REFUNDS

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No idea who this guy is and dont plan to watch this shit but I chuckled reading this

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Esteemed Radio Television of Serbia said that!?

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The entire notion of "transgender" is inherently bigoted, it's rooted in homophobia and sexism. There is no such thing as a man who expresses himself "as a woman". A man who wears makeup is expressing himself in one of the many ways that men can, and by insisting that he's a woman, or even by allowing him to insist that he's a woman, you're actively reducing the number of ways men are allowed to express themselves. You're saying "no, men aren't allowed to be beautiful or wear makeup. they have to become women if they want to do that". You're saying "no, girls aren't allowed to cut their hair short or play sports. they have to become men if they want to do that". Enforced conformity is all it is. It's no different from an oppressive traditionalist purity spiral. If you actually cared about these people you would want them to love and accept their bodies and their actual, true selves. They aren't transgender. Nobody is. There's no such thing as "transgender". They're just afraid of society bludgeoning them to force them to get back in line. So instead of changing their behavior to be more socially acceptable for men, they think they can change their bodies to be more socially acceptable for their behavior. Do you not see how that's the same problem either way? People need to stand up and say "men can wear makeup and women can have hairy legs and it's not taboo". They should never, EVER give in to the society's bigoted demands by changing their bodies to look more like the opposite sex, which never works by the way and always results in monstrosities. If you don't see why actual LGB people are against transgender ideology you're either a bad faith bigot or you have zero empathy.

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I personally didn't see it but I was disappointed with it. I was expecting a nuanced discussion about gender and society's ever-changing definitions of what it means to be a man or a woman, but instead it was all just simplistic biological reductionist quips and low-brow humor. Disappointing. It could have been an interesting topic to explore, but perhaps I'm expecting too much from a Ben Shapiro-owned production company.

    Still, I'm sure it will be popular with people who like simplistic answers to complex questions.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I was expecting a nuanced discussion about gender and society's ever-changing definitions of what it means to be a man or a woman
      you're a retard then. for more reasons than one.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Did you really think this fucking guy was gonna make a documentary out of genuine intellectual curiosity and good faith

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I personally didn't see it but I was disappointed with it. I was expecting a nuanced discussion about gender and society's ever-changing definitions of what it means to be a man or a woman, but instead it was all just simplistic biological reductionist quips and low-brow humor. Disappointing. It could have been an interesting topic to explore, but perhaps I'm expecting too much from a Ben Shapiro-owned production company.

        Still, I'm sure it will be popular with people who like simplistic answers to complex questions.

        good faith

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      how do you argue in "good faith" with people who say if you identify with one gender you are that gender and should get drugs for it and refuse to engage beyond that?

  28. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >gender and sex are different
    >trannies are still their biological sex but identify as the other gender
    >you have to use their gender pronouns or they cry and hang themself or something
    >also have to use women's bathrooms and play in women's sports
    Can't I just use pronouns based on sex? Can't we just split bathrooms and sports by sex and not gender? Doesn't that solve literally everything?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I don't wanna solve everything. I wanna be mad.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You're ignoring that trannies created this "gender" concept in the first place. They want this problem to exist so they can use it to abuse people. If we just went back to sex with no "gender" then trannies wouldn't exist. We would just have happy, non mutilated, non suicidal, much more attractive femboys and tomboys. Trannies want these problems to exist because their cult demands suffering and self hate and identity crisises.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, ignore all gender talks because gender literally doesn't exist, it's just a way to confuse people so that they can lie to them, these people have no shame remember, that's why they try to delude themselves into having pride, because they do shameful things and they try to ignore the associated shame it would normally make a person feel.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Can't I just use pronouns based on sex? Can't we just split bathrooms and sports by sex
      we already did. that's the way it has always been.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's how it's supposed to be. The concept of gender being somehow detached from sex is a modern and subversive manipulation by far-lefty activists. The end goal appears to be the deconstruction of western society.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >question something
        >before you're able to get to an answer, motivated retards rush in and declare there is no answer
        >you're stuck waiting for those retards to die to come to a real conclusion

        of course the greeks/romans came up with the actual conclusion thousands of years ago. there is only masculine and feminine temperament, and anyone can have either, both, or neither.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You can behave like a woman but you will always be a male and society should continue to treat you as a male regardless of your behaviour.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            what made you think that was a relevant response? use your words.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I did. Whatever you believe the Greek and Roman view of sex/gender was is irrelevant.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                so the idea people figured out the conclusion to questioning what defines sex/gender thousands of years ago, and everything since has been just objectively wrong, isn't relevant somehow?

                this is you trying to take an ideological "side" in something that doesn't have any actual sides. interpreting something as a conflict when the solution has already been found and has existed for millennia.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Ancient peoples didn't have magic wisdom. Also under no circumstance did they believe that some homosexual pretending to be a woman was actually a real woman.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >Also under no circumstance did they believe that some homosexual pretending to be a woman was actually a real woman.
                where did i say they did?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >so the idea people figured out the conclusion to questioning what defines sex/gender thousands of years ago, and everything since has been just objectively wrong, isn't relevant somehow?
                it's not exactly hard

                what's that? oh that's water
                what's that? oh that's fire
                what's that? oh that's a rock

                like, it's not hard, bro

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >question what makes a rock, a rock
                >identify its specific combination of properties and how they're unique to rocks

                >question what makes a woman, a woman
                >identify its properties
                >realize most of them aren't exclusive to women
                >realize most of what defines a woman is temperament and cosmetics, which can be applied to animals and inanimate objects to create "a woman"
                we are here. the step ancient greeks/romans took was
                >realize if there are no characteristics that can't be transferred/recreated, then men and women are basically the same, and men/women can be as masculine/feminine as they want

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >what defines a woman is temperament and cosmetics, which can be applied to animals and inanimate objects
                lmao
                lol even

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                the funny part is everyone knows you've jerked off to drawn porn.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >he's on 4chins and never fapped to drawn porn

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                nice reading comprehension.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Why don't you go ahead and explain what you were trying to say then big boy.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                that you've jerked off to drawn porn?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Of course. You haven't?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                where was that implied?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                By you expressing that it's funny that everyone knows that an anon has jerked off to drawn porn on LULZ?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >x attempts to laugh at the assertion that inanimate objects (read: ink and paper) can be made into "a woman"
                >cartoon porn

                reading comprehension

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                A drawing can depict a biological reality. Not sure what your point is supposed to be.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                see

                >question what makes a rock, a rock
                >identify its specific combination of properties and how they're unique to rocks

                >question what makes a woman, a woman
                >identify its properties
                >realize most of them aren't exclusive to women
                >realize most of what defines a woman is temperament and cosmetics, which can be applied to animals and inanimate objects to create "a woman"
                we are here. the step ancient greeks/romans took was
                >realize if there are no characteristics that can't be transferred/recreated, then men and women are basically the same, and men/women can be as masculine/feminine as they want

                so when did you learn that you're retarded?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Anon, cosmetics is not the sole aspect that makes a female/woman what they are. Are you retarded?

                A trap is not a female because he looks like one with clothes and makeup on.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                nobody asked

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Seethe. You're a fag for liking traps btw.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >cosmetics is the sole aspect that makes a female

                where was that said? is it really so difficult to respond to what's actually in posts?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Maybe you should express your ideas better in writing if so many people have trouble understanding what you're trying to say.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                what part are you having difficulty understanding?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Maybe start over from the beginning. You bringing up Romans and Greeks understanding of gender and what your point is, if you even have one.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                so you can't comprehend a single aspect of the idea that ancient greeks/romans went through the run of questioning sex/gender and arrived at a conclusion that refutes every current idea of sex/gender?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Gender isn't a thing, so they definitely didn't entertain that idea. Romans and Greeks knew that men could be feminine and women could be masculine. They were accepted as their sex birth and were accepted for being outside of the norm. It truly is that simple, but modern trannies have to muddy the waters and overcomplicate everything.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >so they definitely didn't entertain that idea.
                yea, that's the point. are you just so locked into your "side" that you're unable to comprehend anything else?

                you (presumably) said this earlier
                >A woman is an individual that identifies herself as someone that belongs to what conforms that group
                what the fuck does "belongs to what conforms that group" mean?

                so you missed the part where ancient greeks/romans said/believed something completely different than that, and, therefore, the person who brings them up will not be the same person who says "you are what you identify as?"

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Can you answer what "belongs to what conforms that group" means?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                no, because not only is it gibberish, its completely at odds with what i'm saying?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                are you or are you not the specific homosexual who is defending trannies ITT?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                i keep trying to bring up the ancient greeks/romans specifically to refute the entire concept of transgenderism.

                but since their ideas are also at odds with your ideas, you interpret this as "defending trannies." because you're retarded.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I just get all the homosexuals in this thread mixed up.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                No, I just interjected into the discussion without reading it. Because you mentioned gender and Greeks in the same sentence, so I just wanted to write the objective truth down, because I happen to know for an objective fact that gender doesn't exist and that idea was never entertained by anyone before 1950. Masculine women were accepted as fully fledged women and feminine men were accepted as fully fledged men. If you're arguing for what I said then good work.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                anon, ancient greek and latin are gendered languages. they literally came up with the concept of attributing "sex" to words/ideas/behaviors.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Wrong. Gender is a grammatical concept. Gender only applies to words. Only in 1950 did people start using "gender" to describe living things. The intentional conflation of a grammatical term with a biological term was done to create a modern day cult based on confusion.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                if you're going to say "wrong" you might want to post something that actually contradicts what the other guy was saying.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I'm asking you what relevance that has at all to the biological and social reality that men are male and women are female. Also why should we care what an ancient culture thinks? Is pederasty good because the ancient Athenians engaged in it a lot?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                the ancient greeks/romans produced some of the greatest minds in human history. they questioned every aspect of reality and arrived at meaningful/useful conclusions about them.

                they held that males/females could (and would be) as masculine/feminine as they wanted.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >they held that males/females could (and would be) as masculine/feminine as they wanted.
                no one disagrees. The disagreement is that being feminine does not make you female, and "women" refers to adult females.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >The disagreement is [something you've never said or implied]

                the greeks/romans are brought up because they're refuting the concept of transgenderism from over 2000 years ago. also refuting the idea that

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >the ancient greeks/romans produced some of the greatest minds in human history. they questioned every aspect of reality and arrived at meaningful/useful conclusions about them.
                hahahahahahahaha they sure did.
                HAHAHAHAHA

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Literally nothing wrong with that statement.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Ancient Greeks and Romans also believed that the gods lived on a specific mountain in Greece and would actively walk among people causing fortune and misfortune. Is that real because the culture also produced some great minds? Are n-words good because I like some music made by black artists?

                What a fucking retarded mindset you have. Shockingly immature too.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                i can comprehend that the greeks and romans not only had firm definitions for men and women, but that they based many of their laws and customs around just such a distinction. women were second class citizens barred from voting, property inheritance, and having public opinions in general based entirely on their sex/gender (lol @ you using them interchangeably by the way).

                if you disagree with this: can you point to one single recorded example of a greek or roman woman identifying as a man and being released from her social bonds as a result? of becoming a patriarch or head of household?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you (presumably) said this earlier
                >A woman is an individual that identifies herself as someone that belongs to what conforms that group
                what the fuck does "belongs to what conforms that group" mean?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >"i didn't say sole! i said most! btw everyone stop arguing in semantics please!"
                i could make fun of you all day. please keep posting, anon.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >i'm retarded
                yes, i can see that.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I don't know what you're arguing about but as a trap who loves traps, you are correct. We are men. People who love traps do so because we love men. Trannies cannot be traps, only natural non ruined men can be traps. The entire point is that there's a man under the clothes and makeup. That is why we like what we like.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The only thing that makes a woman a woman is being female and human. Stop being retarded.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                what makes a rock, a rock
                its specific combination of properties and how they're unique to rocks
                >say trees, mice, the sun, clouds, dreams, the color blue and anger are also rock if we say so
                you are here, the step most of you take next is
                >commit suicide

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                dude, not saying men can be women. why is that so difficult to comprehend?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                most of them aren't exclusive to women
                bro having gametes that get fertilized is exclusive to women

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >realize most of what defines a woman is temperament and cosmetics
                this is what these psychos actually believe. lmao. no wonder they think looking like an ogre in a dress is perfectly normal and understandable.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                no, that isn't what they believe. they believe they can be women. the ancient greeks/romans would've called them retarded.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >realize most of them aren't exclusive to women
                Except they are literally essential biological differences that you have to willfully ignore in order to not notice
                >realize most of what defines a woman is temperament and cosmetics
                The fact all of the cells in your body lack a Y chromosome, you've naturally developed secondary sex characteristics, and the literal bone structure you have are all things we can notice and tell which sex you are. The differences between men and women are not mostly through temperament.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                do you realize you keep repeating rhetoric in response to something that refutes both sides?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >refutes both sides?
                Delusional lmao

                There are numerous traits between men and women that can't be transferred and therefore temperament is not the defining factor between what makes a man or woman. That's my point and you can refute it if you like or not.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >keeps regurgitating rhetoric
                you're actively fighting against obtaining true understanding. its kinda sad.

                according to ancient romans there were
                >male
                >female
                that's it. then there are masculine/feminine acts/appearances. that's it.

                they studied enough of reality to know masculine/feminine behaviors aren't locked to sex.

                that's it.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >women are objects
                Based

  29. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    horrible film. a film called what is a woman should have been made by a WOMAN not by matt walsh who is antifeminist transphobic and anti womens rights. the film was barely even about women it was mostly about how much this guy hates the evil transgender agenda or whatever. anyone can see what a woman is if they look in wikipedia but if your gonna make a movie about how only cis women are women or whatever then how about making it about those women in the first place

  30. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Staying true to yourself means not falling for the transgender fad and not taking drugs or getting surgery or buying into bullshit "gender spectrum" ideology simply to appease stereotypes. It means learning to love how you were born and accept the implications of biological reality. Femboys and tomboys stay true to themselves. Transgender cultists and "non binary" fad chasers do not.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      for me, the red line is chemically and surgical alterations that just feels unnatural to me, we've had femboys before ancient romans arrived on the scene.
      But maybe now this is gonna become the new norm, idk, to me femboys just seems like a phase some men might have and later turn into more masculine men later down the line as they age, femboys seems like a novelty phase for gay experimental youth

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        desu, other animals will engage in "gay sex" as e.g., practice for sex with females, or as demonstrations of their competence in the act of sex for the purpose of wooing females.
        fucking someone you've not interest in having a kid with or marrying because you just want to learn how to fuck, fucking a dude solves that pretty well

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          i just don't overly think about these things, trannies weird me out, yet there's been many attractive ones over the years but they wither away worse than regular women, i mainly just see them as contemporary sex objects and not something meant for long term, so yeah as you kinda put it, someone to just have enjoyable casual non-productive sex.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Animals also engage in incest, you are just acting like an animal which means you belong in a cage. Homosexual sex is always wrong by definition because it is the trait of being attracted to the wrong sex, ergo wrong.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            incest is only really a problem because people don't do enough of it

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              You're retarded and you don't have any siblings.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Nah, your desire to breed is animalistic and subhuman. You belong in a cage. Real men know that the truest form of bonding is between their fellow men. Homosexual relationships are inherently more virtuous.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Breeding is life, you advocate for death, the outright contrary. Homosexuality is death, die in gaypoxaids.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      agreed I have no issue with feminine men or masculine women. it seems more rigid and bizarre to state that if you like doing certain activities not associated with your sex you should cut off your genitalia or take hormones. I dont know why that is so hard for some people to understand

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        All trannies are the most extreme bigots imaginable. We literally had one of these threads last night where a tranny unironically insisted that if a man bought a pink car he should be forced to transition because only women like pink and it's proof that he's trans. They literally believe this cultural shit is set in stone and must be obeyed.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >being so autistic that you fell for the obvious bait
          hmm

  31. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It was interesting and it confirmed my bias. I didn't pay for it of course but I 'hope others do.

  32. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Isn't this entire movie just the same interview 'gotcha' tricks guys like steven crowder or the daily show have done for the last decade? Are boomers really that far behind the curve that this is novel to them?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >show someone is a retard in a debate
      >NO YOU USED TRICKS TO DEFEAT US ITS A GOTCHA QUESTION

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Isn't this move based around interviews? What fucking debate are you talking about?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >What is a woman?
      >*they can't answer the simple question
      How is that a "gotcha"? He gave them plenty of chances
      >durr hurr he asked the nu-mathematician 2+2=? and the guy couldn't answer, that's a gotcha interview, dropped

  33. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >mfw "And you won't find out!"

  34. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Left wingers are insane, narcissistic cultists
    >The founders of their ideologies are pedophiles who got away with constantly lying and child abuse
    >They don't care about reason because they never had any to begin with
    Basically everything I already knew about leftists already but Matt Walsh asking a few very simple questions really shows you just how deluded they are

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Hey don't drag us mentally ill into this

  35. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    We thought the Norwegians did it better 12 years ago:

    https://archive.org/details/Hjernevask_Brainwash_EngSub

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      for video see

      shitty version of this

      ?list=PLWHTKnB0jqZD9cR0zMpNLCvNeqf2UlfIB

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Sorry, 10 years ago

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This mostly just dealt with biological determinism vs environmental determinism and feminism. It didn't really focus on transexuality much.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Bumping for this. It's pretty good.

  36. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Anti-tr00n kino

  37. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    When did LULZ start hating transfolk? Is this a LULZ psyop?

  38. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The documentary only really delves into half the problem. Ok so, the term women has become nebulous and devoid of meaning for a large part of the population. Why does that matter though? Why should I care?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Can one of you tards answer this

      instead of engaging in semantics?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Because of the undoing of segregation of men and women in toilets/private spaces and sports.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I don't care about that though. why would i?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Why do you think bathrooms and sports were segregated since the dawn of mankind?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              men don't like the smell of period blood

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              We haven't had bathrooms since the dawn of mankind, and before the 20th century women didn't do sport outside of childrens games period.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Nobody cares about your individual concerns or lack thereof you retarded selfish nihilist.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I'm not a nihilist. I just want you to elucidate what your concerns are. It's beginning to seem like you can't justify them?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's real useful to be able to talk about women as distinct from men.

                For example, you may want to fuck men, but I don't. So I wanna know if someone's a man or a woman before I meet them for potential fucking. Well, y'know, hypothetically.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you could ask them if they're a female? seems easy to me.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >you could ask them if they're a woman?
                yeah?

                what's the confusion?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                see

                Because transgender ideology has actual social implications such as putting kids on puberty blockers which has permanent negative effects. Also grown ass perverts want access to women's bathrooms to fulfill their sick predatory fetishes.

                This isn't a case of letting people do whatever they want in their private lives like for homosexuals. Trans shit requires a changing of social norms and coercive measures to ensure that trannies don't neck themselves when moments of lucid self-realization hit

                Just because you don't care about these issues doesn't mean others don't and really nobody should care about your opinion since you've already expressed that you don't care.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You should care because something something LULZ something something TRUMP something something BASED.
        Retards here suffer from TDS (trans derangement syndrome) and they want to radicalize other autists to their cause. Very sad.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's a stupid question
        >Waaaah, why should I care about anything
        Because you don't magically live isolated from the rest of humanity and what the rest of us do will eventually affect you. A community is made up of individuals and is dependant on those individuals. The chemical castration of children , the policing of language, and the forcing of etc egalitarian ideologies already affects the community as a whole in a way you might not like.

        Don't want grown men flopping their cock and balls around the ladies restroom? Don't want a quack doctor to emotionally manipulate your child into mutilating themselves and putting your child on experimental and irreversible drug treatments? Tired of being lied to by a bunch of authoritarian fuckwits trying to power trip through their cult like left wing ideology? Because the rest of us absolutely are, not by choice, but because these fucking freaks will not leave you alone

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >NOOOOO YOU HAVE TO CARE BECAUSE... reasons and stuff...
          Why can't you just have a nice day so you don't have to deal with society declining?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If you're a woman (an actual woman) you should care if you don't want to get raped by troons
      If you're a man you should care if you don't want your wife/sisters/daughters to get raped by troons

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That seems statistically unlikely. Our species got by for millennia without special segregated bathrooms. The idea of unisex toilets doesn't seem that tectonic to me.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Our species got by for millennia with special segregated groups by sex, entirely. By segregating the bathrooms, we're engaging in less sexual segregation than how we've evolved. Ever wondered by women all group together?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because transgender ideology has actual social implications such as putting kids on puberty blockers which has permanent negative effects. Also grown ass perverts want access to women's bathrooms to fulfill their sick predatory fetishes.

      This isn't a case of letting people do whatever they want in their private lives like for homosexuals. Trans shit requires a changing of social norms and coercive measures to ensure that trannies don't neck themselves when moments of lucid self-realization hit

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I am an individual. Is the kid who is taking puberty blockers me? No. Therefore, its not my problem.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >kids are being molested in the playground where my children play. but it's fine, nothing happened to them yet
          this is how you sound homosexual

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            it's a troll, bro

            don't see that word used much anymore. troll. someone should bring it back.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Are the children being molested in the playground me?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah ok then shut up since it doesn't concern you and you don't care either way right?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No, stop censoring me.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              I'm just not sure why you're expressing your irrelevant lack of opinion about a subject you don't care about.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Is not having an opinion a kind of opinion?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Maybe, but if someone was truly apathetic about something then why would they spend time in a thread about a subject they don't care about? If you don't care about trannies or laws inhibiting tranny perversions then why would you oppose these said laws?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >we live in a SOCIETY.
        Have you actually ever gone outside anon? Have you seen this SOCIETY that you speak of? There are only n-words and spics. n-words and spics everywhere. And btw, thats good. I dont want to live in a SOCIETY, where stupid n-words like you tell me how to behave in a SOCIETY.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          fr fr no cap

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Also grown ass perverts want access to women's bathrooms to fulfill their sick predatory fetishes.
        I highly doubt a women's bathroom sign on a door prevents a criminal from sneaking into a bathroom to do something that horrible.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >I highly doubt a women's bathroom sign on a door prevents a criminal from sneaking into a bathroom to do something that horrible.
          Then why do we put signs up around schools saying "This is a Gun-Free Zone!"?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Same reason some book says murder bad

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That's a dif issue

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              ...no, it's literally the exact same issue. The sign does not prevent the abuse. We have to frustrate the efforts of evil people by force, not signs.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's a general label of a bathroom door not a "No Rape Zone" sign

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          What's the point of a lock on your door when a robber can break your window.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      because it has real world consequences for everyone. it will determine what your kids are taught in school, what they are encouraged to think about themselves and their own development, what doctors and mental health professionals may tell them, what government or the courts may do if you one day end up in a situation like pic related with an estranged wife.....etc...

      Girl's sports and bathrooms are only the tip of the iceberg. The consequences our societies abandoning truth and reason and instead fully-embracing post-modernism are potentially enormous.

  39. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    https://twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/status/830811853458640896?lang=en

  40. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You CHUDS are STILL spreading toxic transphobic misinformation? That's it, no more Mr. Nice Guy.

    MAYONNAISE CHUD, your toxic rhetoric will NOT divide us.

    Mayonnaise CHUD, we do not forget. We do not forgive. You have been warned.

    We are the Chudbusters. Mayonnaise Chud of Chuddonnaise, consider yourself WARNED. This is ChudWATCH.

    Chudbuster OUT.

  41. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why are you like this?
    have you considered that if you weren't perpetually self-triggering your tranny obsession, you wouldn't actually hear or have to deal with trannies much if at all?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ywnbaw

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        you really do need to stop letting trannies live in your head rent free
        it's disturbing at this point, you're genuinely delusional. You think trannies are trying to castrate kindergartners unironically, and cannot stop thinking and posting about them 24/7

        seriously, actually try not triggering yourself for a few days and see how many times you organically hear about trannies. Obsession is not healthy.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous
          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            why are you posting the el paso incel chud shooter?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous
              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >when the tranny unironically has a stronger chin and less full lips than the chud
                is this more insulting to the tranny, or to the chud?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous
              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                brenton tarrant was a fucking chad

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                this is what a chad looks like, according to anon
                holy fuck and you're calling other people delusional?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                the wall is not exclusive to women

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >this is what a chad looks like
                he looks perfectly fine

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                the wall is not exclusive to women

                >DOOMP IT

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                It's insulting for both equally.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >seriously, actually try not triggering yourself for a few days and see how many times you organically hear about trannies. Obsession is not healthy.
          Go turn on the local news or Discovery channel and tell me how long it takes to see or hear about trannies (hint - a few minutes). I'll wait

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            So this guy doesn't watch the local news or Discovery channel very much.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            let me guess, you watch a bunch of Fox, and think that's representative of all news channels?
            The sane ones are currently still obsessed with Ukraine and shootings, when I turn the news on (which is rarely) I literally never hear about trannies - unless I'm tuning into conservative TV, in which case there's a story about the tranny menace every few minutes yes.
            Do you know what the term "agitprop" means?

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >he's never turned on a liberal local news channel during "pride month"
              give it a try tbqh

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >obsessed with Ukraine and shootings
              >sane

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                "sane" is relative
                at least the shootings and war in Ukraine are actually real events that are happening, even if they're massively overblown by media
                a lot of conservative news is still obsessed with the "rigged" 2020 election narrative and trying desperately to convince their audience that CRT and trannyism are coming soon to a preschool near them

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                but crt and trannyism are already in a school near some of them

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >and trying desperately to convince their audience that CRT and trannyism are coming soon to a preschool near them

                The irony here is that you're doing the gaslighting tactic of shitposting by saying "Lol you fucking idiot, you believe trannies and communists are trying to indoctrinate your kids? Lol you fucking retard. I WISH they were, it would be a GOOD thing if they were, and I hope it DOES happen."

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >help! i'm being gaslighted!!
                you have schizophrenia, my man.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                [log in to view media]

                Stop being a liar.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Why are people like you so disingenuous? Always. I don't even think it's out of malice or spite. I do believe you are genuinely mentally ill. Seek help. It must be Hell to live in a delusion 24-7. Don't worry, the trannies and the homos aren't out to convert you! they don't have to.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                [log in to view media]

                I should be the one asking this question not you.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I know if I were to say I don't approve of that kid, you'd call me a liar. Because I've noticed in your posts that there is no such thing as nuance or context. Everything is black and white. Everything is about taking a side. You have issues.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I know if I were to say I don't approve of that kid, you'd call me a liar.
                But you DO approve of it. That's the problem here. And even if you somehow, on some fucking planet didn't "approve", you'd never say it because you agree with the side that supports it.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Exactly what I mean. Your simple autistic brain can only think in black and white, left or right on issues. Also, your belief that everyone hates trannies simply because you do, despite all the trap porn and the lgbt board. You have the mind of a child. You are literally retarded. Stick to LULZ and cry into the void about how the trannies are gonna take you away or whatever.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Everyone does hate trannies. I'm gay and I hate trannies. All of my lesbian friends hate trannies. Trannies are homophobic bigots. Also traps are not trannies, stop trying to erase male crossdressers from history just to steal clout for your cult. You are proving why people hate trannies.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                In that case, I will make sure to tell every other person on LULZ that a homosexual and his homosexual friends hate trannies, so we are all to do the same. Thank you for letting me know.
                Retard.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Please do. I mean it. I want more people to know that homosexuals hate trannies. I want to stop being blamed for shit that trannies do. I want to stop being put under their cult's umbrella. I love men and I hate people who groom and mutilate men. Tell everybody you know that LGB people are staunchly anti-tranny.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You were the one suggesting that stuff like that doesn't happen at all.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I don't approve of that kid
                The correct response is "I don't approve of these people are doing with these kids". You can't even act normal.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                people in general have a problem with confusing what they see regularly on television, the internet, for common occurrence. throw algorithm governed content and a bit of autism into this mix, and you'll have people who literally believe the internet is reality

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                just like soldiers have a problem with thinking war is dangerous, when actually it's just waiting

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Nobody asked

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >work in mental health
                >clients keep coming in convinced they're trans
                >demanding to be put on HRT and a billion other meds
                >obvious they've literally studied what to say by some guide from the internet
                >tell them, maybe they should think about it
                >get reprimanded by management because muh heckin' valid troons
                >they get trooned up by some other person anyway
                it doesn't affect everyone, it just affects the most vulnerable people.

                not exactly coincidence speedrunners are all turning tranny. hard to think of a more pathetic person than a speedrunner. those are the guys who get rekt by this shit

                and then the women in government sign bills saying that if you e.g. "misgender" someone then you literally face jail time for a "hate crime".

                so now you have unhinged actual retards rolling around on the sidewalk doing all kinds of retarded shit and if you have a problem with it you lose your job

                it's literally at the level of, some schizo comes in claiming that the sun's following him around and wants to kill him, and then you go "yes, that's true" and start fucking, like, saying that shops should stay open during night so this guy's 14th isn't violated or whatever, and if you say "that's fucking retarded" you go to prison

                it's absolute insanity, and it's only gonna get worse and worse

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Isn't it strange how the demographic for trannies lines up perfectly with the demographic most vulnerable to joining cults?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                see

                You tell me.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Trannies literally are out to convert and groom. I'm telling you this as a gay man who has been attacked by them. All trannies are aggressive groomers who literally want to kill LGB people.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                nah
                I'm pointing out that you live in a nightmare world of your own creation where reality is that middle and high schoolers are being taught that
                >hey LGBT people exist and it's OK if you're LGBT don't commit suicide (especially not on campus please)
                but that's not a good enough narrative for you, so you have to scare yourself into thinking the nefarious tranny agenda involves kindergartners being brainwashed and mutilated.
                Probably due to the far-right's unhealthy obsession with sexualizing children, alongside a bad case of collective projection

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                there are literally kindergardeners being brainwashed and mutilated

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >the nefarious tranny agenda involves kindergartners being brainwashed and mutilated.
                Are you denying that minors have been put on puberty blockers?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                define "minor"
                post-puberty teens asking to go through a rigorous approval process to be given a drug that delays the effects of puberty until they're 18 and legally able to seek more permanent treatment =/= kindergartners being castrated and drugs being handed out like skittles
                again, problem being that while the first is happening, that doesn't sound scary enough to you, so you have to make up the second part and conflate the two

                >into thinking the nefarious tranny agenda involves kindergartners being brainwashed and mutilated.
                But it does. Both of those things are things YOU PERSONALLY WANT. Why are you acting like they aren't? That's part of the meme. You pretend "No, we don't want anything to do with your kids taking drugs and being confused about their identity by figures of authority like teachers. That would never happen!" meanwhile you literally, unironically, think it's a good thing if the age that kids can take hormone drugs and get surgery is lowered and teachers do plaster their kids' learning space with pride shit, racist anti-white garbage, and encourage them that they probably are gay/trans. You think those are good things, so why act like you don't?

                >those things are things YOU PERSONALLY WANT. Why are you acting like they aren't?
                because I don't want those things
                please at least attempt to not let boogeymen live in your head rent free

                >that CRT and trannyism are coming soon to a preschool near them
                it is. I'm an education student and we're taught this stuff at uni.

                you're taught about tranny shit in uni, or you're taught that tranny shit will be getting indoctrinated into 8 year olds in uni?
                Because there's a pretty massive gap between those two.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >kindergartners being castrated and drugs being handed out like skittles

                Google James Younger. Literally a fucking 9 year old that is being legally forced by the court to go on puberty blockers and chemical castration drugs because his mother insists he's a female. Yes, it is happening, and you want it to happen.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >define "minor"

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >define "minor"
                if only there were a literal legal and actionable definition for that term on the books.

                >I don't want minors to be indoctrinated and given drugs and conditioned to want to transition! I don't want minors to get surgery and ruin themselves for a meme! I promise!

                >Also, lol define "minor"!

                Bruh.

                >there is no difference between a 6 year old and a 16 year old, actually
                >SHE WAS 17 AND 352 DAYS YOU SICK FUCK!!!
                come now, even you don't believe this
                if you want to play the semantics game, you have to actually make a valid effort.
                Define "minor"

                >kindergartners being castrated and drugs being handed out like skittles

                Google James Younger. Literally a fucking 9 year old that is being legally forced by the court to go on puberty blockers and chemical castration drugs because his mother insists he's a female. Yes, it is happening, and you want it to happen.

                James Younger wants to identify as a girl named Luna
                his mom is willing to let him go through that process
                his dad is not, even though his son apparently crossdresses around him all the time and has told him repeatedly he prefers to be called Luna.
                since they are divorced, and the dad is an alcoholic piece of shit, he gets no right in deciding how his son presents himself

                if you have a problem with this, your issue isn't with trannies, it's with draconian divorce court systems favoring mothers, though even in a reformed system an alcoholic deadbeat dad is not likely to be able to get a favorable ruling on this

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                I dont give a shit who the divorce court system favors, it should be someone with a working brain who rejects trannyism

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                James does not identify as a girl. He is being abused. There's no such thing as identifying as the opposite sex. That's not a real thing.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >James does not identify as a girl
                except that he does, according to both parents and the court testimony
                The dad even admitted in court that James prefers to be called Luna and wear feminine clothing around his house, he just refuses to accept that his son is trans.

                I'll grant Luna is a dumb name, but making up this narrative that the kid is being forced when he's specifically asking for this treatment and the dad keeps refusing is a very different story than the one you presented of
                >the kid is being forced by the evil court to take drugs against his will

                why are you seemingly incapable of being genuine in your arguments? You must always lie and manipulate the truth to make shit seem worse than it is, which ironically just makes your argument seem weaker.
                There is a reasonable case to be made against the wholesale expansion of trans rights, but you're not helping that when you can't stick to a sane script and instead start making up bullshit like this

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                children are not capable of making their own decisions

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                then why bring up in the first place specifically that he doesn't want to and is being forced by the court to take blockers?
                He does want to, which is the crux of the issue: the parents are divorced, and one parent is listening to the kid's desires and the other isn't. The court needs to make a ruling parsing the case.
                why make shit up? It just weakens your argument and make you look stupid. There's a genuine debate to be had around an issue like this, but when you start off with such a blatant lie, it makes you look foolish

                >the kid is being forced
                He's being manipulated at a young and impressionable age.

                but he's the one who brought it up in the first place

                He doesn't. There is literally no such thing as identifying as the opposite sex. That's not a real scenario. It doesn't exist. You are your sex. Claiming to identify as the opposites sex is like saying you identify as a raccoon. That's not real. You're being ridiculous.

                he does
                you can call him insane if you want, but he still does
                your worldview is fundamentally different from his, I realize that autism can make it hard to see things from other people's perspective, but just because you think about something one way doesn't mean other people can't think about it a different way.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Nobody asked.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                He objectively doesn't. You're just wrong, and you were proven wrong. A child cannot identify as the opposites sex any more than they can identify as a cat. If a kid thinks he's a cat, it's because you abused him into saying he's a cat. No kid naturally calls themselves as a cat and no boy naturally calls himself a girl. You are an abuser.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                holy shit
                >I'm right because I know I'm right, and anything to the contrary is proof I'm right
                >if I say you're wrong, you're wrong, because I'm right, and I don't agree with you
                have you been checked for mental illness at any point in your life, anon?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                you got proven wrong, anon. he's right. there's no such thing as gender identity. that kid is being abused by his parents.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                There's all sorts of shit kids might want to do that the law doesn't let them do, for their own good and for the good of everyone. Taking puberty blockers because they've become convinced by some guy's psycho ex-wife that they're trapped in the wrong body should be one of them.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >but he's the one who brought it up in the first place
                That still doesn't change the fact that he is a man and will always be one. People should have explained that what he wants is unrealistic but they don't and he is being abused.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >the kid is being forced
                He's being manipulated at a young and impressionable age.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                He doesn't. There is literally no such thing as identifying as the opposite sex. That's not a real scenario. It doesn't exist. You are your sex. Claiming to identify as the opposites sex is like saying you identify as a raccoon. That's not real. You're being ridiculous.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >tranny supporter is frustrated by other peoples' "semantics"
                lmao. there are no semantics: you asked the thread to define "minor" and when you got a concrete answer literally defined by both law and common consensus you retreated into limpdick sophistry. stop embarrassing yourself and concede you have literally no position.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                If it wasn't obvious before that you're a tranny, it certainly is after that post. The "I'm just disappointed that the documentary didn't delve into the oh-so complex question deeply enough" shtick you've been doing in these threads is easy to see for anyone who has been reading them.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                it's an anonymous board, my intelligent friend
                there are multiple people in this thread disagreeing with you, schizo

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >I don't want minors to be indoctrinated and given drugs and conditioned to want to transition! I don't want minors to get surgery and ruin themselves for a meme! I promise!

                >Also, lol define "minor"!

                Bruh.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >define "minor"
                if only there were a literal legal and actionable definition for that term on the books.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >you're taught about tranny shit in uni, or you're taught that tranny shit will be getting indoctrinated into 8 year olds in uni?
                We're taught to validate and respect the children's trans identity. We're encouraged to see boys wearing dresses as a wonderful thing that should be celebrated. Our psychology lecturer started one class by showing us tiktok videos of turbo-liberal fathers who dress their prepubescent children as girls and sing Disney musicals together as wonderful because it "tears down oppressive gender norms" etc

                Yes I am getting a worthless degree. I foolishly thought teaching wasn't so far-gone. There may be a few like me who will last a few years teaching without conforming to this new orthodoxy, but mostly future generations will be taught by (overwhelmingly female) teachers who have been encouraged to see "trans kids" as something valid and wonderful that should be celebrated and encouraged.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >into thinking the nefarious tranny agenda involves kindergartners being brainwashed and mutilated.
                But it does. Both of those things are things YOU PERSONALLY WANT. Why are you acting like they aren't? That's part of the meme. You pretend "No, we don't want anything to do with your kids taking drugs and being confused about their identity by figures of authority like teachers. That would never happen!" meanwhile you literally, unironically, think it's a good thing if the age that kids can take hormone drugs and get surgery is lowered and teachers do plaster their kids' learning space with pride shit, racist anti-white garbage, and encourage them that they probably are gay/trans. You think those are good things, so why act like you don't?

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >so you have to scare yourself into thinking the nefarious tranny agenda involves kindergartners being brainwashed and mutilated.
                Except that's literally happening , and the argument you're making is a tu quoque btw. Chemical castration of children is absolutely being pushed on them , you can seethe about how everyone who disagrees with you is "far right" and convince yourself everyone you don't like is Hitler all you want.

                That doesn't make your denial of reality any less apparent to anyone outside of your insane in group. Even other leftists don't like you anymore but now they're all Nazis too apparently

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >>hey LGBT people exist and it's OK if you're LGBT don't commit suicide
                1) that isn't all that is being taught (and you know it).
                2) Adding the T to the LGB is a problem. The first three are about sexuality. The T is a mental problem where someone becomes convinced they are/should be the opposite sex.

                It's one thing to say "It's ok if you are gay" it's another thing altogether to say "It's ok if you (as a child) have become convinced that you are really trapped in the wrong biological body. There is no logical reason why those things should be lumped in together, for a start.

                pic related is an example of the problems that approach causes

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                THe world would be vastly improved by fathers kicking the shit out of educators that try to pull this stuff.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                Trannyism in the last few years has skyrocketed. It went from 0.5% of the population to now over 5% of zoomers. That's an insane jump, and it being taught in schools and normalized even further is only going to make those numbers continue to go up.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                You're replying to a shitposter. The tactic is to gaslight and say "It's not happening! You're a crazy conspiracy theorist if you think it is!" because if they can stigmatize you even thinking the thought, then it can continue to happen without your scrutiny.

              • 3 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                >that CRT and trannyism are coming soon to a preschool near them
                it is. I'm an education student and we're taught this stuff at uni.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >trannies
              >school shooting
              >ukraine
              So there's a territorial dispute on the other side of the planet
              A glown-word shooting being used to justify take my rights away
              And a child abuse ring being pushed by the highest levels of the government into schools and hospitals

              And you think the sane news is the one that ignores the latter for the former?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >stop thinking about trannies
          not gonna do it

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >just dont care that people are trying to normalize mutilating your body as if thats normal

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            what are your thoughts on circumcision, anon?

            Matt Walsh will vehemently defend circumcision to anyone who dares question the will of Benny Shapiro

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Well he makes a point of how he's a father and has kids to raise. And now with this new understanding of what it means to be a man or a woman it raises the question of how do you if your child is a boy or a girl? As a matter of fact it raises the question of how do you know if you're a man or a woman?

  42. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    powerful, capitalism is literally quaking

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      interesting it dropped, its said that female babies pick up language faster than boys due to having half of the male test levels.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        They're not female babies though their male babies with a disrupted endocrine system :^)

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Does this mean castratos were retarded?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Them, other eunuchs and all trannies are ditzy, stupid cumsluts.

  43. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    LOL are some of you unironically debating with a tranny?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I read that as "tyranny", basically the same thing.

  44. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it all started with ironic homosexualry on this board, and LULZ in general and now look at this fucking thread, yikes.

  45. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I am a chair. A stupid transgender freak will come and tell me that i identify as a chair. No, you stupid fuck. I am a chair. I identify my penis in your mom's vagina like all the other chairs.

  46. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Sex is objective and useful
    Gender is arbitrary and pointless

    It's literally that simple

  47. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Do you know what my favorite part of LULZ is? No one here ACTUALLY likes or supports or tolerates trannies. But there are literally dozens of people in this thread PRETENDING to be retarded leftist SJW douches who make intentionally stupid and dishonest arguments in favor of them just for the memes.

    And what's more interesting is that they commit to the bit. They never drop the mask. You literally can't ever get them to say "Nah I'm just fucking around to get you to reply", they'll literally pretend they earnestly believe this dumb shit they make up.

    It's like, imagine dedicating your life just to shitposting, that's all you have. That's your entire identity.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I don't like trannies, therefore no one likes trannies
      Autism. Simple as.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >therefore no one likes trannies
        Literally correct, yes.

        Also, by shitpost replying, you're trying to get me to believe that you're NOT shitposting, but actually your entire identity is loving trannies? Yeah?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You really know how to logic. What's Aspergers like anyway? High-functioning is still retarded. Instead of having any useful information stored, your brain is full of trannies. Lmao.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        it's true though

        you don't tolerate something you like

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Do you know what my favorite part of LULZ is? No one here ACTUALLY likes or supports or tolerates trannies.
      check /lgbt/

  48. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    /t/? i want to have a good laugh today

  49. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    in the documentary, he mentions this force trying to push the tranny agenda. i think there is an agenda but why and by who? it cant just be trolls, theres definitely something or someone behind it.
    everyday theres transsexual ideology being forced into our consciousness. for what reason? for what purpose?

  50. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [deleted post]

    >t-slur
    ?

  51. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [deleted post]

    oho...

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      wait so did you steal my (you) or do you now identify as me? i'm losing track.

  52. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    its funny how these threads are just a few retards screaming "tranny" at everyone.

  53. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >What did we think of this film?

    It's pretty good in one way, in that it surfaces and collects many of the insane things that we all have observed over the past few years. But even though he speaks frankly about it, he cannot help but sanitize the worst parts. One of the main ways transexuality has been able to spread through the internet and the world is that if you talk about it plainly, it's so vile and deranged that *you* end up looking like the weirdo. Walsh's documentary is a decent summary for the normie, and I can only appreciate his dorky sense of humor, as for example when he asks his wife what a woman is, and she defines a woman as an adult human female who needs help opening a jar of pickles.

    Or, more tellingly, when he throws a folding chair at a cork board and sedately announces that he is
    >"done asking questions."
    The problem is that behind this church potluck snark is a wry admission that no one on the right is equipped to do much more than ask questions. You can read these various books such as The Transgender Industrial Complex or watch a Matt Walsh documentary, you can retweet libs of tiktok all day, but the fact is that none of us will ever stop this by talking about it.

    Obergefell was not so much a blank check to these people as a capstone on the realization that they could do anything and everything they wanted, push any degeneracy on the whole world, and get away with it, no one would lift a finger to stop them. The law, the internet, the schools, the medical profession, all of it is lousy, from top to bottom, with people who are at minimum complicit, but on average enthusiastic about each new frontier of sexual "emancipation" — and talking and lobbying are not the solution.

    Until Matt Walsh and every single person in his audience is willing to stop asking questions, but this time without the affected millennial insouciance, nothing is going to change.

  54. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What's with all the pro trans in these threads never engaging in discussion about reproduction from a genetic perspective? is really the XX chromosomes + ability to produce ovum the final boss of pro trannies?

Your email address will not be published.