What country treats its indigenous population the shittiest? United States, Australia, Brazil, somewhere else?

What country treats its indigenous population the shittiest? United States, Australia, Brazil, somewhere else?

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the eu

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      *tips*

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      win

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      But they treat the israelites well. I don't know what you mean?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Sami

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Irrefutable

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Canada

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >"Go to school, feather boy."
      >"NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOYA HOYA NOYA HOYA"

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The schools were pretty fucked up alongside have no real oversight+being used as labour reserves.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Give up your comfy lifestyle of roaming the plains on horseback and hunting with the bros
        >Become a Wagie who works 9-5
        Uh yeah I can actually understand why the Indians are so butthurt about those schools

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      oh come on, no way Canada is actively worse than than the US or Australia

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        and we are unrepentant about it too.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >unrepentant
          >every public event starts with an acknowledgement of how badly the injuns got cucked

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            And it's still half-assed.

            Controversial take but I'd say equatorial guinea.

            Little known African nation is ethnically 80% Fang but the Fang only moved there in the 19th century, having migranted down from cameroon along with other Bantu groups. #

            the oringal inhabitants of this area were the Pygmy peoples, such as the Beyele and the Bokuign who now much up less than 1% and aren't even considered human and forced to live in the jungles.

            In some parts of Africa the pygmies are considered to be 'bush meat' and are hunted and eaten. https://www.scotsman.com/news/world/pygmies-are-hunted-and-eaten-congo-2513231

            WTF. The native americans and australians were treated like shit but nobody was fucking eating them like animals. The bantu expansion and it's consiquence were a disaster for the indigenous peoples of the interior.

            >In some parts of Africa the pygmies are considered to be 'bush meat' and are hunted and eaten
            Not that was only the Congo during war and everyone got eaten, not just Pygmies. Cannibalism during war wasn't really uncommon in the region as a threat tool.

            >The native americans and australians were treated like shit but nobody was fucking eating them like animals
            Many were targetted like animals. Tasmania Aboriginals were actively killed by settlers in organized groups.

            • 2 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              >Tasmania Aboriginals were actively killed by settlers in organized groups.
              Now there's no coons living there. They were pretty thorough

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Bolivia and most of south america honestly, indigenous peoples were deprived of their historical territories, displaced, given no legal benefits or ownerships over basically anything, often introduced into farms for some landlords as cheap illiterate pawns provided with no education working for scraps into someone else property, Either that or simply displaced to shit lands where subsistence was not possible.
    Those that weren't were absorbed into the general population and became the lowest classes, to the extent now they live in favellas with precarious housing, extreme poverty and more often than not lack of access to basic services and food. Those that were not absorbed live isolated without access to clean water even.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      doesn't sound much different from the US actually

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        At least in america some of them are economically achievement, in south america you have countries where they are the 99% of the population and a 1% descended from foreigners rules them

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This, it's outright horrifying reading some of the crypto-bondage that goes on in South America. Sons typically lose their virginity to the younger daughter of the servant as standard and for some reason it doesn't cause bloody revolution.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Poverty on the reservations is one of the most egregious and lasting failures in America, but nowadays it is less due to white posses on horseback and more due to systems created in the 60s and 70s by well meaning progressives. The "native" bodies they created routinely steal and misappropriate grants and nothing is done because the failure is too inconvenient for all involved to shed light on. Ordinary natives end up tightly controlled with little power, kept delusional and demoralized by a well orchestrated propaganda network that views them as a vote on 2 legs.

    >stolen land broken promises
    The same people screeching about things that happened decades or centuries ago are oppressing them in the present, and a good number are "1/16 Cherokee" types. It goes to show the power of leftist propaganda. Saul Alinsky's strategies were not for the oppressed and downtrodden. I'm still waiting for some native driven group to go around the country exposing all the corruption and make news, but this never happens, I assume because they still view their "elders" as heroes despite their sordid activities and those that make it out the ghetto with the wherewithal to do this forget where they came from.

    >oil pipelines
    It usually has nothing to do with the environment. The threat of protests is usually an attempt to elicit bribes from oil companies and grants from the government, barely any of which trickles down. It's a racket and protestors don't even realize they are just a bargaining chip.

    The root of this of course is the committee. Rather than own their own land and make decisions as individuals, everything has to go through committee or put to a vote by a broken people. It is a much more pronounced microcosm of the problems that affect democracy as a whole, perhaps an ideological incentive to defend the corruption and hush it up, but in the end it makes democracy weaker and translates into real life poverty and decrepity.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >The same people screeching about things that happened decades or centuries ago are oppressing them in the present, and a good number are "1/16 Cherokee" types
      It's still perfectly legitimate. Also blood quantum is a thing forced upon natives as well as the sheer reality that many Natives mixed with whites because the alternative was either inbreeding or a very small partner pool. It's why you see both Native males and females marrying otuside the tribe.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Also blood quantum is a thing forced upon natives

        I mean, if we're talking about race, what other means of quantifying it are there? There has to be a certain cutoff point where someone 'counts' as a member of a race, otherwise there's no definition and literally anyone can claim to be that race

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Because race is not the only way to identify with a group lol. Not to mention many different ethinc groups of the natives often combined due to population loss and disease so even the "pures" aren't exactly pure.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This is interesting stuff, is this something you have personal experience with or is it just a subject you happen to know about? Do you think there' any good solutions to these issues?

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >traditional lands and ways of life stripped from them
    >make up a tiny percentage of the population
    >most destitute racial group in the country
    >plagued by addiction and health problems
    >reservations are often shitty areas without much in the way of job opportunities
    >most other Americans don't give a flying fuck

    not sure if the US is the absolute worst but it's gotta be up there

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Most Americans think Indigenous Americans are extinct.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, a lot of Americans view Natives in the past tense. And US history classes usually gloss over them

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Can anyone tell me about the treatment of native groups in Mexico?

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Controversial take but I'd say equatorial guinea.

    Little known African nation is ethnically 80% Fang but the Fang only moved there in the 19th century, having migranted down from cameroon along with other Bantu groups. #

    the oringal inhabitants of this area were the Pygmy peoples, such as the Beyele and the Bokuign who now much up less than 1% and aren't even considered human and forced to live in the jungles.

    In some parts of Africa the pygmies are considered to be 'bush meat' and are hunted and eaten. https://www.scotsman.com/news/world/pygmies-are-hunted-and-eaten-congo-2513231

    WTF. The native americans and australians were treated like shit but nobody was fucking eating them like animals. The bantu expansion and it's consiquence were a disaster for the indigenous peoples of the interior.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Beyele and the Bokuign who now much up less than 1%

      Hunter-gatherers aren't known for living in dense groups.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    US was castrating native women into the 90s and unlike Canada the US never forks over reparations

    Ofc both treated the natives badly and that's why they're cursed. Americas one of the worst countries in the world to live in because they've offended almost every god (including the Christian god)

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Keep seething plainsnagger. The only mistake the US government made about you barbarians was leaving enough of you alive to bitch and gripe.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why are you so edgy?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Keep seething plainsnagger. The only mistake the US government made about you barbarians was leaving enough of you alive to bitch and gripe.
        Who's the barbarian?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          What is that? What's going on in that image?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >the US never forks over reparations
      They did for Japanese-Americans kinda but only after many decades after and pretty much nearly all the victims of it either dead or very old.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Canada still sterilizes Indigenous women.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Proof? If that were true you could sell the info to any media corporation for a clean $20k up front.
        The fact that you haven't leads me to believe that you made it up, or think it's 1986

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          https://sencanada.ca/en/info-page/parl-43-2/ridr-forced-and-coerced-sterilization-of-persons-in-canada/
          NTA but you can easily confirm this; its been presented to their government with cases as recent as 2019.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'd say the Japanese with how they treat the Ainu
    >Historical texts refer to the people as Emishi literally meaning "shrimp barbarians"
    >Active contact between the Japanese and Ainu began in the 13th century, with the Ainu still existing as hunter-gatherers.
    >Centuries of being conquered by the Japanese and Chinese, forced marriage of their women to govt officials, etc
    >In the Edo period the Japanese govt's trade monopoly with the Ainu inspired a sort of Beaver War situation that was aggravated by a smallpox epidemic
    >For 7 straight years under the shogun's direct control the Ainu were brutalized: men sold into slavery to ((merchants)) and women forcibly raped/married to Japanese men
    >State mandated policies of enforced family separation and assimilation with Japanese culture
    >Ainu territory was formally annexed in the 1870s with legislation outright erasing their history as indigenous people, now being considered "former aborigines"
    >Their culture/religion/heritage was being destroyed and censored by the Japanese well past the end of WW2; forced monoculturalism
    >Only formally recognized by the Japanese government as an indigenous group in 2019; but still completely memory-holed by most Japanese officials
    You got to give the Western colonizers credit: they at least acknowledged the people they were fucking over were there first.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Are there any places that aren't awful to natives?

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Brazil.

    >'Man of the Hole,' the last member of his Amazon tribe, dies in Brazil The "Man of the Hole" lived in isolation and resisted contact for decades after the rest of his tribe was massacred. His death precedes Brazil's elections, where Indigenous rights are on the ballot.

    >After six of the remaining members of his tribe were killed in an attack, he had lived in isolation for an estimated 26 years, according to Brazil’s indigenous agency, called the National Indian Foundation (FUNAI), and other reports.

    https://www.fox9.com/news/man-of-the-hole-last-member-uncontacted-tribe-brazil-dies-2022

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Australia's worst in the Anglosphere, the dominant experience in the US and Canada was reservations on shit land (and occasional genocides, especially if they resisted) but Aussies treated them like wild animals.

    The Aussie constitution originally let Whites and Maori vote (because they were trying to convince New Zealand to join) but not Aboriginals. And this in 1900, and with no fiction of "autonomous nations" to justify it either.

    I don't know Latin America as well, and gathered it varied wildly from region to region, but the treatment of Amazonians seems comically evil.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >US and Canada was reservations on shit land (and occasional genocides, especially if they resisted)
      I'd say how those two treated the many indigenous who did comply or were more assimilated with white mainstream cultre with the state being more fucked up. The five civilized tribes basically got their asses ruined and displaced.

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Brasil certainly. Right now there are illegal miners linked to cartels invading indian land and killing them. At the same there are people destroying the florest and protected areas to raise cattle and fishing and fucking the ecosystem. ALL THIS WITH THE ENDORSEMENT OF THE ITALIAN-nagger PRESIDENT BOLSONARO

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >What country treats its indigenous population the shittiest?

    Either Australia or the Congo. Both for similar reasons.

    I say Australia because unlike other instances of Colonizers being mean or fucked up to their Indigenous populations: the Aborigines truly did nothing wrong. The Abo's were (are), a Neolithic, placid & harmless people who's only crime was being stupid and absent minded. The Aussies initially killed them for simply getting in the way; Abo's stole livestock, crops, they like sleeping on roads, etc.. But by the Aussie's own volition they quickly escalated their cruelty when they began to genuinely despise the Abo for their weakness.

    The Congolese meanwhile just never saw the Indigenous Pygmy as people. Period. Some of them still don't. Too many of them saw them as kind of talking animal and saw no moral ambiguity with enslaving them, hunting them for sport (you could literally hire a local guide to hunt Pygmies until I think 1976), or even eat them as bushmeat.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      We are talking about first worlders. Only how they treat natives matter since they are colonizers and conquerors

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The OP mentions Brazil, or is that part of the first world now?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Uder Portuguese rule initially and shares similar dynamics.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >The Congolese meanwhile just never saw the Indigenous Pygmy as people
      They did you retard. Why else did people marry and have kids with them as well as cultural exchange. You kids need to stop thinking all of Congi's history was the 2nd Congo war please.

      No one ate Pygmies outside if the recent wars and even "regular" Congolese suffered from that.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >The Abo's were (are), a Neolithic, placid & harmless people who's only crime was being stupid and absent minded.
      They were violent cannibals who ate shipwrecked chinks, beat their wives and kids to death and murdered anyone they could get their hands on. Absolute worthless and vile when compared to pretty much any other indigenous group.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I think this is completely made up. I haven't been able to find a single instance of "killer mother" or any mention of these rituals outside of the website.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Every indigenous group is accused of being violent mindless savages, ultimately it's just a way for colonizers to justify displacing/killing them

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I think this is completely made up. I haven't been able to find a single instance of "killer mother" or any mention of these rituals outside of the website.

        Because psychohistory is a fraud journal, literally anyone can make a journal and publish literally anything in it. I am not fucking with you. That anon basically ripped a page from some "academics" with no actual depth and a "history explains everything".

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Germany

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    South America.

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >US
    Lel literally the best treatment of natives out of all of the nations in the Americas. Read about the history of Spanish-America, both before and after the independence of whatever nation you please. American "mistreatment" gets overhyped because of muh noble savage and muh discrimination. There were barely any natives in what is now the present-day United States at the time of the arrival of Columbus, and most were wiped out by disease. Actual genocide in American history is largely confined to specific areas and eras, and doesn't compare to the history below the Rio Grande in the same time periods.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Massive cope. You do know many schools Indian kids were put in used them as forced labour as well cultural, linguistic and religious persecution

      >The Abo's were (are), a Neolithic, placid & harmless people who's only crime was being stupid and absent minded.
      They were violent cannibals who ate shipwrecked chinks, beat their wives and kids to death and murdered anyone they could get their hands on. Absolute worthless and vile when compared to pretty much any other indigenous group.

      That while site is literally torture abuse porn. I honestly read some of these articles and you just knew the author was writing it with one hand down their pants.

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Your average Western European country. Actively replacing their own population with nowhere to go.

Your email address will not be published.