I’m not a believer, but this argument has always sounded retarded to me. If you accept there’s an omnipotent god, then he should be able to eternal, or self creating, or something
>Tell me you're a 13 year old who has never read anything without saying that.
>Why is it a 'him'
Because the general discussion around God stems from Abrahamic (specifically Christian and to a lesser extent israeli) culture, where God is referred to as 'Father', and that stuck because ~2000 years of use does that to a language. Lrn2history. >Where did that intelligence come from?
Literally something that cannot be known, if it's even a coherent question. Come back when your balls have dropped and you've read anything on the subject - hell, even reading Dawkins would be a step up for someone like you. >We know that ours is produced by a brain, so where does his come from?
Why would you assume that what applies to us means anything to God? See above.
>r u 13? xddddd
What an enlightening response >it's 'him' because israelites from 3000 years ago said so
That previous poster asked why that is necissary, not why it is a convention. Calling someone stupid while answering like an actual imbecile is exactly what I would expect of a LULZ theologian >God intelligence cannot and need not be proven. Also, you're stupid an an atheist xddddd
How intellectually bankrupt can one answer be? Theology truly is a subject without subject matter >god does nit abide my natural laws
Only answer that acually makes sense and is contingent the logical concept of 'god' in your entire post.
The name that God gave to Moses was “I Am”. This name shows that God is eternal, and doesn’t rely on anyone else to exist. God is infinite in past, present, future.
> 13 Moses said to God, “Suppose I go to the Israelites and say to them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you,’ and they ask me, ‘What is his name?’ Then what shall I tell them?” >14 God said to Moses, “I am who I am. This is what you are to say to the Israelites: ‘I am has sent me to you.’”
Exodus 3:13-14
Jesus also gave His identity as God using that term, which is why the israelites tried to stone Him.
> 58 Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.” 59 So they picked up stones to throw at him, but Jesus hid himself and went out of the temple.
John 8:58-59
He always existed, chud.
Coping and seething created God. Specifically at people getting laid. Moses was an incel
he was married, possibly twice
Watsonian answer: God just is eternal
Doylist answer: Ancient Hebrew’s or their Canaanite relatives
How can an animal understand how a human is created
I’m not a believer, but this argument has always sounded retarded to me. If you accept there’s an omnipotent god, then he should be able to eternal, or self creating, or something
It never made much sense to me. It seems to me that if you believe in something without evidence then you can be led to believe anything.
God simply is. The concept creation itself is only something you know of because of him. It didn't exist as something separate or before him.
And why is it a 'him', and not an 'it'? Where did the intelligence come from? We know that ours is produced by a brain, so where does his come from?
>We know that ours is produced by a brain
No it isn't.
Revelation.
>Tell me you're a 13 year old who has never read anything without saying that.
>Why is it a 'him'
Because the general discussion around God stems from Abrahamic (specifically Christian and to a lesser extent israeli) culture, where God is referred to as 'Father', and that stuck because ~2000 years of use does that to a language. Lrn2history.
>Where did that intelligence come from?
Literally something that cannot be known, if it's even a coherent question. Come back when your balls have dropped and you've read anything on the subject - hell, even reading Dawkins would be a step up for someone like you.
>We know that ours is produced by a brain, so where does his come from?
Why would you assume that what applies to us means anything to God? See above.
>r u 13? xddddd
What an enlightening response
>it's 'him' because israelites from 3000 years ago said so
That previous poster asked why that is necissary, not why it is a convention. Calling someone stupid while answering like an actual imbecile is exactly what I would expect of a LULZ theologian
>God intelligence cannot and need not be proven. Also, you're stupid an an atheist xddddd
How intellectually bankrupt can one answer be? Theology truly is a subject without subject matter
>god does nit abide my natural laws
Only answer that acually makes sense and is contingent the logical concept of 'god' in your entire post.
The name that God gave to Moses was “I Am”. This name shows that God is eternal, and doesn’t rely on anyone else to exist. God is infinite in past, present, future.
> 13 Moses said to God, “Suppose I go to the Israelites and say to them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you,’ and they ask me, ‘What is his name?’ Then what shall I tell them?”
>14 God said to Moses, “I am who I am. This is what you are to say to the Israelites: ‘I am has sent me to you.’”
Exodus 3:13-14
Jesus also gave His identity as God using that term, which is why the israelites tried to stone Him.
> 58 Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.” 59 So they picked up stones to throw at him, but Jesus hid himself and went out of the temple.
John 8:58-59
Collective butthurt of gaytheists because their mom made them go to church when they were young
>you just didn't like church as a kid, therefore god is real! Haha QED, checkm8 atheists!
I actually liked going to church, chuddy. I sometimes still go with my family just to enjoy the atmosphere.
Big God